Scannographic Study of Risk Factors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture.

BACKGROUND: Current decision about when to operate abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is based only on the maximum aneurysm diameter (MAD). However, small aneurysms still rupture and we can observe very large AAA without any symptom. A simple morphologic analysis could be a tool to assess the risk of rupture. The main objective of this study was to assess the relevance of ratios between MAD and healthy aorta on computed tomography (CT) as a risk factor of AAA rupture. The secondary objective was to evaluate CT signs as risk factors of AAA rupture. METHODS: Retrospective observational bicentric study comparing CT scans of a ruptured AAA group and a control group treated electively was conducted. Appariement 1:1 based on MAD was applied. Ratios between healthy aorta diameters at several levels, celiac trunk (CTR), superior mesenteric artery (SMA), highest renal artery (RA), and the MAD were calculated. The presence of blebs, crescent signs, ruptures of calcifications of the aneurysm sack, and draped aorta were notified. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2016, 38 ruptured AAA and 38 controls were included. Ratios were superior in the rupture group, respectively: MAD/CTR [2.77 (±0.5) versus 2.58 (±0.4) P < 0.095], MAD/SMA [2.92 (±0.7) versus 2.74 (±0.5) P < 0.194], and MAD/RA [3.02 (±0.70) versus 2.76 (±0.5) P < 0.054] but not significatively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated optimal threshold to detect rupture at 2.8 for the ratio MAD/CTR (area under the curve (AUC) 0.593, sensitivity 47.4%, specificity 78.9%), at 3.3 for the ratio MAD/SMA (AUC 0.564, sensitivity 31.6%, specificity 92.1%), and at 3.3 for the ratio MAD/RA (AUC 0.591, sensitivity 31.6%, specificity 94.7%). Bivariate analysis for rupture risk factor showed significance for the three ratios (MAD/CTR > 2.8 [OR = 11 (1.42; 85.20) P < 0.0217], MAD/SMA > 3.3 [OR = 10 (1.28; 78.12) P < 0.0281], and MAD/RA >3.3 [OR = 11.00 (1.42; 85.20) P < 0.0217]). One scannographic sign was more present in the rupture group: crescent sign 36.8% versus 5.3%, P = 0.0007, as well in bivariate analysis [OR = 7 (1.59; 30.80) P < 0.0326]. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, specific ratios when they exceed calculated threshold, seem to be more prone to rupture. We could consider that these measures, easy to apply in clinical practice, would be complementary keys for rupture risk individual assessment.

The Antegrade Approach Using Transbrachial Access Improves Technical Success Rate of Endovascular Recanalization of TASC C-D Aortoiliac Occlusion in Case of Failed Femoral Access.

BACKGROUND: Technical success rates of endovascular recanalizations for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C-D chronic occlusions are highly variable and depend on the characteristics and sites of the lesions as well as on the operator experience. We hypothesized that an antegrade approach via transbrachial access could improve the technical success rate of endovascular treatment of TASC C-D occlusions in case of failed femoral access. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2012, all patients with symptomatic chronic TASC C-D aortoiliac occlusion were treated with an endovascular-first approach. Recanalization was first attempted using a femoral access. In case of failure, an antegrade approach using a transbrachial access was performed. Patient characteristics, anatomic details, procedural data, and immediate outcomes were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 73 patients (99 arteries) were included. Twenty-seven (37%) patients had TASC C occlusions including 11 bilateral common iliac artery occlusions and 16 external iliac artery (EIA) occlusions involving the common femoral or the internal iliac arteries. Forty-six (63%) patients had TASC D occlusions including 10 aortoiliac occlusions, 31 unilateral occlusions of both common and EIAs, and 5 bilateral EIA occlusions. Technical success with femoral access has been obtained in 53 arteries. An antegrade approach via transbrachial access allowed technical success in the other arteries, except in 7 arteries. Overall technical success rate was 93%, and 2 complications were related to the brachial accesses including 1 thrombosis and 1 pseudoaneurysm both requiring a reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Brachial access for TASC C-D aortoiliac chronic occlusion improves the technical success rate without the need for reentry devices.