Rationale, design and methods of VA-BRAVE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of two formulations of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder in veterans.

BACKGROUND: To address the US opioid epidemic, there is an urgent clinical need to provide persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) with effective medication treatments for OUD (MOUD). Formulations of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (SL-BUP/NLX) are considered the standard of care for OUD including within the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA). However, poor retention on MOUD undermines its effectiveness. Long-acting injectable monthly buprenorphine (INJ-BUP) (e.g., Sublocade®) has the potential to improve retention and therefore reduce opioid use and overdose. Designing and conducting studies for OUD pose unique challenges. The strategies and solutions to some of these considerations in designing Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) 2014, Buprenorphine for Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans (VA-BRAVE), a randomized, 20-site, clinical effectiveness trial comparing INJ-BUP to SL-BUP/NLX conducted within the VHA may provide valuable guidance for others confronted with similar investigation challenges. METHODS: This 52-week, parallel group, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the comparative effectiveness of two current FDA-approved formulations of buprenorphine: (1) daily SL-BUP/NLX vs. (2) monthly (28-day) INJ-BUP for Veterans with moderate to severe OUD (n = 952). The primary outcomes are (1) retention in MOUD and (2) opioid abstinence. Secondary outcomes include measures of other drug use, psychiatric symptoms, medical outcomes including prevalence rates of HIV, hepatitis B and C as well as social outcomes (housing instability, criminal justice involvement), service utilization and cost-effectiveness. Special considerations in conducting a comparative effectiveness trial with this population and during COVID-19 pandemic were also included. DISCUSSION: The evaluation of the extended-release formulation of buprenorphine compared to the standard sublingual formulation in real-world VHA settings is of paramount importance in addressing the opioid epidemic. The extent to which this new treatment facilitates retention, decreases opioid use, and prevents severe sequelae of OUD has not been studied in any long-term trial to date. Positive findings in this trial could lead to widespread adoption of MOUD, and, if proven superior INJ-BUP, by clinicians throughout the VHA and beyond. This treatment has the potential to reduce opioid use among Veterans, improve medical, psychological, and social outcomes, and save lives at justifiable cost. Trial registration Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04375033.

A multicenter randomized placebo controlled trial of rifampin to reduce pedal amputations for osteomyelitis in veterans with diabetes (VA INTREPID).

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus continues to inexorably rise in the United States and throughout the world. Lower limb amputations are a devastating comorbid complication of diabetes mellitus. Osteomyelitis increases the risk of amputation fourfold and commonly presages death. Antimicrobial therapy for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) varies greatly, indicating that high quality data are needed to inform clinical decision making. Several small trials have indicated that the addition of rifampin to backbone antimicrobial regimens for osteomyelitis outside the setting of the diabetic foot results in 28 to 42% higher cure rates. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind investigation of the addition of 6 weeks of rifampin, 600 mg daily, vs. matched placebo (riboflavin) to standard-of-care, backbone antimicrobial therapy for DFO. The study population are patients enrolled in Veteran Health Administration (VHA), ages ≥18 and ≤ 89 years with diabetes mellitus and definite or probable osteomyelitis of the foot for whom an extended course of oral or intravenous antibiotics is planned. The primary endpoint is amputation-free survival. The primary hypothesis is that using rifampin as adjunctive therapy will lower the hazard rate compared with the group that does not use rifampin as adjunctive therapy. The primary hypothesis will be tested by means of a two-sided log-rank test with a 5% significance level. The test has 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.67 or lower with a total of 880 study participants followed on average for 1.8 years. DISCUSSION: VA INTREPID will test if a rifampin-adjunctive antibiotic regimen increases amputation-free survival in patients seeking care in the VHA with DFO. A positive finding and its adoption by clinicians would reduce lower extremity amputations and their associated physical and emotional impact and reduce mortality for Veterans and for the general population with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Given that rifampin-adjunctive regimens are currently employed for therapy for the majority of DFO cases in Europe, and only in a small minority of cases in the United States, the trial results will impact therapeutic decisions, even if the null hypothesis is not rejected. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered January 6, 2017 at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03012529.

Adjunctive Rifampin Therapy For Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis in the Veterans Health Administration.

Importance: Among patients diagnosed with diabetes, the lifetime incidence of foot ulcers is 15%. Infection is a common complication of foot ulcers, and 20% to 60% of infections result in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Current treatment guidelines do not endorse any specific antibiotic agent for DFO, but small clinical trials suggest the addition of rifampin to antimicrobial regimens results in improved cure rates for osteomyelitis. Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated for DFO in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with and without adjunctive rifampin. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study used VHA databases to identify index DFO cases from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2013, and analyzed patients alive and without high-level amputation at 90 days after diagnosis in whom antibiotic therapy was initiated within 6 weeks of diagnosis. Patients with death or major amputation within 90 days of diagnosis, who were not treated with systemic antibiotics dispensed by the VHA within 6 weeks of diagnosis, or who were treated at facilities where rifampin was not dispensed for DFO were excluded. The retrospective cohort to inform the planning of a multisite randomized clinical trial was first investigated in spring 2015; retrospective analysis was performed from February 2017 through September 2019. Exposures: Patients initiating rifampin therapy within 6 weeks of the DFO diagnosis and receiving the drug for at least 14 days within 90 days of diagnosis were considered treated with rifampin. Patients not administered rifampin within 90 days of diagnosis served as the comparator group. Main Outcomes and Measures: A combined end point of mortality or amputation within 2 years of diagnosis was analyzed. Differences in times to event were evaluated using log-rank tests. Differences in event rates were compared using χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: The analysis population included 130 patients treated with rifampin and 6044 treated without rifampin (total of 6174; 6085 men [98.6%]; mean [SD] age, 64.9 [9.7] years). Lower event rates were observed among the rifampin group (35 of 130 [26.9%] vs 2250 of 6044 [37.2%]; P = .02). Patients treated with rifampin were younger (mean [SD] age, 62.2 [9.4] vs 64.9 [9.6] years), had fewer comorbidities (mean [SD] Charlson comorbidity index score, 3.5 [1.8] vs 4.0 [2.2]), had more infectious disease specialty consultations (63 of 130 [48.5%] vs 1960 of 6044 [32.4%]), and more often had Staphylococcus aureus identified in cultures (55 of 130 [42.3%] vs 1755 of 6044 [29.0%]) than patients not treated with rifampin. A logistic regression estimating the odds of events and controlling for these and other covariates yielded a significant association of rifampin (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients administered rifampin experienced lower rates of death and amputation than patients not treated with rifampin, which remained significant after adjustment for confounders. These results coupled with existing evidence from small clinical trials suggest the addition of rifampin to current treatment regimens may be a useful antimicrobial option in the treatment of DFO.

Assessing the impact of prescribing directives on opioid prescribing practices among Veterans Health Administration providers.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to test whether directives on opioid prescribing released by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had an impact on prescribing among VHA providers. METHODS: We used the VHA's linked pharmacy and patient medical records database to identify new prescriptions written for propoxyphene, fentanyl, and controlled release (CR) oxycodone between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2009. We plotted the monthly proportion of these prescriptions that complied with components of four specific safety alerts or directives for these substances issued by the VHA or FDA between 1/1/2001 and 12/31/2008. We modeled compliance using interrupted time series analysis and a generalized additive model with the addition of an indicator variable to flag prescriptions that followed the directive's release date. RESULTS: A total of 32.2 million new prescriptions for fentanyl, oxycodone CR, and propoxyphene were written for VHA patients meeting inclusion criteria. Compliance with guidelines in the directives increased steadily throughout the entire study period, with no clinically meaningful inflection point near the date of each directive's release. Generalized additive modeling and interrupted time series analysis found that the indicator flag slightly improved the fit of the data, but visual inspection of the plots revealed no change at a level of practical significance. CONCLUSIONS: While prescribing compliance increased throughout the period, release of FDA and VHA alerts and guidelines did not appear to contribute to this change. Given the fivefold increase in the rate of drug-related overdose deaths since 1990, identifying effective methods to communicate safety messages and change prescriber behavior remains a priority for future work. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Identifying Previously Undetected Harm: Piloting the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Global Trigger Tool in the Veterans Health Administration.

BACKGROUND: Adverse event (AE) surveillance may be enhanced by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Global Trigger Tool (GTT). A pilot study of the GTT was conducted in one Veterans Health Administration (VA) facility to assess the rates, types, and harm of AEs detected and to examine the overlap in AE detection between the GTT and existing surveillance mechanisms. METHODS: GTT guidelines were followed and medical records were reviewed for 17 weeks of acute care hospitalizations. Investigators met monthly, first to adjudicate discordant reviewer categorizations of harm and later to categorize the AEs detected using standardized definitions. GTT-detected AEs were compared with incident reports, Patient Safety Indicators, and the VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. RESULTS: Medical records were reviewed for 273 of 1980 eligible cases. Using the GTT, a total of 109 AEs were identified. More than 1 of 5 hospitalizations (21%) were associated with an AE. The majority of AEs detected (60%) were minor harms; there were no deaths attributable to medical care. Ninety-six of the 109 AEs (88%) were not detected by other measures. CONCLUSIONS: The GTT identified previously undetected AEs at one VA. The GTT has the potential to track AEs and guide quality improvement efforts in conjunction with existing AE surveillance mechanisms.

Prescription opioid duration of action and the risk of unintentional overdose among patients receiving opioid therapy.

IMPORTANCE: The unprecedented increase in unintentional overdose events that has occurred in tandem with escalating sales of prescription opioids over the past 2 decades has raised concerns about whether the therapeutic use of opioids has contributed to increases in overdose injury. Few controlled studies have examined the extent to which ecologic measures of increases in opioid prescribing and overdose injuries reflect risk among patients prescribed opioids, let alone whether some opioid regimens are safer than others. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the risk of unintentional overdose injury is associated with the duration of opioid action (ie, long-acting vs short-acting formulations). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A propensity score-adjusted cohort study was conducted using population-based health care utilization data from the Veterans Administration Healthcare System. The patients were veterans with chronic painful conditions who began therapy with opioid analgesics between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Unintentional overdoses that are explicitly coded using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision codes as drug or medication poisonings of accidental intent (E850.x-860.x) or undetermined intent (E980.x or drug poisoning [960.x-980.x] without an accompanying external cause of injury code). RESULTS: A total of 319 unintentional overdose events were observed. Patients initiating therapy with long-acting opioids were more than twice as likely to overdose compared with persons initiating therapy with short-acting opioids. After adjustment for age, sex, opioid dose, and other clinical characteristics, patients receiving long-acting opioids had a significantly higher rate of overdose injury than did those receiving short-acting opioids (hazard ratio [HR], 2.33; 95% CI, 1.26-4.32). The risk associated with long-acting agents was particularly marked during the first 2 weeks after initiation of treatment (HR, 5.25; 1.88-14.72). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, the findings of the present study provide the first evidence that the risk of unintentional overdose injury is related to the prescribed opioid's duration of action. If replicated in other cohorts, our findings suggest that clinicians weighing the benefits and risks of initiating different opioid regimens should consider not only the daily dose prescribed but also the duration of opioid action, favoring short-acting agents whenever possible, especially during the first 2 weeks of therapy.

Drinking goal choice and outcomes in a Web-based alcohol intervention: results from VetChange.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the paper are to describe characteristics of participants who chose moderation and abstinence drinking goals, and to examine post-treatment drinking outcomes based on patterns of goal choice during a Web-based alcohol intervention for returning U.S. Veterans. METHOD: We conducted a descriptive secondary analysis of a subsample of 305 of 600 Veterans who participated in a clinical trial of VetChange, an 8-module, cognitive-behavioural intervention. Participants self-selected abstinence or moderation drinking goals, initially at Module 3, and weekly during subsequent modules. Alcohol use and alcohol-related problems were measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Quick Drink Screen (QDS), and Short Inventory of Problems (SIP-2R). RESULTS: Initial goal choices were 86.9% moderation and 13.1% abstinence. Approximately 20% of participants from each initial choice changed goals during the intervention; last goal choices were 68.6% moderation and 31.4% abstinence. Participants who initially chose moderation reported higher percent heavy drinking days at baseline; participants who initially chose abstinence were more likely to report recent substance abuse treatment and were older. Post-intervention levels of alcohol use and alcohol-related problems were significantly reduced in all goal-choice patterns (i.e., Moderation Only, Abstinence Only, Moderation to Abstinence, and Abstinence to Moderation; all measures p < 0.05 or less). Baseline drinking severity did not differentially relate to outcomes across goal-choice patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in a Web-based alcohol intervention for returning U.S. Veterans demonstrated improvements in drinking regardless of whether they chose an abstinence or moderation drinking goal, and whether the goal was maintained or changed over the course of the intervention.

Retention of black and white participants in the selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial (SWOG-coordinated intergroup study S0000).

BACKGROUND: Disproportionally low retention of minority populations can adversely affect the generalizability of clinical research trials. We determine the overall retention rates for White and Black participants from the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) and explore participant and site characteristics associated with retention failure (study disengagement) for these groups. METHODS: A secondary analysis of 28,118 White (age ≥55), and 4,322 Black (age ≥ 50) SELECT participants used multivariate Cox regression to estimate overall retention rates and to calculate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Blacks had higher age-adjusted risk of disengagement than Whites (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.77-2.08). Among Black participants, those ages 50 to 54 were at three times the risk of disengagement than those ≥65 years of age (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 2.41-5.41). Blacks age ≥65 had 1.6 times the risk of disengagement than Whites age ≥65 (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.38-1.87). By 6 years after randomization, 84% of Whites and 69% of Blacks remained engaged in the study. Current smoking status was an independent risk factor for study disengagement for both White and Black participants. For both groups, sites whose staffs missed SELECT training sessions or who received SELECT Retention and Adherence grants were associated with increased and decreased disengagement risks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SELECT retention was disproportionately lower for Blacks than for Whites. IMPACT: The observed difference in retention rates for Blacks and Whites and factors identified by race for study disengagement in SELECT may inform retention efforts for future long-term, cancer prevention trials.

Temporal stability of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in a problem-drinking sample.

The 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) reformulated posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based partially on research showing there were 4 main factors that underlie the symptoms of the disorder. The primary aim of this study was to examine the temporal stability of the DSM-5 factors as measured by the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Weathers et al., 2010). Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to examine the structure of DSM-5 PTSD, and temporal stability over 3 time points was examined to determine if the measure reflects a consistent construct over time. Our sample was 507 combat-exposed veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan who enrolled in an online intervention for problem drinking and combat-related stress (Brief et al., 2013). We administered the PCL-5 at baseline, 8-week postintervention, and 3-month follow-up assessments. The DSM-5 model provided an adequate fit to the data at baseline. Tests of equality of form and equality of factor loadings demonstrated stability of the factor structure over time, indicating temporal stability. This study confirmed the results of previous research supporting the DSM-5 model of PTSD symptoms (Elhai et al., 2012; Miller et al., 2013). This is the 1st study to demonstrate the temporal stability of the PCL-5, indicating its use in longitudinal studies measures the same construct over time.

Incident severe thrombocytopenia in veterans treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C infection.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the incidence and risks for severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50,000/µL) in United States Veteran patients treated with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin for hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV) chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS: Using a retrospective, observational cohort study design to analyze databases from the New England Veterans Healthcare System, we identified 979 patients diagnosed with HCV-positive CLD treated solely with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin. The cohort was stratified by pre-treatment platelet counts of 50,000-100,000/µL (N = 90), >100,000-150,000/µL (N = 162), and >150,000µL (N = 727). The cumulative incidence of severe thrombocytopenia and major bleeding events were determined for each baseline platelet group for 48 weeks following treatment initiation. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify risk factors for incident severe thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: Overall, severe thrombocytopenia occurred in 6.1% (N = 60), but in 41.1% of patients with pre-treatment platelet counts 50, 000-100,000/µL compared with 11.7% (p < 0.001) and 0.55% (p < 0.001) in the two higher pre-treatment platelet groups. Most episodes occurred within the first 12 weeks of treatment. Median nadir count for these 60 patients was 35,000/µL (inter-quartile range 28,000, 44,000). Baseline platelet counts of 50,000-100,000/µL [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.81; 95%CI = 2.07-7.00] and hemoglobin <10 g/dL (adjusted HR = 3.39; 95%CI = 1.45-7.960) associated with severe thrombocytopenia. Major bleeding events during the 48-week observation period were rare (N = 5, 0.51%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of severe thrombocytopenia in a large, observational cohort of veteran patients with HCV CLD treated with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin was 6.1%. Low pre-treatment platelet counts and hemoglobin levels associated with early, incident severe thrombocytopenia.

Veterans Healthcare Administration providers' attitudes and perceptions regarding pragmatic trials embedded at the point of care.

Background The Veterans Healthcare Administration (VA) is implementing an adaptation of a pragmatic trial program, Point of Care Research (POC-R). The goal of POC-R is to embed research into clinical practice, contributing to a Learning Healthcare System. Provider acceptance and participation in POC-R is essential to its successful implementation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate provider's perceptions and beliefs regarding the POC-R program. Methods Provider focus groups and interviews were conducted at seven VA medical facilities involving 62 providers. A semi-structured script was used that included descriptions of four use cases and targeted questions regarding perceptions, concerns, and attitudes about the POC-R program. Sessions were audio-taped, de-identified, transcribed, and analyzed using systematic qualitative techniques to create response categories and overarching themes. Results The emergent themes were as follows: (1) POC-R is a valuable component of evidence-based practice, providing an opportunity to base clinical practice on more generalizable evidence as well as providing tools to improve local practice; (2) POC-R highlights the tension between the need for autonomy of practice and compliance with protocols; (3) POC-R may create increased time and burden resulting from added research responsibilities; (4) concern about the scientific validity and reliability of results; (5) potential for a negative impact on the provider-patient relationship; and (6) uncertainty regarding what constitutes equipoise, given differences in provider knowledge and preferences. Despite substantive concerns, barriers were generally felt to be solvable. Implementation should include provider education, careful attention to workflow for all arms of the study, inclusion of the entire team, and adequate oversight. Limitations The study design is qualitative with limited implications for causal inference. Participants are from the VA and may not be representative of other clinicians. Conclusion VA providers are supportive of the importance and value of pragmatic trials in general and of POC-R in particular. However, providers have significant concerns regarding the burden, ethics, and evidence regarding equipoise. Results are discussed in terms of implementation recommendations.

Strategies to address participant misrepresentation for eligibility in Web-based research.

Emerging methodological research suggests that the World Wide Web ("Web") is an appropriate venue for survey data collection, and a promising area for delivering behavioral intervention. However, the use of the Web for research raises concerns regarding sample validity, particularly when the Web is used for recruitment and enrollment. The purpose of this paper is to describe the challenges experienced in two different Web-based studies in which participant misrepresentation threatened sample validity: a survey study and an online intervention study. The lessons learned from these experiences generated three types of strategies researchers can use to reduce the likelihood of participant misrepresentation for eligibility in Web-based research. Examples of procedural/design strategies, technical/software strategies and data analytic strategies are provided along with the methodological strengths and limitations of specific strategies. The discussion includes a series of considerations to guide researchers in the selection of strategies that may be most appropriate given the aims, resources and target population of their studies.

Web intervention for OEF/OIF veterans with problem drinking and PTSD symptoms: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Veterans who served in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) commonly experience alcohol misuse and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following their return from deployment to a war zone. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a newly developed, 8-module, self-management web intervention (VetChange) based on motivational and cognitive-behavioral principles to reduce alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, and PTSD symptoms in returning combat veterans. METHOD: Six hundred participants, recruited through targeted Facebook ads, were randomized to either an Initial Intervention Group (IIG; n = 404) or a Delayed Intervention Group (DIG; n = 196) that waited 8 weeks for access to VetChange. Primary outcome measures were Drinks per Drinking Day, Average Weekly Drinks, Percent Heavy Drinking Days, and PTSD symptoms. Intent-to-treat analyses compared changes in outcome measures over time between IIG and DIG as well as within-group changes. RESULTS: IIG participants demonstrated greater reductions in drinking (p < .001 for each measure) and PTSD symptoms (p = .009) between baseline and end-of-intervention than did DIG participants between baseline and the end of the waiting period. DIG participants showed similar improvements to those in IIG following participation in VetChange. Alcohol problems were also reduced within each group between baseline and 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that VetChange is effective in reducing drinking and PTSD symptoms in OIF/OEF veterans. Further studies of VetChange are needed to assess web-based recruitment and retention methods and to determine VetChange's effectiveness in demographic and clinical sub-populations of returning veterans.

Thrombocytopenia and bleeding in veterans with non-hepatitis C-related chronic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease (CLD) typically reflects disease severity and may indicate an increased risk for bleeding. AIMS: To describe the longitudinal course of thrombocytopenia and risks for bleeding in veteran patients with non-hepatitis C-related CLD. METHODS: We identified 2,349 patients with non-hepatitis C-related CLD from databases of the New England Veterans Healthcare System between 1999 and 2008. The cohort was stratified by baseline platelet counts of <50,000, 50-100,000, > 100,000-150,000, and >150,000/µl. Primary outcomes were the incidence and hazard rates for bleeding episodes requiring hospitalization and incident severe thrombocytopenia (<50,000/µl). RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR 1.2, 6.3), incident major bleeds, predominantly gastrointestinal, occurred in 254 patients (10.8 % of the cohort) and in 19.9 % of those with baseline platelets <50,000/µl. Incident severe thrombocytopenia occurred in 315 patients (13.4 % of cohort) and in 40.7 % of those with baseline platelet counts between 50,000 and 100,000/µl. Baseline platelet counts between 50,000 and 100,000/µl independently predicted bleeding [adjusted HR 2.89 (1.76, 4.73) p < 0.001] as did esophageal varices, hemoglobin ≤ 9.9 g %, and INR 1.4-2.0. Incident severe thrombocytopenia and minimum platelet counts <25,000/µl each associated with bleeding episodes, but the average of minimum platelet counts recorded for those who bled was 76,000/µl. CONCLUSIONS: Among veteran patients with non-hepatitis C-related CLD, baseline platelet counts of 50,000 to 100,000/µl increased subsequent risks for both incident severe thrombocytopenia and major bleeding events. Whereas associations between severe thrombocytopenia and bleeding most likely reflect CLD severity, liver-related coagulopathies, and co-morbid bleeding risks, interventions to enhance platelet production may be beneficial for such patients.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of D-cycloserine and exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder.

D-Cycloserine (DCS) is a partial NMDA receptor agonist that has been shown to enhance therapeutic response to exposure-based treatments for anxiety disorders, but has not been tested in the treatment of combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to determine whether DCS augments exposure therapy for PTSD in veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan and to test whether a brief six-session course of exposure therapy could effectively reduce PTSD symptoms in returning veterans. In contrast to previous trials using DCS to enhance exposure therapy, results indicated that veterans in the exposure therapy plus DCS condition experienced significantly less symptom reduction than those in the exposure therapy plus placebo condition over the course of the treatment. Possible reasons for why DCS was associated with poorer outcome are discussed. Clinicaltrials.gov Registry #: NCT00371176; A Placebo-Controlled Trail of D-Cycloserine and Exposure Therapy for Combat-PTSD; www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT00371176.

Risk of community-acquired pneumonia in veteran patients to whom proton pump inhibitors were dispensed.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies linking proton pump inhibitor (PPI) exposure with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) have reported either modest or no associations. Accordingly, we studied PPI exposure and CAP in veteran patients, using a retrospective, nested case-control design. METHODS: From linked pharmacy and administrative databases of the New England Veterans Healthcare System, we identified 71985 outpatients newly prescribed PPIs between 1998 and 2007; 1544 patients met criteria for CAP subsequent to PPI initiation; 15440 controls were matched through risk-set sampling by age and time under observation. Crude and adjusted odds ratios comparing current with past PPI exposures, as well as tests for interactions, were conducted for the entire and stratified samples. RESULTS: Current PPI use associated with CAP (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.29 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.15-1.45]). Risks were not substantially altered by age or year of diagnosis. Dementia (n = 85; P = .062 for interaction) and sedative/tranquilizer use (n = 224; P = .049 for interaction) were likely effect modifiers increasing a PPI-CAP association; conversely, for some chronic medical conditions, PPI-associated CAP risks were reversed. PPI exposures between 1 and 15 days increased CAP risks, compared with longer exposures, but PPI initiation also frequently occurred shortly after CAP diagnoses. Prescribed PPI doses >1 dose/day also increased PPI-associated CAP risks. CONCLUSIONS: Among the veterans studied, current compared with past PPI exposures associated modestly with increased risks of CAP. However, our observations that recent treatment initiation and higher PPI doses were associated with greater risks, and the inconsistent PPI-CAP associations between patient subgroups, indicate that further inquiries are needed to separate out coincidental patterns of associations.

Proton pump inhibitor discontinuation in long-term care.

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) discontinuation in long-term care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Veterans Affairs (VA) long-term care facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans admitted for nonhospice care in 2005 with a length of stay of 7 days or more who were prescribed a PPI within 7 days of admission (N = 10,371). MEASUREMENTS: Prescribed medications and comorbidities were determined from VA pharmacy and administrative databases and functional status from Minimum Data Set records. Associations between participant characteristics and PPI discontinuation were determined using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs), censoring at death, discharge, or 180 days after admission. RESULTS: Participants were predominantly male (97%) and had a median age of 73 (interquartile range 60-81). There were 2,749 (27%) PPI discontinuations; 43% of these occurred within 28 days of admission. Hospitalizations (HR = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.46), preadmission PPI use (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.16-1.56), and lowest functional status (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.03-1.45) were associated with early PPI discontinuation in adjusted models. Participants with gastric acid-related disease (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.61), diabetes mellitus (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94), and those who were prescribed six or more medications (6-7 medications, HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66-0.92; 8-10 medications, HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.54-0.76; ≥ 11 medications 0.51, 95% CI = 0.42-0.62) were less likely to have early discontinuation. No PPI discontinuer had PPIs resumed during the study, and few (9%) had histamine-2 receptor antagonist substitutions. CONCLUSION: Although there may be clinical uncertainty regarding PPI discontinuation, more than one-quarter of participants prescribed a PPI upon admission to long-term care had it discontinued within 180 days. Targeting individuals prescribed PPIs for medication appropriateness review may reduce prescribing of potentially nonindicated medications.