RESUMO
This article aims to provide an overview of common and high-impact medical emergencies that require prompt and effective infectious diseases management. In the described clinical scenarios of malaria, sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, and meningitis the authors have emphasized the crucial importance of rapid and accurate diagnosis, as well as appropriate treatment from the perspective of infectious diseases. All of these emergencies demand a high degree of clinical suspicion for accurate diagnosis. Some of them also necessitate the involvement of other medical disciplines, such as neurology in the case of meningitis or surgery for necrotizing fasciitis. Additionally, implementing the right empiric antibiotic regimen or, in the case of malaria, antiparasitic treatment is crucial for improving patient outcomes. As patients with these diagnoses may present at any outpatient department, and efficient and quick management is essential, a deep understanding of diagnostic algorithms and potential pitfalls is of the utmost importance.
Assuntos
Fasciite Necrosante , Sepse , Humanos , Fasciite Necrosante/diagnóstico , Fasciite Necrosante/terapia , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/terapia , Emergências , Malária/diagnóstico , Malária/terapia , Colaboração Intersetorial , Meningite/diagnóstico , Meningite/terapia , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Doenças Transmissíveis/terapia , AlgoritmosRESUMO
This article aims to provide an overview of common and high-impact medical emergencies that require prompt and effective infectious diseases management. In the described clinical scenarios of malaria, sepsis, necrotizing fasciitis, and meningitis the authors have emphasized the crucial importance of rapid and accurate diagnosis, as well as appropriate treatment from the perspective of infectious diseases. All of these emergencies demand a high degree of clinical suspicion for accurate diagnosis. Some of them also necessitate the involvement of other medical disciplines, such as neurology in the case of meningitis or surgery for necrotizing fasciitis. Additionally, implementing the right empiric antibiotic regimen or, in the case of malaria, antiparasitic treatment is crucial for improving patient outcomes. As patients with these diagnoses may present at any outpatient department, and efficient and quick management is essential, a deep understanding of diagnostic algorithms and potential pitfalls is of the utmost importance.
Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Fasciite Necrosante , Malária , Meningite , Humanos , Doenças Transmissíveis/diagnóstico , Emergências , Fasciite Necrosante/diagnóstico , Malária/diagnóstico , Meningite/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment duration for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) bacteraemia is still a matter of debate. The aim of the present study was to compare short-course (≤9 days) and long-course (≥10 days) antibiotic treatments in hospitalized adult patients with uncomplicated VRE bacteraemia. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in four university hospitals in Germany. Adult patients with a positive blood culture for a VRE were screened from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Only patients who received a VRE-active antibiotic for at least 48 hours were included. The exclusion criteria were a survival of <10 days and a deep-seated source of infection requiring prolonged treatment. To compare the outcome of short-course therapy with that of long-course therapy, 30-day and 90-day overall mortality, relapse within 90 days, duration of hospitalization, and potential antibiotic-related adverse events were analysed by inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score and by additional covariate adjustment. RESULTS: Of the 363 patients screened, 219 (60.3%) patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 48 (21.9%) patients had underlying haematological diseases. Seventy-eight (35.6%) patients received short-course treatment (median, 7 days; interquartile range, 5-8 days) and 141 (64.4%) patients received long-course treatment (median, 15 days; interquartile range, 12-23.5 days). Thirty-day mortality was similar in both groups (19.2% vs. 22.0%; adjusted OR, 1.15; p 0.773). Duration of hospitalization (in total and after onset of bacteraemia) was significantly shorter (p < 0.05) in the short-course treatment group, whereas other secondary outcome parameters did not differ between both groups. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that short-course treatment might not be associated with a worse outcome in patients with uncomplicated VRE bacteraemia.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina , Adulto , Humanos , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologiaRESUMO
Infection control measures and travel restrictions implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic have limited the transmission of seasonal influenza viruses as well. It must be assumed that after these public health measures have largely been lifted, influenza activity will sharply increase in the coming influenza season. Anticipating the potentially high number of cases, the co-circulation of influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2, efforts to increase vaccination rates against both infectious diseases must be given more attention.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Estações do AnoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Symptoms often persistent for more than 4 weeks after COVID-19-now commonly referred to as 'Long COVID'. Independent of initial disease severity or pathological pulmonary functions tests, fatigue, exertional intolerance and dyspnea are among the most common COVID-19 sequelae. We hypothesized that respiratory muscle dysfunction might be prevalent in persistently symptomatic patients after COVID-19 with self-reported exercise intolerance. METHODS: In a small cross-sectional pilot study (n = 67) of mild-to-moderate (nonhospitalized) and moderate-to-critical convalescent (formerly hospitalized) patients presenting to our outpatient clinic approx. 5 months after acute infection, we measured neuroventilatory activity P0.1, inspiratory muscle strength (PImax) and total respiratory muscle strain (P0.1/PImax) in addition to standard pulmonary functions tests, capillary blood gas analysis, 6 min walking tests and functional questionnaires. RESULTS: Pathological P0.1/PImax was found in 88% of symptomatic patients. Mean PImax was reduced in hospitalized patients, but reduced PImax was also found in 65% of nonhospitalized patients. Mean P0.1 was pathologically increased in both groups. Increased P0.1 was associated with exercise-induced deoxygenation, impaired exercise tolerance, decreased activity and productivity and worse Post-COVID-19 functional status scale. Pathological changes in P0.1, PImax or P0.1/PImax were not associated with pre-existing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point towards respiratory muscle dysfunction as a novel aspect of COVID-19 sequelae. Thus, we strongly advocate for systematic respiratory muscle testing during the diagnostic workup of persistently symptomatic, convalescent COVID-19 patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicações , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Músculos Respiratórios/fisiologia , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-AgudaRESUMO
COVID-19 is a respiratory tract infection that can affect multiple organ systems. Predicting the severity and clinical outcome of individual patients is a major unmet clinical need that remains challenging due to intra- and inter-patient variability. Here, we longitudinally profiled and integrated more than 150 clinical, laboratory, and immunological parameters of 173 patients with mild to fatal COVID-19. Using systems biology, we detected progressive dysregulation of multiple parameters indicative of organ damage that correlated with disease severity, particularly affecting kidneys, hepatobiliary system, and immune landscape. By performing unsupervised clustering and trajectory analysis, we identified T and B cell depletion as early indicators of a complicated disease course. In addition, markers of hepatobiliary damage emerged as robust predictor of lethal outcome in critically ill patients. This allowed us to propose a novel clinical COVID-19 SeveriTy (COST) score that distinguishes complicated disease trajectories and predicts lethal outcome in critically ill patients.
RESUMO
While several studies have described the clinical course of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), direct comparisons with patients with seasonal influenza are scarce. We compared 166 patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between February 27 and June 14, 2020, and 255 patients with seasonal influenza diagnosed during the 2017-18 season at the same hospital to describe common features and differences in clinical characteristics and course of disease. Patients with COVID-19 were younger (median age [IQR], 59 [45-71] vs 66 [52-77]; P < 0001) and had fewer comorbidities at baseline with a lower mean overall age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (mean [SD], 3.0 [2.6] vs 4.0 [2.7]; P < 0.001) than patients with seasonal influenza. COVID-19 patients had a longer duration of hospitalization (mean [SD], 25.9 days [26.6 days] vs 17.2 days [21.0 days]; P = 0.002), a more frequent need for oxygen therapy (101 [60.8%] vs 103 [40.4%]; P < 0.001) and invasive ventilation (52 [31.3%] vs 32 [12.5%]; P < 0.001) and were more frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (70 [42.2%] vs 51 [20.0%]; P < 0.001) than seasonal influenza patients. Among immunocompromised patients, those in the COVID-19 group had a higher hospital mortality compared to those in the seasonal influenza group (13 [33.3%] vs 8 [11.6%], P = 0.01). In conclusion, we show that COVID-19 patients were younger and had fewer baseline comorbidities than seasonal influenza patients but were at increased risk for severe illness. The high mortality observed in immunocompromised COVID-19 patients emphasizes the importance of protecting these patient groups from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
We provide detailed clinical, virological, and immunological data of a B-cell-depleted patient treated with obinutuzumab for follicular lymphoma with protracted coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and viremia. A sustained response was achieved after 2 courses of remdesivir and subsequent convalescent plasma therapy. Immunocompromised patients might require combined and prolonged antiviral treatment regimens.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Imunização Passiva , SARS-CoV-2 , Soroterapia para COVID-19RESUMO
Infectious diseases are a frequent reason for medical consultations both in the inpatient and outpatient setting. Inadequate management is associated with increased costs, morbidity and mortality. In times of rising antibiotic resistance rational therapy and antimicrobial stewardship are of utmost importance. While it is crucial to avoid excessively broad antimicrobial coverage and unnecessary therapies, serious conditions must be treated effectively. The article highlights common infections and gives recommendations for empiric and targeted antibiotic treatment. Discussed are pulmonary, abdominal, urinary tract, skin and soft tissue infections, as well as sepsis and staphylococcal bloodstream infections. The recommendations consider national and international guidelines, recent publications and current antimicrobial resistance in Germany.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Alemanha , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
Leishmaniasis is a protozoan parasitic infection that can manifest as visceral or cutaneous disease. Immunosuppression, mainly through TNF-α) inhibition, is a risk factor for complicated leishmaniasis that is becoming increasingly known. Here, we present a case of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in a patient who suffers from advanced Takayasu-Arteritis, requiring TNF-α inhibition with infliximab. The primary CL lesions in this 47-year-old, female patient were caused by Leishmaniapanamensis and occurred after a touristic trip to Panama on her right foot. The lesions first resolved under treatment with liposomal amphotericin B. However, ten months later, the patient returned with relapsing lesions requiring further treatment. We discuss the challenges and risks of leishmaniasis in patients with TNF-α inhibition and the rare phenomenon of relapsing CL and the management hereof. We review published cases of CL associated with TNF-α inhibition. A growing body of evidence now suggests that especially CL (and visceral leishmaniasis (VL)) can be associated with TNF-α inhibition. The host response to leishmaniasis is of the Th1-type and TNF-α and interferon-gamma expression are crucial for disease control. Inversely, TNF-α inhibition can lead to complicated and relapsing progression of leishmanial infection. Therefore, we propose that CL and VL should be considered in at-risk patients receiving immunosuppressants.
Assuntos
Arterite , Infliximab , Leishmaniose Cutânea , Feminino , Humanos , Leishmaniose Visceral , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The combination of boceprevir or telaprevir with peginterferon-alfa and ribavirin for the treatment of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 has led to significantly increased rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in phase III trials. There is only limited data regarding the safety and efficacy in a "real-life" cohort. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of 110 unselected HCV patients who started triple therapy from September 2011 to February 2013 by chart review with focus on the individual course of treatment, complications and outcome. We excluded 8 patients from analysis because of HIV-coinfection (N = 6) or status post liver transplant (N = 2). Importantly, 41 patients displayed F3 or F4 fibrosis, 10 patients had a history of treatment with protease/polymerase inhibitors and 15 patients were prior partial- or null-responder. RESULTS: SVR12 was achieved in 62 of the 102 patients (60.8%). A high rate of serious adverse events (N = 30) was observed in 22 patients including 2 fatalities in cirrhotic diabetes patients. Age >50 years, liver cirrhosis, bilirubin >1.1 mg/dl (P < 0.01, each), platelets <100,000/µl (P = 0.01), ASAT >100 U/l (P = 0.03) and albumin ≤35 g/l (P = 0.04) at baseline were associated with occurence of a SAE. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of SVR in a "real-life" treatment setting is slightly lower as compared to the results of the phase III trials for telaprevir or boceprevir. Importantly, we observed a high frequency of SAE in triple therapy, especially in patients with liver cirrhosis.