Clinical impact of breast MRI with regard to axillary reverse mapping in clinically node positive breast cancer patients following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is a technique that discerns axillary lymphatic drainage of the arm from the breast. In the current study, we retrospectively evaluated the incidence of metastatic axillary lymph node involvement, including ARM lymph nodes, in clinically node positive breast cancer patients (cN+ patients) in whom neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was administered followed by primary ALND using breast MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 98 cN+ breast cancer patients were analysed retrospectively. Patients without residual axillary disease at breast MRI following NAC (RAD-, n = 64) were compared with patients with residual axillary disease (RAD+, n = 34). Presence of suspect axillary lymph nodes on pre-NAC and post-NAC breast MRI was determined by experienced breast radiologists and was correlated to histopathological findings. RESULTS: In the RAD-group residual axillary disease on pathological analysis following NAC was found in 25 patients (39.1%), as compared to 24 patients (70.6%) in the RAD + group (p = 0.003). Metastatic involvement of ARM lymph nodes following NAC was demonstrated in 5 patients (7.8%) in the RAD-group as compared to 10 patients (29.4%) in the RAD + group (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Breast MRI following NAC is not suitable to detect residual metastatic disease of the axilla. However, breast MRI post-NAC may be of use to identify cN+ patients with a low risk of ARM lymph node metastases. This may help to select a subgroup of cN+ patients in whom sparing of ARM lymph nodes during axillary lymph node dissection can be considered.

Addition of zoledronic acid to neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not enhance tumor response in patients with HER2-negative stage II/III breast cancer: the NEOZOTAC trial (BOOG 2010-01).

BACKGROUND: The role of zoledronic acid (ZA) when added to the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer (BC) in enhancing the clinical and pathological response of tumors is unclear. The effect of ZA on the antitumor effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not prospectively been studied before. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NEOZOTAC is a national, multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy of TAC (docetaxel, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide i.v.) followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on day 2 with or without ZA 4 mg i.v. q 3 weeks inpatients withstage II/III, HER2-negative BC. We present data on the pathological complete response (pCR in breast and axilla), on clinical response using MRI, and toxicity. Post hoc subgroup analyses were undertaken to address the predictive value of menopausal status. RESULTS: Addition of ZA to chemotherapy did not improve pCR rates (13.2% for TAC+ZA versus 13.3% for TAC). Postmenopausal women (N = 96) had a numerical benefit from ZA treatment (pCR 14.0% for TAC+ZA versus 8.7% for TAC, P = 0.42). Clinical objective response did not differ between treatment arms (72.9% versus 73.7%). There was no difference in grade III/IV toxicity between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of ZA to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve pathological or clinical response to chemotherapy. Further investigations are warranted in postmenopausal women with BC, since this subgroup might benefit from ZA treatment.