Remote ischemic preconditioning does not induce activation of Akt and STAT5 in the rat heart.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is hypothesized to be a promising cardioprotective strategy to protect hearts against ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury; however, the current understanding of the underlying signal transduction pathways involved remains unclear. It has been previously demonstrated that protein kinase B/AKT, which is a crucial protein of the reperfusion injury salvage kinases pathway, and STAT5, which is a member of the survivor activating factor enhancement pathway, serve a pivotal role in cardioprotection. However, whether and at what time-points (TPs) RIPC leads to the activation of AKT and STAT5 in a rat model of RIPC and I/R injury remains to be determined. The present study hypothesized that RIPC may induce the phosphorylation of AKT and/or STAT5 immediately following RIPC and/or at a later TP with or without subsequent I/R. In the first set of experiments (part A), male Wistar rats were randomized into 2 groups (n=6 per group): The first group underwent RIPC via a hind limb tourniquet (4x5 min I/R episodes), while the second group received the respective sham treatment. In the second set of experiments (part B), the rats were randomized into 4 groups (n=6 per group) that either underwent RIPC or sham treatment prior to 35 min of ischemia by occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 120 min reperfusion or a respective sham treatment. At the end of the experiments, the heart tissue was isolated in order to analyze the phosphorylation levels of AKT and STAT5. The results revealed that RIPC did not induce the immediate or late phosphorylation of AKT or STAT5. In addition, following I/R, the activation of AKT and STAT5 was not modulated by RIPC. In conclusion, the findings of the present study suggested that RIPC-induced cardioprotection may not be mediated by the activation of AKT or STAT5 at the investigated TPs.

Influence of Hyperglycemia During Different Phases of Ischemic Preconditioning on Cardioprotection-A Focus on Apoptosis and Aggregation of Granulocytes.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) protects the myocardium against ischemia/reperfusion injury. Evidence suggests that hyperglycemia inhibits IPC-induced cardioprotection. The effects of hyperglycemia initiated during different phases of IPC on myocardial injury were characterized with emphasis on apoptosis and aggregation of polymorphonuclear granulocytes (PMN). METHODS: Male Wistar rats were subjected to 35 min of myocardial ischemia and 2 h of reperfusion. Control animals were not further treated. IPC was induced by three cycles of 3 min ischemia and 5 min of reperfusion before major ischemia. Hyperglycemia (blood glucose more than 22.2 mmol/L) was induced by glucose administration with or without IPC during different phases (trigger- (before ischemia), mediator- (during ischemia), early reperfusion-phase). One additional group received an anti-PMN-antibody before ischemia. Infarct size was quantified by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Cytochrome C release and B-cell lymphoma two (Bcl-2) expression were assessed by western blot analysis. Poly-ADP-Ribose staining and PMN accumulation were quantified with immunohistochemistry and histochemistry. RESULTS: IPC reduced infarct size compared with control. Hyperglycemia completely abolished IPC-induced cardioprotection independent of the time point of initiation. Hyperglycemia before and during major ischemia but without IPC also slightly reduced infarct size. IPC reduced the accumulation of PMNs. This effect was reversed by hyperglycemia during trigger- and mediator-phase but not by hyperglycemia during reperfusion. Hyperglycemia alone had no effect on PMN accumulation. In all treatment groups, signs of myocardial apoptosis were reduced compared with control. IPC alone, combined with hyperglycemia and anti-PMN treatment, reduced apoptosis by a Bcl-2-associated mechanism. Hyperglycemia alone reduced apoptosis by a Bcl-2-independent pathway. CONCLUSION: Hyperglycemia inhibits IPC-induced cardioprotection independent of its onset. Furthermore, hyperglycemia prevents apoptosis and IPC-induced reduction of PMN aggregation.

Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning and myocardial ischemia on microRNA-1 expression in the rat heart in vivo.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is an easily applicable method for protecting the heart against a subsequent ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury. However, the exact molecular mechanisms underlying RIPC are unknown. We examined the involvement of microRNAs (miRNAs) and in particular the expression of miRNA-1 (miR-1) in RIPC and myocardial ischemia. Remote ischemic preconditioning was conducted by four cycles of 5-min bilateral hind-limb ischemia in male Wistar rats. Cardiac ischemia was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery for 35 min followed by 2 or 6 h of reperfusion. MicroRNA expression was analyzed by Taqman miRNA arrays and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays. Luciferase assays were performed to validate the miR-1 target gene brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA and protein levels were analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Remote ischemic preconditioning led to a differential expression of miRNAs. The most abundant cardiac miRNA, miR-1, was downregulated by RIPC without following ischemia as well as after I/R and RIPC followed by I/R after 2 h of reperfusion. After 6 h of reperfusion, RIPC led to an upregulation of miR-1, whereas ischemia had no effect on miR-1 expression. Luciferase assays confirmed the interaction of miR-1 with BDNF, a protein that has been shown to exert cardioprotective effects. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor protein levels in rat hearts measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were not significantly altered after 2 or 6 h of reperfusion in all intervention groups. Remote ischemic preconditioning leads to changes in the expression levels of the most abundant cardiac miRNA, miR-1. MicroRNA 1 levels did not correlate with protein levels of BDNF, a known miR-1 target, in vivo. Further studies are needed to explore the biological significance of changes in miR-1 expression levels and the potential interaction with BDNF in RIPC-induced cardioprotection.

Cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning exhibits a signaling pattern different from local ischemic preconditioning.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and local ischemic preconditioning (IPC) protect the myocardium from subsequent ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. In this study, the protective effects of early RIPC, IPC, and the combination of both (RIPC-IPC) were characterized. Furthermore, the hypothesis was tested that protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), important mediators of IPC, are activated in RIPC. Infarct size, serum troponin T, and creatine kinase levels were assessed after 4 × 5-min noninvasive RIPC, local IPC, or a combination of both and 35 min of regional ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Protein kinase C ε and the MAPKs extracellular signal-regulated MAPK (ERK), c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 MAPK were analyzed by Western blot analysis and activity assays in the myocardium and skeletal muscle immediately after the preconditioning protocol. Remote ischemic preconditioning, IPC, and RIPC-IPC significantly reduced myocardial infarct size (RIPC-I/R: 54% ± 15%; IPC-I/R: 33% ± 15%; RIPC-IPC-I/R: 33% ± 15%; P < 0.05 vs. I/R [76% ± 14%]) and troponin T release (RIPC-I/R: 15.4 ± 6.4 ng/mL; IPC-I/R: 10.9 ± 7.0 ng/mL; RIPC-IPC-I/R: 9.8 ± 5.6 ng/mL; P < 0.05 vs. I/R [27.1 ± 12.0 ng/mL]) after myocardial I/R. Ischemic preconditioning led to an activation of PKCε and ERK 1/2, whereas RIPC did not lead to a translocation of PKCε to the mitochondria or phosphorylation of the MAPKs ERK 1/2, JNK 1/2, and p38 MAPK. Remote ischemic preconditioning did not induce translocation of PKCε to the mitochondria or phosphorylation of MAPKs in the preconditioned muscle tissue. Remote ischemic preconditioning, IPC, and RIPC-IPC exert early protection against myocardial I/R injury. Remote ischemic preconditioning and local IPC exhibit different activation dynamics of signal transducers in the myocardium. The studied PKC-MAPK pathway is likely not involved in the protective effects of RIPC.