COVID-19 as a polymorphic inflammatory spectrum of diseases: a review with focus on the brain.

There appear to be huge variations and aberrations in the reported data in COVID-19 2 years now into the pandemic. Conflicting data exist at almost every level and also in the reported epidemiological statistics across different regions. It is becoming clear that COVID-19 is a polymorphic inflammatory spectrum of diseases, and there is a wide range of inflammation-related pathology and symptoms in those infected with the virus. The host's inflammatory response to COVID-19 appears to be determined by genetics, age, immune status, health status and stage of disease. The interplay of these factors may decide the magnitude, duration, types of pathology, symptoms and prognosis in the spectrum of COVID-19 disorders, and whether neuropsychiatric disorders continue to be significant. Early and successful management of inflammation reduces morbidity and mortality in all stages of COVID-19.

Long COVID, neuropsychiatric disorders, psychotropics, present and future.

Long COVID refers to the lingering symptoms which persist or appear after the acute illness. The dominant long COVID symptoms in the two years since the pandemic began (2020-2021) have been depression, anxiety, fatigue, concentration and cognitive impairments with few reports of psychosis. Whether other symptoms will appear later on is not yet known. For example, dopamine-dependent movement disorders generally take many years before first symptoms are seen. Post-stroke depression and anxiety may explain many of the early long COVID cases. Hemorrhagic, hypoxic and inflammatory damages of the central nervous system, unresolved systematic inflammation, metabolic impairment, cerebral vascular accidents such as stroke, hypoxia from pulmonary damages and fibrotic changes are among the major causes of long COVID. Glucose metabolic and hypoxic brain issues likely predispose subjects with pre-existing diabetes, cardiovascular or lung problems to long COVID as well. Preliminary data suggest that psychotropic medications may not be a danger but could instead be beneficial in combating COVID-19 infection. The same is true for diabetes medications such as metformin. Thus, a focus on sigma-1 receptor ligands and glucose metabolism is expected to be useful for new drug development as well as the repurposing of current drugs. The reported protective effects of psychotropics and antihistamines against COVID-19, the earlier reports of reduced number of sigma-1 receptors in post-mortem schizophrenic brains, with many antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs being antihistamines with significant affinity for the sigma-1 receptor, support the role of sigma and histamine receptors in neuroinflammation and viral infections. Literature and data in all these areas are accumulating at a fast rate. We reviewed and discussed the relevant and important literature.

Inflammatory neuropsychiatric disorders and COVID-19 neuroinflammation.

Neuropsychiatric sequalae to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection are beginning to emerge, like previous Spanish influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome episodes. Streptococcal infection in paediatric patients causing obsessive compulsive disorder (PANDAS) is another recent example of an infection-based psychiatric disorder. Inflammation associated with neuropsychiatric disorders has been previously reported but there is no standard clinical management approach established. Part of the reason is that it is unclear what factors determine the specific neuronal vulnerability and the efficacy of anti-inflammatory treatment in neuroinflammation. The emerging COVID-19 data suggested that in the acute stage, widespread neuronal damage appears to be the result of abnormal and overactive immune responses and cytokine storm is associated with poor prognosis. It is still too early to know if there are long-term-specific neuronal or brain regional damages associated with COVID-19, resulting in distinct neuropsychiatric disorders. In several major psychiatric disorders where neuroinflammation is present, patients with abnormal inflammatory markers may also experience less than favourable response or treatment resistance when standard treatment is used alone. Evidence regarding the benefits of co-administered anti-inflammatory agents such as COX-2 inhibitor is encouraging in selected patients though may not benefit others. Disease-modifying therapies are increasingly being applied to neuropsychiatric diseases characterised by abnormal or hyperreactive immune responses. Adjunct anti-inflammatory treatment may benefit selected patients and is definitely an important component of clinical management in the presence of neuroinflammation.

Neurodegeneration, Neuroregeneration, and Neuroprotection in Psychiatric Disorders.

Prevention of deterioration of brain function over time is important in the long-term management of chronic brain disorders such as dementia, schizophrenia, and mood disorders. Although the possibility of neurogenesis in the adult human brain is attractive, and there are psychiatric drugs proven to be effective inducers of neurogenesis in animals, we have yet to see their utility in clinical practice. The terms neurodegeneration and neuroregeneration are often used in a nonspecific manner. Neuroregeneration may mean neurogenesis, dendritogenesis, spinogenesis, or axonogenesis. The term "neuroprotection" is attractive clinically and may involve different mechanisms. Many causative and protective factors of neurodegeneration and neuroregeneration have been proposed. However, the specificity of these factors and agents and differential neuronal vulnerability factors have generally been ignored in past studies. It is also hard to separate disease-modifying from "neuroprotective" effects of a drug. The application of stringent long-term neuroanatomical, neurochemical, neurophysiological, and therapeutic efficacy criteria should improve future research in this important area.

Is neurogenesis relevant in depression and in the mechanism of antidepressant drug action? A critical review.

OBJECTIVES: Major depression is a complex disorder that involves genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in its aetiology. Recent research has suggested that hippocampal neurogenesis may play a role in antidepressant action. However, careful examination of the literature suggests that the complex biological and psychological changes associated with depression cannot be attributed to disturbance in hippocampal neurogenesis alone. While antidepressants may induce hippocampal neurogenesis in non-human primates, there is a paucity of evidence that such effects are sufficient for full therapeutic action in humans. METHODS: This review examines the literature on neurogenesis and discusses the stress-induced cortisol neurotoxicity and antidepressant-induced neurogenesis rescue model of depression. The disparity between a simple antidepressant-induced neurogenesis rescue model in the hippocampus and the complexity of clinical depression is analyzed through critical evaluation of recent research data. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Major depression is a complex brain disorder with multiple symptoms and disturbances reflecting dysfunction in more than one single brain area. Initial research suggesting a model of hippocampal degeneration as basis of depression, and reversal by antidepressants through neurogenesis seems to be over-simplified given the emergence of new data. Synaptogenesis and re-organization or re-integration of new neurons rather than simple addition of new neurons may underlie the role of antidepressant drugs in the reversal of some but not all symptoms in depression. The importance of the neurogenesis hypothesis of depression and antidepressant action lies in stimulating further research into the possible roles played by the new neurons and synapses generated.

Personalized psychopharmacology for the affective disorders and schizophrenia: where is the evidence?

Individualized medicine is the ultimate aim of many medical specialties. Attempts to individualize psychopharmacology have focused on the genetic polymorphisms of neurotransmitter- and CNS-related genes. While there have been numerous reports on the discovery of possible genetic differences in various psychiatric disorders, clinical psychopharmacology has not yet significantly benefited from such data. At present, individualized psychopharmacology in practice is still largely the choice of drugs with the least side effects for a particular patient.

Paroxetine.

BACKGROUND: Paroxetine is a widely used antidepressant that has received attention regarding suicide risk in younger patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to review the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of paroxetine in the affective disorders. METHODS: The authors performed a PubMed search for all literature in English crossing the words 'paroxetine' and 'Paxil' against the words 'serotonin transporter,' 'clinical trials,' 'depression' and 'SSRI'. A search for paroxetine-related information at the FDA website and under the clinical trial register of the GSK website were also performed. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Paroxetine is a serotonin re-uptake inhibitor with good selectivity and no significant active metabolites. Paroxetine is approved (ages >or= 18 years) for the treatment of major depressive disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social anxiety disorder (social phobia), post-traumatic stress disorder, and generalized anxiety disorders. Drug - drug interactions involving the CYP enzyme system have been documented, as well as concern for increased suicidality risk in younger adults and recent FDA alerts regarding teratogenicity, serotonin syndrome and persistent pulmonary hypertension.

Influence of exercise on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations in healthy human subjects.

The effect of short-term exercise (15 min step-exercise) on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels was evaluated in healthy human subjects. Results showed a short-term, significant increase in serum BDNF levels after exercise. Intra-individual differences in serum BDNF levels were remarkably small on the rest day and also when compared to rest values on the day of the exercise test. Inter-individual differences, on the other hand, were larger by comparison. The result of this study supports the need for larger sample size in studies on BDNF changes in psychiatric disorders or psychiatric drug effects.

Modulation of the suppressive effect of corticosterone on adult rat hippocampal cell proliferation by paroxetine.

OBJECTIVE: The literature has shown that cognitive and emotional changes may occur after chronic treatment with glucocorticoids. This might be caused by the suppressive effect of glucocorticoids on hippocampal neurogenesis and cell proliferation. Paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake transporter, is a commonly used antidepressant for alleviation of signs and symptoms of clinical depression. It was discovered to promote hippocampal neurogenesis in the past few years and we wanted to investigate its interaction with glucocorticoid in this study. METHODS: Adult rats were given vehicle, corticosterone, paroxetine, or both corticosterone and paroxetine for 14 d. Cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus was quantified using 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The corticosterone treatment suppressed while paroxetine treatment increased hippocampal cell proliferation. More importantly, paroxetine treatment could reverse the suppressive effect of corticosterone on hippocampal cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: This may have clinic application in preventing hippocampal damage after glucocorticoid treatment.

Corticosteroid decreases subventricular zone cell proliferation, which could be reversed by paroxetine.

PURPOSE: Major depressive disorder is often associated with elevated glucocorticoid levels, which in turn suppress cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Increasing evidence supports that antidepressants induce hippocampal neurogenesis and this induces speculation that decrease in hippocampal neurogenesis has causal relationship with depression. There is, however, a lack of information about neurogenic effects of antidepressants on the subventricular zone, which is another CNS region with continuous neurogenesis throughout adulthood. In the present study, we investigated whether corticosterone and the SSRI paroxetine, have effects on SVZ cell proliferation. METHODS: Rats were treated with the corresponding drugs for 14 days and the proliferating cells were labeled with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). BrdU labeled cells in the SVZ were quantified and analyzed. RESULTS: In the corticosterone-treatment group, cell proliferation was decreased by 18% compared to vehicle-treatment group. Paroxetine-treatment group, in contrast, shows a 34% increase in cell proliferation. The decreased cell proliferation caused by corticosterone was prevented by paroxetine. CONCLUSIONS: Although corticosterone and antidepressants were found to affect cell proliferation in hippocampus, this is the first report to demonstrate that 1) corticosterone decreases cell proliferation in SVZ; 2) paroxetine promotes SVZ cell proliferation and 3) the suppressive effect on SVZ cell proliferation by corticosterone could be attenuated by paroxetine. These findings provide new insights into basic mechanisms of antidepressants, potential impact of steroid therapy on CNS neurogenesis, antidepressant mechanisms of action and potential involvement of the olfactory system in depression.