Anorectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in women with and without reported anal sex and sex workers in sexual health centres in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Control of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection (gonorrhoea) depends on effective testing strategies. Anorectal testing in women is often done on indication of anal sex; however, anorectal infections are seen with and without anal exposure, possibly caused by autoinoculation. This study aims to enhance understanding of anorectal infections in women, by identifying risk factors for anorectal diagnosis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we used national surveillance data from Dutch sexual health centres from Jan 1, 2016, to Dec 31, 2021. We included cisgender women having sex with men who were tested urogenitally and anorectally for gonorrhoea. Due to different testing policies, we identified three groups: women who had not reported recent anal sex (in the past 6 months), women who had reported recent anal sex, and sex workers. Extracted data for analyses included demographics, sexual behaviour, and diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection (STI). Per group, multivariable models using Firth's penalised maximum likelihood logistic regression were constructed, identifying determinants of anorectal gonorrhoea among all women and among gonorrhoea-positive women only. Variables included in model construction were age, education level, migration background, number of partners, condom use, partner notification, STI symptoms, having a partner who has sex with men (MSM) or a migrant partner, previous STI test, anal sex, and chlamydia and gonorrhoea diagnoses per anatomical location. FINDINGS: In total, 117 693 women were included: 43 757 women without reported recent anal sex, 51 728 women with reported recent anal sex, and 22 208 sex workers. In all three groups, around 2% of women were gonorrhoea positive, and 70% or more of women had an anorectal infection. The strongest determinant of anorectal gonorrhoea was a concurrent urogenital gonorrhoea diagnosis (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 782 [95% CI 605-1018]) among women without reported recent anal sex (612 [490-768] among women with reported recent anal sex, and 464 [335-652] among sex workers). Among gonorrhoea-positive women, determinants of anorectal gonorrhoea were urogenital and anorectal chlamydia co-infection (aOR 2·03 [95% CI 1·38-3·02], for women without reported anal sex) and migration background (1·44 [1·02-2·06], for women with reported anal sex). Determinants among sex workers were condomless sex (2·43 [1·55-3·82]), anal sex (1·71 [1·10-2·66]), MSM or migrant partner (1·78 [1·13-2·79]), and urogenital and anorectal chlamydia co-infection (2·28 [1·11-5·14]). INTERPRETATION: These findings support the possibility of an autoinoculation process from the urogenital to the anorectal location due to the very strong correlation between urogenital and anorectal gonorrhoea, and due to the similarity of results across all three groups. Current testing strategies could miss anorectal infections, which should be considered when developing gonorrhoea prevention and control guidelines. FUNDING: None.

Feasibility of quantitative environmental surveillance in poliovirus eradication strategies.

The progress of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative is monitored by acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance supplemented with environmental surveillance in selected areas. To assess the sensitivity of environmental surveillance, stools from (re)vaccinated elderly persons with a low seroprevalence and from wastewater were concurrently collected and analyzed in the Netherlands over a prolonged period of time. A total number of 228 healthy individuals with different levels of immunity were challenged with monovalent oral polio vaccine serotype 1 or 3. Poliovirus concentrations were determined by the titration of fecal suspensions on poliovirus-sensitive L20B cells and of sewage concentrates by L20B monolayer plaque assay. Almost half of the individuals (45%) shed poliovirus on day 3 after challenge, which peaked (57%) on day 8 with an average poliovirus excretion of 1.3 × 10(5) TCID(50) per g of feces and gradually decreased to less than 5% on day 42. The virus concentrations in sewage peaked on days 6 to 8 at approximately 100 PFU per liter, remained high until day 14, and subsequently decreased to less than 10 PFU per liter on day 29. The estimated poliovirus concentration in sewage approximated the measured initial virus excretion in feces, within 1 log(10) variation, resulting in a sensitivity of detection of 100 infected but mostly asymptomatic individuals in tens of thousands of individuals. An additional second peak observed in sewage may indicate secondary transmission missed by enterovirus or AFP surveillance in patients. This enables the detection of circulating poliovirus by environmental surveillance, supporting its feasibility as an early warning system.

Differences in clinical presentation between norovirus genotypes in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: In healthcare settings, norovirus (NoV) outbreaks are predominated by genotype II.4 (GII.4) strains. Periodically, new variants of GII.4 emerge, causing a temporary increase of outbreaks. OBJECTIVES: To study the relationship between symptoms and NoV genotype. STUDY DESIGN: Data of 49 nursing homes which were monitored for NoV outbreaks in the winter seasons of 2005/2006 and/or 2006/2007 were used. RESULTS: Data on symptoms and duration of illness were available for 465 residents and 174 staff members from 28 NoV outbreaks. Genotype GII.4 was responsible for 21 outbreaks. Attack rates for residents seemed to be higher in GII.4 outbreaks compared to other genotypes. In outbreaks caused by GII.4, residents vomited more often than in outbreaks with other genotypes. They also had more often complaints of nausea, abdominal cramps, fever, and mucus in stool. The GII.4 2004 variant outbreaks showed higher percentages of nausea, stomach ache, and fever than outbreaks with the GII.4 2006a variant. Differences in duration of illness were not found. In nursing home staff, no clear differences were found between outbreaks caused by GII.4 and non-GII.4 NoVs. CONCLUSIONS: Genotype GII.4 was found to be related to more symptomatic disease, including more residents vomiting, and to a lesser extent, higher attack rates among residents.

Norovirus outbreaks in nursing homes: the evaluation of infection control measures.

Effective infection control measures during norovirus outbreaks are urgently needed in places where vulnerable individuals gather. In the present study, the effect of a number of measures was investigated in daily practice. Forty-nine Dutch nursing homes were monitored prospectively for norovirus outbreaks during two winter seasons. A total of 37 norovirus outbreaks were registered. Control measures were most effective when implemented within 3 days after onset of disease of the first patient. Measures targeted at reduced transmission between persons, via aerosols, and via contaminated surfaces reduced illness in staff and in residents. Reducing illness in staff results in fewer costs for sick leave and substitution of staff and less disruption in the care of residents. The effect of control measures on outbreak duration was limited. This is the first intervention study examining the effect of control measures. Further research is needed to extend and refine the conclusions.