RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Objectively validated pediatric sleep questionnaires covering a broader age range and different sleep disturbances are lacking, therefore we developed the Sleep Screening Questionnaire Children and Adolescents (SSQ-CA) and compared it with objective sleep parameters. METHODS: This child-reported questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary panel and face validated. In a cross-sectional prospective design, participants aged 6-17, answered the questionnaire twice with 21-28 days in between, wore actigraphy (AG) and kept a sleep diary for seven nights and home-polysomnography (PSG) for one of these nights. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA), reliability and validity assessments were performed. RESULTS: Of the 139 participants, 128 (F:47.7%, AG: n = 128, PSG: n = 59), were included in the analyses. Mean age: 11.3 years (SD: 2.9). EFA revealed 11 factors and 40 items loading above r = 0.4. Subscale internal consistency: 0.54-0.92. Subscale test-retest reliability: r = 0.71-0.87. Total sleep time (TST) from SSQ-CA on weekdays correlated with PSG (r = 0.48, p = 0.001) and with AG (r = 0.75, p < 0.001). The subscale total score for "Sleep duration and latency" correlated with TST from AG (r = -0.19, p = 0.03) and sleep latency (r = 0.31, p < 0.001), but not for PSG variables. The subscale "Awakenings" showed no correlation with objective measures whereas "Circadian rhythm" correlated to AG-derived mid-sleep time (r = 0.34, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The SSQ-CA shows adequate reliability for the 6-17-year-olds and acceptable criterion validity for two subscales. It appears to be a useful tool for screening for sleep disturbances in combination with objective tools as the subjective and objective parameters seem to uncover different aspects of sleep.
