Both younger and elderly patients in pain are willing to undergo knee replacement despite the COVID-19 pandemic: a study on surgical waiting lists.

PURPOSE: To identify factors influencing patient's availability to re-schedule primary total knee replacement (TKR) or revision (RKR) surgery after the lockdown (March-May 2020) during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A prospective cohort study through a telephone survey was performed in 156 patients (143 for primary and 13 for revision) included in the TKR and RKR surgical waiting list before March 2020. Contact of each patient with COVID-19, stress and anxiety, perceived pain, and function were obtained in the interviews, and also the preference of each patient to have re-scheduled surgery (early or late). Finally, we registered their response (acceptance or refusal) when surgery was effectively re-scheduled. RESULTS: 88 out of 156 patients waiting for knee replacement (76/143 of those waiting for TKR, 12/13 of those waiting for RKR) declared themselves ready for surgery in less than 1 month. When re-scheduled, 115 patients underwent surgery and 41 refused. Significantly different preferences were found for age (more prone to surgery if under 65), revision surgery (more readily available), pain (7.9 ± 1.7/10 in NRS in those undergoing surgery, 5.6 ± 2.3/10 in those refusing, p = 0.000), or COVID-19 diagnosis, but not other close contact with COVID-19, comorbidities, stress, or anxiety. A logistic regression model confirmed that revision surgery (OR 9.33), perceived severe pain (OR 5.21), and age under 65 years (OR 5.82) were significantly associated with patient preference. The probability of patients over 65 to prefer early surgery reached 60% only with pain at or above 9/10. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical timing preferences for knee replacement vary between patients older than 65 years (immediate surgery only when pain is intense) and younger patients (immediate surgery no matter the amount of pain). Even if COVID-19 severely stroke our population, the need for knee replacement stood in the young population and even in the aged population at risk for COVID when pain was important.

Validation of a long bone fracture non-union healing score after treatment with mesenchymal stromal cells combined to biomaterials.

The available scores to clinically evaluate fracture consolidation encounter difficulties to interpret progression towards consolidation in long-bone non-union, particularly when incorporating biomaterials in the surgical treatment. The aims of this study were to validate the REBORNE bone healing scale in tibia, humerus and femur non-unions treated by a combination of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and biomaterials, through the interclass correlation (ICC) among raters, and to define reliability and concordance in anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, compared to computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Twenty-six cases from the EudraCT 2011-005441-13 clinical trial underwent bone healing evaluation, if at least 3 out of 4 cortical views clearly identified. Three senior orthopaedic surgeons evaluated radiographs and CTs at 3 and 6 months FU. All cases included preoperative imaging and radiographs at 12 months. The 4-stage scale score was obtained from each cortical view in orthogonal radiographs or CTs. A score of 0.6875 (11/16) was set as a threshold for bone healing. Statistically, ICC evaluated agreement among raters. Cronbach's alpha coefficient tested reliability. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were estimated between mean CT scores and mean radiographic scores. Bland and Altman graphs provided the limits of agreement between both imaging techniques. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed in radiographs (against CT), and the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) Curve was estimated. The probability to predict bone consolidation with REBORNE scores obtained from radiographs was modelled. RESULTS: An ICC of 0.88 and 0.91 (CT and radiographs) confirmed agreement in the REBORNE score for non-union bone healing, with an inter-rater reliability of 0.92 and 0.95. Scores through the radiographic evaluation were found equivalent to the CTs at 6 months FU. A CCC of 0.79 was detected against CT. The radiographic scores in the REBORNE bone healing scale correctly classified bone consolidation in 77%, with an accuracy of 83% based on ROC curves. CONCLUSIONS: The REBORNE score measured with CT or radiographic images was reliable among raters at a follow-up time above 6 months for long bone non-union fractures. The REBORNE scale measured with radiographs proved valid to assess consolidation against CT measurements.