Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Obesity Class V (BMI > 60 kg/m2): a Modified Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the preferred method to achieve significant weight loss in patients with Obesity Class V (BMI > 60 kg/m2). However, there is no consensus regarding the best procedure(s) for this population. Additionally, these patients will likely have a higher risk of complications and mortality. The aim of this study was to achieve a consensus among a global panel of expert bariatric surgeons using a modified Delphi methodology. METHODS: A total of 36 recognized opinion-makers and highly experienced metabolic and bariatric surgeons participated in the present Delphi consensus. 81 statements on preoperative management, selection of the procedure, perioperative management, weight loss parameters, follow-up, and metabolic outcomes were voted on in two rounds. A consensus was considered reached when an agreement of ≥ 70% of experts' votes was achieved. RESULTS: A total of 54 out of 81 statements reached consensus. Remarkably, more than 90% of the experts agreed that patients should be notified of the greater risk of complications, the possibility of modifications to the surgical procedure, and the early start of chemical thromboprophylaxis. Regarding the choice of the procedure, SADI-S, RYGB, and OAGB were the top 3 preferred operations. However, no consensus was reached on the limb length in these operations. CONCLUSION: This study represents the first attempt to reach consensus on the choice of procedures as well as perioperative management in patients with obesity class V. Although overall consensus was reached in different areas, more research is needed to better serve this high-risk population.

Innovative Bariatric Procedures and Ethics in Bariatric Surgery: the IFSO Position Statement.

With the rise in obesity and bariatric procedures worldwide, there has been a surge in new and innovative procedures that has been increasingly offered to patients. In this position statement, IFSO highlights the importance of surgical ethics in innovation and when offering new procedures. Furthermore, the task force reviewed the current literature to describe which procedures can be offered as mainstream outside research protocols versus those that are still investigational and need further data.

Timely Access to Essential Surgery, Surgical Workforce, and Surgical Volume: Global Surgery Indicators in Mexico.

INTRODUCTION: The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery seeks to improve surgical care outcomes and equity for the world population through 6 indicators outlined in its 2030 Global Surgery Report. Our study aimed to estimate the percentage of the Mexican population with access to surgical care within the 2-hour distance range (indicator 1), the surgical workforce density (indicator 2), and the number of surgical procedures performed per 100,000 inhabitants (indicator 3) during the year 2020. Knowing these indicators can help to design and implement policies to increase surgical care access coverage and equity in our country. METHODS: Data related to population distribution, local referral hospitals, and surgical volume were obtained from the 2020 Mexican National Census. Information relating to hospital characteristics and surgical specialists was collected from the Secretariat of Health's public records. We calculated travel time between health care facilities and municipalities using the TrueWay Matrix API and R Studio. RESULTS: Taking into consideration the health care system affiliation, the proportion of the Mexican population with timely access to essential surgery was 81.7%, with 29.3 specialists per 100,000 inhabitants and 726.9 annual procedures performed per 100,000 inhabitants. We identified clusters of municipalities where a low proportion of the population has timely access to essential surgery. CONCLUSION: These findings illustrate that changes in Mexican policy are required to facilitate more equitable and timely access to essential surgical care among the population.

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels dynamics of cured patients with impaired renal function following parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative parathyroid hormones have been used to establish operative success in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. This study's aim was to assess the impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine levels on the fulfillment of >50% drop and normalization of intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels. METHODS: Patients successfully treated for primary hyperparathyroidism were analyzed. The samples for parathyroid hormone were collected at baseline, 5-, 10-, and 30-minutes postexcision. The patients were classified as follows: (1) estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min, (2) estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min and serum creatinine levels <1.2 mg/dL, and (3) estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min and serum creatinine levels >1.2 mg/dL. Comparative analysis of patients achieving the >50% parathyroid hormone drop criterion and normalization of intraoperative parathyroid hormone was performed. RESULTS: One hundred-fourteen patients were distributed as follows: 88 patients (77.2%), 14 (12.3%), and 12 (10.5%) for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. No difference between groups in the proportion of patients fulfilling the >50% parathyroid hormone drop criterion was found. An abnormally elevated intraoperative parathyroid hormone level at 30-minute postexcision was observed in 0, 14.3, and 16.6% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P ≤ .0001). CONCLUSION: In the study, >50% parathyroid hormone drop criterion was equally achieved despite normal or reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate. When serum creatinine levels increased >1.2 mg/dL and estimated glomerular filtration rate declined <60 mL/min, the likelihood of reaching normal intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels postexcision was significantly lower.

Innovative Bariatric Procedures and Ethics in Bariatric Surgery: the IFSO Position Statement.

With the rise in obesity and bariatric procedures worldwide, there has been a surge in new and innovative procedures that has been increasingly offered to patients. In this position statement, IFSO highlights the importance of surgical ethics in innovation and when offering new procedures. Furthermore, the task force reviewed the current literature to describe which procedures can be offered as mainstream outside research protocols versus those that are still investigational and need further data.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Banded and Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric procedure performed worldwide. It accounts for more than 50% of primary bariatric surgeries performed each year. Recent long-term data has shown an alarming trend of weight recidivism. Some authors have proposed the concurrent use of a non-adjustable gastric band to decrease long-term sleeve failure. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes (weight loss) and safety (rate of complication and presence of upper GI symptoms) between SG and BSG. METHODS: A systematic search with no language or time restrictions was performed to identify relevant observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating people with morbid obesity undergoing SG or SGB for weight loss. An inverse-of-the-variance meta-analysis was performed by random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane X2 and I2 analysis. RESULTS: A total of 7 observational studies and 3 RCT were included in the final analysis. There were 911 participants pooled from observational studies and 194 from RCT. BSG showed a significant higher excess of weight loss (% EWL). The difference among groups was clinically relevant after the third year where the weighted mean difference (SMD) was 16.8 (CI 95% 12.45, 21.15, p < 0.0001), while at 5 years, a SMD of 25.59 (16.31, 34.87, p < 0.0001) was noticed. No differences related to overall complications were noticed. Upper GI symptoms were up to three times more frequent in the BSG group (OR 3.26. CI 95% 1.96, 5.42, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, BSG is superior to SG in weight loss at 5 years but is associated with a higher incidence of upper GI symptoms. However, these conclusions are based mainly on data obtained from observational studies. Further RCT are needed to evaluate the effect and safety of BSG.

Adjustable Gastric Banding Conversion to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: Data Analysis of a Multicenter Database.

INTRODUCTION: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been proposed as a rescue technique for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) poor responders. AIM: We sought to analyze, complications, mortality, and medium-term weight loss results after LAGB conversion to OAGB. METHODS: Data analysis of an international multicenter database. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine LAGB-to-OAGB operations were retrospectively analyzed. Eighty-seven (46.0%) were converted in one stage. Patients operated on in two stages had a higher preoperative body mass index (BMI) (37.9 vs. 41.3 kg/m2, p = 0.0007) and were more likely to have encountered technical complications, such as slippage or erosions (36% vs. 78%, p < 0.0001). Postoperative complications occurred in 4.8% of the patients (4.6% and 4.9% in the one-stage and the two-stage group, respectively). Leak rate, bleeding episodes, and mortality were 2.6%, 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively. The final BMI was 30.2 at a mean follow-up of 31.4 months. Follow-up at 1, 3, and 5 years was 100%, 88%, and 70%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Conversion from LAGB to OAGB is safe and effective. The one-stage approach appears to be the preferred option in non-complicate cases, while the two-step approach is mostly done for more complicated cases.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Super Obesity: Primary Response Criteria and Their Relationship with Comorbidities Remission.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of super obesity has increased considerably in recent years, representing up to the 0.5% of the population. Even though bariatric surgery induces significant weight loss in these patients, it has been reported that up to 50% of the patients with super obesity will fail according to the current primary response criteria. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare different primary response criteria and their impact regarding comorbidities remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients with super obesity who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were identified in our institution from March 2004 to February 2019. An evaluation of the primary response at a 2-year follow-up was made using different criteria. A multivariate analysis was made to evaluate related variables to comorbidities remission. RESULTS: Two years later, the rate of patients who achieved an EWL > 50%, %EWL > 70%, and BMI < 35 kg/m2 were 84.5%, 52.1%, and 62%, respectively. Regarding the comorbidities, 85%, 84.8%, and 81.1% of the patients improved or remitted T2D, HBP, and hyperlipidemia, respectively. An EWL > 50% 2 years later was related to complete remission of hyperlipidemia (p = 0.047), whereas weight regain above 10% is a risk factor for failure of complete remission of HBP in 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: More than 75% of patients with super obesity yield an EWL > 50% 2 years later. In terms of hyperlipidemia, it is desirable to achieve an EWL of at least 50%. Whereas for T2D and HBP, a minimum of 25% TWL yields 72% and 60.5% of complete remission.

Computed tomography (CT) scan identified necrosis, but is it a reliable single parameter for discerning between malignant and benign adrenocortical tumors?

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. Discernment of adrenocortical carcinoma in an adrenal mass through imaging studies is paramount for early surgical treatment. Recently, necrosis has been proposed as a single morphological parameter for adrenocortical carcinoma diagnosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the measures of diagnostic efficiency of necrosis and the different computed tomography-scan features related to adrenocortical carcinoma diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of patients surgically treated for an adrenal mass with histopathological report consistent with adrenocortical carcinoma (cases) and adrenocortical adenoma (control patients) between 1987 and 2019. Radiological features on computed tomography scan were collected. Bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed for the different imaging features. The measures of diagnostic efficiency for each feature were calculated. Concordance analysis between image-detected and histopathological-identified necrosis was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen adrenocortical carcinoma and 41 adrenocortical adenomas were included. Differences between adrenocortical carcinoma and adrenocortical adenoma were found regarding heterogeneity (odds ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval 2.3-8.9; P < .0001), tumor size ≥4 cm (odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 2.05-6.14; P < .0001), and attenuation index ≥10 Hounsfield units (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.6; P = .001). Necrosis was the most important imaging feature significantly associated with adrenocortical carcinoma (odds ratio 35, 95% confidence interval 5.1-241.6; P < .0001), present in all adrenocortical carcinoma cases. After measures of diagnostic efficiency calculation, necrosis had the highest diagnostic accuracy (98%). Cohen's kappa for concordance between image-detected and histopathological-identified necrosis was 90.4% (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Computed tomography scan-detected necrosis is a reliable radiological feature to discern adrenocortical carcinoma from adrenocortical adenomas.

Endocrine hypertension secondary to adrenal tumors: clinical course and predictive factors of clinical remission.

PURPOSE: Endocrinopathies constitute ~ 10% of secondary hypertension (SH) etiologies. Primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma (PHEO), and Cushing's syndrome are common causes. Early identification and treatment result in resolution/improvement of SH. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical course, outcomes, and remission-associated prognostic factors of SH related to adrenal tumors. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including patients with SH who underwent adrenalectomy from 2000 to 2019. Postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Remission was defined as normalization of blood pressure without drug use. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with SH were included. Mean ± SD age was 38.8 ± 14.2 years and 75.9% were women. Diagnosis was PHEO in 35 patients (42.2%), aldosteronoma (APA) in 28 (33.7%), cortisol producing adenoma (CPA) in 16 (19.3%), and ACTH-dependent Cushing's in 4 (4.8%). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed in 81 (97.6%) patients. Mean ± SD follow-up was 57.4 ± 49.6 months (range 1-232). Surgical morbidity occurred in 7.2% of patients and there was no mortality. Remission of SH occurred in 61(73.5%): 100% of ACTH-dependent Cushing's, 85.7% of PHEO, 68.8% of CPA, and 57.1% of APA. Biochemical phenotype and the combination of larger tumor size, number of antihypertensive drugs, male gender, older age, obesity, and preoperative SH for more than 5 years were associated with less likely clinical remission in patients with APA (p = 0.004), CPA (p < 0.0001), and PHEO (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: SH remission rates are 57-100% after adrenalectomy. Several prognostic factors could be used to predict SH control. Adrenalectomy provides good clinical outcome and must be considered a treatment option in all surgical candidates.

Bariatric surgery in Mexico: training, practice and surgical trends.

Bariatric surgery is extremely safe and effective, but several factors need to be addressed to obtain such results. Patient selection, type of training, accreditation, type of practice, and surgical trends and technique are involved in this process. Local and global standardization are ill-advised, especially in countries with high obesity prevalence, and where the bariatric practice is fast growing.An online survey with 22 questions was sent to bariatric surgeons in Mexico. Only participants with the active practice were included, and the aim was to obtain for the first time insight in bariatric surgery training, characteristics of current practice and surgical trends.Complete responses from 114 surgeons were obtained. Most were male, under 50 years-old, ≤ 10 years of experience, and practice in low-volume hospitals. Less than half had a 12-month formal training. Gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were the most common procedures. Practice trends like leak tests, use of drains, preoperative weight loss, routine endoscopy, and pharmacological tromboprofilaxis are common. In surgical technique, the gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy confection was more homogenic when compared to the one-anastomosis gastric bypass.Complete responses from 114 surgeons were obtained. Most were male, under 50 years-old, ≤ 10 years of experience, and practice in low-volume hospitals. Less than half had a 12-month formal training. Gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were the most common procedures. Practice trends like leak tests, use of drains, preoperative weight loss, routine endoscopy, and pharmacological tromboprofilaxis are common. In surgical technique, the gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy confection was more homogenic when compared to the one-anastomosis gastric bypass. An important number of bariatric surgeons in Mexico are young, male, and with < 10 years of practice. The most common techniques performed are gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Several practices and technique trends are similar to global consensus. Fellowship programs and Board Certification in bariatric surgery are major advances in our country, thus standardization and high-quality practice can be achieved.

Outcomes of Adrenalectomy and the Aldosteronoma Resolution Score in the Black and Hispanic Population.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after adrenalectomy in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) are variable. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) uses preoperative variables to calculate a score that identifies those patients that are more likely to have resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy. We aim to determine the efficacy of adrenalectomy and whether the ARS accurately predicts clinical success in a Black and Hispanic population. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent adrenalectomy for PA from 2004 to 2018 at two academic centers treating primarily Hispanic and Black patients. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated based on the primary aldosteronism surgical outcome consensus criterion. Retrospectively, the accuracy of ARS was determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Forty-three Hispanic and 10 Black patients underwent adrenalectomy for PA. Twenty-two patients (41.5%) had complete clinical success. Variables associated with complete clinical success in the univariate analysis were female gender (p = 0.026), younger age (p = 0.001), lower preoperative aldosterone (p = 0.035), lower preoperative systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications (p = 0.007) and a higher ARS (p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, only fewer number of preoperative antihypertensive medications was independently associated with complete clinical success (p = 0.026). The AUC of the ARS was 0.746. CONCLUSION: The rate of clinical success from adrenalectomy is good for Hispanic and Black patients with PA. Our analysis shows that the ARS is an accurate test of clinical success in Hispanic and Black patients. The ARS may be utilized preoperatively to frame expectations after adrenalectomy in these populations.

The first modified Delphi consensus statement on sleeve gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the commonest bariatric procedure worldwide. Yet there is significant variation in practice concerning its various aspects. This paper report results from the first modified Delphi consensus-building exercise on SG. METHODS: We established a committee of 54 globally recognized opinion makers in this field. The committee agreed to vote on several statements concerning SG. An agreement or disagreement amongst ≥ 70.0% experts was construed as a consensus. RESULTS: The committee achieved a consensus of agreement (n = 71) or disagreement (n = 7) for 78 out of 97 proposed statements after two rounds of voting. The committee agreed with 96.3% consensus that the characterization of SG as a purely restrictive procedure was inaccurate and there was 88.7% consensus that SG was not a suitable standalone, primary, surgical weight loss option for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) without dysplasia. There was an overwhelming consensus of 92.5% that the sleeve should be fashioned over an orogastric tube of 36-40 Fr and a 90.7% consensus that surgeons should stay at least 1 cm away from the angle of His. Remarkably, the committee agreed with 81.1% consensus that SG patients should undergo a screening endoscopy every 5 years after surgery to screen for BE. CONCLUSION: A multinational team of experts achieved consensus on several aspects of SG. The findings of this exercise should help improve the outcomes of SG, the commonest bariatric procedure worldwide, and guide future research on this topic.

The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become one of the most commonly performed gastric bypass procedures in some countries. OBJECTIVES: To assess how surgeons viewed the OAGB, perceptions, indications, techniques, and outcomes, as well as the incidence of short- and long-term complications and how they were managed worldwide. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all IFSO members in all 5 chapters to study the pattern of practice and outcomes of OAGB. RESULTS: Seven hundred and forty-two surgeons responded. The most commonly performed procedures were sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and OAGB. Preoperatively, 70% of the surgeons performed endoscopy routinely. In regards to weight loss, 83% (570 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than SG, and 49% (342 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than RYGB. The most common length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) utilized was 200 cm. Sixty-seven percent of surgeons did not measure the total length of the small bowel. In patients with reflux disease and history of smoking, 53% and 22% of surgeons respectively still offered OAGB as a treatment option. Postoperatively, leak was documented in 963 patients, and it was the leading cause for mortality. Leak management was conservative in 35%. Conversion to RYGB was performed in 31%. In 16% the anastomosis was reinforced, 6% of the patients were reversed, and other procedures were performed in 12%. Revision of OAGB for malnutrition/steatorrhea or severe bile reflux was reported at least once by 37% and 45% of surgeons, respectively (200 cm was the most commonly encountered biliopancreatic limb BPL in those revised for malnutrition). Most common strategy for revision was conversion to RYGB (43%), reversal to normal anatomy (32%), shortening of the BPL (20%), and conversion to SG (5%). Nevertheless, 5 out of 98 mortalities (5%) were due to liver failure/malnutrition. CONCLUSION: There are infrequent but potentially severe specific complications including malnutrition, liver failure, and bile reflux that may require surgical correction after OAGB.

Reaching LDL-C Targets in Patients with Moderate, High, and Very High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease After Bariatric Surgery According to Different Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is highly prevalent in obese patients and is the leading cause of death. High levels of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with higher coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the achievement of the currently proposed cardiovascular prevention goals after 1 year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis from a prospectively built database of patients who underwent a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from 2004 to 2018. Patients with intermediate, high, or very high risk for CVD according to the 2018 AHA/ACC or the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines were selected. An analysis of clinical and biochemical variables in 1 year was performed. Logistic multivariate regressions were made to assess the impact of preoperative and weight loss parameters in the achievement of LDL-C goals. RESULTS: From 1039 patients, 70 met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis of the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines, and 75 in the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Mean decrease in LDL-C levels was 21.1 ± 40.2 mg/dL 1 year after surgery, and 29/34 patients were off medications. The percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals according to the 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines was 27.1%, whereas according to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, the percentages was 9.3%. The %TWL was associated with achieving LDL-C goals according to the 2018 AHA/ACC at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: RYGB induces a significant weight loss and an improvement in LDL-C levels 1 year after surgery. The number of patients that reached the goals varies according to the guidelines used and ranged from 9.3 to 27.1%.

Barrett's Oesophagus and Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery-IFSO 2020 Position Statement.

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has been playing an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical community at large about the importance of surgical and/or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The occurrence of chronic conditions following bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS), such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and columnar (intestinal) epithelial metaplasia of the distal oesophagus (also known as Barrett's oesophagus (BE)), has long been discussed in the metabolic surgical and medical community. Equally, the risk of neoplastic progression of Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the resulting requirement for surgery are the source of some concern for many involved in the care of these patients, as the surgical alteration of the gastrointestinal tract may lead to impaired reconstructive options. As such, there is a requirement for guidance of the community.The IFSO commissioned a task force to elucidate three aspects of the presenting problem: First, to determine what the estimated incidence of Barrett's oesophagus is in patients presenting for BMS; second, to determine the frequency at which Barrett's oesophagus may develop following BMS (with a particular focus on the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)); and third, to determine if regression of Barrett's oesophagus may occur following BMS given the close relationship of obesity and the development of BE/EAC. Based on these findings, a position statement regarding the management of this pathology in the context of BMS was developed. The following position statement is issued by the IFSO Barrett's Oesophagus task force andapproved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed regularly.

Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2020.

PreambleThe International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has played an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical communities at large about the role of innovative and new surgical and or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) is a relatively new procedure that has been proposed as an alternative to the conventional duodenal switch (DS) procedure. The IFSO published a position paper on SADI-S/OADS in 2018 with which concluded that this procedure was likely to be a safe and efficacious treatment for adiposity and its related diseases. However, it noted that there was insufficient long-term data and minimal high-level evidence available. The position statement called for patients to be enrolled in long-term multidisciplinary care encouraged the registration of patients in national registries, and called for more randomized controlled trials (RCT) (Obes Surg 28:1207-16, 2018) involving the procedure. The following position statement is an update of the previous position statement. It is issued by the IFSO SADI-S/OADS task force and has been reviewed and approved by both the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed again in 2 years.

Clinical factors associated with early and persistent hypocalcaemia after parathyroidectomy in patients on dialysis with severe hyperparathyroidism.

AIM: Severe hypocalcaemia following parathyroidectomy for secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT/THPT) is scarcely studied. We aimed to describe and identify risk factors for early and persistent hypocalcaemia after parathyroidectomy. METHODS: Retrospective pair-matched cohort study. We assessed 87 dialysis patients with SHPT (n = 73) or THPT (n = 14) paired with 146 subjects with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) who underwent parathyroidectomy and were followed for 12 months. Early severe hypocalcaemia was defined as a free Ca ≤0.8 mmol/L [3.2 mg/dl] or corrected Ca ≤1.87 mmol/L [7.5 mg/dl] within 48 h. After parathyroidectomy and persistent hypocalcaemia, as an elemental Ca intake >3.0 g/day to achieve corrected Ca >2 mmol/L [8.0 mg/dl]. RESULTS: Early severe hypocalcaemia occurred in 77% (67/87) versus 6.8% (10/146) of subjects with SHPT/THPT and PHPT, respectively (p < .001). In SHPT/THPT cases, persistent hypocalcaemia occurred in 77% (49/64) and 64% (35/54) after 6 and 12 months of parathyroidectomy, respectively. In PHPT cases, persistent hypocalcaemia occurred in 6.8% (10/146) after 4-12 months of parathyroidectomy. Preoperative serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was the only risk factor associated to early severe hypocalcaemia (OR 7.3, 95% C.I. 1.7-10.9, p = .006) and persistent hypocalcaemia (OR 7.1, 95% C.I: 2.1-14.2, p = .011). Subjects with persistently low intact parathormone (iPTH) (<5.3 pmol/L [50 ng/ml]), suggestive of adynamic bone disease) showed higher Ca increases and less oral calcium requirements compared to those who progressively increased iPTH after parathyroidectomy. CONCLUSION: Early and persistent hypocalcaemia after parathyroidectomy in severe HPT were a common event associated directly to preoperative ALP levels. Subjects with persistently low postoperative iPTH normalized serum Ca more frequently after 1 year of follow up.