Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has been widely used to treat obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. Here we evaluate rates of revision and explant related to HGNS implantation and assess types of adverse events contributing to revision and explant. METHODS: Postmarket surveillance data for HGNS implanted between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022, were collected. Event rates and risk were calculated using the postmarket surveillance event counts and sales volume over the same period. Indications were categorized for analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported and freedom from explant or revision curves were grouped by year of implantation. RESULTS: Of the 20,881 HGNS implants assessed, rates of explant and revision within the first year were 0.723% and 1.542%, respectively. The most common indication for explant was infection (0.378%) and for revision was surgical correction (0.680%). Of the 5,820 devices with 3-year postimplantation data, the rate of explant was 2.680% and of revision was 3.557%. During this same interval, elective removal (1.478%) was the most common indication, and for revisions, surgical correction (1.134%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of HGNS is comparable in the real world setting to published clinical trial data. Rates of explant and revision are low, supporting a satisfactory safety profile for this technology. CITATION: Moroco AE, Wei Z, Byrd I, et al. Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(9):1497-1503.

Olfactory Function is Affected in Patients with Cirrhosis Depending on the Severity of Hepatic Encephalopathy.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Olfactory functions are altered to a variable degree by chronic liver disease. Few studies including only small populations of patients emphasized the possibility of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) influencing olfactory nervous tasks. So far, no study has explicitly focused on olfactory function depending on the severity of HE as assessed by objective diagnostic procedures. Thus we performed a study using the "Sniffin' Sticks" test system, critical flicker-fusion frequency (CFF) and clinical West Haven criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 54 cirrhotic patients with liver cirrhosis were included. Furthermore, 43 adult volunteers participating as a non-cirrhotic control group. Olfactory testing was performed using the "Sniffin' Stick" test battery (Burghart Medizintechnik, Wedel, Germany) which renders a widely-used tool both in clinical and research settings for the assessment of olfactory threshold, odor identification and discrimination. Several complications of cirrhosis were diagnosed by reference methods. Statistical analysis of cirrhosis-associated complications and their relation to olfactory function was performed. Assessment of HE and classification of different stages were performed according to clinical criteria (West- Haven criteria) and according to CFF, which was determined using a portable analyzer. RESULTS: Olfactory function was significantly reduced in cirrhotic patients (in 61.1%) compared to controls (p < 0.001). Among cirrhotics patients, the prevalence of olfactory deficits (hyposmia, anosmia) increased with the severity of HE as assessed by CFF and clinical criteria (p = 0.008 and p = 0.097, respectively). No correlation was observed between olfactory deficits and severity of liver disease as assessed by Child-Pugh-Score, etiology of cirrhosis and complications of cirrhosis such as ascites and portal venous hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory testing serves as a screening tool for HE and may facilitate grading of HE-severity.