Quality of life in patients with heartburn but without esophagitis: effects of treatment with omeprazole.

OBJECTIVE: Because improvement in quality of life (QoL) is an important therapeutic goal in patients with heartburn but without esophagitis, the aim of the present study was to compare the impact of omeprazole 20 mg or 10 mg daily with that of placebo on QoL in patients with heartburn as the predominant symptom. METHODS: QoL was measured at baseline and after 4 wk using two validated questionnaires, the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. RESULTS: The two questionnaires were completed by 163 patients in the omeprazole 20 mg group, 163 in the omeprazole 10 mg group, and 82 in the placebo group. The reflux dimension of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale showed a significant improvement in terms of reflux symptoms on omeprazole 20 mg versus omeprazole 10 mg and placebo, and on omeprazole 10 mg compared with placebo. The total score of the PGWB index improved significantly more on both doses of omeprazole than on placebo. The mean scores rose from 96.8 to 103.9 on omeprazole 20 mg, from 98.4 to 106.0 on omeprazole 10 mg, and from 98.0 to 100.6 on placebo. All dimensions of the PGWB index improved on treatment with omeprazole, but the improvements were most pronounced in the dimensions depicting anxiety, depressed mood, and self-control. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that treatment with omeprazole 20 mg and omeprazole 10 mg restores QoL to a level comparable with that observed in a healthy population.

One-week omeprazole treatment in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux are common, and currently available methods for diagnosing reflux disease are expensive and uncomfortable for the patient. The diagnostic value of a treatment test with omeprazole is unclear. METHODS: Patients with dyspepsia including heartburn admitted for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were studied in a prospective, randomized, double-blind Scandinavian multicentre study. Before entry 188 patients were enrolled, and 160 were randomized to 1-week treatment with 20 mg omeprazole twice daily or placebo. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was defined as reflux oesophagitis Savary-Miller grades II-III at endoscopy or pH < 4 exceeding 4% of the total time at 24-h oesophageal pH-monitoring and was found in 135 patients. The treatment test was considered positive when the patient's symptoms improved during the treatment week compared with the pretreatment day. RESULTS: The sensitivity in diagnosing reflux disease was 71-81% with omeprazole as a diagnostic test, compared with 36-47% for placebo during treatment days 3-7. The specificity was similar for the two treatment arms during the first days of the study. During the end of the week a larger proportion of the patients with normal endoscopy and pH test responded to omeprazole treatment, giving omeprazole lower specificity than placebo. The investigators' overall evaluation of whether the patient was a responder to the test had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 55% in the omeprazole-treated patients. The corresponding figures in the placebo group were 17% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: One week of omeprazole treatment is a simple diagnostic test with a fairly high sensitivity. The specificity is poor owing to the placebo effect and to the lack of a gold standard in diagnosing reflux disease.

Heartburn without oesophagitis: efficacy of omeprazole therapy and features determining therapeutic response.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited on the value of effective antisecretory therapy in the relief of heartburn in patients without oesophagitis. METHODS: Patients with heartburn, without endoscopic signs of oesophagitis, were randomized to double-blind treatment with omeprazole, 20 or 10 mg once daily, or placebo, for 4 weeks (n = 509). Pre-treatment oesophageal acid exposure was assessed using 24-h intra-oesophageal pH monitoring. Heartburn was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: At 4 weeks the proportion of patients with complete absence of heartburn was 46% (95% confidence interval, 39-53%) with 20 mg omeprazole, 31% (25-38%) with 10 mg omeprazole, and 13% (7-20%) with placebo. Satisfaction with therapy was reported by 66%, 57%, and 31% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole, 20 and 10 mg once daily, provides rapid relief of heartburn in patients without endoscopic oesophagitis.

Well-being and gastrointestinal symptoms among patients referred to endoscopy owing to suspected duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated quality of of life (QoL) in patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases, and there is a lack of validated measures for use in gastroenterology. METHODS: The applicability and relevance of self-administered questionnaires such as the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) index and the Gastrointestinal Symptoms referred to endoscopy because of suspected duodenal ulcer were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 1526 patients with suspected duodenal ulcer were screened for inclusion in a clinical study. On the basis of medical history and endoscopy, 1424 patients who completed the questionnaire before endoscopy were classified in five diagnostic groups: oesophagitis, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, negative endoscopy, and gastritis duodenitis. Irrespective of diagnosis, all patient groups reported a considerable decrease in their general well-being (mean score, 85, compared with 105 in healthy populations) with no significant differences between the groups. The results of the GSRS, however, showed statistically significant differences between the groups in dimensions depicting Abdominal pain, Reflux, Indigestion, and Diarrhoea Syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that, irrespective of endoscopic findings, patients complaining of upper gastrointestinal symptoms have a low degree of general well-being. The symptoms profiles in the different diagnostic groups vary considerably.

Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. An improved evaluation of treatment regimens?

There is growing interest in measuring quality of life (QoL) in medicine. Together with objective variables such as healing rate, as recorded with endoscopy, this is believed to give a better basis for evaluation of treatment regimens in patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases. A strategy for the assessment of QoL in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms is presented here. The QoL evaluation was based on a battery of questionnaires, covering both general and specific aspects of life. General well-being was evaluated with the Psychological General Well-being Index (PGWB), and subjective symptoms with two specific questionnaires, the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and the Ulcus Esophagitis Subjective Symptoms Scale (UESS). This new strategy was applied clinically in a study including 146 outpatients with suspected peptic ulcer. Initially, the patients reported a low degree of general well-being as evaluated with the PGWB, but the values returned to those found in normal populations within 4 weeks. Evaluation of the GSRS and UESS with regard to internal consistency, construct validity, and the ability to detect changes showed them to be satisfactory. The psychometric documentation of the measures indicates that they may give reliable and clinically valid information when used for evaluation of medical treatments in upper gastrointestinal disease. Further documentation of the methods is, however, needed to establish a generally acceptable QoL assessment in gastroenterology.