Utilization and in-hospital complications of cardiac resynchronization therapy: trends in the United States from 2003 to 2013.

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in selected patients with heart failure. We sought to investigate the utilization and in-hospital complications of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and pacemaker (CRT-P) implantations in the United States from 2003 to 2013. Methods and results: Patients receiving CRT-D or CRT-P were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database (NIS), using the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification procedure codes. Annual implantation rates, patient demographics, co-morbidities, in-hospital complications, and length of stay were analysed. From 2003 to 2013, an estimated total of 439 010 (95% CI: 406 723-471 296) inpatient CRT implantations were performed in the U.S. The median age of patients was 72 and 71% were male. Overall, 6.1% had at least one complication. During the study period, comorbidity index and overall complication rate increased (P = 0.002 and P = 0.01, respectively). Mortality and length of stay showed no significant trend. Predictors of complications included: age 65 and older, female sex (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.12-1.27), Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index, and elective admission (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.57-0.66). Conclusion: From 2003 to 2013, the severity of comorbid conditions increased and a rising trend was observed in the rate of periprocedural complications among patients undergoing CRT in the United States. In-hospital mortality and length of stay showed no uniform trend.

Increased perforation risk with an MRI-conditional pacing lead: a single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been considered contraindicated in patients with cardiac pacemakers (PPMs). Recently, Medtronic (MDT) MRI SureScan PPM (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and leads were introduced into clinical practice in the United States of America. OBJECTIVE: To compare MDT CapSureFix 5086 MRI SureScan lead-associated perforation and dislodgement rates with MDT non-MRI SureScan active fixation leads. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of all patients implanted with MDT CapSureFix 5086 MRI SureScan leads as well as all patients implanted with MDT 4076 and 5076 leads at our institution from April 2011 to April 2014. RESULTS: Four of 72 patients implanted with MDT CapSureFix 5086 MRI SureScan leads (5.5%) had evidence of lead perforation, necessitating pericardiocentesis in three cases and lead revision in one case. Three of the four perforations were delayed perforations, presenting more than 3 weeks postimplant. Two patients implanted with MDT CapSureFix 5086 MRI SureScan leads (2.8%) had lead dislodgement. Of 420 patients implanted with MDT non-MRI SureScan leads, there were two perforations (0.47%) and four dislodgements (0.9%). There were significantly increased lead perforations associated with MDT CapSureFix 5086 MRI SureScan leads (P = 0.005) and a nonsignificant trend toward increased dislodgements (P = 0.18) when compared with MDT non-MRI SureScan leads. CONCLUSION: In contradiction to prior studies, this retrospective study suggests an increased perforation rate with MDT CapSureFix 5086 MRI SureScan leads. Most perforations were delayed perforations, presenting more than 3 weeks postimplant. Higher volume prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm our findings.

Characteristics of responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: the impact of echocardiographic left ventricular volume.

BACKGROUND: One-third of patients who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are classified as nonresponders. Characteristics of responders to CRT have been studied in multiple clinical trials. HYPOTHESIS: Independent predictors of CRT response may be identified by studying a series of patients in routine clinical practice. METHOD: One hundred twenty-five patients were examined retrospectively from a multidisciplinary CRT clinic program. Echocardiographic CRT response was defined as a decrease in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume of ≥15% and/or absolute increase of 5% in LV ejection fraction at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: There were 81 responders and 44 nonresponders. By univariate analyses, female sex, nonischemic cardiomyopathy etiology, baseline QRS duration, the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) index predicted CRT response. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that only QRS duration, LBBB, and LVEDV index were independent predictors (QRS width, odds ratio [OR]: 1.027, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.004-1.050, P = 0.023; LBBB, OR: 3.568, 95% CI: 1.284-9.910, P = 0.015; LVEDV index, OR: 0.970, 95% CI: 0.953-0.987, P = 0.001). Although female sex and nonischemic etiology were associated with an improved CRT response on univariate analyses, after adjusting for LV volumes they were not independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: QRS width, LBBB, and LVEDV index are independent predictors for echocardiographic CRT response. Previously reported differences in CRT response for sex and cardiomyopathy etiology are associated with differences in baseline LV volumes in our clinical practice.

Respiratory compensation improves the accuracy of electroanatomic mapping of the left atrium and pulmonary veins during atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: The creation of accurate electroanatomic maps (EAM) of the left atrium and pulmonary veins is important for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to guide ablative lesions and improve the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Respiratory motion of the heart and the pulmonary veins affects the accuracy of these maps. PURPOSE: This study aims to assess changes in the left atrial and pulmonary venous anatomy due to respiration and to evaluate their implication for EAM acquisition. METHODS: Two separate EAM were created using the CARTO 3 mapping system in 22 consecutive patients (63% males; mean age, 63 ± 8 years) undergoing AF ablation at our center: a non-respiratory compensation (RC) map in which endocardial points were collected irrespective of respiratory phase and an RC map in which the points were collected during end expiration only. These maps were compared to pre-procedural cardiac CT/MRI images. RESULTS: Non-RC mapping required 3.2 ± 1.0 min versus 7.8 ± 2.1 min for the maps with RC. In comparison to the pre-procedural CT/MRI images, maps without RC significantly overestimated the dimensions of the pulmonary veins' ostia compared to maps with RC in both long and short axes. Distances between the pulmonary veins were not significantly different when comparing non-RC to RC mapping at the left atrial roof or floor. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory compensation at the time of EAM acquisition during AF ablation more accurately represents the true anatomical dimensions of the pulmonary vein ostia. The resulting more accurate maps may improve the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation.