Value of spectral detector computed tomography to differentiate infected from noninfected thoracoabominal fluid collections.

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic value of spectral detector CT (SDCT)-derived virtual non-contrast (VNC), virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) and iodine overlays (IO) for distinguishing infected from noninfected fluid collections (FC) in the chest or abdomen. METHOD: This retrospective study included 58 patients with venous phase SDCT with 77 FC. For all included FC, microbiological analysis of aspirated fluid served as reference. For quantitative analysis, wall thickness was measured, and (ROI)-based analysis performed within the fluid, the FC's wall (if any) and the aorta. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated visibility of wall enhancement, diagnostic confidence regarding infection of fluid collection, confidence of CT-guided drainage catheter placement and visibility of anatomical landmarks in conventional images (CI) and VNC, VMI40keV, IO. RESULTS: Wall thickness significantly differed between infected (n = 46) and noninfected (n = 31) FC (3.5 ± 1.8 mm vs. 1.4 ± 1.8 mm, AUC = 0.81; p < 0.05). Fluid attenuation and wall enhancement was significantly higher in infected as compared to noninfected FC in all reconstructions (p < 0.05, respectively). Highest AUC regarding A) attenuation in fluid was yielded in CI and VMI70,80keV (0.75); B) wall enhancement in CI (0.88) followed by iodine concentration (0.86). Contrast-to-noise ratio of wall vs. fluid was highest in VMI40keV (p < 0.05). All assessed qualitative parameters received significantly higher ratings when using spectral reconstructions vs. CI (p for all <0.05), except for visibility of wall enhancement. CONCLUSION: Spectral reconstructions improve the assessment of infected from noninfected thoracoabdominal fluid collections and depiction of wall enhancement. Diagnostic performance of the quantitative measurements in spectral reconstructions were comparable with measurements in conventional images.

Pneumatosis intestinalis and porto-mesenteric venous gas: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Estimating the prognosis of patients with pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) and porto-mesenteric venous gas (PMVG) can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to refine prognostication to improve decision making in daily clinical routine. METHODS: A total of 290 patients with confirmed PI were included in the final analysis. The presence of PMVG and mortality (90d follow-up) were evaluated with regard to the influence of possible risk factors. Furthermore, a linear estimation model was devised combining significant parameters to calculate accuracies for predicting death in patients undergoing surgery by means of a defined operation point (ROC-analysis). RESULTS: Overall, 90d mortality was 55.2% (160/290). In patients with PI only, mortality was 46.5% (78/168) and increased significantly to 67.2% (82/122) in combination with PMVG (median survival: PI: 58d vs. PI and PMVG: 41d; p < 0.001). In the entire patient group, 53.5% (155/290) were treated surgically with a 90d mortality of 58.8% (91/155) in this latter group, while 90d mortality was 51.1% (69/135) in patients treated conservatively. In the patients who survived > 90d treated conservatively (24.9% of the entire collective; 72/290) PMVG/PI was defined as "benign"/reversible. PMVG, COPD, sepsis and a low platelet count were found to correlate with a worse prognosis helping to identify patients who might not profit from surgery, in this context our calculation model reaches accuracies of 97% specificity, 20% sensitivity, 90% PPV and 45% NPV. CONCLUSION: Although PI is associated with high morbidity and mortality, "benign causes" are common. However, in concomitant PMVG, mortality rates increase significantly. Our mathematical model could serve as a decision support tool to identify patients who are least likely to benefit from surgery, and to potentially reduce overtreatment in this subset of patients.

[Interventional Radiology in Oncology - Update 2021]. / Interventionelle radiologische Verfahren in der Onkologie ­ Update 2021.

Interventional radiology plays a crucial role in oncology. The most common interventional treatments are transarterial embolisation as well as percutaneous thermal ablations. Transarterial embolisation, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) are well established, usually palliatively intended treatment options for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Embolisation is usually well tolerated under conscious sedation and can be repeated several times. Percutaneous thermoablation is a local ablative, usually curatively intended treatment for hepatic, renal and pulmonary tumors. As a minimally invasive technique, it competes against surgery and radiation therapy. There are different types of thermoablation, most commonly used are radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA) and cryo-ablation. Ablation is usually performed in general anesthesia, less common in conscious sedation. New interventional treatments are high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and irreversible electroporation (IRE). HIFU allows a non-invasive, imaging-guided thermoablation that is currently certified for uterine myoma, prostate cancer and bone tumors. IRE is a minimal invasive non-thermal ablation that is especially established for locally advanced tumors that show a close relationship to large vessels, for example pancreatic cancer.