Increase of Cardiac Autoantibodies Against Beta-2-adrenergic Receptor During Acute Cellular Heart Transplant Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) in heart transplant (HTx) recipients may be accompanied by cardiac cell damage with subsequent exposure to cardiac autoantigens and the production of cardiac autoantibodies (aABs). This study aimed to evaluate a peptide array screening approach for cardiac aABs in HTx recipients during ACR (ACR-HTx). METHODS: In this retrospective single-center observational study, sera from 37 HTx recipients, as well as age and sex-matched healthy subjects were screened for a total of 130 cardiac aABs of partially overlapping peptide sequences directed against structural proteins using a peptide array approach. RESULTS: In ACR-HTx, troponin I (TnI) serum levels were found to be elevated. Here, we could identify aABs against beta-2-adrenergic receptor (ß-2AR: EAINCYANETCCDFFTNQAY) to be upregulated in ACR-HTx (intensities: 0.80 versus 1.31, P = 0.0413). Likewise, patients positive for ß-2AR aABs showed higher TnI serum levels during ACR compared with aAB negative patients (10.0 versus 30.0 ng/L, P = 0.0375). Surprisingly, aABs against a sequence of troponin I (TnI: QKIFDLRGKFKRPTLRRV) were found to be downregulated in ACR-HTx (intensities: 3.49 versus 1.13, P = 0.0025). A comparison in healthy subjects showed the same TnI sequence to be upregulated in non-ACR-HTx (intensities: 2.19 versus 3.49, P = 0.0205), whereas the majority of aABs were suppressed in non-ACR-HTx. CONCLUSIONS: Our study served as a feasibility analysis for a peptide array screening approach in HTx recipients during ACR and identified 2 different regulated aABs in ACR-HTx. Hence, further multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic implications of aAB testing and diagnostic or therapeutic consequences.

Oral Anticoagulants after Heart Transplantation-Comparison between Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

AIMS: Patients after heart transplantation (HTX) often require oral anticoagulants (OACs) due to atrial arrhythmias or thromboembolic events but little is known about the post-transplant use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We investigated the frequency, indications, and complications of DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) after HTX. METHODS: We screened all adult patients for the use of post-transplant OACs who underwent HTX at Heidelberg Heart Center between 2000 and 2021. Patients were stratified by type of OAC (DOAC or VKA) and by DOAC agents (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban). Indications for OACs comprised atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, pulmonary embolism, upper and lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, as well as intracardiac thrombus. RESULTS: A total of 115 of 459 HTX recipients (25.1%) required OACs, including 60 patients with DOACs (52.2%) and 55 patients with VKAs (47.8%). Concerning DOACs, 28 patients were treated with rivaroxaban (46.7%), 27 patients with apixaban (45.0%), and 5 patients with edoxaban (8.3%). We found no significant differences between both groups concerning demographics, immunosuppressive drugs, concomitant medications, indications for OACs, ischemic stroke, thromboembolic events, or OAC-related death. Patients with DOACs after HTX had a significantly lower one-year rate of overall bleeding complications (p = 0.002) and a significantly lower one-year rate of gastrointestinal hemorrhage (p = 0.011) compared to patients with VKAs after HTX in the Kaplan-Meier estimator. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs were comparable to VKAs concerning the risk of ischemic stroke, thromboembolic events, or OAC-related death but were associated with significantly fewer bleeding complications in HTX recipients.

Hemodynamic markers of pulmonary vasculopathy for prediction of early right heart failure and mortality after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is broadly accepted as an imminent risk factor for mortality after heart transplantation (HTx). However, no current HTx recipient risk score includes PVR or other hemodynamic parameters. This study examined the utility of various hemodynamic parameters for risk stratification in a contemporary HTx population. METHODS: Patients from seven German HTx centers undergoing HTx between 2011 and 2015 were included retrospectively. Established risk factors and complete hemodynamic datasets before HTx were analyzed. Outcome measures were overall all-cause mortality, 12-month mortality, and right heart failure (RHF) after HTx. RESULTS: The final analysis included 333 patients (28% female) with a median age of 54 (IQR 46-60) years. The median mean pulmonary artery pressure was 30 (IQR 23-38) mm Hg, transpulmonary gradient 8 (IQR 5-10) mm Hg, and PVR 2.1 (IQR 1.5-2.9) Wood units. Overall mortality was 35.7%, 12-month mortality was 23.7%, and the incidence of early RHF was 22.8%, which was significantly associated with overall mortality (log-rank HR 4.11, 95% CI 2.47-6.84; log-rank p < .0001). Pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) was associated with overall mortality (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.25-2.30; p < .001) independent of other non-hemodynamic risk factors. Ea values below a calculated cutoff represented a significantly reduced mortality risk (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.76; p < .0001). PVR with the established cutoff of 3.0 WU was not significant. Ea was also significantly associated with 12-month mortality and RHF. CONCLUSIONS: Ea showed a strong impact on post-transplant mortality and RHF and should become part of the routine hemodynamic evaluation in HTx candidates.

Frequency, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes of Late-Onset Atrial Flutter in Patients after Heart Transplantation.

Aims: Atrial flutter (AFL) is a common late-onset complication after heart transplantation (HTX) and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Methods: This study investigated the frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of late-onset post-transplant AFL. We analyzed 639 adult patients undergoing HTX at the Heidelberg Heart Center between 1989 and 2019. Patients were stratified by diagnosis and type of late-onset post-transplant AFL (>90 days after HTX). Results: A total of 55 patients (8.6%) were diagnosed with late-onset post-transplant AFL, 30 had typical AFL (54.5%) and 25 had atypical AFL (45.5%). Patients with AFL were younger at HTX (p = 0.028), received more biatrial anastomosis (p = 0.001), and presented with moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (56.4%). Typical AFL was associated with graft rejection (p = 0.016), whereas atypical AFL was associated with coronary artery disease (p = 0.028) and stent implantation (p = 0.042). Patients with atypical AFL showed a higher all-cause 1-year mortality (p = 0.010) along with a higher rate of graft failure after diagnosis of AFL (p = 0.023). Recurrence of AFL was high (83.6%). Patients with catheter ablation after AFL recurrence had a higher 1-year freedom from AFL (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Patients with late-onset post-transplant AFL were younger at HTX, received more biatrial anastomosis, and showed a higher rate of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation. Typical AFL was associated with graft rejection, whereas atypical AFL was associated with myocardial ischemia, graft failure, and mortality. Catheter ablation represents a viable option to avoid further episodes of late-onset AFL after HTX.

Pre-transplant Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated With Higher Graft Failure and Increased 5-Year Mortality After Heart Transplantation.

Aims: Cardiac transplant recipients often suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) but its influence on graft failure and post-transplant mortality remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of pre-transplant T2DM in patients after heart transplantation (HTX). Methods: This study included a total of 376 adult patients who received HTX at Heidelberg Heart Center between 01/01/2000 and 01/10/2016. HTX recipients were stratified by diagnosis of T2DM at the time of HTX. Patients with T2DM were further subdivided by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ≥ 7.0%). Analysis included donor and recipient data, immunosuppressive drugs, concomitant medications, post-transplant mortality, and causes of death. Five-year post-transplant mortality was further assessed by multivariate analysis (Cox regression) and Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results: About one-third of all HTX recipients had T2DM (121 of 376 [32.2%]). Patients with T2DM showed an increased 5-year post-transplant mortality (41.3% versus 29.8%; P = 0.027) and had a higher percentage of death due to graft failure (14.9% versus 7.8%; P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis showed T2DM (HR: 1.563; 95% CI: 1.053-2.319; P = 0.027) as an independent risk factor for 5-year mortality after HTX. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly better 5-year post-transplant survival of patients with T2DM and a HbA1c < 7.0% than patients with T2DM and a HbA1c ≥ 7.0% (68.7% versus 46.3%; P = 0.008) emphasizing the clinical relevance of a well-controlled T2DM in HTX recipients. Conclusion: Pre-transplant T2DM is associated with higher graft failure and increased 5-year mortality after HTX.

Five-year results of heart rate control with ivabradine or metoprolol succinate in patients after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac graft denervation causes inadequate sinus tachycardia in patients after heart transplantation (HTX) which is associated with reduced survival. This study investigated the 5-year results of heart rate control with ivabradine or metoprolol succinate in patients after HTX. METHODS: This registry study analyzed 104 patients receiving either ivabradine (n = 50) or metoprolol succinate (n = 54) within 5 years after HTX. Analysis included patient characteristics, medication, echocardiographic features, cardiac catheterization data, cardiac biomarkers, heart rates, and post-transplant survival including causes of death. RESULTS: Demographics and post-transplant medication revealed no significant differences except for ivabradine and metoprolol succinate use. At 5-year follow-up, patients with ivabradine had a significantly lower heart rate (73.3 bpm) compared to baseline (88.6 bpm; P < 0.01) and to metoprolol succinate (80.4 bpm; P < 0.01), a reduced left ventricular mass (154.8 g) compared to baseline (179.5 g; P < 0.01) and to metoprolol succinate (177.3 g; P < 0.01), a lower left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP; 12.0 mmHg) compared to baseline (15.5 mmHg; P < 0.01) and to metoprolol succinate (17.1 mmHg; P < 0.01), and a reduced NT-proBNP level (525.4 pg/ml) compared to baseline (3826.3 pg/ml; P < 0.01) and to metoprolol succinate (1038.9 pg/ml; P < 0.01). Five-year post-transplant survival was significantly better in patients with ivabradine (90.0%) versus metoprolol succinate (68.5%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving ivabradine showed a superior heart rate reduction and a better left ventricular diastolic function along with an improved 5-year survival after HTX.

Performance, clinical effectiveness, and safety of immunoadsorption in a wide range of indications.

Immunoadsorption is well known to selectively remove immunoglobulins and immune complexes from plasma and is applied in a variety of autoimmune diseases and for desensitization before, or at acute rejection after organ transplantation. Performance, safety, and clinical effectiveness of immunoadsorption were the aim of this study. This prospective, noninterventional, multicentre cohort study included patients treated with immunoadsorption (Immunosorba or GLOBAFFIN adsorbers) for any indication. Clinical effectiveness was assessed after termination of the patient's individual treatment schedule. Eighty-one patients were included, 69 were treated with Immunosorba, 11 with GLOBAFFIN, one patient with both adsorbers. A majority of patients was treated for neurological indications, dilated cardiomyopathy, and before or after kidney or heart transplantation. Mean IgG reduction from pre- to post-treatment was 69.9% ± 11.5% for Immunosorba and 74.1% ± 5.0% for GLOBAFFIN, respectively. The overall IgG reduction over a complete treatment block was 68%-93% with Immunosorba and 62%-90% with GLOBAFFIN depending on the duration of the overall treatment. After termination of the immunoadsorption therapy, an improvement of clinical status was observed in 63.0%, stabilization of symptoms in 29.6%, and a deterioration in 4.9% of patients. Changes in fibrinogen, thrombocytes, and albumin were mostly classified as noncritical. Overall, the treatments were well tolerated. Immunoadsorption in routine clinical practice with both GLOBAFFIN and Immunosorba has been safely performed, was well tolerated by patients, and effective in lowering immunoglobulins with an improvement or maintenance of clinical status, thus represents an additional therapeutic option for therapy refractory immune disorders.

Risk Factors, Treatment and Prognosis of Patients with Lung Cancer after Heart Transplantation.

Long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTX) is impacted by adverse effects of immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy, and post-transplant lung cancer is a common occurrence. This study aimed to examine the risk factors, treatment, and prognosis of patients with post-transplant lung cancer. We included 625 adult patients who received HTX at Heidelberg Heart Center between 1989 and 2018. Patients were stratified by diagnosis and staging of lung cancer after HTX. Analysis comprised donor and recipient characteristics, medications including immunosuppressive drugs, and survival after diagnosis of lung cancer. A total of 41 patients (6.6%) were diagnosed with lung cancer after HTX, 13 patients received curative care and 28 patients had palliative care. Mean time from HTX until diagnosis of lung cancer was 8.6 ± 4.0 years and 1.8 ± 2.7 years from diagnosis of lung cancer until last follow-up. Twenty-four patients (58.5%) were switched to an mTOR-inhibitor after diagnosis of lung cancer. Multivariate analysis showed recipient age (HR: 1.05; CI: 1.01-1.10; p = 0.02), COPD (HR: 3.72; CI: 1.88-7.37; p < 0.01), and history of smoking (HR: 20.39; CI: 2.73-152.13; p < 0.01) as risk factors for post-transplant lung cancer. Patients in stages I and II had a significantly better 1-year (100.0% versus 3.6%), 2-year (69.2% versus 0.0%), and 5-year survival (53.8% versus 0.0%) than patients in stages III and IV (p < 0.01). Given the poor prognosis of late-stage post-transplant lung cancer, routine reassessment of current smoking status, providing smoking cessation support, and intensified lung cancer screening in high-risk HTX recipients are advisable.

Atrial fibrillation before heart transplantation is a risk factor for post-transplant atrial fibrillation and mortality.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) after heart transplantation (HTX) is associated with worse clinical outcomes. The current study aimed to analyse the association between AF before HTX and AF within 30 days after HTX. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 639 adults who received HTX at Heidelberg Heart Center. Patients were subdivided into four groups depending on the status of AF before and after HTX. Analyses comprised recipient and donor data, medication, echocardiographic features, permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke, and mortality after HTX. Three hundred thirty-two patients (52.0%) had neither AF before nor after HTX, 15 patients (2.3%) had no AF before HTX but showed AF after HTX, 219 patients (34.3%) showed AF before HTX but had no AF after HTX, and 73 patients (11.4%) had AF before and after HTX. Patients with AF before and after HTX had a higher 1 year post-transplant mortality (39.7%) than patients without AF before or after HTX (18.1%, P < 0.01). Secondary outcomes showed a higher percentage of enlarged atria, ventricular dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, 1-year stroke, and 1-year permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with AF before and after HTX. Multivariate analysis revealed a six-fold elevated risk for post-transplant AF in patients with AF before HTX (hazard ratio: 6.59, confidence interval: 3.72-11.65; P < 0.01). Further risk factors for post-transplant AF were higher donor age and prolonged ischaemic time, whereas total orthotopic HTX was associated with a two-fold lower risk for post-transplant AF. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation before HTX is a risk factor for post-transplant AF, permanent pacemaker implantation, and mortality after HTX.

Newly acquired complete right bundle branch block early after heart transplantation is associated with lower survival.

AIMS: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) after heart transplantation (HTX) is a common finding, but its impact on post-transplant survival remains uncertain. This study investigated the post-transplant outcomes of patients with complete RBBB (cRBBB) ≤ 30 days after HTX. METHODS: This registry study analysed 639 patients receiving HTX at Heidelberg Heart Center between 1989 and 2019. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of cRBBB ≤ 30 days after HTX. Analysis included recipient and donor data, medication, echocardiographic features, graft rejections, atrial fibrillation, heart rates, permanent pacemaker implantation and mortality after HTX including causes of death. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients showed cRBBB ≤ 30 days after HTX (21.8%), 20 patients with pre-existing cRBBB in the donor heart (3.2%) and 119 patients with newly acquired cRBBB (18.6%). Patients with newly acquired cRBBB had a worse 1-year post-transplant survival (36.1%, P < 0.01) compared with patients with pre-existing cRBBB (85.0%) or without cRBBB (86.4%), along with a higher percentage of death due to graft failure (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis indicated cRBBB ≤ 30 days after HTX as significant risk factor for 1-year mortality after HTX (HR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.68-2.87; P < 0.01). Secondary outcomes showed a higher rate of an enlarged right atrium (P = 0.01), enlarged right ventricle (P < 0.01), reduced right ventricular function (P < 0.01), 30-day atrial fibrillation (P < 0.01) and 1-year permanent pacemaker implantation (P = 0.02) in patients with cRBBB after HTX. CONCLUSIONS: Newly acquired cRBBB early after HTX is associated with increased post-transplant mortality.

Combined amiodarone and digitalis therapy before heart transplantation is associated with increased post-transplant mortality.

AIMS: Amiodarone and digitalis are frequently used drugs in patients with heart failure. Both have separately been linked to reduced post-transplant survival, but their combined impact on mortality after HTX remains uncertain. This study investigated the effects of combined amiodarone and digitalis use before HTX on post-transplant outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This registry study analysed 600 patients receiving HTX at Heidelberg Heart Center between 1989 and 2016. Patients were stratified by amiodarone and digitalis use before HTX. Analysis included patient characteristics, medication, echocardiographic features, heart rates, permanent pacemaker implantation, atrial fibrillation, and post-transplant survival including causes of death. One hundred eighteen patients received amiodarone before HTX (19.7%), hereof 67 patients with digitalis (56.8%) and 51 patients without digitalis before HTX (43.2%). Patients with and without amiodarone before HTX showed a similar 1 year post-transplant survival (72.0% vs. 78.4%, P = 0.11), but patients with combined amiodarone and digitalis before HTX had a worse 1 year post-transplant survival (64.2%, P = 0.01), along with a higher percentage of death due to transplant failure (P = 0.03). Echocardiographic analysis of these patients showed a higher percentage of an enlarged right ventricle (P = 0.02), left atrium (P = 0.02), left ventricle (P = 0.03), and a higher rate of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis indicated combined amiodarone and digitalis use before HTX as a significant risk factor for 1 year mortality after HTX (hazard ratio: 1.69; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-2.77; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Combined pre-transplant amiodarone and digitalis therapy is associated with increased post-transplant mortality.

Elevated pre-transplant pulmonary vascular resistance is associated with early post-transplant atrial fibrillation and mortality.

AIMS: Severely elevated pre-transplant pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) has been linked to adverse effects after heart transplantation (HTX). The impact of a moderately increased PVR before HTX on post-transplant outcomes remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of an elevated pre-transplant PVR ≥ 300 dyn·s·cm-5 (≥3.75 Wood units) on outcomes after HTX. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational retrospective single-centre study included 561 patients receiving HTX at Heidelberg Heart Center between 1989 and 2015. Patients were stratified by degree of pre-transplant PVR. Analyses covered demographics, post-transplant medication, mortality and causes of death after HTX, early post-transplant atrial fibrillation (AF), and length of the initial hospital stay after HTX. Ninety-four patients (16.8%) had a PVR ≥ 300 dyn·s·cm-5 (≥3.75 Wood units). These patients had a higher rate of early post-transplant AF [20.2 vs. 10.7%, difference: 9.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-18.1%, P = 0.01] and an increased 30 day post-transplant mortality (25.5 vs. 6.4%, hazard ratio: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.6-7.6, P < 0.01), along with a higher percentage of death due to transplant failure (21.2 vs. 4.1%, difference: 17.1%, 95% CI: 8.7-25.5%, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed a PVR ≥ 300 dyn·s·cm-5 (≥3.75 Wood units) as a significant risk factor for increased 30 day mortality after HTX (hazard ratio: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.5-7.6, P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier estimator showed a lower 2 year survival after HTX (P < 0.01) in patients with a PVR ≥ 300 dyn·s·cm-5 (≥3.75 Wood units). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated pre-transplant PVR ≥ 300 dyn·s·cm-5 (≥3.75 Wood units) is associated with early post-transplant AF and increased mortality after HTX.

Risk factors and survival of patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after heart transplantation (HTX) may be required due to severe bradycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors, indications, perioperative outcomes and complications of PPM implantation after HTX as well as the underlying effect on post-transplant mortality including causes of death. METHODS: This registry study included 621 patients receiving HTX at Heidelberg Heart Center between 1989 and 2018. Patients were stratified by PPM implantation after HTX. Data analysis of risk factors for PPM implantation included donor and recipient demographics, post-transplant medication, mortality, and causes of death. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (5.8%) received PPM implantation after HTX, 12 (33.3%) with early PPM and 24 (66.7%) with late PPM. Indications for PPM implantation after HTX included sinus node dysfunction (SND) (n=15; 41.7%) and atrioventricular block (AVB) (n=21; 58.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed recipient body mass index (BMI) [hazard ratio (HR): 1.10; confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.21; P=0.03], donor age (HR: 1.07; CI: 1.03-1.10; P<0.01), and biatrial HTX (HR: 2.63; CI: 1.22-5.68; P=0.01) as significant risk factors for PPM implantation after HTX. Kaplan-Meier estimator displayed a statistically significant inferior 5-year post-transplant survival among patients with early PPM after HTX in comparison to patients with late PPM or no PPM after HTX (P<0.01) along with a higher percentage of death due to infection (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate risk factors for PPM implantation after HTX include recipient BMI, donor age, and biatrial HTX. Early PPM implantation after HTX is associated with increased 5-year post-transplant mortality due to infection.

COPD in patients after heart transplantation is associated with a prolonged hospital stay, early posttransplant atrial fibrillation, and impaired posttransplant survival.

OBJECTIVES: COPD is associated with reduced physical activity, an increased risk for pulmonary infections, and impaired survival in nontransplant patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of COPD in patients after heart transplantation (HTX). METHODS: We performed an observational retrospective single-center study of 259 patients receiving HTX at Heidelberg University Hospital between 2003 and 2012. Patients were stratified by the Tiffeneau index (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity [FEV1/FVC]) <0.70 before HTX. The analysis included demographics, posttransplant medication, length of the initial hospital stay after HTX, early posttransplant atrial fibrillation (AF), mortality, and causes of death. RESULTS: In total, 63 (24.3%) patients had an FEV1/FVC <0.70. These patients showed a prolonged hospital stay after HTX (52.0 days vs 43.4 days, mean difference (MD) = 8.6 days, 95% CI: 0.2, 17.0 days), a higher rate of early posttransplant AF (19.0% vs 8.2%, MD = 10.8%, 95% CI: 0.4%, 21.2%), and an increased 30-day mortality (9.5% vs 2.6%, HR = 3.79, 95% CI: 1.16, 12.40). Kaplan- Meier analysis showed a significant inferior 5-year survival in patients with an FEV1/FVC <0.70, along with a higher percentage of death due to transplant failure and infection/sepsis. In addition, a multivariate analysis for mortality within 5 years after HTX indicated an FEV1/FVC <0.70 as a significant risk factor for impaired 5-year posttransplant survival (HR =4.77, 95% CI: 2.76, 8.22). CONCLUSION: COPD in patients after HTX is associated with a prolonged hospital stay, early posttransplant AF, and impaired posttransplant survival.

Improved outcomes after heart transplantation for cardiac amyloidosis in the modern era.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis, caused most commonly by deposition of light chain (AL) or transthyretin (ATTR) type fibrils, has an extremely poor prognosis. In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated temporal trends in survival after heart transplantation for cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS: We analyzed 48 patients with cardiac amyloidosis (AL, n = 32; familial ATTR, n = 16) who underwent heart transplantation from May 2002 to March 2017. Patients were analysed in 2 periods, Era 1 (2002- 2007) and Era 2 (2008- 2017), separated by altered patient selection in both, AL and ATTR amyloidosis, and changed chemotherapy regimens for AL amyloidosis. RESULTS: The modern era was characterized by a lower number of extracardiac organ involvement for AL (94% isolated cardiac amyloidosis in Era 2 vs 56% in Era 1; p = 0.0221), and more frequent treatment for AL with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (94% in Era 2 vs 6% in Era 1; p < 0.0001). AL patients had significantly lower survival than patients with non-amyloid cardiomyopathy after heart transplantation in Era 1, and ATTR patients had numerically lower survival. However, survival in the modern era was comparable to non-amyloid transplants in both cohorts, possibly reflecting a shift in chemotherapy strategies and patient selection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the current era, use of enhanced chemotherapy regimens for isolated advanced AL cardiac amyloidosis was associated with outcomes comparable to non-amyloid cardiomyopathy. We conclude that heart transplantation in highly selected patients with isolated non-systemic advanced cardiac amyloidosis may be a feasible approach.

Control of cardiac chronotropic function in patients after heart transplantation: effects of ivabradine and metoprolol succinate on resting heart rate in the denervated heart.

BACKGROUND: Patients after heart transplantation (HTX) present with sinus tachycardia due to graft denervation. As elevated heart rates negatively affect survival, the aim of this study was to analyze the effects of ivabradine vs metoprolol succinate on heart rate, left ventricular (LV) mass and survival following HTX. METHODS: This observational retrospective single-center study assessed 84 patients continuously receiving either ivabradine (n = 40) or metoprolol succinate (n = 44) within 2 years after HTX. Patients with dual therapy (ivabradine and metoprolol succinate), other beta blockers, amiodarone, or digitalis were excluded. Patient characteristics, post-transplant medication, heart rates, LV mass, and survival were investigated. RESULTS: Analysis of patient characteristics, immunosuppressive drug regimen, and post-transplant medication showed no significant differences between groups except for ivabradine and metoprolol succinate. Baseline heart rates differed not significantly between patients treated with ivabradine [87.0 beats per minute (bpm)] and metoprolol succinate (86.2 bpm; P = 0.6395). At 2-year follow-up, patients with ivabradine (76.7 bpm) had a significantly lower heart rate compared to baseline (P < 0.0001) and to metoprolol succinate (82.0 bpm; P = 0.0283). LV mass in patients receiving ivabradine was lower at 2-year follow-up compared to baseline (P = 0.0067) and patients receiving metoprolol succinate (P = 0.0179). Patients with ivabradine had a superior 2-year survival after HTX (P = 0.0049). CONCLUSION: Treatment with ivabradine in patients within 2 years after HTX significantly reduced post-transplant heart rate and LV mass and was associated with a superior survival in comparison with patients receiving metoprolol succinate.

Chronic digitalis therapy in patients before heart transplantation is an independent risk factor for increased posttransplant mortality.

OBJECTIVES: Digitalis therapy (digoxin or digitoxin) in patients with heart failure is subject to an ongoing debate. Recent data suggest an increased mortality in patients receiving digitalis. This study investigated the effects of chronic digitalis therapy prior to heart transplantation (HTX) on posttransplant outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study. It comprised 530 adult patients who were heart-transplanted at Heidelberg University Hospital between 1989 and 2012. Patients with digitalis prior to HTX (≥3 months) were compared to those without (no or <3 months of digitalis). Patients with digitalis were further subdivided into patients receiving digoxin or digitoxin. Primary outcomes were early posttransplant atrial fibrillation and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 347 patients (65.5%) had digitalis before HTX. Of these, 180 received digoxin (51.9%) and 167 received digitoxin (48.1%). Patients with digitalis before HTX had a significantly lower 30-day (P=0.0148) and 2-year (P=0.0473) survival. There was no significant difference between digoxin and digitoxin in 30-day (P=0.9466) or 2-year (P=0.0723) survival. Multivariate analysis for posttransplant 30-day mortality showed pretransplant digitalis therapy as an independent risk factor (hazard ratio =2.097, CI: 1.036-4.248, P=0.0397). Regarding atrial fibrillation in the early posttransplant period, there was neither a statistically significant difference between patients with and without digitalis (P=0.1327) nor between patients with digoxin or digitoxin (P=0.5867). CONCLUSION: Digitalis in patients before HTX is an independent risk factor for increased posttransplant mortality.

Comparison of posttransplant outcomes in patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Major concerns about the safety of pretransplant amiodarone use have been raised. As a result of its long half-life, the cardiac allograft is exposed to amiodarone posing potential risks such as bradycardia, requirement for pacemaker implantation, or increased mortality after heart transplantation (HTX). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the posttransplant outcomes of patients with no, acute, or chronic amiodarone use before HTX. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 530 adult patients who received HTX between 06/1989 and 12/2012. Patients were stratified by their amiodarone therapy before HTX: no continuous amiodarone use (≤90 days before HTX), acute amiodarone use (≤90 days before HTX), and chronic amiodarone use (>90 days before HTX). Differences between the 3 groups in demographics, posttransplant medication, echocardiographic features, heart rates including occurrences of bradycardia, permanent pacemaker implantation, atrial fibrillation (AF), and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (77.7%) were in the "no amiodarone" group, 23 patients (4.4%) in the "acute amiodarone" group, and 95 patients (17.9%) in the "chronic amiodarone" group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.5819), heart rates including occurrence of bradycardia during posttransplant week 1 (P=0.0979 and P=0.2695), week 2 (P=0.1214 and P=0.8644), week 3 (P=0.1033 and P=0.8894), and week 4 (P=0.2892 and P=0.8644), permanent pacemaker implantation within 30-day (P=0.8644), or overall follow-up after HTX (P=0.8664) were not significant between groups. Patients with chronic pretransplant amiodarone therapy had the lowest rate of early posttransplant AF (P=0.0065). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in 30-day (P=0.8656), 1-year (P=1.0000), 2-year (P=0.8763), 5-year (P=0.5174), or overall posttransplant follow-up mortality (P=0.1936). CONCLUSION: Administration of acute or chronic pretransplant amiodarone was not related to an increased occurrence of bradycardia, requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation, or mortality after HTX. Importantly, chronic amiodarone use effectively reduced early AF after HTX, whereas acute amiodarone use showed no such effect.

Renal function in heart transplant patients after switch to combined mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and calcineurin inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUND: A calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression combined with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORs) seems to be attractive in patients after heart transplantation (HTX) in special clinical situations, for example, in patients with adverse drug effects of prior immunosuppression. Previous studies in patients after HTX detected advantageous effects regarding renal function of a tacrolimus (TAC)-based vs cyclosporine-A (CSA)-based immunosuppression (in combination with mycophenolate mofetil). However, data regarding renal function after HTX in mTOR/CNI patients remain limited. AIM: Primary end point of the present study was to analyze renal function in HTX patients 1 year after switch to an mTOR/CNI-based immunosuppression. METHODS: Data of 80 HTX patients after change to mTOR/CNI-based immunosuppression were retrospectively analyzed. Renal function was assessed by measured serum creatinine and by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated from Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received mTOR/CSA-based treatment and 51 patients received mTOR/TAC-based therapy. At time of switch and at 1-year follow-up, serum creatinine and eGFR did not differ significantly between both study groups (all P=not statistically significant). Analysis of variances with repeated measurements detected a similar change of renal function in both study groups. CONCLUSION: The present study detected no significant differences between both mTOR/CNI study groups, indicating a steady state of renal function in HTX patients after switch of immunosuppressive regimen.