RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide and patient clinical outcomes seem influenced by their socioeconomic position (SEP). Since little has been investigated on this topic in the Italian context, our aim was to investigate the role of SEP in the care pathway of lung cancer patients in terms of diagnosis, treatment and mortality. METHODS: This observational retrospective cohort study included patients discharged in the Lazio Region with a lung cancer diagnosis between 2014 and 2017. In the main analysis, educational level was used as SEP measure. Multivariate models, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables, were applied to evaluate the association between SEP and study outcomes, stratified for metastatic (M) and non-metastatic (NM) cancer. We defined a diagnosis as 'delayed' when patients received their initial cancer diagnosis after an emergency department admission. Access to advanced lung cancer treatments (high-cost, novel and innovative treatments) and mortality were investigated within the 24-month period post-diagnosis. Moreover, two additional indicators of SEP were examined in the sensitivity analysis: one focusing on area deprivation and the other on income-based exemption. RESULTS: A total of 13,251 patients were identified (37.3% with metastasis). The majority were males (> 60%) and over half were older than 70 years. The distribution of SEP levels among patients was as follow: 31% low, 29% medium-low, 32% medium-high and 7% high. As SEP increased, the risks of receiving a delayed diagnosis ((high vs low: M: OR = 0.29 (0.23-0.38), NM: OR = 0.20 (0.16-0.25)) and of mortality ((high vs low M: OR = 0.77 (0.68-0.88) and NM: 0.61 (0.54-0.69)) decreased. Access to advanced lung cancer treatments increased in accordance with SEP only in the M cohort (high vs low: M: OR = 1.57 (1.18-2.09)). The primary findings were corroborated by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted the need of public health preventive and educational programs in Italy, a country where the care pathway of lung cancer patients, especially in terms of diagnosis and mortality, appears to be negatively affected by SEP level.
Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Itália , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Disparidades Socioeconômicas em SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) infections may lead to severe consequences in infants born preterm with breathing problems (such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)) or congenital heart diseases (CHD). Since studies investigating the influence of different gestational age (WGA) and concomitant specific comorbidities on the burden of RSV infections are scarce, the present study aimed to better characterize these high-risk populations in the Italian context. METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal and record-linkage cohort study involved infants born between 2017 and 2019 in Lazio Region (Italy) and is based on data extracted from administrative databases. Each infant was exclusively included in one of the following cohorts: (1) BPD-RDS (WGA ≤35 with or without CHD) or (2) CHD (without BPD and/or RDS) or (3) Preterm (WGA ≤35 without BPD (and/or RDS) or CHD). Each cohort was followed for 12 months from birth. Information related to sociodemographic at birth, and RSV and Undetermined Respiratory Agents (URA) hospitalizations and drug consumption at follow-up were retrieved and described. RESULTS: A total of 8,196 infants were selected and classified as 1,084 BPD-RDS, 3,286 CHD and 3,826 Preterm. More than 30% of the BPD-RDS cohort was composed by early preterm infants (WGA ≤ 29) in contrast to the Preterm cohort predominantly constitute by moderate preterm infants (98.2%), while CHD infants were primarily born at term (83.9%). At follow-up, despite the cohorts showed similar proportions of RSV hospitalizations, in BPD-RDS cohort hospitalizations were more frequently severe compared to those occurred in the Preterm cohort (p<0.01), in the BPD-RDS cohort was also found the highest proportion of URA hospitalizations (p<0.0001). In addition, BPD-RDS infants, compared to those of the remaining cohorts, received more frequently prophylaxis with palivizumab (p<0.0001) and were more frequently treated with adrenergics inhalants, and glucocorticoids for systemic use. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of the study clinical outcomes highlighted that, the demographic and clinical characteristics at birth of the study cohorts influence their level of vulnerability to RSV and URA infections. As such, continuous monitoring of these populations is necessary in order to ensure a timely organization of health care system able to respond to their needs in the future.
Assuntos
Displasia Broncopulmonar , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/prevenção & controle , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Palivizumab/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Displasia Broncopulmonar/epidemiologia , Antivirais/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the demographics, clinical characteristics, drug treatment outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and injuries among people with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (F-DRE) analysed separately for six European countries. METHODS: We used electronic medical record data from six European (Belgium, Spain, Italy, France, UK and Germany) primary care/specialist care databases to identify antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment-naïve people (aged ≥ 18 years at F-DRE diagnosis). They were followed from their epilepsy diagnosis until death, the date of last record available, or study end. We used descriptive analyses to characterise the F-DRE cohort, and results were reported by country. RESULTS: One-thousand-seventy individuals with F-DRE were included (mean age 52.5 years; 55.4 % female). The median follow-up time from the first diagnosis to the end of the follow-up was 95.5 months across all countries. The frequency of F-DRE diagnosis in 2021 ranged from 8.8 % in Italy to 18.2 % in Germany. Psychiatric disorders were the most common comorbidity across all countries. Frequently reported psychiatric disorders were depression (26.7 %) and anxiety (11.8 %). The median time from epilepsy diagnosis to the first ASM failure ranged from 5.9 (4.2-10.2) months in France to 12.6 (5.8-20.4) months in Spain. Levetiracetam and lamotrigine were the most commonly used ASM monotherapies in all countries. Consultation with a general practitioner is sought more frequently after F-DRE diagnosis than after epilepsy diagnosis, except in the UK. SIGNIFICANCE: No one ASM is optimal for all people with F-DRE, and the risks and benefits of the ASM must be considered. Comorbidities must be an integral part of the management strategy and drive the choice of drugs.
Assuntos
Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos , Epilepsias Parciais , Epilepsia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Epilepsias Parciais/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Lamotrigina/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To provide clinical characteristics and to quantify the number of patients receiving the extemporaneous combination of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor zofenopril in a real-world setting. This evidence can provide a snapshot of the potential users of the two molecules in a single pill combination (SPC). METHODS: Retrospective observational study using data from the IQVIA Italian Longitudinal Patient Database. Adult patients firstly prescribed with amlodipine and zofenopril between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2020 were identified and demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted. Treatment adherence was evaluated as proportion of days covered (PDC). The potential number of patients eligible for a SPC was calculated. RESULTS: A population of 2394 hypertensive patients, mean age of 68.6 years ±12.7, 52.6% male were treated with amlodipine and zofenopril. The majority of patients (54.5%) were low adherent (PDC <40%), 25.9% were intermediate adherent and only 19.6% were high adherent (>80%) to therapy. Around 42,500 adult hypertensive patients were estimated to be prescribed the extemporaneous combination in 2019 in Italy, being potentially eligible for treatment with amlodipine and zofenopril SPC. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of the extemporaneous combination of zofenopril and amlodipine in hypertensive patients is a common practice in Italy. The development of a SPC can be a viable treatment option to simplify therapy and to increase adherence in hypertensive patients who are already on the two monotherapies in combination.
Assuntos
Anlodipino , Hipertensão , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Anti-Hipertensivos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Análise de Dados , Pressão Sanguínea , Combinação de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe MDD patients starting antidepressant (AD) treatment by pharmacological approach and identify factors associated with a longer sick leave (SL) duration. METHODS: Retrospective study on IQVIA German Disease Analyser (specialists) and Spanish Longitudinal Patient Database (general practitioners and specialists). MDD patients initiating AD treatment between July 2016-June 2018 were grouped by therapeutic approach (AD monotherapy vs. combination/switch/add-on) and their characteristics were analysed descriptively. Multiple logistic regression models were run to evaluate factors affecting SL duration (i.e., >30 days). RESULTS: One thousand six hundred and eighty-five patients (monotherapy: 58%; combination/switch/add-on: 42%) met inclusion criteria for Germany, and 1817 for Spain (monotherapy: 83%; combination/switch/add-on: 17%). AD treatment influenced SL duration: combination/switch/add-on patients had a 2-fold and a 4-fold risk of having >30 days of SL than monotherapy patients, respectively in Germany and Spain. Patients with a gap of time between MDD diagnosis and AD treatment initiation had a higher likelihood of experiencing a longer SL both in Germany and Spain (38% higher likelihood and 6-fold risk of having >30 days of SL, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A careful and timely selection of AD treatment approach at the time of MDD diagnosis may improve functional recovery and help to reduce SL, minimising the socio-economic burden of the disease.Key pointsThe major depressive disorder has a substantial impact on work absenteeism.The present study aimed to describe MDD patients starting antidepressant (AD) treatment depending on the pharmacological approach and to identify factors associated with longer sick leave (SL) duration.Patients receiving AD monotherapy had a lower likelihood of having more than 30 days of sick leave than those receiving AD combination/switch/add-on.Patients for whom a gap of time between MDD diagnosis and initiation of AD treatment was observed, showed a higher likelihood of having more than 30 days of sick leave.Because findings from this analysis relied on secondary data, the authors would like to claim the urgency of conducting prospective observational studies that further investigate the effect that different AD therapeutic approaches and timely initiation of treatment might exert on patients' recovery.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Licença Médica , Espanha/epidemiologia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Clinically describing hypertensive patients initiating nebivolol/zofenopril extemporaneous combination (NZ-EXC) and estimating the number of patients currently receiving NZ-EXC and of those potentially eligible for the fixed-dose combination of the two molecules (NZ-FDC) in Italy. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used data from IQVIA Italian Longitudinal Patient Database (LPD). Adult hypertensive patients firstly prescribed NZ-EXC between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2020 were identified and their demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted. Treatment adherence was evaluated as proportion of days covered (PDC) and classified as low (PDC <40%), intermediate (PDC ≥40% and <80%) or high (PDC ≥80%). Two additional cohorts were identified in 2019 to provide the national-level yearly estimates of patients prescribed NZ-EXC and of patients eligible for NZ-FDC. RESULTS: In total 1745 patients were prescribed NZ-EXC: 60% were women; mean age was 65 years. The most frequent comorbidities were dyslipidemia (19.0%), diabetes (15.5%) and thyroid diseases (13.1%); the most common co-prescribed treatments were antithrombotics (29.1%), lipid-lowering agents (28.8%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (26.1%) and antihyperglycemic agents (13.5%). Mean PDC was 39%, and 57% of the patients had a PDC < 40%. The yearly estimate of patients prescribed NZ-EXC in 2019 was 59,000, while potential users of NZ-FDC were estimated to be 29,000. CONCLUSIONS: NZ-EXC in hypertensive patients is a common practice in Italy and the development of a NZ-FDC can be a viable treatment option for hypertensive patients who are already receiving nebivolol and zofenopril through the concomitant assumption of two distinct pills. As supported by scientific literature, FDCs of antihypertensive drugs could simplify treatment, improve adherence and potentially reduce health-care costs as related to a better control of blood pressure.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos , Hipertensão , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Captopril/análogos & derivados , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Lipídeos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Nebivolol/uso terapêutico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify sick leave days (SLD) predictors after starting antidepressant (AD) treatment in patients affected by major depressive disorder (MDD), managed by general practitioners, with a focus on different AD therapeutic approaches. METHODS: Retrospective study on German IQVIA® Disease Analyser database. 19-64 year old MDD patients initiating AD treatment between July-2016 and June-2018 were grouped by therapeutic approach (AD monotherapy versus combination/switch/add-on). Data were analysed descriptively by AD therapeutic approach, while a zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) multiple regression model was run to evaluate SLD predictors. RESULTS: 8,891 patients met inclusion criteria (monotherapy: 66%; combination/switch/add-on: 34%). All covariates had an influence on SLD after AD treatment initiation. Focussing on variables that physicians may more easily intervene to improve outcomes, it was found that the expected SLD number of combination/switch/add-on patients was 1.6 times that of monotherapy patients, and the expected SLD number of patients diagnosed with MDD before the decision to start AD treatment was 1.2 times that of patients not diagnosed with MDD. CONCLUSIONS: A patient tailored approach in the selection of AD treatment at the time of MDD diagnosis may improve functional recovery and help to reduce the socio-economic burden of the disease.KEY POINTSFew studies previously investigated the effect of antidepressant treatment approaches on sick leave days in major depressive disorder.To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the effect of different antidepressant treatment approaches on sick leave days in major depressive disorder in German patients.Patients receiving antidepressant monotherapy treatment seemed to lose fewer working days than patients receiving antidepressants combination/switch/add-on therapy, both before and after starting treatment, even if differences were more pronounced after treatment has started.The use of antidepressant monotherapy or combination/switch/add-on therapy was the strongest predictor of sick leave days after starting antidepressant treatment: the expected number of sick leave days for the combination/switch/add-on group was 1.6 times that of the monotherapy group.Among factors associated with increased sick leave days, antidepressant therapeutic approach and the promptness of starting the antidepressant treatment when major depressive disorder is diagnosed, are those on which physicians may more easily intervene to improve outcomes.Findings from the present study suggest that a patient tailored approach may improve functional recovery and help reducing the socio-economic burden of the disease.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Licença Médica , Adulto , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Geral , Alemanha , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: The primary objectives were to describe weight changes following initiation of lurasidone versus other antipsychotics and estimate the risk of clinically relevant (≥7%) weight changes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, longitudinal comparative cohort study was based on electronic medical records (EMRs) of United States (US) adult patients with schizophrenia who were prescribed lurasidone or other antipsychotics as monotherapy between 1 April 2013 and 30 June 2019. RESULTS: Overall, the study included 15,323 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia; 6.1% of patients received lurasidone, 60.4% received antipsychotics associated with a medium-high risk of weight gain (clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, paliperidone) and 33.5% received antipsychotics with a low risk of weight gain (aripiprazole, first-generation antipsychotics, ziprasidone). Lurasidone was associated with the smallest proportion of patients experiencing clinically relevant weight gain and the greatest proportion of patients with clinically relevant weight loss. The risk of clinically relevant weight gain was numerically higher with all antipsychotics versus lurasidone and was statistically significant for olanzapine (hazard ratio [HR]=1.541; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.121; 2.119; p=0.0078) versus lurasidone. The likelihood of ≥7% weight loss was significantly greater with lurasidone versus all antipsychotics (p<0.05), except ziprasidone. CONCLUSION: This real-world study suggests that lurasidone has a lower risk of clinically relevant weight gain and a higher likelihood of clinically relevant weight loss than other commonly used antipsychotics.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several studies have been focusing on the potential role of atmospheric pollutants in the diffusion and impact on health of Covid-19. This study's objective was to estimate the association between ≤10 µm diameter particulate matter (PM10) exposure and the likelihood of experiencing pneumonia due to Covid-19 using individual-level data in Italy. METHODS: Information on Covid-19 patients was retrieved from the Italian IQVIA® Longitudinal Patient Database (LPD), a computerized network of general practitioners (GPs) including anonymous data on patients' consultations and treatments. All patients with a Covid-19 diagnosis during March 18th, 2020 - June 30th, 2020 were included in the study. The date of first Covid-19 registration was the starting point of the 3-month follow-up (Index Date). Patients were classified based on Covid-19-related pneumonia registrations on the Index date and/or during follow-up presence/absence. Each patient was assigned individual exposure by calculating average PM10 during the 30-day period preceding the Index Date, and according to GP's office province. A multiple generalized linear mixed model, mixed-effects logistic regression, was used to assess the association between PM10 exposure tertiles and the likelihood of experiencing pneumonia. RESULTS: Among 6483 Covid-19 patients included, 1079 (16.6%) had a diagnosis of pneumonia. Pneumonia patients were older, more frequently men, more health-impaired, and had a higher individual-level exposure to PM10 during the month preceding Covid-19 diagnosis. The mixed-effects model showed that patients whose PM10 exposure level fell in the second tertile had a 30% higher likelihood of having pneumonia than that of first tertile patients, and the risk for those who were in the third tertile was almost doubled. CONCLUSION: The consistent findings toward a positive association between PM10 levels and the likelihood of experiencing pneumonia due to Covid-19 make the implementation of new strategies to reduce air pollution more and more urgent.
Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos , Poluição do Ar , COVID-19 , Poluentes Atmosféricos/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar/análise , Teste para COVID-19 , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Material Particulado/efeitos adversos , Material Particulado/análise , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Preliminary results from the SABINA (SABA use IN Asthma) program showed lower overuse of short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) in Italy compared to other European countries. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether SABINA's results might have been affected by the Italian National Health System and pharmaceutical market dynamics, by examining patients' characteristics in relation to SABA prescription/purchase habits. METHODS: Multiple approaches were used: (1) a retrospective study using the General Practitioners' (GPs) Italian IQVIA Longitudinal Patient Database (LPD) to assess SABA overuse (more than two canisters/year) and its association with exacerbation risk; (2) a survey conducted across 200 Italian pharmacies to calculate the proportions of SABA purchases without a prescription; (3) a cross-sectional study on the specialists' IQVIA Patient Analyzer database to understand the SABA prescription habits of specialists. RESULTS: Among SABA users identified through IQVIA LPD, the proportion of patients having more than two SABA canisters/year was 32%. Overall, patients prescribed more than two SABA canisters/year by GPs had 30% higher risk of exacerbations than patients with a maximum of two SABA canisters/year. The joint evaluation of IQVIA LPD and survey's findings revealed that IQVIA LPD tracks three out of four SABA canisters dispensed. The survey showed that, on average, SABA users purchased four canisters/year. Patients prescribed SABA by specialists were more frequently men, younger, thinner, and had higher spirometry values. CONCLUSION: SABA overuse is common in Italy, with a share of consumption not regulated by medical prescriptions. Because SABA overuse increases exacerbation risk, changes to national guidelines should be encouraged to ensure implementation of global recommendations.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Understand the demographics and clinical features of patients with osteoarthritis (OA), quantify healthcare resource utilization by OA patients, and estimate the annual direct medical costs per OA patient from a National Health Service (NHS) perspective in Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort analysis using data from electronic medical records captured by the Italian IQVIA Longitudinal Patient Database (LPD). Only direct medical costs reimbursed by the NHS were considered. Patients were included if they received at least one diagnosis of OA during the period from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Each patient was observed for 3 years: a 24-month baseline period preceding the index date, and a 12-month follow-up period starting at the index date. RESULTS: A total of 71,467 patients met inclusion criteria: 43.98% had not been prescribed NSAIDs/opioids, 40.76% had been prescribed NSAIDs, and 15.26% an opioid. Mean age was 71.36 years, and 68.2% of the patients were women. At least one comorbidity was present in 91.34% of the patients; 38.05% were newly diagnosed with OA. During 1-year of follow-up, 173,884 prescriptions with an associated diagnosis of OA were found: 47.36% had been prescribed an NSAID, 9.11% diclofenac, 8.30% codeine+paracetamol, and 7.32% ketoprofen. Nearly 15% of the patients had at least 1 request for a specialist visit and 23.82% had at least 1 request for exams. Orthopedic visits accounted for 60% of all specialist visits. Yearly mean costs per patient were 622, for approximately 2.5 billion per year in direct costs, considering 3.9 million patients with OA in Italy. Protheses were a major driver in annual costs: 143.45 in patients without a prosthesis and 10,090.91 in those with a joint prosthesis. CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis of direct costs of care of patients with OA in Italy confirms the substantial economic burden. Direct costs dramatically increased when joint replacement was needed.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is a major cause of anemia in older people. Increasing the knowledge on the predictors of iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) may facilitate its timely diagnosis. AIM: To investigate the predictors of IDA in older people in four European countries. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective longitudinal study. Primary care patients aged 65 or older (N = 24,051) in four European countries. METHODS: IDA predictors were estimated using multivariate Cox regression based on information gathered from national primary care databases: Italy (years 2002-2013), Belgium, Germany and Spain (years 2007-2012). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: In Spain and Belgium, men were at greater risk of IDA than women, while they had a lower risk in Italy. Weakness, irritability, alopecia and xerostomia were signs and symptoms significantly associated with IDA. Concurrent diseases, potential causes of anemia, positively associated with IDA were small bowel polyposis, stomach cancer, obesity, gastritis and peptic ulcer, esophagitis, Crohn's disease, celiac disease, lymphangiectasis, gastrectomy or gastric atrophy, gut resection or bypass, and cardiac prosthetic valve. Aspirin users had a 12-35% higher hazard of IDA than non-users. Similarly, corticosteroids and anti-acids were positively associated with IDA. A higher level of comorbidity was associated with an increased hazard of IDA in all countries. CONCLUSIONS: Specific signs and symptoms, chronic conditions, a greater comorbidity burden, and specific pharmacological treatments registered in primary care databases represent relevant predictors and correlates of incident IDA in older people in Europe. General practitioners might employ this information to obtain early diagnosis of IDA in community-dwelling older adults.
Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anemia Ferropriva/diagnóstico , Anemia Ferropriva/epidemiologia , Bélgica , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Itália , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , EspanhaRESUMO
Iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) was the main condition contributing to higher rates of years lived with disabilities in women in 2016. To date, few studies have investigated gender differences in determinants of IDA in Europe. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the determinants of IDA among females and males in four European countries. IDA determinants were estimated using multivariable Cox regression based on information gathered from national primary care databases, namely Italy (for years 2002-2013), Belgium, Germany, and Spain (for years 2007-2012). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Age was significantly associated with IDA in females of childbearing age in all four countries, as well as pregnancy, for which the aHR ranged from 1.20 (95% CI 1.15-1.25) in Italy to 1.88 (95% CI 1.53-2.31) in Germany. In males, the aHR increased with age starting from the 65-69 age group. Menometrorrhagia was associated with IDA in Germany (aHR 2.71, 95% CI 1.96-3.73), Italy (aHR 1.80, 95% CI 1.60-2.03), and Spain (aHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.31-1.76). A greater risk for women with alopecia was also observed. Weakness and headache indicated a higher risk in both men and women. Patients with diseases characterized by blood loss or gastrointestinal malabsorption were also at significantly increased risk. Physicians should encourage women of childbearing age to adhere to dietary recommendations regarding iron intake and regularly prescribe screening of iron status. Upper and lower gastrointestinal investigations should be recommended for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of IDA.
Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Caracteres Sexuais , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anemia Ferropriva/dietoterapia , Anemia Ferropriva/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Complicações Hematológicas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Hematológicas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações Hematológicas na Gravidez/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have assessed treatment usage in clinical practice among patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate patterns of medications used for CSU, analyzing the electronic patient records contained in the Italian general practice Health Search IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database (HSD). The study period was from January 2002 to December 2013. RESULTS: The most frequent prescriptions during the year following CSU diagnosis were H1-antihistamines (78.47%) and corticosteroids (49.20%). Different medications were given to a limited number of CSU patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that H1-antihistamines were the most prescribed drugs to treat CSU, reflecting their role as the mainstay of CSU treatment. Systemic corticosteroids continue to be frequently prescribed for CSU in clinical practice. Alternative drugs were used only in very few patients, suggesting the possibility that severe refractory cases of CSU are undertreated in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Urticária/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Urticária/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To perform a cost-effectiveness evaluation comparing the originator follitropin alfa (Gonal-f®) to the biosimilar (Bemfola®) in the Italian and Spanish contexts, with an assessment of the German and UK backgrounds. METHODS: Starting from the study by Rettenbacher et al, a cost-effectiveness model was developed in the Italian and Spanish contexts. Clinical data on subjects, doses of gonadotropin, pregnancies, live-born children, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were used to feed the model. Costs related to drugs, hospitalizations, specialist visits, and examinations were retrieved from Italian and Spanish tariffs. Gonadotropin acquisition costs for Germany and the UK were also taken into account to expand the economical assessment to the other countries. The evaluation was done based on the National Health Service perspective. Sensitivity analyses, both univariate and probabilistic, as long as scenario analyses, tested the robustness of the model. RESULTS: Originator follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) costs were 3,663 and 6,387 in Italy and Spain, respectively, whereas biosimilar FSH costs were 3,483 and 6,342. The efficacy was found to be 0.52 for the originator and 0.47 for the biosimilar. The average cost per live birth was estimated to be 7,044 and 12,283 for the originator FSH and 7,411 and 13,494 for the biosimilar for Italy and Spain, respectively. Furthermore, the originator FSH generated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 3,600 for Italy and 900 for Spain compared to the biosimilar. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the results of the base case model. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicated that the originator FSH is a cost-efficient treatment strategy for Italian and Spanish health services compared to the biosimilar and it would be worthwhile extending this evaluation to other countries.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a global public health concern, being responsible for about 800 000 deaths per year worldwide. To date, few studies have investigated the epidemiology of IDA in Europe. This study therefore aimed to assess the incidence rate and determinants of IDA in four European countries. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information was obtained from four national primary care databases, respectively, for Italy, Belgium, Germany and Spain. IDA-related determinants were estimated using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: The annual incidence rates of IDA ranged between 7.2 and 13.96 per 1000 person-years. The estimates were higher in Spain and Germany. Females, younger and older patients were at greater risk of IDA, as well as those suffering from gastrointestinal diseases, pregnant women and those with history of menometrorrhagia, and aspirin and/or antacids users. A Charlson Index >0 was a significant determinant of IDA in all countries. CONCLUSIONS: The use of primary care databases allowed us to assess the incidence rate and determinants of IDA in four European countries. Given the crucial role of general practitioners in the diagnosis and management of this condition, our findings may contribute to increase the awareness of IDA among physicians as well as to reduce its occurrence among at-risk patients.
Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anemia Ferropriva/diagnóstico , Anemia Ferropriva/etiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of use is a key factor in safeguarding patient's health as well as a product's therapeutic properties. This paper presents the results of a survey conducted in nine European countries to verify the appropriateness of use of nimesulide in patients with inflammatory pain. METHODS: Computer-aided telephone interviews were administered to 1,277 nimesulide-prescribing general practitioners in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, and Slovakia, covering an estimated 31,719 patients. The interview questionnaire collected information on nimesulide prescriptions with respect to daily dose, treatment duration, and indication. RESULTS: In the majority of cases, prescriptions of nimesulide did not exceed the recommended daily dose of 200 mg (given as 100 mg twice a day), with a range from 161 mg (Greece) to 190 mg (Slovakia). An adherence to the 15-day treatment limit was observed in over 90% of cases. The average number of treatment days was always less than 15, with a range from 5.4 (Italy) to 13.6 (Czech Republic). Nimesulide was primarily used for the treatment of acute pain and short-term painful episodes in chronic conditions. The presence of gastrointestinal diseases/ulcers was the most frequent reason for not prescribing nimesulide. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey demonstrate that nimesulide is generally prescribed in compliance with the information reported in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) with regard to daily dose and treatment duration, and suggest that it is mainly used for the management of episodes of acute pain in patients with a chronic disorder. These findings indicate the appropriateness of use of nimesulide in the European countries considered in this survey.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION. The objective of this survey was to describe the nephrologists attitude on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD stages 3, 4 and 5), with iron deficiency anemia and no response/intolerance to oral iron therapy. Furthermore, this survey describes the nephrologists view about the impact of lack of anemia correction on patient health, as well as the influence of organization and management of nephrological centers on IV iron management. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 60 nephrologists were interviewed via web by using an interactive simulation that investigates nephrologists clinical and therapeutic approach on 3 different types of patients; subsequently, a questionnaire was administered with in-deeper questions. RESULTS. Regarding the first virtual patient, 64% of nephrologists still choose oral iron, while IV iron was chosen by 16% of them. 36% opted for ESA. For the other two virtual patients the most selected treatments were combinations of oral iron + ESA (42% and 36%) or IV iron + ESA (21% and 38%), respectively. According to what was perceived by nephrologists, issues related to IV iron are: patient discomfort due to frequent hospital transfers for IV administration (50%), inadequate center organization (48%), fear of damaging the venous tree (40%). CONCLUSIONS. Half of the nephrologists stated they are unsatisfied with available iron therapies. Difficult therapy management and restrictions of health structure were identified as barriers to the prescription of IV iron therapy. A smaller number of administrations and less free-iron toxicity are expected from nephrologists from the new iron preparations for the management of iron deficiency in patients not responding/intolerant to oral iron therapy.
Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva/diagnóstico , Anemia Ferropriva/tratamento farmacológico , Ferro/administração & dosagem , Nefrologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Administração Oral , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anemia Ferropriva/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Ferro/efeitos adversos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Inquéritos e Questionários , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Health care utilization (HCU) databases are widespread sources of data for pharmacoepidemiologic investigations. Possible confounders are typically not measured in such databases. We show how to assess the impact of confounders in a study aimed at comparing cardiovascular (CV) risk according to drug regimen prescribed at starting antihypertensive therapy, nominally one agent (monotherapy) or a combination of agents in a unique tablet (fixed-dose combination) or in at least two distinct tablets (extemporaneous combination). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: A nested case-control study was carried out by including the 209,650 patients from Lombardy (Italy) newly treated between 2000 and 2001. Cases were the 10,688 patients who were hospitalized for CV disease until 2007. Three controls were selected for each case. Logistic regression was used to model the CV risk associated with initial therapeutic regimen. A Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis was performed for accounting unmeasured confounders (hypertension severity and chronic disease score) by means of external adjustment with medical record (MR) data. RESULTS: Compared with patients on fixed-dose combination, those on extemporaneous combination or monotherapy, respectively, had CV risk increased to 15% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3%, 29%) or 17% (95% CI: 8%, 26%). External adjustment did not modify the risk associated with monotherapy. In contrast, the excess of risk associated with extemporaneous combination was annulled when external adjustment was applied. CONCLUSION: MR data can be used to assess confounding bias unmeasured from HCU database. Starting antihypertensive therapy with a combination of agents probably reduces the CV risk with respect to monotherapy, even in the setting of primary prevention.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacoepidemiologia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Viés , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Combinação de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Guidelines recommend a combination of 2 drugs to be used as first-step treatment strategy in high-risk hypertensive individuals to achieve timely blood pressure control and avoid early events. The evidence that this is associated with cardiovascular (CV) benefits compared with initial monotherapy is limited, however. The objective of this study was to assess whether, compared with antihypertensive monotherapy, a combination of antihypertensive drugs provides a greater CV protection in daily clinical practice. A population-based, nested case-control study was carried out by including the cohort of 209 650 patients from Lombardy (Italy) aged 40 to 79 years who were newly treated with antihypertensive drugs between 2000 and 2001. Cases were the 10 688 patients who experienced a hospitalization for CV disease from initial prescription until 2007. Three controls were randomly selected for each case. Logistic regression was used to model the CV risk associated with starting on and/or continuing with combination therapy. A Monte-Carlo sensitivity analysis was performed to account for unmeasured confounders. Patients starting on combination therapy had an 11% CV risk reduction with respect to those starting on monotherapy (95% CI: 5% to 16%). Compared with patients who maintained monotherapy also during follow-up, those who started on combination therapy and kept it along the entire period of observation had 26% reduction of CV risk (95% CI: 15% to 35%). In daily life practice, a combination of antihypertensive drugs is associated with a great reduction of CV risk. The indication for using combination of blood pressure drugs should be broadened.