Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to spondylodiscitis in Spanish children through the RIOPed network: evaluation before and after the publication of the national consensus document.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric spondylodiscitis (PSD) is an uncommon condition, for which there are no specific international clinical guidelines. Factors related to complications have not been stablished. Our aim was to describe clinical and epidemiological characteristics of PSD, to analyze factors associated with complications and to evaluate adherence to the recommendations of the Spanish National Consensus Document (NCD) for the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to acute osteoarticular infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ambispective, multicenter, national study of two PSD cohorts: historical (2008-2012) and prospective (2015-2020, after publication of NCD). Patients with diagnosis of PSD were included. Demographic, clinical, microbiological and radiological data were recorded. Factors related to the development of complications were analized by logistic regression. Comparisons between both cohorts were performed. RESULTS: Ninety-eight PSD were included. In 84.7%, diagnosis was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Microbiological isolation was obtained in 6.1%, with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus as the main etiologic agent. Complications occurred in 18.9%, the most frequent being soft tissue abscess. Of the 8.6% of patients with sequelae, persistent pain was the most common. Comparing cohorts, there was better adherence to NCD treatment recommendations in the prospective one (57.6% vs. 12.9%, p < 0.01), including a reduction in the length of intravenous antibiotic therapy (10 vs. 14 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of PSD in our series was favorable, with low frequency of complications and sequelae. The adherence to the recommendations of the NCD was high. Studies with larger sample size are needed to establish new recommendations to optimize the approach to these infections.

Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Pediatric Osteoarticular Infection: When and to Whom?

BACKGROUND: Osteoarticular infections (OAIs) are typically treated initially with intravenous antibiotics. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether an exclusive oral treatment in selected children may be appropriate. METHODS: The Spanish Network of Osteoarticular Infections is a nationwide multicenter registry comprising 37 hospitals in Spain. The registry prospectively includes clinical characteristics and outcome of children with OAI. One of the hospitals from RioPed offers oral treatment to children meeting certain criteria. Patients were classified into 2 groups. Group 1: management with initial intravenous antibiotic therapy. Group 2: patients exclusively treated with oral antibiotics. A comparison between the 2 groups was performed. RESULTS: We compared 893 children who initially received intravenous antibiotics (group 1) with 64 children who received exclusively oral therapy (group 2). Patients from group 2 were younger (33.9 vs. 20.3 months; P = 0.001), had a lower percentage of Staphylococcus aureus (23.3% vs. 3.1%; P < 0.001), a higher proportion of Kingella kingae (12.1% vs. 28.1%; P = 0.001), higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate/C-reactive protein (CRP) ratio (1.4 interquartile range 0.6-3.6 vs. 3.3 interquartile range 1.7-5.7; P < 0.001) and showed lower rate of fever (63% vs. 48.8%; P = 0.024) than in group 1. Complications were not found in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: An exclusively oral administration could be a safe option in selected patients with OAI. Low-risk criteria are proposed: good general condition, no underlying disease, 6 months to 3 years old, appropriate oral tolerance, C-reactive protein <80 mg/L, erythrocyte sedimentation rate/C-reactive protein ratio ≥0.67, no skin injury, no recent surgery, no cervical spondylodiscitis and no local complications at onset.