Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Foot Ankle Int ; 28(12): 1271-5, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18173991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limiting postoperative pain and minimizing systemic narcotic complications are important considerations in foot and ankle surgery to maximize patient comfort and promote early discharge from the hospital. Nerve blocks are valuable additions to perioperative care. A variety of nerve blocks have been advocated, but few reports have evaluated a preoperative supine approach for popliteal block in foot and ankle surgery. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of a preoperative popliteal block in 25 consecutive patients undergoing a variety of foot and ankle procedures, as well as the length of block coverage, patient satisfaction, and any complications. Patients were monitored clinically and by a questionnaire at various time increments: preoperatively, in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative day one, and postoperative week one. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 15 of 25 patients had a complete block (motor and sensory), five of 25 patients demonstrated motor function, but denied sensation or pain, and the remaining five of 25 had sensation to light touch but no motor function or pain. None of the patients reported pain postoperatively in the PACU within an hour after surgery. The average time the block lasted was 14 hours. Overall satisfaction with the block on postoperative day one and week one was 4.8 out of 5. There were no intraneural injections, neurologic sequelae, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that a preoperative nerve block for a sedated patient in the operating room saves time, avoids patient discomfort, augments general anesthesia, provides good postoperative pain control, and has high patient satisfaction with no significant complications.


Assuntos
Tornozelo/cirurgia , Pé/cirurgia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Perna (Membro)/inervação , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Artrodese , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipestesia/etiologia , Perna (Membro)/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Osteotomia/métodos , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Medicação Pré-Anestésica , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Foot Ankle Int ; 27(9): 667-71, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17038275

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine safety and efficacy of lateral transtendinous popliteal blocks performed after induction of general anesthesia for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery. METHODS: The charts of 475 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. The technique was a lateral transtendinous popliteal block under nerve stimulator direction (described in the text). Patient records were retrospectively evaluated from the postanesthesia care unit, as well as at followup on postoperative day 1 and weeks 2, 6, and 12. RESULTS: The block was complete in 398 patients (83.7%). An incomplete block was found in 77 patients (16.2 %). In the incomplete category, 21 patients (4.4%) had no pain but some motor function, 32 patients (6.5%) reported mild to moderate pain, and 24 patients (5.3%) had severe pain. The average block duration was 16.5 hours. There were no adverse effects documented in any patient at followup. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral popliteal nerve block after induction of general anesthesia appears to be safe and effective for intraoperative and postoperative pain control in elective foot and ankle surgery.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Tornozelo/cirurgia , Pé/cirurgia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; (431): 193-200, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15685075

RESUMO

Twenty-eight patients were treated for a primary epithelioid sarcoma of the hand. Twenty-seven patients (96%) had excisions before evaluation, including 11 (39%) with multiple prior excisions with varying diagnoses before epithelioid sarcoma, and all had surgical treatment after referral. The patients' surgical management included three patients with amputation at the forearm, three patients with wide excision, and 21 patients with a partial amputation of the hand. The followup period averaged 120 months (range, 24-276 months). Eighteen patients have no evidence of disease at last followup. Treatment failures included one local recurrence, four regional metastases, and five distant metastases. Five patients died secondary to disease. Two patients are alive with disease, and three are alive with no evidence of disease after additional treatment. After aggressive surgical management with negative margins, 71% of the patients were alive without evidence of disease at the last followup, with a 5- and 10-year survivorship of 85%. Our goal is to review: (1) the effectiveness of preoperative imaging, (2) the role of adjuvant therapy, (3) survival after alternative resections, and (4) function after resection.


Assuntos
Mãos , Sarcoma , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Mãos/cirurgia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Sarcoma/mortalidade , Sarcoma/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...