Efficacy of venlafaxine for the prevention and relief of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity: results of EFFOX, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity is dose limiting and may present as acute symptoms and/or cumulative peripheral neuropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2005 to May 2008, patients with oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity were randomized into a double-blind study, to receive either venlafaxine 50 mg 1 h prior oxaliplatin infusion and venlafaxine extended release 37.5 mg b.i.d. from day 2 to day 11 or placebo. Neurotoxicity was evaluated using numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity and experienced relief under treatment, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and the oxaliplatin-specific neurotoxicity scale. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a 100% relief under treatment. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (27 males, median age: 67.6 years). Most patients had colorectal cancer (72.9%). Median number of cycles administered at inclusion was 4.5 (mean cumulative oxaliplatin dose: 684.6 mg). Twenty out of 24 patients in arm A (venlafaxine) and 22 out of 24 patients in arm B (placebo) were assessable for neurotoxicity. Based on the NRS, full relief was more frequent in the venlafaxine arm: 31.3% versus 5.3% (P=0.03). Venlafaxine side-effects included grade 1-2 nausea (43.1%) and asthenia (39.2%) without grade 3-4 events. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine has clinical activity against oxaliplatin-induced acute neurosensory toxicity.

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus estramustine and single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere)-based regimens are the new standard therapy in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A synergistic activity has been shown with docetaxel in combination with estramustine in vitro; however, the benefit of this combination remains controversial in clinical practice. We assessed the activity and safety of docetaxel alone and docetaxel-estramustine in HRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 92) with metastatic HRPC and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) while receiving androgen suppression were randomized to 3-weekly treatment with either docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1 (D), or docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), day 2, plus oral estramustine 280 mg twice daily, days 1-5 (DE). RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were treated (DE 47, D 44). A PSA response occurred in 68% (primary endpoint met) and 30% of patients, respectively. Median PSA response duration was 6.0 months in both groups. Median time to progression was 5.7 and 2.9 months, and median survival was 19.3 and 17.8 months in the DE and D arms, respectively. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxic effects were mild and similar in both arms. One patient in each group withdrew due to toxicity. Quality of life was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Combining estramustine with docetaxel in this schedule is an active and well-tolerated treatment option in HRPC.

Relationship between cytochrome 3A activity, inflammatory status and the risk of docetaxel-induced febrile neutropenia: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that cancer-related inflammation might increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) induced by docetaxel (DCX, Taxotere), by both affecting the exposure to DCX and the tissue sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced cancer patients with normal liver function, performance status (PS)<3, were included. Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP 3A) activity was estimated before the first cycle of DCX by a single determination of midazolam plasma concentration, 4 hours after 0.015 mg/kg i.v. bolus. Following the first cycle of 75-100 mg/m2 DCX, clearance and area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) were estimated using a limited sampling strategy. RESULTS: Among 56 assessable patients, 7 FNs occurred after first cycle (13%). In univariate analysis, high midazolam concentration and free DCX AUC were associated with severe neutropenia and FN. In addition to DCX exposure-related parameters, the risk of FN was also correlated with poor PS, baseline lymphopenia and lung cancer, while high ferritin level, indicator of an inflammatory state, reached borderline significance (P=0.07). By multivariate analysis, total DCX AUC and baseline lymphopenia were associated with FN. High midazolam concentration was correlated with elevated ferritin level (r=0.32; P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Inflammatory status and lymphocyte count should be included in the evaluation of the benefice/risk ratio before the initiation of DCX.

Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer: docetaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (T/EC), or the reverse sequence (EC/T), every 2 weeks, versus docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (TEC) every 3 weeks. AERO B03 randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Adding a taxane to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival in node-positive patients but optimal dose and schedule remain undetermined. This study aimed to select a dose-dense regimen for further assessment in phase III studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with node-positive invasive breast adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to docetaxel (Taxotere) (T) 75 mg/m2, epirubicin (E) 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2 (TEC)x6, every 3 weeks; E 100 mg/m2, C 600 mg/m2 x 4, then T 100 mg/m2 x 4 (EC-->T) or the reverse sequence (T-->EC), every 2 weeks, with pegfilgrastim support. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 4 toxicity. RESULTS: Dose intensity was almost doubled with dose-dense regimens, compared with TEC. Twenty-seven patients experienced grade 4 toxicity: 26%, 40% and 18% with TEC, EC-->T and T-->EC, respectively, mainly neutropenia, but febrile neutropenia occurred only in 11%, 10% and 3%. Grade 3-4 nail disorders, hand-foot syndrome and peripheral neuropathy occurred in 46%, 73% and 68% of patients with TEC, EC-->T and T-->EC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-dense regimens yield more frequent and severe nonhematological toxic effects than standard dose TEC regimen. Though grade 4 toxicity rates appear acceptable with the T-->EC regimen, the incidence of grade 3-4 events makes it difficult to recommend either dose-dense regimen for further investigation.

Dose-finding study of weekly 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil associated with alternating oxaliplatin or irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To determine maximum tolerated dose, safety and efficacy of weekly 24 h infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined alternately with oxaliplatin and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advanced colorectal carcinoma patients in first- or second-line chemotherapy received increasing doses of 5-FU (weekly 24 h continuous intravenous infusion without leucovorin) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, irinotecan days 1 and 15; and oxaliplatin days 8 and 22, every 35 days. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients received 175 cycles. The median age was 64 years (range 47-78). Eighteen per cent of patients had the primary tumor in the rectum, with a median of one disease site (range one to three), and liver involvement in 88% and lung in 38%. Six (18%) patients had chemotherapy for prior advanced disease. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (41% of patients), but the regimen was well tolerated clinically, with febrile neutropenia in two patients and grade 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days in one; grade 3-4 diarrhea, nausea and vomiting in 6% of patients; grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy in 9% of patients. Seventeen patients had a partial response (50%; 95% confidence interval 33%-67%), 13 had stable disease and one had progressive disease. Five patients underwent metastatic surgical resection after tumor shrinkage. Median response duration was 14 months (range 4.7-29.2+) and median time to progression was 11.3 months (range 1.1+-30.7+). CONCLUSIONS: This combination three-drug regimen is feasible and well tolerated without toxicity overlap. Preliminary antitumor activity compares well with standard double combinations, with an unusually long median time to progression. The recommended dose is 5-FU 3000 mg/m(2), weekly for 4 weeks, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 15, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) days 8 and 22. Further assessment of antitumor activity and safety is warranted.

Campath-1H treatment of T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia in patients for whom at least one prior chemotherapy regimen has failed.

PURPOSE: We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Campath-1H, an anti-CD52 humanized monoclonal antibody, in previously treated T-prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) patients in a compassionate-use program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with T-PLL (including four chemotherapy-naive patients) received 3, 10, and 30 mg of Campath-1H on sequential days, followed by 30 mg three times weekly, as 2-hour intravenous infusions, for 4 to 12 weeks. RESULTS: Median patient age was 60 years (range, 35 to 84). Spleen liver, lymph node, and skin involvement were present in 64%, 40%, 54%, and 18% of patients, respectively. All tested patients had CD2, CD7, CD4, and/or CD8 positivity, whereas CD5 and CD3 were positive in 98% and 96% of tested patients, respectively. The objective response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 63%), with a 39.5% complete response (CR) rate (95% CI, 28% to 51%). The median duration of CR was 8.7 months (range, 0.13+ to 44.4), and median time to progression was 4.5 months (range, 0.1 to 45.4) compared with 2.3 months (range, 0.2 to 28.1) after first-line chemotherapy. The median overall survival was 7.5 months (14.8 months for CR patients). The most common Campath-1H-related adverse events were acute reactions during or immediately after infusions. Fifteen infectious episodes occurred during treatment in 10 patients (13%), leading to treatment discontinuation in three. Eight patients experienced possibly related, late-onset infections. Severe thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia occurred in six patients (8%), leading to treatment discontinuation in four. Two treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Campath-1H is an active drug in T-PLL patients for whom first-line therapy has failed. It has a favorable risk/benefit ratio and should be prospectively investigated in chemotherapy-naive patients.

Prognostic factors for tumour response, progression-free survival and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients given irinotecan (CPT-11) as second-line chemotherapy after 5FU failure. CPT-11 F205, F220, F221 and V222 study groups.

Our purpose was to determine, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with irinotecan single-agent after 5-FU failure, the most significant predictive parameters for tumour response, progression-free survival and toxicity. Between October 1992 and April 1995, 455 patients with 5-FU resistant metastatic colorectal carcinoma entered four consecutive phase II trials. The first two studies assessed tumour response, the other two were randomized studies which assessed the efficacy of racecadotril to prevent irinotecan-induced diarrhoea. Due to homogeneous main eligibility criterias, data from those studies could be pooled for statistical analysis. Potential clinical and biological predictive factors (PF) for toxicity, tumour growth control, e.g. response or stabilization and progression-free survival (PFS), were studied in multivariate analysis. 363 patients were evaluable for response, 432 were evaluable for PFS, 368 for neutropenia and 416 for delayed diarrhoea, respectively. Normal baseline haemoglobin level (Hb), time since diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or diarrhoea at first cycle and a low number of organs involved were the most PF for tumour growth control (P<0.05). Significant prognostic variables for PFS were WHO Performance Status, liver and lymph-node involvement, time since diagnosis, age and CEA value (P < or =0.02). Six groups of patients based on the number of unfavourable prognostic factors are presented. Baseline bilirubin, haemoglobin level, number of organs involved and time from diagnosis were PF for neutropenia; PS, serum creatinine, leukocyte count, time from 5-FU progression and prior abdominopelvic irradiation were PF for delayed diarrhoea (P< or =0.05). These PF should help clinicians to anticipate for a given patient the probability to observe a response/stabilization or a toxicity. These results should also be prospectively confirmed in ongoing or future trials using irinotecan, both as a single agent and in combination with other drugs.

Clinical activity and benefit of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with colorectal cancer truly resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy, clinical benefit and safety of CPT-11 (irinotecan) in patients with stringently-defined 5-fluorouracil-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). 107 patients with documented progression of metastatic CRC during 5-FU were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks in a multicentre phase II study. Tumour response and toxicity were assessed using WHO criteria. Changes in performance status (PS), weight and pain were also measured. The WHO response rate was 13/95 (13.7%, 95% CI 7.5% to 22.3%) eligible patients with a median duration of response of 8.5 months (37 weeks, range: 18-53+). There was also a high rate of disease stabilisation (44.2%) with a median duration of 4.8 months. The probability of being free of progression at 4 months was 50%. Median survival from first administration of CPT-11 was 10.4 months or 45 weeks (range: 3-66+ weeks). There was weight stabilisation or gain in 81% (73/90) of patients, a favourable outcome in PS in 91% (82/90) (improvement of WHO PS 2 or stabilisation of PS 0-1), and pain relief in 54% (26/48). There were no toxic deaths. Neutropenia was short-lasting and non-cumulative. Diarrhoea grade > or = 3 occurred in 7% of cycles and 28/107 (26%) of patients. CPT-11 350 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks has an encouraging degree of activity in progressive metastatic CRC truly resistant to 5-FU with a relatively high rate of tumour growth control translated into clinical benefit. The toxicity profile of CPT-11 is becoming better understood and has been considerably improved.

Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In phase II studies, irinotecan is active in metastatic colorectal cancer, but the overall benefit has not been assessed in a randomised clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with proven metastatic colorectal cancer, which had progressed within 6 months of treatment with fluorouracil, were randomly assigned either 300-350 mg/m2 irinotecan every 3 weeks with supportive care or supportive care alone, in a 2:1 ratio. FINDINGS: 189 patients were allocated irinotecan and supportive care and 90 supportive care alone. The mean age of the participants was 58.8 years; 181 (65%) were men and 98 (35%) were women. WHO performance status was 0 in 79 (42%) patients, 1 in 77 (41%) patients, and 2 in 32 (17%) patients. Tumour-related symptoms were present in 134 (71%) patients and weight loss of more than 5% was seen in 15 (8%) patients. With a median follow-up of 13 months, the overall survival was significantly better in the irinotecan group (p=0.0001), with 36.2% 1-year survival in the irinotecan group versus 13.8% in the supportive-care group. The survival benefit, adjusted for prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis, remained significant (p=0.001). Survival without performance-status deterioration (p=0.0001), without weight loss of more than 5% (p=0.018), and pain-free survival (p=0.003) were significantly better in the patients given irinotecan. In a quality-of-life analysis, all significant differences, except on diarrhoea score, were in favour of the irinotecan group. INTERPRETATION: Our study shows that despite the side-effects of treatment, patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer, and for whom fluorouracil has failed, have a longer survival, fewer tumour-related symptoms, and a better quality of life when treated with irinotecan than with supportive care alone.

Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In phase II trials, irinotecan is active in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but the survival and clinical benefit of irinotecan compared with second-line fluorouracil by continuous infusion is not known. METHODS: 267 patients who had failed to respond to first-line fluorouracil, or whose disease had progressed after treatment with first-line fluorouracil were randomly allocated irinotecan 300-350 mg/m2 infused once every 3 weeks or fluorouracil by continuous infusion. Treatment was given until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or the patient refused to continue treatment. The primary endpoint was survival, while progression-free survival, response rate, symptom-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints. FINDINGS: 133 patients were randomly allocated irinotecan and 134 were allocated fluorouracil by continuous infusion. Patients treated with irinotecan lived for significantly longer than patients on fluorouracil (p=0.035). Survival at 1 year was increased from 32% in the fluorouracil group to 45% in the irinotecan group. Median survival was 10.8 months in the irinotecan group and 8.5 months in the fluorouracil group. Median progression-free survival was longer with irinotecan (4.2 vs 2.9 months for irinotecan vs fluorouracil, respectively; p=0.030). The median pain-free survival was 10.3 months and 8.5 months (p=0.06) for irinotecan and fluorouracil, respectively. Both treatments were equally well tolerated. QoL was similar in both groups. INTERPRETATION: Compared with fluorouracil by continuous infusion second-line irinotecan significantly improved survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Pathophysiology and therapy of irinotecan-induced delayed-onset diarrhea in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective assessment.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan (CPT-11), a camptothecin derivative, has shown efficacy against colorectal cancer. Delayed-onset diarrhea is its main limiting toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine the pathophysiology of CPT-11-induced delayed-onset diarrhea and assess the efficacy of combined antidiarrheal medication in a phase II, prospective, successive-cohorts, open study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with advanced colorectal cancer refractory to fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy received CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The first cohort of 14 consecutive patients explored for the mechanism of diarrhea received acetorphan (a new enkephalinase inhibitor) 100 mg three times daily; the second 14-patient cohort received, in addition to acetorphan, loperamide 4 mg three times daily. Before treatment, and if late diarrhea occurred, patients underwent colon mucosal biopsies for CPT-11 and topoisomerase I levels; intestinal transit time; fecalogram; fat and protein excretion; alpha1-antitrypsin clearance; D-xylose test; blood levels for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, glucagon, gastrin, somatostatin, prostaglandin E2, and carboxylesterase; CPT-11/SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide pharmacokinetics; and stool cultures. RESULTS: Delayed-onset diarrhea occurred during the first three treatment cycles in 23 patients (82%). Electrolyte fecal measurements showed a negative or small osmotic gap in nine of nine patients and an increased alpha1-antitrypsin clearance in six of six patients. There were no modifications in stool cultures or hormonal dysfunction. Four of 11 patients (36%) with delayed-onset diarrhea in the first cohort responded to acetorphan, whereas nine of 10 patients (90%) responded to the combination of acetorphan and loperamide (P < .02). CONCLUSION: CPT-11-induced delayed-onset diarrhea is caused by a secretory mechanism with an exudative component. Early combined treatment with loperamide and acetorphan seems effective in controlling the diarrheal episodes.

High dose-intensity of irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in advanced cancer patients: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To assess, on a multicenter basis, the feasibility of treating advanced cancer patients with high-dose irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients who met the usual phase I criteria (26 men and nine women) were included. Primary tumor sites were colon, head and neck, unknown primary, kidney, liver, and others. All had been previously treated. Irinotecan was given at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) (600 mg/m2) or the level below (500 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were entered in the four participating centers at the MTD of 600 mg/m2. This dose level was clearly shown not to be feasible: 14 patients (78%) had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, with febrile episodes in 11 patients; grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was observed in nine patients; and one toxic death occurred. Subsequently, 17 not heavily pretreated patients were included at 500 mg/m2 and carefully monitored. The safety of this dose level was considered acceptable: 41% of patients had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 24% experienced grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, and no febrile granulocytopenia or toxic death occurred. Six partial responses were documented in metastatic colorectal cancer, all in patients who had previously received conventional chemotherapy, four in patients who had exhibited progressive disease under fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We plan to study the higher dose-intensity 500-mg/m2 level on good-risk and carefully monitored patients. This could enlarge the spectrum of tumors sensitive to irinotecan and improve the already good results observed in colorectal cancers.

Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS: Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan during a phase II clinical trial in colorectal cancer. Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

PURPOSE: A pharmacokinetic study was performed during a phase II clinical trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) to confirm the pharmacokinetic profile of this drug and its metabolite and to investigate interpatient and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variations and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six men and 21 women (mean age, 61 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, performance status less than 3 (World Health Organization [WHO] scale), and normal renal and hepatic function were administered CPT-11 (350 mg/m2) by 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion every 21 days. CPT-11 and its metabolites SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using fluorimetric detection. RESULTS: The mean CPT-11 clearance and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were 15.2 L/h. m2 and 24,769ng. h/mL, respectively. The large difference in SN-38 and SN-38G AUCs (559 v 2,283 ng. h/mL) was suggestive of extensive glucuronidation of SN-38. Interindividual variation in the metabolic ratio ([AUCSN-38 + AUCSN-38Gl/AUCCPT-11) was marked (coefficient of variation [CV] = 51.6%] compared with intrapatient variation in this variable (CV = 32.6%). A significant relationship existed between percentage reduction in neutrophil count and the AUC of CPT-11 (r = .597, P < .001) and SN-38 (r = .559, P < .001). No relationship was identified between any pharmacokinetic parameter and delayed diarrhea or therapeutic outcome. CONCLUSION: Interindividual variations in the metabolic ratio suggest interpatient variation in carboxylesterase activity. Furthermore, glucuronidation of SN-38 may also be in part responsible for the large interpatient variability in the total SN-38 AUC. Conversely, low intrapatient variation of this parameter was observed in this study, which indicates a lack of autoinduction of the carboxylesterase system. The relationship between neutropenia and both CPT-11 and SN-38 pharmacokinetic parameters confirms the results of previous studies.

CPT-11 (irinotecan) in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the Western World. Although 50% of patients are cured by surgery alone, the outcome is poor in high-risk patients (Dukes stages B2 and C) despite adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens. CPT-11 (irinotecan) is a promising new agent for the treatment of colorectal cancer with a unique mechanism of action. CPT-11 is a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, which has not demonstrated susceptibility to the P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug-resistant phenotype. Phase II studies with CPT-11 have demonstrated definite activity against colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients (response rates of 15-32% observed) even with clinical evidence of resistance to 5-FU. The response rate appears to be consistent, reproducible and equivalent to that achieved with 5-FU plus folinic acid in chemotherapy-naive patients.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and active metabolite SN-38 during phase I trials.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a novel water-soluble camptothecin derivative selected for clinical testing based on its good in vitro and in vivo activity in various experimental systems, including pleiotropic drug-resistant tumors. Its mechanism of action appears mediated through topoisomerase I inhibition. The purpose of this study was to describe CPT-11 and active metabolite SN-38 population pharmacokinetics, examine patient characteristics that may influence pharmacokinetics, and to investigate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships that may prove useful in the future clinical management of this drug. PATIENTS AND METHODS: As part of 3 Phase I studies including 235 patients, pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and metabolite SN-38 were determined in 107 patients. CPT-11 was administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion according to 3 different schedules: daily for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks, weekly for 3 weeks, and once every 3 weeks. Patients characteristics were the following: median age 53 years; 62 men, 45 women; 105 caucasians, 2 blacks; performance status was 0-1 in 96 patients; tumor sites were predominantly colon, rectum, head and neck, lung, ovary and breast; with the exception of 6 patients, all had been previously treated with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. CPT-11 and metabolite SN-38 were simultaneously determined by HPLC using fluorescence detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using model-independent and model-dependent analyses. RESULTS: 168 pharmacokinetic data sets were obtained in 107 patients (97 first courses, 43 second courses, 23 third courses, 4 fourth courses, and 1 fifth course). Rebound concentrations of CPT-11 were frequently observed at about 0.5 to 1 h following the end of the i.v. infusion, which is suggestive of enterohepatic recycling of the drug. Model-independent analysis yielded the following mean population pharmacokinetic parameters for CPT-11: a terminal half-life of 10.8 h, a mean residence time (MRT) of 10.7 h, a volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) of 150 L/m2, and a total body clearance of 14.3 L/m2/h. Model-dependent analysis disclosed a CPT-11 plasma disposition as either biphasic or triphasic with a mean terminal half-life of 12.0 h. The volume of distribution Vdss (150 L/m2) and total body clearance (14.8 L/m2/h) yielded almost identical values to the above model-independent analysis. The active metabolite SN-38 presented rebound concentrations in many courses at about 1 h following the end of the i.v. infusion which is suggestive of enterohepatic recycling. The mean time at which SN-38 maximum concentrations was reached was at 1 h since the beginning of the 0.5 h infusion (i.e., 0.5 h post i.v.). SN-38 plasma decay followed closely that of the parent compound with a mean apparent terminal half-life of 10.6 h. Mean 24 h CPT-11 urinary excretion represented 16.7% of the administered dose, whereas metabolite SN-38 recovery in urine was minimal (0.23% of the CPT-11 dose). The number of CPT-11 treatments did not influence pharmacokinetic parameters of either the parent compound or metabolite SN-38. Although CPT-11 pharmacokinetics presented an important interpatient variability, both CPT-11 maximum concentrations (Cmax) and the CPT-11 area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) increased proportionally and linearly with dosage (Cmax, r = 0.78, p < 0.001); CPT-11 AUC, r = 0.88, p < 0.001). An increase in half-life and MRT was observed at higher dosages, although this did not influence the linear increase in AUC as a function of dose. The volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) and the total body clearance (CL) were not affected by the CPT-11 dose. Metabolite SN-38 AUC increased proportionally to the CPT-11 dose (r = 0.67, p < 0.001) and also with the parent compound AUC (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Phase I and pharmacologic studies of the camptothecin analog irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A phase I study was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients meeting standard phase I eligibility criteria were included (24 women, 40 men; median age, 51 years; primary sites: colon, head and neck, lung, pleura; 60 of 64 had been previously treated). Pharmacokinetics was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: One hundred ninety CPT-11 courses were administered as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks (100 to 750 mg/m2). Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities included diarrhea (16%; three hospitalizations), nausea and vomiting (9%), asthenia (14%), alopecia (53%), elevation of hepatic transaminases (8%), and one case of skin toxicity. An acute cholinergic syndrome was observed during CPT-11 administration. Diarrhea appeared dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2, but this was circumvented by using a high-dose loperamide protocol that allowed dose escalation. Dose-dependent, reversible, noncumulative granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (nadir, days 6 to 9; median recovery time, 5 days). Grade 3 to 4 anemia was observed in 9% of patients. One patient died during the study, 8 days after CPT-11 treatment. Two complete responses (cervix, 450 mg/m2; head and neck, 750 mg/m2) and six partial responses in fluorouracil (5-FU)-refractory colon cancer were observed (260 to 600 mg/m2). Pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and active metabolite SN-38 were performed in 60 patients (94 courses). CPT-11 plasma disposition was bi- or triphasic, with a mean terminal half-life of 14.2 +/- 0.9 hours (mean +/- SEM). The mean volume of distribution (Vdss) was 157 +/- 8 L/m2, and total-body clearance was 15 +/- 1 L/m2/h. The CPT-11 area under the plasma concentration versus time curves (AUC) and SN-38 AUC increased linearly with dose. SN-38 plasma decay had an apparent half-life of 13.8 +/- 1.4 hours. Both CPT-11 and SN-38 AUCs correlated with nadir leukopenia and granulocytopenia, with grade 2 diarrhea, and with nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: The MTD of CPT-11 administered as a 30-minute IV infusion every 3 weeks is 600 mg/m2, with granulocytopenia being dose-limiting. At 350 mg/m2, diarrhea appeared dose-limiting, but high-dose loperamide reduced this toxicity and allowed dose escalation. For safety reasons, the recommended dose is presently 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; more experience must be gained to establish the feasibility of a higher dose in large multicentric phase II studies. However, when careful monitoring of gastrointestinal toxicities is possible, a higher dose of 500 mg/m2 could be recommended in good-risk patients. The activity of this agent in 5-FU-refractory colorectal carcinoma makes it unique and mandates expedited phase II testing.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) high-dose escalation using intensive high-dose loperamide to control diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is a serious side effect that may prevent the administration of high doses of the antitumor drug Irinotecan (CPT-11). PURPOSE: Intensive, high-dose loperamide was used in an attempt to control or downstage CPT-11-induced diarrhea and thus permit the use of higher dose intensities of CPT-11. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with various cancers were treated with doses of CPT-11 ranging from 400 to 600 mg/m2, administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Starting 8 hours or more after the administration of CPT-11, any episode of diarrhea was treated with 2 mg of loperamide taken every 2 hours. Patients stopped taking loperamide only after a 12-hour diarrhea-free period. If diarrhea was not controlled after 3 consecutive days of nonstop loperamide intake, or if the patient was dehydrated, loperamide was stopped and the patient was hospitalized for intravenous fluids. If blood or mucus were found in the stools at any time during diarrhea, loperamide was stopped and the patient was hospitalized. RESULTS: Seventeen of 23 patients had diarrhea while on CPT-11 treatment. Eighty-two CPT-11 cycles were administered to these 17 patients, and diarrhea occurred in 49 of these cycles, at a median time-to-onset of 6 days after CPT-11 administration. The loperamide protocol was followed in 46 of the 49 episodes of diarrhea, with 21 capsules of loperamide the median number being taken (range, 5-72). Only one patient was hospitalized for failure to respond to loperamide, and no major toxicity was associated with loperamide use. Fourteen of the 17 patients who experienced diarrhea were rechallenged with CPT-11 three or more times, and seven patients six or more times. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose loperamide controlled diarrhea in patients receiving CPT-11 and allowed administration of higher doses of CPT-11. IMPLICATIONS: The effectiveness of CPT-11 might be increased by higher dose intensities, which can be made tolerable by control of diarrhea with loperamide.

Phase II trial of pirarubicin in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Eighteen patients with either metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma were treated with intravenous infusion of Pirarubicin 50 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. Seventeen patients were evaluable for response. One had minor response, 5 had stable disease, and 11 had progression of disease. Hematological toxicity was moderate, leading to a dose reduction in only 1 patient; there was no clinical cardiac toxicity. We conclude that Pirarubicin used with this dosage and schedule has no activity in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

Phase I and pharmacological study of intra-arterial hepatic administration of pirarubicin in patients with advanced hepatic metastases.

Intra-arterial hepatic (i.a.h.) administration of the doxorubicin analogue pirarubicin was evaluated in a phase I trial, based on preclinical studies that showed an advantage of pirarubicin over doxorubicin after locoregional hepatic administration. Pirarubicin was given to 9 patients with metastatic liver disease with intrapatient dose escalation. Of the 58 cycles evaluable for tolerance, no hepatobiliary or vascular toxicity was observed. The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia: the maximum administered doses ranged from 50 to 120 mg/m2, suggesting variable rates of pirarubicin hepatic extraction between patients. Pharmacokinetic data obtained in 7 patients, in which a direct comparison of intravenous (i.v.) and i.a.h. administration was possible, indicated a median i.v./i.a.h. ratio of 7.4 for the maximal plasma concentration, and a median ratio of 4 for the area under the plasma concentrations versus time curves, suggesting a high pirarubicin hepatic extraction. An unexpectedly high response rate was observed: two complete (colorectal carcinoma) and two partial responses. These data demonstrate that i.a.h. pirarubicin not only produced high locoregional concentrations and reduced systemic exposure, but can also achieve responses in metastatic liver disease of colorectal origin.