Comparison of multiplex PCR with conventional biochemical methods for the identification of Listeria spp. isolates from food and clinical samples in Queensland, Australia.

Listeria monocytogenes is an important foodborne pathogen with high mortality. L. monocytogenes and five other Listeria species can frequently be found in the same sample. To identify Listeria isolates found in foods to the species level, two multiplex PCRs were designed. The PCR and conventional biochemical methods were compared for the identification of 456 Listeria isolates collected from routine food quality monitoring schemes between June 2004 and February 2006 and for 62 L. monocytogenes isolates from patients between 1999 and 2005. The results showed that the PCR and biochemical methods had 100% agreement in Listeria identification. The distribution of Listeria species from foods was as follows: L. monocytogenes, 50.4%; L. innocua, 33.8%; L. welshimeri, 14.9%; L. seeligeri, 0.7%; L. grayi, 0.2%; and L. ivanovii, 0.0%. Additional analyses were performed to identify the major serotypes (1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c, and 4b) and the three lineages of L. monocytogenes isolates from foods and patients, with 1/2a (69.6%) and 1/2b (21.7%) dominating the food isolates and 1/2b (54.8%) and 4b (30.7%) dominating the patient isolates. The lineage results showed that isolates of 1/2a and 1/2c belonged to lineage II and that isolates of 1/2b and 4b belonged to lineage I. The multiplex PCRs for Listeria identification that have been established provide an accurate and rapid method for food quality control. This study has provided the basic knowledge of distribution of Listeria species and L. monocytogenes serotypes in Queensland, Australia, which is useful for epidemiological investigations of listeriosis.

Distribution of 19 major virulence genes in Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from patients and water in Queensland, Australia.

The distribution of 19 major virulence genes and the presence of plasmids were surveyed in 141 Legionella pneumophila serogroup (SG) 1 isolates from patients and water in Queensland, Australia. The results showed that 16 of the virulence genes examined were present in all isolates, suggesting that they are life-essential genes for isolates in the environment and host cells. The 65 kb pathogenicity island identified originally in strain Philadelphia-1(T) was detected more frequently in isolates from water (44.2%) than in those from patients (2.7%), indicating that the 65 kb DNA fragment may aid the survival of L. pneumophila in the sampled environment. However, the low frequency of the 65 kb fragment in isolates from patients suggests that the pathogenicity island may not be necessary for L. pneumophila to cause disease. Plasmids were not detected in the L. pneumophila SG1 isolates from patients or water studied. There was an association of both lvh and rtxA with the virulent and predominant genotype detected by amplified fragment length polymorphism, termed AF1, whereas the avirulent common isolate from water termed AF16 did not have lvh or rtxA genes, with the exception of one isolate with rtxA. It was found that a PCR detection test strategy with lvh and rtxA as pathogenesis markers would be useful for determining the infection potential of an isolate.

A predominant and virulent Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strain detected in isolates from patients and water in Queensland, Australia, by an amplified fragment length polymorphism protocol and virulence gene-based PCR assays.

In epidemiological investigations of community legionellosis outbreaks, knowledge of the prevalence, distribution, and clinical significance (virulence) of environmental Legionella isolates is crucial for interpretation of the molecular subtyping results. To obtain such information for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates, we used the standardized amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) protocol of the European Working Group on Legionella Infection to subtype L. pneumophila SG1 isolates obtained from patients and water sources in Queensland, Australia. An AFLP genotype, termed AF1, was predominant in isolates from both patients (40.5%) and water (49.0%). The second most common AFLP genotype found in water isolates was AF16 (36.5%), but this genotype was not identified in the patient isolates. When virulence gene-based PCR assays for lvh and rtxA genes were applied to the isolates from patients and water, nearly all (65 of 66) AF1 strains had both virulence genes, lvh and rtxA. In contrast, neither the lvh nor the rtxA gene was found in the AF16 strains, except for one isolate with the rtxA gene. It appears that this may explain the failure to find this genotype in the isolates from patients even though it may be common in the environment. In view of the evidence that the AF1 genotype is the most common genotype among strains found in patients and water sources in this region, any suggested epidemiological link derived from comparing the AF1 genotype from patient isolates with the AF1 genotype from environmental isolates must be interpreted and acted on with caution. The use of virulence gene-based PCR assays applied to environmental samples may be helpful in determining the infection potential of the isolates involved.