Late natural history of corneal topography after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the 3 month to 1 year natural history of corneal topography after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized comparative study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 75 eyes of 68 patients with myopia were studied. INTERVENTION: Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and computer-assisted videokeratography were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and 3, 6, and 12 month postoperative topography patterns were compared and changes assessed by averaging defined sectors of the ablation zone in individual maps to produce composite "average" topography maps. RESULTS: Corneal topography was relatively smooth 3 months after PRK. By 12 months, the corneal contour in general had become even more uniform. No "central island" effect was observed. When looking at right and left eyes independently, there was a tendency toward maximum flattening nasally. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal topography in general continues to smooth from 3 to 12 months after PRK, possibly as a result of epithelial and stromal healing and remodeling. Right and left eyes on average show mirror-image, spatially oriented topography patterns.

Topography changes associated with sublamellar epithelial ingrowth after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was performed in 1 eye of a patient for correction of myopia. The patient was evaluated postoperatively using both Placido-disk-based videokeratography and rasterstereography. The patient developed an epithelial defect and subsequent sublamellar epithelial ingrowth after LASIK. The Placido-disk system demonstrated an area of flattening over the area of epithelial ingrowth, and rasterstereography more specifically identified the area over the epithelial ingrowth as an area of relative elevation.

Effect of lamellar flap location on corneal topography after laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of hinge position on corneal topography after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. SETTING: Academic center and refractive surgery practice. METHODS: Topography data obtained from 89 eyes of 46 patients after LASIK were analyzed. Using a system of Cartesian coordinates, data along the horizontal and vertical axes were analyzed, measuring sagittal height and power change at 1 mm intervals from the ablation zone center. Data points that were equidistant and on opposite sides of the ablation center were compared to find asymmetry along either axis relative to nasally hinged flaps. RESULTS: Along the horizontal axis, areas of the cornea closer to the hinge had a higher topography than areas farther from the hinge. Specifically, the points nearest and farthest from the hinge were significantly different in sagittal height (P <.034); the areas farthest from the hinge were reduced more after surgery (relatively lower topography). When results were stratified into low- and high-diopter corrections, this difference was significant in only the high-diopter group (P <.0006). Trends in power change were also observed. Areas of the cornea closer to the hinge were relatively flatter than areas farther from the hinge. Statistical significance was detected in only the low-diopter group at data points 2 mm from the ablation zone center in opposite directions (P <.008). No asymmetry was seen along the vertical axis in power change or sagittal height. CONCLUSIONS: The lamellar flap in LASIK may influence postoperative corneal topography. Hypothetically, the corneal flap may retract toward the hinge, producing axial asymmetry in the postoperative topography relative to the hinge. Understanding the influence of corneal flap characteristics on post-LASIK topography may improve optical results and may be particularly important in the development and effectiveness of topography-guided ablation techniques.

Delayed keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis.

We report 2 cases of delayed keratitis that occurred after uneventful laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The first patient presented with a peripheral corneal infiltrate 3 months after a LASIK enhancement procedure. The infiltrate progressed despite treatment with topical combination tobramycin-dexamethasone. The flap was then lifted and the interface was irrigated with fortified antibiotics. The keratitis promptly resolved, and the patient recovered a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/20. The second patient presented with decreased vision, inflammation, and a sublamellar infiltrate 1 month after primary LASIK. The flap was promptly lifted and irrigated with antibiotics. Cultures were positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis. One week later, the infiltrate had resolved and BCVA had returned to 20/20. Delayed bacterial keratitis has been described as a rare occurrence after incisional refractive surgery. To the best of our knowledge, it has not yet been reported after LASIK. It is important to consider infectious keratitis in the differential diagnosis of a patient who presents with corneal inflammation, even months after having LASIK.

Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of optical side effects. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: This report presents patient-reported optical symptoms after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). DESIGN: Preoperative and postoperative patient surveys in a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty eyes of 220 patients entered the study; 105 were randomized to PRK and 115 were randomized to LASIK. INTERVENTION: All patients received a one-pass, multizone excimer laser ablation as part of either a PRK or LASIK procedure. Attempted corrections ranged from 6.00 to 15.00 diopters (D). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Glare, halo, and monocular diplopia symptoms as reported by patients on questionnaires before surgery and at the 6-month follow-up. Comparison was made between symptoms when using optical correction before surgery and symptoms without correction after surgery. RESULTS: For both the PRK and LASIK groups analyzed individually, the difference in average glare index before surgery and after surgery was not statistically significant (P = 0.54 for PRK; P = 0.15 for LASIK; t test). Twenty-four PRK patients (41.4%) reported worsening of glare symptoms from baseline compared with 11 LASIK patients (21.6%); however, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.086, chi-square test). Within the PRK group, the difference in average halo index before and after surgery was statistically significant (P = 0.0003, t test); in the LASIK group, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.1 1, t test). Thirty-four PRK patients (58.6%) reported worsening of halo symptoms from baseline compared with 26 LASIK patients (50.0%); this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.086, chi-square test). For both the PRK and LASIK groups, the difference in average diplopia index before and after surgery was statistically significant (P < 0.0001 for PRK; 0.047 for LASIK; t test). Twenty-six PRK patients (44.8%) reported a worsening of monocular diplopia symptoms from baseline compared with 19 LASIK patients (35.8%); this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.39, chi-square test). When changes in glare and halo from before surgery to after surgery were pooled as a glare-halo index, however, the PRK group did show a significantly greater likelihood of demonstrating an increase in symptoms compared with the LASIK group (P = 0.048, chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: Optical sequelae of glare, halo, and monocular diplopia may occur in some patients after either both PRK or LASIK for moderate to high myopia; in contradistinction, many other patients' preoperative symptoms improve after surgery. On average, PRK patients show an increase in halo and diplopia symptoms, but not glare, after surgery, and LASIK patients show an increase in diplopia, but not glare and halo symptoms. There is a suggestion of a somewhat lesser tendency toward postoperative optical symptoms in LASIK compared with PRK treated eyes.

Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia with a 15 Hz repetition rate.

PURPOSE: To evaluate excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia using a repetition rate of 15 Hz instead of 10 Hz. SETTING: The Cornea and Laser Eye Institute, Teaneck, and Department of Ophthalmology, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy using a 15 Hz repetition rate was performed in 23 eyes of 14 patients by a single surgeon at 1 center. The attempted corrections ranged from -2.8 diopters (D) to -5.5 D. Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), predictability, corneal haze, and subjective glare/halo were evaluated over 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, UCVA was 20/32 or better in all eyes and at least 20/20 in 14 eyes (73.7%). Two eyes (10.5%) lost 2 or more Snellen lines of BSCVA; postoperative BSCVA was at least 20/25 in 100% of eyes and 20/20 or better in 95.0%. Fifteen eyes (78.9%) were within +/-0.5 D of attempted correction, and 19 (100%) were within +/-1.0 D. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was -4.62 D preoperatively, +0.15 D at 1 month, -0.09 D at 3 months, and -0.37 D at 6 months. At 6 months, 4 eyes (21.0%) had no corneal haze and 14 (73.7%) had trace subepithelial haze. Fifteen eyes (78.9%) had no glare/halo effect at 6 months, and 4 (21.0%) had minimal glare/halo effect. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes after excimer laser PRK for myopia using an increased repetition rate of 15 Hz were good and similar to those in studies conducted with a 10 Hz repetition rate.

Comparing predictability between eyes after bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis: a theoretical analysis of simultaneous versus sequential procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) between eyes of individuals to determine whether the refractive result of the first eye is useful in improving fellow eye outcomes. DESIGN: Single-center case series. PARTICIPANTS: One surgeon and 196 eyes of 98 patients. INTERVENTION: All patients received sequential bilateral LASIK. The mean time between procedures was 11.6 days. Attempted corrections ranged from 2.30 to 12.00 diopters (D). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictability (achieved minus attempted correction), postoperative manifest refraction, and theoretical postoperative manifest refraction, using a proposed attempted correction on the second eye based on first eye results, were analyzed. RESULTS: At 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, predictability of the first operated eye was correlated with predictability of the fellow eye (1 week: mean 1st = 0.33 D, mean 2nd = 0.33 D, Pearson coefficient = 0.46, P < 0.0005; 1 month: mean 1st = 0.028 D, mean 2nd = -0.020 D, Pearson coefficient = 0.43, P < 0.0005; 3 months: mean 1st = -0.22 D, mean 2nd = -0.12 D, Pearson coefficient = 0.52, P < 0.0005). At the 3-month follow-up of the second eye, comparing the actual distance from emmetropia with that calculated using a theoretical proposed attempted correction based on the first eye refraction, distance from emmetropia was closer in the theoretical correction group. This finding was stronger in patients with preoperative myopia less than 5.5 D (P = 0.03). For this group, 93% of patients in the proposed attempted correction group would fall within 1.0 D of emmetropia compared to 80% found in the actual outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The refractive predictability between the two eyes of an individual after LASIK is correlated. Theoretically, therefore, one may be able to achieve correction closer to emmetropia in the second eye by applying the refractive predictability results from the first operated eye. In this study, using a theoretical proposed attempted correction in the second eye based on the first eye outcome, we have shown that better outcomes in the second eye are possible, particularly in low myopes. Thus, it may be advantageous to perform bilateral LASIK sequentially rather than simultaneously, using predictability outcomes from the first operated eye in planning fellow eye treatment. Moreover, waiting approximately 1 week was found to be potentially as effective as waiting longer periods of time between treatments. Further studies are necessary to better assess the actual clinical significance of these findings.

Early corneal topography patterns after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

OBJECTIVES: We defined early patterns of corneal topography following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with a Summit Apex laser without pretreatment software, investigated changes in patterns over time, and identified factors associated with different topography patterns. METHODS: Fifty-eight eyes of 39 myopic patients were studied. EyeSys videokeratography data were analyzed at 1 week and 1, 2, and 3 months after surgery and were classified using a standardized classification system. RESULTS: At 1 week, 4.3% (n = 2) of corneas showed a homogeneous topography, 0.0% showed a toric-with-axis configuration, 2.2% (n = 1) showed a toric-against-axis configuration, 8.7% (n = 4) showed an irregularly irregular topography, 17.4% (n = 8) showed a keyhole pattern, 23.9% (n = 11) showed a semicircular pattern, 41.3% (n = 19) showed a central island pattern, and 2.2% (n = 1) showed focal topographic variants. From 1 week to 1 month, 78.9% of maps changed; from 1 to 2 months, 33.3% of maps changed; and from 2 to 3 months, 40.0% of maps changed, generally to more regular patterns. The central island pattern, which predominated at 1 week, was not seen at 3 months; most had changed to the keyhole or semicircular pattern. An association was found between the central island pattern and irregularity of reflected rings on the video-image of the cornea (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The central island pattern is an early and usually transient topography pattern following PRK. Keyhole and semicircular patterns taken together were the most prevalent in the early postoperative period. In some cases, central islands may be a consequence of corneal epithelial irregularity, and the meridional orientation of the keyhole and semicircular patterns suggests an influence of epithelial healing over time.

Surgically induced astigmatism after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the axis and magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism in photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Multicenter clinical trial. METHODS: In this prospective randomized trial, 220 eyes of 220 patients entered the study cohort: 105 randomized to PRK and 115 to LASIK. All patients received a single-pass, multizone excimer laser ablation as part of a PRK or LASIK procedure. Attempted corrections ranged from -6.00 to -15.00 diopters (D). The LASIK procedures were performed with nasal hinges. Absolute changes in astigmatism and axis and magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism were analyzed. Patients were followed for up to 6 month. RESULTS: In the PRK group, the mean change in absolute astigmatism was +0.14, +0.16 and +0.32 D at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively; in the LASIK group, the mean change was -0.15, -0.08, and -0.03 D, respectively. At all time points, a greater proportion of PRK than LASIK eyes had an increase in absolute magnitude of astigmatism. In the PRK group, the axis of vectoral-induced astigmatism was significantly different from random at 3 and 6 months (P = .01, P < .001), respectively) with a tendency for induced with-the-rule shifts postoperatively. In the LASIK group, the axis of vectoral-induced astigmatism was significantly different from random at only 1 month (P = .04), and there was no preponderant direction of axis shift. Despite these findings, other analyses showed no statistically significant between-group differences in vectoral axis or magnitude of surgically induced astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Induced astigmatism was generally less and more random in axis in LASIK than in PRK; a general trend for induced with-the-rule astigmatism in PRK was not seen in LASIK. Hypothetically, the lamellar corneal flap in LASIK may counteract the tendency toward steepening at 90 degrees seen in PRK by retracting toward the hinge, by masking underlying induced astigmatism in the ablation zone, or by its mitigating influence on postoperative corneal healing.

Natural history of corneal topography after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the natural history of corneal topography after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: A prospective, single center clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 40 eyes of 34 patients with myopia were studied. INTERVENTION: Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and computer-assisted videokeratography were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative, 1 week, and 1, 2, and 3 months postoperative topography patterns were compared and changes assessed by averaging defined sectors of the ablation zone in individual maps to produce composite "average" topography maps. RESULTS: Corneal topography was generally not homogeneous at 1 week after PRK. By 3 months, there had been considerable smoothing of corneal contour. A general "central island" effect early in the postoperative period flattened over time. When right and left eyes were evaluated independently, a tendency toward a keyhole-semicircular pattern was seen on average; the maximum flattening was nasal and the least flattening was inferotemporal for both right and left eyes. CONCLUSIONS: A tendency, on average, toward central island and keyhole-semicircular patterns is seen early in the postoperative course after PRK. Central islands tend to evolve into the keyhole-semicircular pattern, and the corneal topography in general after PRK tends to smooth considerably with time.

Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. A randomized prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This report presents the results of a randomized clinical trial of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). DESIGN: A randomized, prospective multicenter clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 220 eyes of 220 patients entered the study cohort: 105 randomized to PRK and 115 to LASIK. The mean preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent was -9.23 diopters (D) in the PRK group and -9.30 D in the LASIK group. INTERVENTION: All patients received a one-pass, multizone excimer laser ablation as part of either a PRK or LASIK procedure using the Summit Apex excimer laser. Attempted corrections ranged from 6.00 to 15.00 D. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, predictability,and stability of refraction, corneal haze, and flap complications were analyzed. Patients were observed for up to 6 months. RESULTS: One day after surgery, 0 (0.0%) and 3 (4.5%) eyes in the PRK group saw 20/20 and 20/40 or better uncorrected, respectively, while 7 (10%) and 48 (68.6%) eyes in the LASIK group saw 20/20 and 20/40 or better, respectively. At 6 months after PRK, 13 (19.1%) and 45 (66.2%) eyes saw 20/20 and 20/40 or better, respectively, while after LASIK, 16 (26.2%) and 34 (55.7%) eyes saw 20/20 and 20/40 or better, respectively (odds ratio = 0.56 for likelihood of uncorrected visual acuity < 20/40 for PRK vs. LASIK, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31-1.19). After PRK, 39 eyes (57.4%) were within 1.0 D of attempted correction compared with 24 eyes (40.7%) in the LASIK group (odds ratio = 0.50 for likelihood fo undercorrection 1.0 D for PRK vs. LASIK, 95% CI = 0.24-1.04); however, the standard deviation of the predictability was similar between groups: 1.01 D for PRK and 1.22 D for LASIK. From months 1 to 6, there was an average regression of 0.89 D in the PRK group and 0.55 D in the LASIK group. After PRK, eight eyes (11.8%) had a decrease in spectacle-corrected visual acuity of two Snellen lines or more; after LASIK, two eyes (3.2%) had a decrease of two lines or more (odds ratio = 3.89 for risk of loss of spectacle-corrected visual acuity for PRK vs. LASIK, 95% CI = 0.71-21.30). Only two eyes had postoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity less than 20/32, however. CONCLUSIONS: Although improvement in uncorrected visual acuity is more rapid in LASIK than in PRK, efficacy outcomes in the longer term generally are similar between the two procedures. There is a greater tendency toward undercorrection in LASIK eyes using the specific laser and nomogram in this study, but the scatter in achieved versus attempted correction is similar, suggesting little difference in the accuracy of the two procedures. A suggestion of decreased propensity for loss of spectacle-corrected visual acuity in LASIK eyes requires further investigation.

Excimer laser refractive surgery.

Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and excimer laser in situ keratomileusis are relatively new treatment modalities that can be used to correct refractive errors of the eye. They are most commonly used to correct myopia (nearsightedness) but can also be used to correct hyperopia (farsightedness) and astigmatism. The excimer laser alters the refractive state of the eye by removing tissue from the anterior cornea through a process known as photoablative decomposition. This process uses ultraviolet energy from the excimer laser to disrupt chemical bonds in the cornea without causing any thermal damage to surrounding tissue. The modified anterior corneal surface enables light to be focused on the retina, thereby reducing or eliminating the dependence on glasses and contact lenses. We discuss in detail all aspects of excimer laser refractive surgery--techniques, indications and contraindications, clinical outcomes, and complications.

Corneal topography of photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare qualitative patterns of corneal topography early in the postoperative course after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) when used for the treatment of myopia of 6.0 to 15.0 diopters. DESIGN: The study design was a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 64 eyes were treated with PRK and 54 eyes were treated with LASIK. INTERVENTION: Using the Summit Apex excimer laser, patients received either PRK or LASIK using a single pass, multizone excimer laser ablation. Computer-assisted videokeratography was performed at designated postoperative examinations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Videokeratography maps at 1 and 3 months after surgery were classified using a standard classification scheme. The association of topography patterns to loss of spectacle-corrected visual acuity was tested. RESULTS: At 1 month, for the PRK (n = 60) and LASIK (n = 51) groups, respectively, 63.3% and 19.6% of eyes fell into one of the four optically irregular groups (central island, keyhole, semicircular, or irregularly irregular; P < 0.001). At 3 months, for the PRK (n = 49) and LASIK (n = 39) groups, respectively, 36.7% and 10.3% of eyes fell into one of the optically irregular groups (P = 0.004). Comparing the 1- and 3-month examination results in the PRK and LASIK groups, respectively, 19 (42%) of 45 eyes and 11 (31%) of 36 eyes had a change in topography, generally to an optically smoother pattern. The irregular groups, taken together, were associated with a greater tendency toward loss of spectacle-corrected visual acuity of two or more Snellen lines (P = 0.01). There also was greater tendency toward loss of spectacle-corrected visual acuity in the PRK group that diminished with time (P < 0.01 at 1 month, P = 0.05 at 3 months). CONCLUSIONS: After treatment for moderate-to-high myopia, LASIK topography patterns generally are more regular than are PRK patterns. This may be a result either of masking of underlying topography perturbations by the lamellar corneal flap, thus mitigating induced topography changes, or differences in surface wound healing. This study suggests that more rapid return of spectacle-corrected visual acuity found in patients treated with LASIK may be a result of more regular topography patterns early in the postoperative course.

Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the outcomes of single-zone photorefractive keratectomy (SZPRK), aspherical photorefractive keratectomy (ASPRK), and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of myopia between -6 and -12 diopters. DESIGN: Two simultaneous prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: 286 first-treated eyes of 286 patients enrolled in one of two studies. In Study I, 134 eyes were randomized to SZPRK (58 eyes) or ASPRK (76 eyes). In Study II, 152 eyes were randomized to ASPRK (76 eyes) or to LASIK (76 eyes). INTERVENTION: All eyes received spherical one-pass excimer laser ablation as part of PRK or LASIK performed with the Summit Technologies Apex laser under an investigational device exemption, with attempted corrections between -6 and -12 diopters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, predictability and stability of refraction, and complications were analyzed. Follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: At 1 month postoperatively, more eyes in the LASIK group achieved 20/20 and 20/25 or better uncorrected visual acuity than PRK-treated eyes; at the 20/25 or better level, the difference was significant for LASIK (29/76 eyes, 38%) over SZPRK (10/58 eyes, 17%) (P = .0064). At all subsequent postoperative intervals, no difference was seen between treatment groups. Similarly, best corrected visual acuities were better for LASIK than all PRK eyes at 1 month postoperatively, and LASIK was better than SZPRK at 3 months follow-up (e.g., for 20/20 or better at 1 month, LASIK 50/76 eyes (66%) versus SZPRK 24/57 eyes (42%), P = .0066). PRK eyes had a mean loss of BCVA through 6 months, while LASIK eyes had a slight gain of mean BCVA through month 6; at 12 months, both ASPRK groups but not SZPRK continued to have a small mean loss of BCVA (e.g., compared to preoperative, mean BCVA at 12 months for SZPRK was + 0.3, LASIK was +.21, ASPRK I was -0.11, and ASPRK II -0.31 (SZPRK versus ASPRK II, P = .0116). Predictability was better for PRK than LASIK at all follow-up intervals (e.g., for manifest refraction spherical equivalent +/- 1.0 diopters at 6 months, ASPRK I 42/62 eyes (68%) versus LASIK 29/72 eyes (40%), P = .0014%). Stability was slightly but insignificantly less in the LASIK eyes compared to PRK eyes. All visual outcome measures were better for eyes with preoperative myopia between -6 and -8.9 D compared with eyes with myopia between -9 and -12 D. No consistent differences in refractive outcomes or postoperative corneal haze were seen between aspherical and single-zone ablations; haze diminished over 12 months and was judged to be vision-impairing in only one ASPRK eye. Microkeratome and flap complications occurred in 4 eyes, resulting in delay of completion of the procedure in 3 eyes but not causing long-term impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in uncorrected visual acuity and return of best corrected visual acuity was more rapid for LASIK than PRK, but efficacy outcomes in the longer term through 12 months were similar for all treatment groups. LASIK eyes tended toward undercorrection with the nomogram employed in this study compared to PRK, but the scatter was similar, suggesting little difference between these procedures for most patients by 6 months and thereafter. No consistent advantage was demonstrated between aspherical and single-zone ablation patterns. Predictability was much better for all procedures for corrections of -6 to -8.9 D compared with -9 to -12 D. Sporadic loss of best corrected vision in the PRK eyes not found in the LASIK eyes and other measures of visual function require further study.

Disparity between refractive error and visual acuity after photorefractive keratectomy: multifocal corneal effects.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between postoperative refractive error and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and compare the results to those in unoperated control eyes with different degrees of myopic refractive error. SETTING: Academic cornea and refractive surgery subspecialty practice. METHODS: Uncorrected visual acuity and manifest refraction were recorded for 52 consecutive patients who had PRK for myopia. Eight control eyes that did not have PRK and in which artificial myopia was induced were also studied to ascertain the association of UCVA with myopia in untreated eyes. Uncorrected visual acuity in postoperative eyes was compared with that in control eyes. RESULTS: Of the 46 eyes with a myopic spherical equivalent postoperative refraction, 44 (96%) had better UCVA than control eyes with equivalent myopic refractions. Twelve of 13 (92%) eyes with refractions of -1.00 diopter or more had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. CONCLUSION: After excimer laser PRK, patients achieved better Snellen visual acuity than might be expected from their residual refractive error, perhaps as a result of a multifocal postoperative corneal topography. Nonuniformity of the corneal surface following PRK may create "focal areas of emmetropia" that allow patients to achieve better visual acuity than the refraction may predict.

Results of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. The Summit PRK Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to determine safety and efficacy outcomes of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the treatment of mild-to-moderate myopia. DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, phase III clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 701 eyes of 701 patients were entered in the study; 612 eyes were examined at 2 years after surgery. INTERVENTION: Intervention was photorefractive keratectomy using the Summit ExciMed UV200LA excimer laser (Summit Technology, Inc., Waltham, MA). The treatment zone diameter used was 4.5 mm in 251 eyes (35.8%) and 5 mm in 450 eyes (64.2%). Attempted corrections ranged from 1.50 to 6.00 diopters (D). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictability and stability of refraction, uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, refractive and keratometric astigmatism, corneal haze, contrast sensitivity, subjective reported problems of glare and halo, and patient satisfaction were the parameters measured. RESULTS: At 2 years, 407 (66.5%) eyes achieved 20/20 or better uncorrected visual acuity and 564 (92.5%) eyes achieved 20/40 or better visual acuity. Three hundred thirty-six (54.9%) eyes were within 0.5 D and 476 (77.8%) eyes were within 1.0 D of attempted correction. Stability of refraction improved with time; 86.8% of eyes were stable within 1.0 D from 6 to 12 months, 94% were stable from 12 to 18 months, and 96.3% were stable from 18 to 24 months. There was no evidence of progressive or late myopic or hyperopic refractive shifts. One hundred fourteen (18.6%) eyes gained 2 or more lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity, whereas 42 (6.9%) eyes lost 2 or more lines; however, of the latter, 32 (76.2%) had spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better and 39 (92.9%) eyes had 20/40 or better. Four hundred forty-two (72.2%) corneas were clear, 138 (22.5%) showed trace haze, 20 (3.3%) mild haze, 9 (1.5%) moderate haze, and 3 (0.5%) marked haze. On patient questionnaires, 87 (29.7%) patients reported worsening of glare from preoperative baseline; 133 (50.1%) reported worsening of halo symptoms from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy appears effective for myopic corrections of -1.50 to -6.00 D. Uncorrected visual acuity is maximized in most eyes by 3 months, although some patients require between 6 months and 1 year to attain their best postoperative uncorrected visual acuity and some may require from 1 to 2 years for stabilization of refraction. Refraction stabilizes progressively without evidence of late myopic or hyperopic refractive shifts. Optical sequelae of glare and halo occur in some patients treated with a 4.5- or 5-mm treatment zone.

Corneal topography of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy using a 6-mm beam diameter. Summit PRK Topography Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to define qualitative patterns of corneal topography after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a 6-mm beam diameter, investigate changes in patterns over time, and identify associations of topography patterns with clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-eight eyes of 90 patients with myopia who had undergone PRK using the Summit Technology, Inc., excimer laser with a 6-mm beam diameter. INTERVENTION: Computer-assisted videokeratography data were analyzed for eyes having undergone PRK. Topography patterns at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were classified and associations with clinical outcomes assessed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED: Topography patterns after PRK were determined at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Associations with preoperative characteristics of age and attempted correction, and postoperative outcomes of uncorrected and spectacle-corrected visual acuity, predictability, astigmatism, corneal haze, glare, halo, and patient satisfaction were analyzed. RESULTS: At 1 year, 21.4% of corneas showed a homogeneous topography, 27.6% showed a toric-with-axis configuration, 10.2% showed a toric-against-axis configuration, 7.1% showed an irregularly irregular topography, 24.5% showed a keyhole/semicircular pattern, and 9.2% showed focal topographic variants. From 3 to 6 months, 40.1% of maps changed; from 6 to 12 months, 53.1% of maps changed, generally to optically smoother, regular patterns. Older age and higher attempted correction were associated with the development of more irregular patterns. The irregular groups showed worse predictability than did the regular groups and a tendency for slight overcorrection. The average reported glare/halo of 1.33 (scale = 0 to 5) in this study was less than in a previous study of the 4.5- to 5-mm treatment zone. However, of six patients expressing dissatisfaction with the results of surgery, three ranked their glare or halo at the maximum level. CONCLUSIONS: Topography patterns using a 6-mm beam diameter are identifiable, improve with time, and may affect clinical outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The keyhole/semicircular pattern is more prevalent with a 6 mm treatment zone than with smaller treatment zones. Although optical side effects of glare and halo appear to be reduced with the 6-mm treatment, a small number of patients still report substantial glare or halo after the procedure.

Characteristics influencing outcomes of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Summit Photorefractive Keratectomy Phase III Study Group.

PURPOSE: To identify preoperative and intraoperative characteristics associated with outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: In the phase III multicenter clinical trials of the Summit Technology excimer laser for corrections of 1.5 to 6.0 diopters (D) of myopia, three principal outcomes of PRK on 612 patients were examined: (1) uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, (2) predictability of refractive outcome within 1.0 D of attempted correction, and (3) stability of refractive result between 12 and 24 months. Multiple logistic regression was used to test for independent associations of multiple preoperative and intraoperative characteristics with each of these outcomes. RESULTS: Older age was independently associated with lesser likelihood of achieving 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity (odds ratio = 1.08 per incremental year of age, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-1.12) and with decreased predictability, specifically with overcorrection (odds ratio = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.06-1.12), but age was not associated with stability of refraction. Greater attempted correction was associated independently with a decreased likelihood of 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity (odds ratio = 2.78 for corrections of 3.5-5.5 D, 95% CI = 1.18-6.75; odds ratio = 4.19 for corrections of > or = 5.5 D, 95% CI = 1.66-10.58), with decreased predictability (odds ratio = 1.72 for corrections of 3.5-5.5 D, 95% CI = 1.05-2.85; odds ratio = 2.95 for corrections of > or = 5.5 D, 95% CI = 1.65-5.26), and with a reduced likelihood of stability of refraction (odds ratio = 3.46 for corrections of > or = 5.0 D, 95% CI = 1.32-9.11). No intraoperative characteristics were associated with any of the outcomes assessed. CONCLUSIONS: Using this specific excimer laser system with an optical zone of 4.5 or 5.0 mm, patient age and attempted correction are important preoperative characteristics associated with postoperative uncorrected visual acuity and predictability of PRK. Stability of refraction is strongly associated with attempted correction. Such information may help guide patient selection, determine timing of fellow eye treatment, and suggest changes in the laser treatment algorithm for individual patients. Although these findings may be representative of PRK in general, similar analyses should be performed before modifying patient treatments using either a 6.0-mm treatment zone or other laser systems.