Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of the Cancer-Targeting MRI Contrast Agent MT218 in Healthy Males.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of MT218, a peptide-targeted gadolinium-based contrast agent, in healthy males. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose study including 30 healthy male subjects. In each dose group (0.01, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08 mmol/kg), 4 subjects received MT218 and 2 subjects received placebo (saline) in bolus injections. The highest dose group (0.08 mmol/kg) was assessed in 2 cohorts, 1 fasted and 1 nonfasted. Clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiograms were investigated. Gadolinium concentrations were measured in plasma samples collected before administration and over a 24-hour period postinjection, and in urine specimens collected until 22 days. A noncompartmental model was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. A clinical and biological safety follow-up was carried out for up to 6 months. RESULTS: No clinically significant modifications in biochemistry, hematology, urinalysis, electrocardiogram parameters, or vital signs were reported at any time point for any treatment group. No serious adverse events were observed in any dose group. Transient dizziness, hyperhidrosis, and injection site coldness were the main adverse events reported in both the MT218 and placebo groups. The mean total apparent clearance decreased slightly with increasing dose, and the median plasma t 1/2 ranged from 1.7 hours in the 0.01 mmol/kg group to 2.7 hours in the 0.08 mmol/kg nonfasted group. MT218 was rapidly excreted via renal filtration with 42.9% to 52.8% of the injected dose measured in urine within the first hour after administration, and 92.5% to 117.3% in urine within 24 hours. No Gd was detected by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in urine after 21 days. CONCLUSION: Single intravenous administration of MT218 was safely tolerated in the healthy males. Its pharmacokinetic parameters and safety profile are well aligned with those of other gadolinium-based contrast agents.

A Single Administration of OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) Nasal Spray Induces Short-Term Alterations in Conjunctival Goblet Cells in Patients with Dry Eye Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Dry eye disease is characterized by a persistently unstable or deficient tear film causing discomfort or visual impairment. Varenicline is a small-molecule nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist recently approved for use as a preservative-free nasal spray (OC-01 [varenicline solution] nasal spray [OC-01 VNS]) to treat signs and symptoms of dry eye disease, but its effect on conjunctival goblet cells has not been studied. METHODS: In this phase 2, single-center, vehicle-controlled study, patients aged 18 years or more with a diagnosis of dry eye disease and Ocular Surface Disease Index© score of at least 23 were randomized 2:1 to receive a 50-µL single dose of OC-01 0.06 mg VNS or vehicle nasal spray in each nostril. Image assessments for area and perimeter were performed pre and 10 min post treatment for goblet cells by in vivo confocal microscopy and for meibomian glands by infrared meibography. Non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared pre- and post-treatment measurements for each treatment group. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. RESULTS: The study randomized 18 patients (mean age 61 years); 6 received vehicle (3/6 [50%] female) and 12 patients received OC-01 VNS (11/12 [92%] female). OC-01 VNS treatment decreased mean goblet cell area (pre-treatment, 106.4 µm2; post-treatment, 67.6 µm2; p = 0.02) and perimeter (pre-treatment, 38.9 µm; post-treatment, 31.2 µm; p = 0.03) but not vehicle did not (p = 0.25). There were no significant changes in mean meibomian gland area with either treatment (p ≥ 0.05). All TEAEs were non-ocular, non-serious, and mild. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a single administration of OC-01 0.06 mg VNS in patients with dry eye disease reduced conjunctival goblet cell area and perimeter, suggesting goblet cell degranulation and associated release of lubricating mucin. By activating the natural tear film, OC-01 VNS may provide benefits over topical medications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03688802.

Efficacy and Safety of OC-01 (Varenicline Solution) Nasal Spray on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease: The ONSET-2 Phase 3 Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray for treatment of patients with dry eye disease. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults 22 years of age or older with a diagnosis of dry eye disease, artificial tear use, Ocular Surface Disease Index score of 23 or more, and Schirmer test score (STS) of 10 mm or less. Eligibility was not restricted by eye dryness score (EDS). METHODS: Patients (N = 758) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to twice-daily treatment with 50-µl intranasal spray in each nostril of OC-01 0.03 mg (n = 260), OC-01 0.06 mg (n = 246), or vehicle (control; n = 252) for 4 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04036292). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients achieving a 10-mm improvement or more in STS at week 4. Secondary end points included change from baseline to week 4 in STS and EDS in a controlled adverse environment (CAE) chamber and in the clinic. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. RESULTS: A statistically significantly greater percentage of patients achieved the primary end point in both OC-01 treatment groups compared with the vehicle group (OC-01 0.03 mg, 47.3%; OC-01 0.06 mg, 49.2%; vehicle, 27.8%; P < 0.0001 for both doses). Change from baseline in STS at week 4 was statistically significantly greater for patients receiving OC-01 than vehicle (P < 0.0001 for both doses). Eye dryness score assessed at week 4 improved with OC-01 treatment compared with vehicle, although the difference was not significant for EDS measured in the CAE chamber and showed (nominal) significance in the clinic. Overall, 86.5% of patients (654/756) reported at least 1 TEAE during the treatment period; most were mild, nonocular (sneezing, cough, throat irritation, and instillation site irritation) and were reported by fewer patients in the vehicle group than in the OC-01 treatment groups (OC-01 0.03 mg, 97.3%; OC-01 0.06 mg, 99.2%; vehicle, 57%). CONCLUSIONS: OC-01 nasal spray was well tolerated and showed a clinically meaningful effect on signs and symptoms of dry eye disease.

A phase II randomized trial to evaluate the long-term (12-week) efficacy and safety of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray for dry eye disease: The MYSTIC study.

PURPOSE: Dry eye disease is characterized by loss of tear film stability. OC-01 (varenicline solution) is a small-molecule nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist administered as a nasal spray that stimulates tear production. METHODS: In MYSTIC (NCT03873246) patients aged ≥22 years with dry eye disease were randomized 1:1:1 to OC-01 0.03 mg, OC-01 0.06 mg, or vehicle (n = 41 per group), administered twice daily via intranasal spray, for 12 weeks (84 days). Primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline in anesthetized Schirmer's test score (STS) in study eye at day (D) 84. RESULTS: Patients receiving OC-01 0.03 and 0.06 mg had statistically significantly increased tear production at D84 versus vehicle; least squares mean changes from baseline in STS were 10.8 mm and 11.0 mm for OC-01 0.03 and 0.06 mg, respectively. A trend toward a higher proportion of patients experiencing ≥10-mm improvement in STS from baseline was observed with OC-01 0.03 mg (36.6%; p > 0.05), and was significant for OC-01 0.06 mg (48.8%; p = 0.024), versus vehicle (24.4%). Non-ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 21 patients; the most common was sneezing (OC-01 0.03 mg, 2 [4.9%]; OC-01 0.06 mg, 3 [7.3%]), with similar frequencies between treatment groups. No severe or serious TEAEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray improved tear production in patients with dry eye disease over a long-term (12-week) period, and represents a receptor neuro-activator with a nasal route of administration that spares the ocular surface to stimulate tear production.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Dose Oral Delafloxacin Compared With Intramuscular Ceftriaxone for Uncomplicated Gonorrhea Treatment: An Open-Label, Noninferiority, Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated single oral dose of delafloxacin versus single intramuscular ceftriaxone in participants with uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea (primary objective). Secondary objectives included the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of delafloxacin versus ceftriaxone for uncomplicated urogenital, rectal, and/or pharyngeal gonorrhea. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter study, 460 participants at 25 study centers were randomized (2:1) to receive a single 900-mg oral dose of delafloxacin or 250-mg intramuscular ceftriaxone. Neisseria gonorrhoeae culture, nucleic acid amplification test, and clinical responses were evaluated. The primary efficacy end point was the urogenital microbiological cure in the urogenital microbiological intention-to-treat population; noninferiority (NI) was assessed using a 10% NI margin. RESULTS: In the urogenital microbiological intention-to-treat population, urogenital cure rates for delafloxacin were 85.1% (194/228) versus 91.0% (91/100) for ceftriaxone (95% confidence interval, -13.18% to 1.36%). Because the lower bound of the confidence interval exceeded the prespecified -10% NI margin, delafloxacin did not demonstrate NI to ceftriaxone. Treatment failures were more often associated with N. gonorrhoeae with higher delafloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. In microbiologically evaluable participants, failure occurred in 1 (0.6%) of 177 urogenital infections caused by isolates with delafloxacin MICs <0.008 µg/mL and 31 (64.6%) of 48 infections caused by isolates with delafloxacin MICs ≥0.008 µg/mL. Gastrointestinal adverse events were common with 900-mg of delafloxacin and typically included mild to moderate diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting. The most common adverse event was diarrhea in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: A single 900-mg dose of delafloxacin is not a reliable treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea. Treatment failures were common in infections caused by N. gonorrhoeae with delafloxacin MICs ≥0.008 µg/mL. Additional testing with alternative dosing regimens could be considered.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02015637.

A randomized, double-blind, Phase 2 study to evaluate subjective and objective outcomes in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections treated with delafloxacin, linezolid or vancomycin.

OBJECTIVES: Delafloxacin is an investigational anionic fluoroquinolone being developed to treat infections caused by Gram-positive and -negative organisms. This clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of delafloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). METHODS: In a double-blind, Phase 2 trial, 256 patients were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to 300 mg of delafloxacin, 600 mg of linezolid or 15 mg/kg vancomycin (actual body weight), each administered intravenously twice daily for 5-14 days. Randomization was stratified by infection category. The primary endpoint was the investigator's assessment of cure, defined as complete resolution of baseline signs and symptoms at follow-up. Secondary endpoints included reductions in the total areas of erythema and induration and assessments of bacterial eradication. This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT01283581. RESULTS: Cure rates were significantly greater with delafloxacin versus vancomycin (mean difference: -16.3%; 95% CI, -30.3% to -2.3%; P = 0.031); differences were significant for obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2); mean difference: -30.0%; 95% CI, -50.7% to -9.3%; P = 0.009), but not for non-obese patients. Cure rates with delafloxacin and linezolid were similar. Using digital measurement, the percentage decrease in total erythema area was significantly greater with delafloxacin versus vancomycin at follow-up (-96.4% versus -84.5%; P = 0.028). There were no differences in bacterial eradication among the treatment groups. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that delafloxacin is effective in the treatment of ABSSSIs and is well tolerated.

Rapid, needle-free delivery of lidocaine for reducing the pain of venipuncture among pediatric subjects.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal configuration of an investigational, single-use, needle-free, drug system (ALGRX 3268) that delivers powdered lidocaine into the epidermis for the rapid production of local anesthesia among pediatric subjects undergoing venipuncture. METHODS: Children 3 to 18 years of age were randomly allocated to receive 1 of 3 treatments, ie, (1) placebo, (2) a system configured to deliver 0.25 mg of lidocaine, or (3) a system configured to deliver 0.5 mg of lidocaine, at the antecubital fossa 2 to 3 minutes before venipuncture. Three age groups were included, ie, 3 to 7 years, 8 to 12 years, and 13 to 18 years. Two sets of pain rating scales were used, the Faces Pain Scale-Revised for the youngest age stratum and a visual analog scale for the oldest age stratum. Children in the middle age stratum used both scales. RESULTS: One-hundred forty-four subjects completed the study. For all ages combined, there was a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in pain scores for subjects who received 0.5 mg of lidocaine, compared with placebo. The reduction in pain after 0.25 mg of lidocaine did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Both active configurations were safe and well tolerated by pediatric subjects undergoing venipuncture at the antecubital fossa. ALGRX 3268 at 0.5 mg, administered 2 to 3 minutes before venipuncture, produced significantly lower pain scores, compared with placebo.