Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(5): 507-513, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351475

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A global epidemic of allergic contact dermatitis to (meth)acrylates has been described in relation to the widespread use of manicure products. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequency of sensitization to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) among consecutively patch tested patients with eczema in Spain; the percentage of current relevance; the MOAHLFA index; and, the potential sources of exposure to (meth)acrylates. METHODS: From January 2019 to December 2022, 2-HEMA 2% pet. was prospectively patch tested in 24 REIDAC (Spanish Allergic Contact Dermatitis Registry) centres. RESULTS: Six thousand one hundred thirty-four patients were consecutively patch tested with 2-HEMA 2% pet. 265/6134 (4.3%) were positive. Positive reactions of current relevance were identified to involve 184/265 (69%). The efficiency (number of patch tests needed to detect relevant positive patch test reactions) was 34 (6134/184). The variable 'occupational' was found to be significantly associated with a higher risk for relevant positive reactions to 2-HEMA (OR: 10.9; 95% CI: 8.1-14.9). CONCLUSION: (Meth)acrylate sensitization is a prevalent health issue in Spain. 2-HEMA 2% pet. has been identified to be a highly effective (meth)acrylate allergy marker in the GEIDAC baseline series. The responsible authorities should implement policies guaranteeing accurate labelling of industrial, medical, and consumer materials while ensuring the enforcement of said labelling through appropriate legal means.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Humanos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Metacrilatos/efeitos adversos , Acrilatos , Testes do Emplastro
4.
Dermatitis ; 33(6): 429-434, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35674508

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We recently identified an outbreak of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) involving workers of a Spanish company selling smartphone protective cases from a glue product. A chemical analysis of one glue sample revealed the presence of 4-acryloylmorpholine among other allergens.The same glue is also used to attach tempered glass protective cases to Apple smartwatches. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe a case series of nonoccupational consumer ACD from the previously mentioned Apple smartwatch protective case glue. METHODS: We evaluated epidemiological and clinical data, as well as patch tests results. RESULTS: Three women were diagnosed with nonoccupational ACD from the adhesive. An annular vesicular inflammatory plaque involving the dorsal aspect of the wrist was initially observed in all. Two of the 3 patients were patch tested with 4-acryloylmorpholine 0.5% with positive strong reactions. Both also strongly reacted to a sample of the glue semiopen tested in a drop of petrolatum. One of them was also positive for various acrylates. CONCLUSIONS: 4-Acryloylmorpholine has been identified in an adhesive used to attach protective cases to smartwatches. Nonoccupational ACD have been described to involve consumers of smartwatches. A UV-curable adhesive used to attach protective cases to smartwatches has been considered to be the culprit.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Humanos , Feminino , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Acrilamidas , Alérgenos , Adesivos/efeitos adversos
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 87(1): 53-61, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35184294

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sensitization to acrylates is a concern in the occupational/environmental dermatology field. OBJECTIVE: To describe an occupational allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) outbreak from a smartphone screen protector glue. METHODS: Thirteen affected workers of a chain store selling phone screen protectors were investigated in five Spanish dermatology departments. The glue datasheet and label were assessed. A chemical analysis of the glue was performed. Based on this, some patients underwent additional testing. RESULTS: All patients (all female, mean age: 25) had severe fingertip dermatitis. The datasheet/label indicated that the glue contained isobornyl acrylate (IBOA), a "photoinitiator" and polyurethane oligomer. The company informed us that the ingredients were polyurethane acrylate, "methacrylate" (unspecified), acrylic acid, hydroxyethyl methacrylate, propylmethoxy siloxane, and photoinitiator 184. Isobornyl acrylate (or IBOA) and N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) were patch tested in eight and two cases, respectively, with negative results. A chemical analysis revealed 4-acryloylmorpholine (ACMO); isobornyl methacrylate (IBMA), and lauryl acrylate in one glue sample. Seven patients were patch tested with dilutions of the identified substances and six of seven were positive for ACMO 0.5% pet. CONCLUSION: An outbreak of occupational ACD, likely from ACMO in a glue is described. Further investigations are needed to corroborate the role played by each compound identified in the chemical analyses.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Ocupacional , Acrilatos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro , Poliuretanos , Smartphone
7.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34029518

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Standard patch test series must be updated using objective data on allergen sensitization. The Spanish standard series was last updated in 2016 and the European series in 2019, and the inclusion of several emerging allergens needs to be evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational, multicenter study of consecutive patients from the registry of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group (GEIDAC) who were patch tested in 2019 and 2020 with linalool hydroperoxide, limonene hydroperoxide, 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate, benzisothiazolinone, octylisothiazolinone, textile dye mix (TDM), sodium metabisulfite, propolis, bronopol, Compositae mix II, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, decyl glucoside, and lauryl glucoside. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 4654 patients tested with diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, and bronopol, and 1890 tested with the other allergens. The values for the MOAHLFA index components were 30% for male, 18% for occupational dermatitis, 15% for atopic dermatitis, 29% for hand, 6.5% for leg, 23% for face, and 68% for age > 40 years. Sensitization rates above 1% were observed for 7 allergens: linalool hydroperoxide, 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate, benzisothiazolinone, limonene hydroperoxide, TDM, sodium metabisulfite, and propolis. Three allergens had a current relevance rate of over 1%: linalool hydroperoxide, 2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylat, and limonene hydroperoxide. Benzisothiazolinone and TDM had a relevance rate of between 0.9% and 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that 7 new allergens should be considered when extending the Spanish standard patch test series. The data from our series could be helpful for guiding the next extension of the European baseline series.

9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 85(5): 572-577, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745152

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN) was one of the most frequent and relevant allergens found in patch testing at the beginning of this century. In 2008, this preservative was banned from cosmetics in Europe and ever since the prevalence of contact allergy to MDBGN has progressively decreased. Despite that gradual decline, MDBGN is still patch-tested in most baseline series. This study assessed the frequency of MDBGN sensitization, epidemiological characteristics of allergic patients, and the relevance of positive patch tests in a nationwide Spanish registry (REIDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated consecutively patch-tested patients in all participating centres. Using these data, we calculated the proportion of patients with positive patch tests to MDBGN from June 2018 to June 2020 and evaluated the relevance of the positive patch tests. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen out of 5072 (2.24 %) tested patients were sensitized to MDBGN. Clinical current relevance was confirmed in only one case. CONCLUSION: Although the frequency of contact allergy to MDBGN remains high, no clinical significance was found in most of these patients (5072 tests needed to obtain one relevant positive result). The clinical usefulness of this allergen seems weak and its continued inclusion in the European baseline series is questionable.


Assuntos
Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Nitrilas/efeitos adversos , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Alérgenos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 84(6): 395-406, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33534191

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fragrances constitute the second most frequent cause of allergic contact dermatitis in Spain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of sensitization to the individual fragrances of fragrance mix (FM) I and FM II for each of the demographic and clinical factors included in the MOAHLFA (male, occupational dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, hand dermatitis, leg dermatitis, facial dermatitis, age) index. METHODS: We conducted a 5-year retrospective study in 23 Spanish centres. We identified the patients who had undergone patch testing with a specific fragrance series after reacting positively to fragrance markers in a baseline series. We obtained the MOAHLFA index items in this population, then calculated for each demographic and clinical factor the frequencies of sensitization to the individual fragrances of FM I and FM II. RESULTS: A specific fragrance series was patch tested in 1013 patients. The most frequent allergens in men, women, children, and retired people were Evernia prunastri (16%), geraniol (16.6%), isoeugenol (17.9%), and geraniol (22.4%), respectively. Citral (20.5%) and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) (14.5%) were the most common allergens in occupational eczemas and were also associated with a large proportion of hand and facial dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency of sensitization to the individual fragrances of FM I and FM II varies with age, sex, affected body region, and history of occupational or atopic dermatitis.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Odorantes , Adulto , Idade de Início , Criança , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Dermatoses Faciais/epidemiologia , Dermatoses Faciais/etiologia , Feminino , Dermatoses da Mão/etiologia , Humanos , Dermatoses da Perna/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Perna/etiologia , Masculino , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia
14.
Contact Dermatitis ; 76(2): 74-80, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27896835

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limonene and linalool are common fragrance terpenes widely used in cosmetic, household and hygiene products. Their primary oxidation products formed after air exposure, the hydroperoxides, have been recognized as important contact haptens. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of contact allergy to hydroperoxides of limonene (Lim-OOHs) and hydroperoxides of linalool (Lin-OOHs) in Spain, and to define the optimal concentration for screening in consecutive patients. METHODS: Three different concentrations of Lim-OOHs (0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% pet.) and Lin-OOHs (0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% pet.) were simultaneously tested in 3639 consecutive patients at 22 departments of dermatology in Spain. RESULTS: Lim-OOHs at 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% yielded positive patch test reactions in 1.4%, 3.4% and 5.1% of the tested patients, respectively; and Lin-OOHs at 0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% yielded positive reactions in 1.3%, 2.9% and 4.9% of the tested patients, respectively. Few irritant (1.5-1.9%) and doubtful reactions (0.4-0.5%) to both terpene hydroperoxides were registered at the highest concentrations tested. CONCLUSIONS: Lim-OOHs and Lin-OOHs can be considered as common causes of contact allergy, and their inclusion in an extended baseline patch test series therefore seems to be appropriate. The patch test preparations of Lim-OOHs 0.3% pet. and Lin-OOHs 1.0% pet. are useful tools for screening of contact sensitization.


Assuntos
Cicloexenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/efeitos adversos , Monoterpenos/efeitos adversos , Perfumes/efeitos adversos , Terpenos/efeitos adversos , Monoterpenos Acíclicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Limoneno , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxirredução , Testes do Emplastro , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 30(6): e177-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23025548

RESUMO

A teenager with atopic dermatitis presented with a 12-month history of recurrent, pruritic, round and polygonal patches on her face. Patch tests using the European standard series (including nickel, chromium, and cobalt chloride), a plastic and glue series of allergens, polyester components, and personal and environmental products in contact with the patient were conducted. For the patient and 3 of 14 healthy volunteers, positive reactions were observed to the patient's mobile phone touchscreen (TS), an extract solution from the TS, and a non-TS phone of another brand. Accordingly, the patient's dermatitis disappeared when contact with mobile phone screens was avoided.


Assuntos
Telefone Celular , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Dermatoses Faciais/etiologia , Irritantes/efeitos adversos , Poliésteres/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Dermatite de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatoses Faciais/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Testes Cutâneos
17.
Med. segur. trab ; 58(228): 237-245, jul.-sept. 2012. ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-109261

RESUMO

El Kathon CG constituye el nombre comercial de una mezcla de isotiazolinas: Metilcloroisotiazolinona y Metilisotiazolinona. Es un conservante muy utilizado, sobre todo en la industria cosmética, aunque en los últimos años también se ha impuesto su presencia en productos de limpieza de uso doméstico y actualmente a concentraciones más altas en preparados de uso industrial como aceites de corte, emulsiones de látex, pinturas al temple, aceites para motores Diesel, etc. Por su alto poder sensibilizante y amplia utilización, constituye actualmente una de las causas más frecuentes de alergia de contacto por preservativos, tanto en nuestra vida privada, como en el ámbito profesional. Objetivos: Estudiar la capacidad sensibilizante del Kathon CG y su relación con el desarrollo de eczema de contacto alérgico de origen profesional. Métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo, a través de la revisión de las historias clínicas de los pacientes vistos en el Servicio de Dermatología Laboral del Instituto Nacional de Medicina y Seguridad en el Trabajo durante los años 2008-2012; 1520 pacientes fueron evaluados y estudiados mediante pruebas epicutáneas para descartar una posible dermatosis profesional. Se registraron los casos de sensibilización al Kathon CG y se analizaron las siguientes variables: genero, edad, grupo profesional, localización de las lesiones cutáneas, relevancia y relación profesional. El análisis estadístico se realizó con el programa SPSS 15.0. Resultados: Se observó sensibilización al Kathon CG en 88 pacientes (5,8%), correspondiendo un 42% a sensibilizaciones de origen profesional. Conclusiones: La alergia de contacto profesional por Kathon CG constituye actualmente es un problema de alta prevalencia. Ante un paciente con positividad a este alérgeno hay que interrogar siempre por su profesión (AU)


Kathon CG is the tradename for a mixture of isothiazolines: methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone. It is a widely used preservative, especially in the cosmetic industry, although in recent years is presence have also been imposed in cleaning products for household use and, at higher concentrations in industrial preparations such as cutting oils, latex emulsions, paints, oils for diesel engines, etc. Because of its high sensitizing power and widespread use, is currently one of the most common causes of allergic contact dermatitis, both in our private lives, as in the occupational field.Objectives: To study the sensitizing capacity of Kathon CG and its relation to the development of allergic contact dermatitis of occupational origin.Methods: We performed a retrospective study by reviewing the medical records of patients seen at the Department of Occupationsal Dermatology at the Instituto Nacional de Medicina y Seguridad en el Trabajo, during the years 2008-2012. In that period, 1520 patients were evaluated and studied by patch testing, to rule out an occupational skin condition. We recorded cases of sensitization to Kathon CG and analyzed the following data: gender, age, occupational group, location of skin lesions, relevance and occupational origin. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0.Results: We observed sensitization to Kathon CG in 88 patients (5.8%), and 42% were of occupational origin.Conclusions: Occupational contact allergy to Kathon CG is currently a problem of high prevalence. In patients with sensitization to this allergen, we should always ask about their occupation (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aditivos em Cosméticos , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Epidemiologia Descritiva
19.
Med. segur. trab ; 54(210): 73-78, mar. 2008. ilus
Artigo em Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-67628

RESUMO

Desde la inauguración del Museo Olavide en 1882 su historia ha sido compleja y en muchos momentos desconocida, no conociéndose de forma exacta el número de figuras que tuvo en sus momentos de apogeo. Además, no existen evidencia de que los escultores especialmente E. Zofío fueran o estuvieran contratados por el propio museo. Después de muchos avatares en los años 1966-67 el museo se cierra y comienza un largo peregrinaje de las cajas en donde se encontraban las figuras y documentación del museo de los escultores e incluso del propio fundador Dr. José Eugenio de Olavide. Una vez localizadas las figuras se planteaba el problema de encontrar un lugar para su recuperación y posterior exposición. Gracias a la colaboración de la Escuela Nacional de Medicina del Trabajo y especialmente a su director el Dr. Jerónimo Maqueda, se ha podido habilitar un espacio que reúne las condiciones adecuadas para poder realizar este complejo trabajo


Since the inauguration in 1882, the Olavide Museum had a complex history. There are many aspects still unknown, like the exact number of figures. Moreover, there is no evidence that another artists, in addition to E. Zofío, were contracted for the museum. After many events, in the years 1966-67 the museum is closed. The figures and a lot of documentation about the museum and his founder, Dr. José Eugenio de Olavide, were kept in boxes, which remained in several places. Once these figures were localized, the next problem was to have a place to work in the restoration and exposition of them. Thanks to the collaboration of the Escuela Nacional de Medicina del Trabajo (National School of Occupational Medicine), and specially to his director, Dr. Jerónimo Maqueda, we have a place with the adequate conditions to do this work


Assuntos
Humanos , Museus , Anatomia Artística , Anatomia/educação
20.
Med. segur. trab ; 53(208): 1-7, sept. 2007. ilus, tab
Artigo em Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-67532

RESUMO

El Kathon es un conservante resultante de la mezcla de dos isotiazolinonas. Se utiliza preferentemente en la industria cosmética a concentraciones 3-15 ppm. También se ha impuesto su presencia en productos de limpieza de uso doméstico y actualmente a concentraciones más altas en preparados de uso industrial como aceites de corte, emulsiones de látex, pinturas al temple, reveladores de fotografía y radiografía, aceites para motores Diesel. Todo ello hace que sea un sensibilizante importante en nuestra vida privada y profesional. Objetivos: 1. Demostrar la relación del Kathon como sustancia sensibilizante en el desarrollo de dermatitis de contacto. 2. Demostrar la relación entre Kathon y dermatitis de contacto de origen laboral y determinadas profesiones. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo: revisión de las historias clínicas de los pacientes que fueron vistos por el Servicio de Dermatología Laboral del Instituto Nacional de Medicina y Seguridad en el Trabajo durante los años 2004-2006; 2333 pacientes, remitidos por diferentes lesiones dermatológicas con posible relación laboral. Buscaremos los sensibilizados a Kathon y analizaremos las variables: sexo, edad, profesión, enfermedades dermatológica de base, localización de las lesiones, manejo de productos que contengan Kathon. Realizaremos el análisis estadístico con el programa SPSS. Resultados: De las 110 positividades a Kathon, 32 son relacionadas con el trabajo (37,2%). Podemos sumarles otros 13 casos dudosos (15,11%) y de estos casos positivos, el 46,6% fueron varones. Conclusiones: El Kathon es un conservante muy utilizado en el mundo laboral, y son precisamente las profesiones que más productos con Kathon usan, las que mayor número de casos registran


The Kathon is a preservative obtained of the mixture of two isothiazolinones. It is preferently used in the cosmetic industry at 3-15 ppm concentrations. Its presence has increased from the end of the 70's in Europe and from the middle of the 80's in USA. The product presence has also imposed in house-cleaning use and at higher concentrations in the industrial use as motor oils, latex emulsions, painting oils, revealers for photography and x-ray, oils for diesel engines. All of these make it to be an important irritating product in our private and professional life. Objectives: 1. To demonstrate the relation of the Kathon like irritating substance in producing contact dermatitis. 2. To demonstrate to the relation between Kathon and contact dermatitis of labor origin and certain professions. Methodology: Descriptive study: revision of clinical histories of the patients who have been observed in the Department of Labor Dermatology of the National Institute of Medicine and Labor Security during years 2004-2006; 2333 patients, found with different dermatological injuries with possible labor relation. We will look for the Kathon-sensitive persons and we will analyze the variables: sex, age, dermatological profession, dermatological diseases, location of the injuries, product handling that contains Kathon. We will make the statistical analysis with program SPSS. Results: Of the 110 positive reactions to Kathon, 32 are related to the labour activities (29.09%). We can add other 13 doubtful cases to them (11.81%) and of these positive cases, 46.6% were men. Conclusions: The Kathon is an additive very used in the labour ambit. The professions that are using more products with Kathon are those with greater number of cases registered


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Dermatite de Contato/diagnóstico , Poluentes Industriais , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...