Predictors of postpartum glucose metabolism disorders in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postpartum glucose metabolism disorders are a common problem in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). They are often underdiagnosed since many patients do not attend the postpartum screening. This study aims to assess predictors of postpartum glucose metabolism disorders and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after GDM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study in women with GMD who underwent postpartum screening for glucose metabolism disorders (n = 2688). Logistic regression was used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: 24.6% of women had postpartum glucose metabolism disorder. In multivariate analysis, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) 25-30 kg/m2 (OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.05 to 2.02) or BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (OR 2.62, 95%CI 1.72 to 3.96), diagnosis of GDM before 20 weeks of pregnancy (OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.57 to 3.46), fasting plasma glucose after diagnosis of GDM ≥90 mg/dl (OR 2.12, 95%CI 1.50 to 2.98), postprandial glucose ≥100 mg/dl (OR 1.47, 95%CI 1.09 to 2.99), and HbA1c in the third trimester of pregnancy ≥5.3% (2.04, 95%CI, 1.52 to 2.75) were independent predictors for any postpartum glucose metabolism disorder. CONCLUSION: postpartum screening for T2DM should be performed in all women with GDM, and it is especially important not to lose follow-up in those with one or more predictive factors.

Prevalence and predictors of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent in morbid obesity (MO). A considerable proportion of patients with MO have non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver biopsy (LB) is the only procedure that reliably differentiates NASH from other stages of NAFLD, but its invasive nature prevents it from being generalisable. Hence, non-invasive assessment is critical in this group of patients. OBJECTIVES: To report NAFLD/NASH prevalence in a cohort of patients with MO and to identify predictors of NASH. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients subjected to bariatric surgery in a University hospital in Spain underwent LB. Anthropometric, clinical and biochemical variables were registered. According of the results of the LB, individuals were classified by whether they had NASH or not. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with NASH. RESULTS: NAFLD was reported in 94.2% of the patients, simple steatosis was present in 51.92% and NASH in 42.31%. Meanwhile, 17.3% of patients exhibited significant fibrosis (≥F2). HIGHT score for NASH risk was established using five independent predictors: systemic Hypertension, Insulin resistance, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, High density lipoprotein cholesterol and alanine Transaminase. This score ranges from 0 to 7 and was used to predict NASH in our cohort (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.846). A score of 4 or greater implied high risk (sensitivity 77.3%, specificity 73.3%, positive predictive value 68%, negative predictive value 81.5%, accuracy 75%). CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD is practically a constant in MO with a considerable proportion of patients presenting NASH. The combination of five independent predictors in a scoring system may help the clinician optimise the selection of patients with MO for LB.

Change in levothyroxine requirements after bariatric surgery in patients with hypothyroidism.

Objectives. This study aims to evaluate the need to modify the total and weight-adjusted doses of levothyroxine after bariatric surgery, identify predictors, and assess the influence of the weight loss on the levothyroxine requirements. Methods. A retrospective study in patients with treated hypothyroidism that underwent bariatric surgery. The modification of the levothyroxine dose and its association with the weight loss and other potential predictors were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery. Results. Among the 63 patients included, 82.54% needed an adjustment of levothyroxine dose during the follow-up. The total weekly dose of levothyroxine (µg) decreased post-surgery at 6 months (ß= -49.1; 95%CI-93.7 to -4.5; p=0.031) and 12 months (ß=-54.9; 95%CI-102 to -7.8; p=0.022), but did not significantly change at 24 months (p=0.114). The weekly weight-adjusted dose (µg/k) increased at 6 months (ß=1.37; 95%CI 0.91 to 1.83; p<0.001), 12 months (ß=2.05; 95%CI 1.43 to 2.67; p<0.001), and 24 months (ß=2.52; 95%CI 1.74 to 3.30; p<0.001). The weight loss showed association with the weight-adjusted dose (OR=1.07; 95%CI 1.02 to 1.12; p=0.004), but not the total dose (p=0.320). Conclusions. This study shows a significant decrease in the total dose of levothyroxine requirements change after bariatric surgery during the first year of the follow-up and an increase in the weight-adjusted dose over the first two years. No predictors of modification of the total dose of levothyroxine were identified.

Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring on maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

AIMS: This systematic review aims to evaluate the effect of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: Two authors conducted a systematic search using PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The inclusion criteria for the systematic review were randomized clinical trials that compared the effects of CGM and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in women with GDM. A restricted maximum likelihood random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. The measures of effect were risk ratios for categorical data and mean differences for continuous data. RESULTS: Of the 457 studies reviewed, six randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. A total of 482 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The use of CGM was associated with lower HbA1c levels at the end of pregnancy (mean difference: -0.22; 95%CI -0.42 to -0.03) compared to BGM. Women using CGM also had less gestational weight gain (mean difference: -1.17, 95%CI -2.15 to -0.19), and their children had lower birth weight (mean difference: -116.26, 95%CI -224.70 to -7.81). No differences were observed in the other outcomes evaluated. CONCLUSION: Women with GDM using CGM may achieve lower average blood glucose levels, lower maternal weight gain and infant birth weight than women using BGM. Nevertheless, current evidence is limited by the low number of studies and the small sample sizes of these studies. Larger clinical trials are needed to better understand the effects of CGM in GDM. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration ID CRD42021225651.

Prevalence and predictors of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent in morbid obesity (MO). A considerable proportion of patients with MO have non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver biopsy (LB) is the only procedure that reliably differentiates NASH from other stages of NAFLD, but its invasive nature prevents it from being generalisable. Hence, non-invasive assessment is critical in this group of patients. OBJECTIVES: To report NAFLD/NASH prevalence in a cohort of patients with MO and to identify predictors of NASH. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients subjected to bariatric surgery in a University hospital in Spain underwent LB. Anthropometric, clinical and biochemical variables were registered. According of the results of the LB, individuals were classified by whether they had NASH or not. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with NASH. RESULTS: NAFLD was reported in 94.2% of the patients, simple steatosis was present in 51.92% and NASH in 42.31%. Meanwhile, 17.3% of patients exhibited significant fibrosis (≥F2). HIGHT score for NASH risk was established using five independent predictors: systemic Hypertension, Insulin resistance, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, High density lipoprotein cholesterol and alanine Transaminase. This score ranges from 0 to 7 and was used to predict NASH in our cohort (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.846). A score of 4 or greater implied high risk (sensitivity 77.3%, specificity 73.3%, positive predictive value 68%, negative predictive value 81.5%, accuracy 75%). CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD is practically a constant in MO with a considerable proportion of patients presenting NASH. The combination of five independent predictors in a scoring system may help the clinician optimise the selection of patients with MO for LB.

Performance of Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Scores in the Morbid Obese Patient, Same Scores but Different Thresholds.

INTRODUCTION: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease. It is a spectrum of progressive alterations, with the final step in liver fibrosis which carries a high burden of long-term mortality. The scores used to predict liver fibrosis are not properly validated in morbid obesity (MO). Our aim was to evaluate the performance of seven risk scores in bariatric surgery (BS) patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis in a cohort of 60 patients with MO undergoing BS. Liver biopsy (LB) was taken and compared with fibrosis risk assessed by noninvasive scores: APRI, FIB-4, Forns, NFS (NAFLD fibrosis score), BARD, BAAT, and Hepamet. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) and measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated; performance of fibrosis scores was evaluated at standard threshold vs those suggested by ROC analysis. RESULTS: LB was available in 50 patients; 9 (18%) had significant fibrosis (F2-F4). The BARD and Forns scores best predicted the absence of fibrosis, both with negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.5%, with AUROC of 0.761 and 0.667, respectively. Modification of standard thresholds (2 for BARD and 6.9 for Forns) to those suggested by ROC analysis (3 and 3.6, respectively) improved performance of scores. Basal glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), aspartate transaminase (AST), and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) were identified by logistic regression analysis as independent predictor of fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Existing scoring systems are unable to stratify fibrosis risk in MO using established thresholds; its performance is improved if these cutoffs are modified.

Increased risk of neonatal complications or death among neonates born small for gestational age to mothers with gestational diabetes.

AIMS: To evaluate if neonatal complications or death were poorer for neonates born small for gestational age (SGA) than for those born with adequate weight or large for gestation age (LGA) to women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the clinical outcomes of neonates born to 3413 women with GDM. The prevalence of neonatal hypoglycaemia, hypocalcaemia, hyperbilirubinemia, polycythaemia, and death was compared among three birthweight groups: SGA, adequate, and LGA. A two-sided chi-squared or Fisher's exact test was used for between-group comparisons. A forward multiple logistic regression was performed to determine the odds ratio (OR) associated with SGA. RESULTS: Neonatal complications were more frequent in the SGA group (20.1%) than in the adequate (9.9%) or LGA (15.2%) groups. There were four deaths (1.6%) in the SGA group compared to one in the LGA (0.4%) and six in the adequate (0.2%) groups (P = 0.002). SGA was a risk factor for neonatal complications or death (OR. 2.122; 95% confidence interval, 1.552-2.899), independent of maternal age, weight gain, fasting glucose, glycaemic control, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, smoking, or neonatal prematurity. CONCLUSION: SGA birthweight is an important risk factor for neonatal complications or death among neonates born to mothers with GDM.

Transient PAX8 Expression in Islets During Pregnancy Correlates With ß-Cell Survival, Revealing a Novel Candidate Gene in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Transient Pax8 expression was reported in mouse islets during gestation, whereas a genome-wide linkage and admixture mapping study highlighted PAX8 as a candidate gene for diabetes mellitus (DM). We sought the significance of PAX8 expression in mouse and human islet biology. PAX8 was induced in gestating mouse islets and in human islets treated with recombinant prolactin. Global gene expression profiling of human and mouse islets overexpressing the corresponding species-specific PAX8 revealed the modulation of distinct genetic pathways that converge on cell survival. Accordingly, apoptosis was reduced in PAX8-overexpressing islets. These findings support that PAX8 could be a candidate gene for the study of gestational DM (GDM). PAX8 was genotyped in patients with GDM and gestational thyroid dysfunction (GTD), a pathology commonly found in patients with mutations on PAX8 A novel missense PAX8 mutation (p.T356M, c.1067C>T) was identified in a female diagnosed with GDM and GTD as well as in her father with type 2 DM but was absent in control patients. The p.T356M variant did not alter protein stability or cellular localization, whereas its transactivation activity was hindered. In parallel, a retrospective clinical analysis uncovered that a pregnant female harboring a second PAX8 mutation (p.P25R, c.74C>G) previously reported to cause congenital hypothyroidism also developed GDM. These data indicate that increased expression of PAX8 affects islet viability and that PAX8 could be considered as a candidate gene for the study of GDM.

Diabetes mellitus gestacional: control glucémico durante el embarazo y su relación con los resultados neonatales en embarazos gemelares y de feto único / Gestational diabetes mellitus: glycemic control during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of twin and singleton pregnancies

Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto del control glucémico de la diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG) en el peso y las complicaciones de origen metabólico neonatales de embarazos gemelares y de feto único. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo que incluyó gestantes con DMG: 120 embarazos gemelares y 240 embarazos de feto único como controles. Registramos los parámetros de control glucémico durante el embarazo (resultados de la sobrecarga oral de glucosa diagnóstica, tratamiento, insulinización, HbA1c media del tercer trimestre), las complicaciones neonatales y el peso neonatal. Resultados: Los neonatos de embarazos únicos tuvieron mayor índice ponderal fetal (IPF 1,02±0,12 vs. 0,88±0.12, p<0,001) y menor incidencia de pequeños para la edad gestacional grave (2,5% vs. 8,3%, p=0.012). La tasa de neonatos grandes para edad gestacional, macrosómicos y pequeños para la edad gestacional fue similar en ambos grupos. Los recién nacidos de embarazos gemelares tuvieron un mayor riesgo de hipoglucemia: OR ajustada 4,71 (1,38-16,07, p=0,013) y poliglobulia: OR ajustada 10,05 (1,82-55,42, p=0,008). El IPF se correlacionó con la glucosa basal en la sobrecarga oral de glucosa al diagnóstico (r=0,223, p=0,001) y la HbA1c media del tercer trimestre (r=0,199, p=0,003) en los embarazos únicos, pero no en los gemelares (r=0,003, p=0,748; r=0,049, p=0,610; respectivamente). Conclusiones: El riesgo de pequeño para la edad gestacional grave, hipoglucemia y poliglobulia fue mayor en los embarazos gemelares con DMG. Los resultados de peso neonatal y las complicaciones de origen metabólico no se relacionan con el control metabólico materno en los embarazos gemelares

Objective: To assess the impact of glycemic control in gestational on neonatal weight and metabolic complications of twin and singleton pregnancies. Methods: An observational, retrospective study to monitor 120 twin and 240 singleton pregnancies in women with GDM. Maternal glycemic parameters during pregnancy (oral glucose tolerance test results, treatment, insulinization rate, mean HbA1c in the third trimester), and neonatal complications and weight were recorded. Results: A higher infant birth weight ratio (IBWR 1.02±0.12 vs. 0.88±0.12, P<.001) and a lower rate of newborns small for gestational age (severe SGA 2.5% vs. 8.3%, P=.012) were seen after singleton pregnancies as compared to twin pregnancies. The rates of newborns large for gestational age (LGA 12.6% vs. 12.5%, P=.989); macrosomic (6.7% vs. 7.5%, P=.777); or small for gestational age (SGA 6.7% vs. 10.8%, P=.175) were similar in both groups. Neonates from twin pregnancies had a higher risk of hypoglycemia (adjusted OR 4.71; 1.38-16.07, P=.013) and polycythemia (adjusted OR 10.05; 1.82-55.42, P=0.008). A linear relationship was seen between third trimester HbA1c levels and IBWR in singleton (r=.199, P=.003), but not in twin pregnancies (r=0.049, P=0.610). Conclusions: Risk of severe SGA, hypoglycemia, and polycythemia was significantly higher in twin pregnancies of women with GDM. Neonatal weight outcomes and metabolic complications in twin pregnancies of women with GDM were not related to glycemic control. Moreover, in our study population, fasting glucose at diagnosis and mean HbA1c in the third trimester showed a linear relationship with higher birth weights in singleton, but not in twin pregnancies

Gestational diabetes mellitus: glycemic control during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of twin and singleton pregnancies. / Diabetes mellitus gestacional: control glucémico durante el embarazo y su relación con los resultados neonatales en embarazos gemelares y de feto único.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of glycemic control in gestational on neonatal weight and metabolic complications of twin and singleton pregnancies. METHODS: An observational, retrospective study to monitor 120 twin and 240 singleton pregnancies in women with GDM. Maternal glycemic parameters during pregnancy (oral glucose tolerance test results, treatment, insulinization rate, mean HbA1c in the third trimester), and neonatal complications and weight were recorded. RESULTS: A higher infant birth weight ratio (IBWR 1.02±0.12 vs. 0.88±0.12, P<.001) and a lower rate of newborns small for gestational age (severe SGA 2.5% vs. 8.3%, P=.012) were seen after singleton pregnancies as compared to twin pregnancies. The rates of newborns large for gestational age (LGA 12.6% vs. 12.5%, P=.989); macrosomic (6.7% vs. 7.5%, P=.777); or small for gestational age (SGA 6.7% vs. 10.8%, P=.175) were similar in both groups. Neonates from twin pregnancies had a higher risk of hypoglycemia (adjusted OR 4.71; 1.38-16.07, P=.013) and polycythemia (adjusted OR 10.05; 1.82-55.42, P=0.008). A linear relationship was seen between third trimester HbA1c levels and IBWR in singleton (r=.199, P=.003), but not in twin pregnancies (r=0.049, P=0.610). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of severe SGA, hypoglycemia, and polycythemia was significantly higher in twin pregnancies of women with GDM. Neonatal weight outcomes and metabolic complications in twin pregnancies of women with GDM were not related to glycemic control. Moreover, in our study population, fasting glucose at diagnosis and mean HbA1c in the third trimester showed a linear relationship with higher birth weights in singleton, but not in twin pregnancies.

Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Women with Gestational Diabetes and Morbid Obesity.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the greatest gestational weight gain (GWG) without adverse pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and morbid obesity. METHODS: An observational retrospective study including 3284 patients with single pregnancies and GDM was completed. Of the patients, 131 (4.0%) were classified as having pre-pregnancy morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2). Perinatal complications were compared among BMI groups. In the group with morbid obesity, GWG threshold values to predict outcomes were examined based on sensitivity and specificity values under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: GWG was higher in mothers with morbid obesity and macrosomic neonates: 11.3 (4.4-15.7) versus 4.8 (1.5-8.2) kg (p = 0.033). The GWG and neonatal ponderal index were positively correlated (r = 0.305, p = 0.001). The GWG was 7.0 (2.9-11.6) kg in women with hypertensive disorder versus 4.5 (1.0-7.5) kg in normotensive women (p = 0.017). A GWG above 5 kg was a risk factor for macrosomia (87.8% sensitivity, 54.7% specificity) and hypertensive disorder (70.0% sensitivity, 48.4% specificity). GWG associations were maintained after controlling for glycemic control, maternal and gestational age, parity, smoking and neonatal sex. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: A GWG below 5 kg is recommended for women with GDM and morbid obesity. In these women, adequate GWG may prevent macrosomia, fetal overgrowth and hypertensive disorder.

Cambios glucémicos durante el ciclo menstrual en mujeres con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 / Glycemic changes during menstrual cycles in women with type 1 diabetes

Fundamento y objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia de mujeres con diabetes tipo 1 que experimentan cambios glucémicos durante el ciclo menstrual, analizar sus características clínicas, y evaluar el patrón de los cambios glucémicos. Pacientes y métodos: Analizamos las lecturas de los glucómetros a lo largo de 168 ciclos menstruales en 26 mujeres con diabetes tipo 1. Evaluamos la glucemia media, la desviación estándar media, la glucemia media basal, el porcentaje de lecturas > 7,8 mmol/l y < 3,1 mmol/l, y la dosis de insulina media en 4 períodos de cada ciclo. Se consideró que una mujer tenía cambios cíclicos cuando la glucemia media se elevó entre la fase folicular temprana y la fase lútea tardía en dos tercios de sus ciclos menstruales. Resultados: El 65,4% de las mujeres experimentaron cambios cíclicos. Las características de las mujeres con y sin cambios cíclicos, incluyendo la autopercepción de cambios glucémicos, fueron similares, exceptuando la edad de diagnóstico de la diabetes (22,5 [7,5] frente a 14,4 [9,5] años; p = 0,039). En mujeres con cambios cíclicos el porcentaje medio de los valores de glucosa > 7,8 mmol/l se elevó entre la fase folicular temprana (52,2 [16,3] %) y la fase lútea temprana y tardía (58,4 [16,0] %, p = 0,0269; 61,0 [16,9] %, p = 0,000). Conclusión: Casi dos tercios de las mujeres con diabetes tipo 1 experimentan fenómenos del ciclo menstrual atribuibles a un incremento de las excursiones hiperglucémicas durante la fase lútea. Posibilitar que las mujeres evalúen su glucemia media semanal a partir de las lecturas de los glucómetros, y explorar las causas de las excursiones hiperglucémicas durante la fase lútea podría garantizar una mayor precisión al impartir instrucciones para la gestión de la diabetes en mujeres con hiperglucemia premenstrual (AU)

Background and objective: To determine frequency of women with type 1 diabetes showing menstrual cyclic changes in glycemia, analyze their clinical characteristics, and assess the pattern of glycemic changes. Patients and methods: We analyzed glucose meter readings along 168 menstrual cycles of 26 women with type 1 diabetes. We evaluated mean glucose, mean glucose standard deviation, mean fasting glucose, percentage of glucose readings > 7.8 mmol/L and < 3.1 mmol/L, and mean insulin dose in 4 periods for each cycle. A woman was identified as having cyclic changes when mean glucose rose from early follicular to late luteal in two-thirds of her menstrual cycles. Results: A percentage of 65.4 of the women had cyclic changes. Characteristics of women with and without cyclic changes, including self-perception of glycemic changes, were similar with exception of age at diabetes diagnosis (22.5 [7.5] vs. 14.4 [9.5] years; P = .039). In women with cyclic changes mean percentage of glucose readings > 7.8 mmol/L rose from early follicular (52.2 [16.3] %) to early and late luteal (58.4 [16.0] %, P = .0269; 61.0 [16.9] %, P = .000). Conclusion: Almost two-thirds of women with type 1 diabetes experience a menstrual cycle phenomenon, attributable to an increase in hyperglycemic excursions during the luteal phase. Enabling women to evaluate their weekly mean glucose from their meter and exploring the causes of hyperglycemic excursions during luteal phase should ensure more accuracy when giving instructions for diabetes management in women with premenstrual hyperglycemia (AU)

HbA1c and Gestational Weight Gain Are Factors that Influence Neonatal Outcome in Mothers with Gestational Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Maternal glucose and weight gain are related to neonatal outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The aim of this study was to explore the influence of average third-trimester HbA1c and excess gestational weight gain on GDM neonatal complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study included 2037 Spanish singleton pregnant women with GDM followed in our Diabetes and Pregnancy Unit. The maternal HbA1c level was measured monthly from GDM diagnosis to delivery. Women were compared by average HbA1c level and weight gain categorized into ≤ or > the current Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations for body mass index. The differential effects of these factors on large-for-gestational-age birth weight and a composite of neonatal complications were assessed. RESULTS: Women with an average third-trimester HbA1c ≥5.0% (n = 1319) gave birth to 7.3% versus 3.8% (p = 0.005) of large-for-gestational-age neonates and 22.0% versus 16.0% (p = 0.006) of neonates with complications. Women with excess gestational weight gain (n = 299) delivered 12.5% versus 5.2% (p < 0.001) of large-for-gestational-age neonates and 24.7% versus 19.0% (p = 0.022) of neonates with complications. In an adjusted multiple logistic regression analysis among mothers exposed to the respective risk factors, ∼47% and 52% of large-for-gestational-age neonates and 32% and 37% of neonatal complications were potentially preventable by attaining an average third-trimester HbA1c level <5.0% and optimizing gestational weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Average third-trimester HbA1c level ≥5% and gestational weight gain above the IOM recommendation are relevant risk factors for neonatal complications in mothers with gestational diabetes.

[Glycemic changes during menstrual cycles in women with type 1 diabetes]. / Cambios glucémicos durante el ciclo menstrual en mujeres con diabetes mellitus tipo 1.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine frequency of women with type 1 diabetes showing menstrual cyclic changes in glycemia, analyze their clinical characteristics, and assess the pattern of glycemic changes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed glucose meter readings along 168 menstrual cycles of 26 women with type 1 diabetes. We evaluated mean glucose, mean glucose standard deviation, mean fasting glucose, percentage of glucose readings>7.8 mmol/L and<3.1 mmol/L, and mean insulin dose in 4 periods for each cycle. A woman was identified as having cyclic changes when mean glucose rose from early follicular to late luteal in two-thirds of her menstrual cycles. RESULTS: A percentage of 65.4 of the women had cyclic changes. Characteristics of women with and without cyclic changes, including self-perception of glycemic changes, were similar with exception of age at diabetes diagnosis (22.5 [7.5] vs. 14.4 [9.5] years; P=.039). In women with cyclic changes mean percentage of glucose readings>7.8 mmol/L rose from early follicular (52.2 [16.3] %) to early and late luteal (58.4 [16.0] %, P=.0269; 61.0 [16.9] %, P=.000). CONCLUSION: Almost two-thirds of women with type 1 diabetes experience a menstrual cycle phenomenon, attributable to an increase in hyperglycemic excursions during the luteal phase. Enabling women to evaluate their weekly mean glucose from their meter and exploring the causes of hyperglycemic excursions during luteal phase should ensure more accuracy when giving instructions for diabetes management in women with premenstrual hyperglycemia.

Asistencia a la gestante con diabetes. Guía de práctica clínica actualizada en 2014 / Care of pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Clinical practice guidelines: 2014 update

La diabetes es una de las complicaciones metabólicas más frecuentes de la gestación y se asocia a un incremento del riesgo de morbimortalidad maternal y fetal, que pueden evitarse y/o reducirse con un adecuado control. En la diabetes pregestacional, la preparación específica previa a la gestación es indispensable para intentar conseguir un control glucémico lo más próximo a la normalidad, evaluar complicaciones y revisar las pautas de tratamientos farmacológicos. En el caso de la diabetes gestacional, el tratamiento de esta entidad ha demostrado disminuir la tasa de complicaciones maternas y perinatales, por lo que su diagnóstico está justificado. En relación con la estrategia diagnóstica, ante la falta de consenso y la controversia desatada tras la aparición de los nuevos criterios IADPSG, el grupo ha decidido mantener la misma estrategia diagnóstica en 2 pasos y con los mismos puntos de corte hasta disponer de datos sólidos que avalen la introducción de nuevos criterios

Diabetes is one of the most common metabolic complications of pregnancy, and is associated with an increased risk of maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality that can be prevented and/or reduced with adequate glycaemic control. In pre-gestational diabetes, specific preparation prior to the pregnancy is essential in order to achieve glycaemic control near to normal as possible and to evaluate complications and review pharmacologic treatment prescription. The treatment of gestational diabetes has been shown to decrease the rate of maternal and perinatal complications, thus its diagnosis is justified. As regards the diagnostic strategy and due to the lack of consensus and the controversy arising after the publication of the new International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG), the group has decided to keep the same diagnostic strategy in two stages, and with the same cut-off points, until there are solid data available that support the introduction of new criteria

Prepregnancy body mass index and prenatal fasting glucose are effective predictors of early postpartum metabolic syndrome in Spanish mothers with gestational diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may be an expression of early metabolic syndrome. It is unknown whether weight and/or glucose parameters assessed at GDM pregnancies predict the risk of metabolic syndrome at the early postpartum period. METHODS: A group of women with GDM (N=1512) was evaluated at 3-11 months postpartum. Incident cases of diabetes were excluded. Antenatal measurements of GDM severity, third-trimester average glycated hemoglobin levels, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), and increased gestational weight gain were considered. The predictive capability of these factors for postpartum metabolic syndrome was estimated. RESULTS: The prevalence of postpartum metabolic syndrome was 10.9%. The three most common features of metabolic syndrome were low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (31.2%), high fasting glucose values (23.5%), and a high waist circumference (22.8%). The main predictors of metabolic syndrome were overweight or obesity prepregnancy and high antenatal fasting glycemia. This analysis was adjusted for family history of diabetes, prior GDM, dyslipidemia before pregnancy, chronic arterial hypertension, age, and smoking. The model area 95% confidence interval under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (0.84-0.90) for metabolic syndrome presence. The risk for metabolic syndrome was progressively increased as risk factors were added (P<0.001 for trend). When obesity and high fasting glycemia were combined, a multiplied effect ensued. CONCLUSIONS: Women having GDM are at threat of early postpartum metabolic syndrome. This risk can be easily identified by assessing prepregnancy BMI and antenatal fasting glycemia in the first pregnancy visit.

Experiencia en el uso de insulina lispro durante el embarazo en mujeres con diabetes mellitus pregestacional / Use of insulin lispro during pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus

Fundamento y objetivo: Evaluar la seguridad y eficacia de los análogos de insulina en comparación con insulina humana en mujeres embarazadas con diabetes pregestacional. Pacientes y métodos: Se recogieron datos de las embarazadas con diabetes tipo 1 o 2 que fueron atendidas en la Unidad de Diabetes y Embarazo entre enero de 1998 y abril de 2008 (n=351). Doscientas cuarenta y una pacientes fueron tratadas con insulina regular y NPH, y 110 fueron tratadas con diferentes combinaciones de insulinas incluyendo un análogo de insulina (la mayoría con NPH y lispro). Resultados:No hubo diferencias en cuanto a malformaciones congénitas entre ambos grupos (3,3 y 3,6%). El grupo con análogo de insulina tuvo una HbA1c ligeramente más alta que el grupo con insulina humana durante el primer trimestre (6,9 [1,1]% vs 6,6 [1,0]%; p=0,022) y necesitó menor dosis de insulina durante todo el embarazo. La hipoglucemia grave fue significativamente menos frecuente entre las mujeres tratadas con un análogo de insulina rápida (2,3 vs 10,0%; p=0,025). La hipoglucemia neonatal fue significativamente más frecuente en dicho grupo (34,9 vs 23,6%; p=0,043) en relación con el uso concomitante de bomba de insulina. Otras variables obstétricas y neonatales no fueron diferentes entre ambos grupos (AU)

Background and objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of insulin analogues versus human insulin in pregnant women with pregestational diabetes. Patients and methods: We collected data on pregnant women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who were attended at the Diabetes and Pregnancy Unit between January 1998 and April 2008 (N=351). Two hundred and forty one patients were treated with regular insulin and NPH and 110 were treated with different combinations of insulins including an insulin analogue (most of them with NPH and lispro). Results:There was no significant difference in terms of congenital malformation rate between groups (3.3% and 3.6%). The group on insulin analogue had slightly higher mean HbA1c during the first trimester than the group on human insulin (6.6 [1.0]% vs 6.9 [1.1]%; P=0,022) and needed smaller insulin doses during whole pregnancy. Severe hypoglycaemia was significantly less frequent among women treated with a rapid insulin analogue (2.3 vs 10.0%; P=0,025). Neonatal hypoglycaemia was significantly more frequent in the group treated with a rapid insulin analogue (34.9 vs 23.6%; P=0.043) due to the concomitant use of an insulin pump. Other obstetric and neonatal variables were not different between the two groups. Conclusion: Our study shows that insulin analogues are safe during pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. Overall, glycaemic control, maternal and foetal outcome were similar to those with human insulin. The main advantage with respect to human insulin was to importantly reduce maternal severe hypoglycaemia (AU)

Use of insulin lispro during pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of insulin analogues versus human insulin in pregnant women with pregestational diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data on pregnant women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who were attended at the Diabetes and Pregnancy Unit between January 1998 and April 2008 (N=351). Two hundred and forty one patients were treated with regular insulin and NPH and 110 were treated with different combinations of insulins including an insulin analogue (most of them with NPH and lispro). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of congenital malformation rate between groups (3.3% and 3.6%). The group on insulin analogue had slightly higher mean HbA1c during the first trimester than the group on human insulin (6.6 [1.0]% vs 6.9 [1.1]%; P=0,022) and needed smaller insulin doses during whole pregnancy. Severe hypoglycaemia was significantly less frequent among women treated with a rapid insulin analogue (2.3 vs 10.0%; P=0,025). Neonatal hypoglycaemia was significantly more frequent in the group treated with a rapid insulin analogue (34.9 vs 23.6%; P=0.043) due to the concomitant use of an insulin pump. Other obstetric and neonatal variables were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that insulin analogues are safe during pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. Overall, glycaemic control, maternal and foetal outcome were similar to those with human insulin. The main advantage with respect to human insulin was to importantly reduce maternal severe hypoglycaemia.