Thrombelastography monitoring of resistance to enoxaparin anticoagulation in thrombophilic pregnancy patients.

The anticoagulant effect of enoxaparin is readily observed by Thrombelastography (TEG), particularly on the reaction time (R) to form a clot, and is completely reversed by heparinase. In this study, recalcified citrated whole blood with heparinase (CNHR) and without (CNR), along with TEG R time, was used to derive a delta R (CNR-CNHR). This delta R (DeltaR) was then used to measure enoxaparin anticoagulation, which was correlated by linear regression (r(2)=0.806) with plasma anti-Xa in 48 thrombophilic pregnancy patients. In a follow up study whole blood from 15 thrombophilic and 15 normal pregnancy subjects was titrated ex vivo with enoxaparin and TEG DeltaR determined. Linear dose responses (all r(2)>0.9) of DeltaR versus plasma enoxaparin concentration were obtained for each subject. A large variation in slope was observed for both thrombophilic (>7 fold, 217 to 1,588 s DeltaR/unit anti-Xa) and normal (>3 fold, 788 to 2,758) pregnancy subjects. The average slope for the thrombophilic group (710 s DeltaR/unit anti-Xa) was significantly (P=0.002) lower than the normal pregnancy group (1,354 s), indicating resistance to enoxaparin anticoagulation in the thrombophilic group. This technique may help gauge the appropriate dose of enoxaparin for each individual, check for residual anticoagulation before invasive procedures, and perhaps help screen for thrombophilic subjects.

Prospective evaluation of platelet B2 bradykinin and thrombopoietin receptor levels from preeclamptic compared to non-preeclamptic pregnancy patients.

Our recent study determined a difference between preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic patients in platelet potentiation by thrombopoietin (TPO) of reactivity to collagen. The main conclusion was that non-preeclamptic, but not preeclamptic, pregnancy patients' platelets showed significant TPO potentiation at first and third trimesters. Since TPO or B2 Bradykinin platelet receptor levels might influence TPO potentiation, we obtained platelet samples from 187 first trimester pregnant patients prospectively followed through pregnancy. Patients were additionally sampled at third trimester, delivery, and 4 to 6 weeks postpartum. A total of 43 patients, including 11 diagnosed as preeclamptic at third trimester, were sampled at least three different times. We used Western blotting normalized with glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase as a loading and staining control. There were no significant differences in relative receptor levels between groups or sampling times using repeated measures ANOVA with the mixed model allowing for missing samples. While the mechanism for differences in thrombopoietin potentiation of platelet activation by collagen remains unknown, it may be a first trimester indicator of developing preeclampsia.

Lack of thrombopoietin potentiation of platelet collagen activation in the first trimester is associated with preeclampsia.

To determine whether a difference exists in platelet reactivity to collagen and potentiation by thrombopoietin (TPO) between preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic patients, 187 first trimester pregnant patients were prospectively followed through pregnancy. Citrated blood, drawn at first (<14 weeks estimated gestational age) and third trimesters (>28 weeks), when patients were admitted for delivery, and 4-6 weeks postpartum, was assayed by a Whole Blood Impedance Aggregometer measuring platelet activation by 0.4 mug/ml collagen, +/-10 ng/ml TPO. There was no significant difference in 1st trimester platelet collagen activation by unpaired t-test between groups. Significant TPO potentiation of collagen activation (P<0.05, paired t-test) was observed in non-preeclamptic patients at the first and third trimesters. In contrast, preeclamptic patients' platelets show no significant (P>0.8, paired t-test) TPO potentiation at any time. While the mechanism for this difference in thrombopoietin potentiation of platelet activation by collagen as early as the first trimester is unknown, it may be one of the initiating events in this syndrome.