Pamidronate disodium for palliative therapy of feline bone-invasive tumors.

This study sought to quantify in vitro antiproliferative effects of pamidronate in feline cancer cells and assess feasibility of use of pamidronate in cats by assessing short-term toxicity and dosing schedule in cats with bone-invasive cancer. A retrospective pilot study included eight cats with bone invasive cancer treated with intravenous pamidronate. In vitro, pamidronate reduced proliferation in feline cancer cells (P < 0.05). One cat treated with pamidronate in combination with chemotherapy and two cats treated with pamidronate as a single agent after failing prior therapy had subjective clinically stable disease; median progression free interval in these cats from initial pamidronate treatment was 81 days. Three cats developed azotemia while undergoing various treatment modalities including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pamidronate. Median overall survival was 116.5 days for all cats and 170 days for cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Median progression free survival was 55 days for all cats and 71 days for cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Pamidronate therapy appears feasible for administration in cancer bearing cats with aggressive bone lesions in the dose range of 1-2 mg/kg every 21-28 days for multiple treatments. No acute or short-term toxicity was directly attributable to pamidronate.

In vitro cyclooxygenase-2 protein expression and enzymatic activity in neoplastic cells.

BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and its principle enzymatic metabolite, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), are implicated in cancer progression. Based upon immunohistochemical (IHC) evidence that several tumor types in animals overexpress COX-2 protein, COX-2 inhibitors are used as anticancer agents in dogs and cats. HYPOTHESIS: IHC is inaccurate for assessing tumor-associated COX-2 protein and enzymatic activity. METHODS: Five mammalian cell lines were assessed for COX-2 protein expression by IHC and Western blot analysis (WB), and functional COX-2 activity was based upon PGE2 production. RESULTS: Detection of COX-2 protein by IHC and WB were in agreement in 4 of 5 cell lines. In 1 cell line that lacked COX-2 gene transcription because of promoter hypermethylation (HCT-116), IHC produced false-positive staining for COX-2 protein expression. Functional COX-2 enzymatic activity was dissociated from relative IHC-based COX-2 protein expression in 2 cell lines (RPMI 2650 and SCCF1). The RPMI 2650 cell line demonstrated strong COX-2 protein expression but minimal PGE2 production. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Western blot is more accurate than IHC for the detection of COX-2 protein in the cell lines studied. Furthermore, the semiquantitative identification of COX-2 protein by IHC or WB does not necessarily correlate with enzymatic activity. Based upon the potential inaccuracy of IHC and dissociation of COX-2 protein expression from enzymatic activity, the practice of instituting treatment of tumors with COX-2 inhibitors based solely on IHC results should be reconsidered.