Eficiencia de las unidades de agudos de geriatría frente al resto de servicios hospitalarios. Análisis de la casuística de 5 años ajustada por GRD / Efficiency of the acute geriatric units compared to the rest of the hospital departments. A 5-year audit of the case-mix adjusted for diagnosis-related group

Introducción: La ocupación hospitalaria por pacientes mayores es elevada y lo será aún más en los próximos años. Sus estancias suelen ser más prolongadas, por lo que es importante que los hospitales desarrollen estructuras con la mayor eficiencia posible. Método: En un complejo hospitalario de 1.200 camas con dos unidades de geriatría de agudos (UGA), una en el hospital general (HG) y otra en un hospital de apoyo (HA), se analizaron las altas de los 15 grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico (GRD) más frecuentes en geriatría durante 5años y se compararon las estancias de los pacientes mayores de 75años en ambas UGA con las del resto de servicios de sus respectivos centros. Resultados: Se incluyeron 14.948 altas, cuyas estancias fueron 2,9días (25% de la estancia) inferiores en las UGA que en el resto de servicios. Las diferencias en la unidad del HG fueron del 22% (9,2 vs 11,7días) en 2011, del 16% (9,3 vs 11,1días) en 2012, del 21% (9,3 vs 11,1días) en 2013, del 34% (7,4 vs 11,1días) en 2014 y del 25% (8,3 vs 11días) en 2015. Las diferencias en la unidad del HA fueron del 18% (10,4 vs 12,7días) en 2011, del 19% (9,5 vs 11,7días) en 2012, del 25% (8,8 vs 11,7días) en 2013, del 24% (8,8 vs 11,6días) en 2014 y del 32% (9 vs 13,1días) en 2015, todas las diferencias con p<0,05. Conclusiones: Las UGA son un 25% más eficientes que el resto de servicios en el ingreso de pacientes mayores de 75años

Introduction: Hospital occupancy rate by older patients is high, and it will be even higher in the future. Their hospital stay is usually longer, making it important for hospitals to develop structures with the best efficiency possible. Method: Hospital discharges of patients older than 75years with the 15 most frequent Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) in Geriatrics were recorded during a 5-year period in a 1,200-bed hospital. Length of stay was compared between the two acute geriatric units (AGU), one in the general hospital (GH) and another in an affiliate hospital (AH), as well as with the rest of departments. Results: A total of 14,948 discharged patients were included. Length of stay was 2.9 (25%) days shorter in AGU units than in the rest of departments. Differences were 22% (9.2 vs 11.7days) in 2011, 16% (9.3 vs 11.1days) in 2012, 21% (9.3 vs 11.1days) in 2013, 34% (7.4 vs 11.1days) in 2014, and 25% (8.3 vs 11days) in 2015 in the GH. Differences were 18% (10.4 vs 12.7days) in 2011, 19% (9.5 vs 11.7days) in 2012, 25% (8.8 vs 11.7days) in 2013, 24% (8.8 vs 11.6days) in 2014, and 32% (9 vs 13.1days) in 2015 at the AH, all of them with a P<.05. Conclusions: AGU are 25% more efficient than the rest of hospital departments in managing hospital admissions of patients older than 75years

[Efficiency of the acute geriatric units compared to the rest of the hospital departments. A 5-year audit of the case-mix adjusted for diagnosis-related group]. / Eficiencia de las unidades de agudos de geriatría frente al resto de servicios hospitalarios. Análisis de la casuística de 5 años ajustada por GRD.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital occupancy rate by older patients is high, and it will be even higher in the future. Their hospital stay is usually longer, making it important for hospitals to develop structures with the best efficiency possible. METHOD: Hospital discharges of patients older than 75years with the 15 most frequent Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) in Geriatrics were recorded during a 5-year period in a 1,200-bed hospital. Length of stay was compared between the two acute geriatric units (AGU), one in the general hospital (GH) and another in an affiliate hospital (AH), as well as with the rest of departments. RESULTS: A total of 14,948 discharged patients were included. Length of stay was 2.9 (25%) days shorter in AGU units than in the rest of departments. Differences were 22% (9.2 vs 11.7days) in 2011, 16% (9.3 vs 11.1days) in 2012, 21% (9.3 vs 11.1days) in 2013, 34% (7.4 vs 11.1days) in 2014, and 25% (8.3 vs 11days) in 2015 in the GH. Differences were 18% (10.4 vs 12.7days) in 2011, 19% (9.5 vs 11.7days) in 2012, 25% (8.8 vs 11.7days) in 2013, 24% (8.8 vs 11.6days) in 2014, and 32% (9 vs 13.1days) in 2015 at the AH, all of them with a P<.05. CONCLUSIONS: AGU are 25% more efficient than the rest of hospital departments in managing hospital admissions of patients older than 75years.

Eficiencia de las unidades geriátricas de agudos en los hospitales españoles / Efficiency of acute geriatric units in Spain hospitals

Objetivos Revisar los datos publicados de los hospitales españoles en los que se hayan realizado comparaciones entre las estancias de los pacientes ingresados en unidades geriátricas de agudos (UGA) y en otros servicios, mediante la utilización del sistema de Grupos Relacionados por el Diagnóstico (GRD) de clasificación de pacientes. Aportar la experiencia propia en este tema. Material y métodos Se revisaron los trabajos españoles recogidos en una revisión sistemática previa. Se añadió la casuística del hospital, se analizaron los episodios de los pacientes mayores de 74 años dados de alta durante 24 meses incluidos en los GRD más frecuentes. Se compararon las estancias de los pacientes en las UGA con los del resto de los servicios médicos de los hospitales y con el estándar de la comunidad autónoma correspondiente.Resultados Hay datos de 5 hospitales generales españoles. La comparación de las estancias muestra una reducción entre el 8 y el 19% en las UGA comparadas con las de los otros servicios de los mismos hospitales en pacientes similares. En un hospital, la reducción de la estancia media (EM) en geriatría llega al 21% en los mayores de 80 años. En 3 de los 4 hospitales en que se comparó con el estándar, la EM en la UGA fue menor en la mayoría de los GRD, con reducciones del 7 al 9%. Conclusiones Estos resultados permiten concluir que, sobre la base de los sistemas de clasificación y codificación habitualmente usados, las UGA españolas son más eficientes que el resto de los servicios en la hospitalización aguda de los ancianos(AU)

Objectives To review published data from Spanish hospitals in which comparisons had been made between the mean length of stay in patients admitted to acute geriatric units (AGU) and those admitted to other departments using the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) classification system and to describe our own experience. Material and methods The Spanish reports collected in a previous systematic review were reviewed. The case mix of our hospital was added by analyzing episodes in patients older than 74 years old discharged during a 24-month period and included in the most frequent DRGs. The length of stay in patients admitted to the AGU was compared with that in the remaining medical departments in the hospital and with the standard average stay in the corresponding autonomous region. Results Data were obtained from five Spanish general hospitals. The comparison revealed that the mean length of stay in the AGU was 8–19% shorter than that of similar patients in the other medical departments of the same hospitals. In one hospital, the reduction in the mean length of stay was 21% in patients older than 80 years. In three of the four hospitals where comparisons with the standard were performed, the mean length of stay in the AGU was lower for most of the DRGs, showing reductions of 7–9%. Conclusions These results allow us to conclude that, based on the commonly used patient classification and coding system, Spanish AGUs are more efficient than the remaining medical services in the acute hospitalization of elderly patients in our setting (AU)

[Efficiency of acute geriatric units in Spain hospitals]. / Eficiencia de las unidades geriátricas de agudos en los hospitales españoles.

OBJECTIVES: To review published data from Spanish hospitals in which comparisons had been made between the mean length of stay in patients admitted to acute geriatric units (AGU) and those admitted to other departments using the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) classification system and to describe our own experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Spanish reports collected in a previous systematic review were reviewed. The case mix of our hospital was added by analyzing episodes in patients older than 74 years old discharged during a 24-month period and included in the most frequent DRGs. The length of stay in patients admitted to the AGU was compared with that in the remaining medical departments in the hospital and with the standard average stay in the corresponding autonomous region. RESULTS: Data were obtained from five Spanish general hospitals. The comparison revealed that the mean length of stay in the AGU was 8-19% shorter than that of similar patients in the other medical departments of the same hospitals. In one hospital, the reduction in the mean length of stay was 21% in patients older than 80 years. In three of the four hospitals where comparisons with the standard were performed, the mean length of stay in the AGU was lower for most of the DRGs, showing reductions of 7-9%. CONCLUSIONS: These results allow us to conclude that, based on the commonly used patient classification and coding system, Spanish AGUs are more efficient than the remaining medical services in the acute hospitalization of elderly patients in our setting.