A Single Center's Experience With Spinal Anesthesia for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Surgical Procedures.

PURPOSE: To perform a single institution review of spinal instead of general anesthesia for pediatric patients undergoing surgical procedures. Spinal success rate, intraoperative complications, and postoperative outcomes including unplanned hospital admission and emergency department visits within seven days are reported. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for surgical procedures from 2016 until 2022. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure and anesthetic characteristics, intraoperative complications, unplanned admissions, and emergency department returns. RESULTS: The study cohort included 1221 patients. Ninety-two percent of the patients tolerated their surgical procedure without requiring conversion to general anesthesia, and 78% of patients that had spinals placed successfully did not receive any sedation following lumbar puncture. The most common intraoperative event was systolic blood pressure below 60 mm Hg (14%), but no cases required administration of vasoactive agents, and no serious intraoperative adverse events were observed. Post-Anesthesia Care Unit Phase I was bypassed in 72% of cases with a median postoperative length of stay of 84 min. Forty-six patients returned to the emergency department following hospital discharge, but no returns were due to anesthetic concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia is a viable and versatile option for a diversity of pediatric surgical procedures. We noted a low incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. There remain numerous potential advantages of spinal anesthesia over general anesthesia in young pediatric patients particularly in the ambulatory setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort treatment study.

Epidural Abscess Complicating Tunneled Caudal Epidural Catheter in an Infant for Postoperative Pain Management of Open Abdominal Surgery.

Regional anesthesia is being used more frequently in pediatric anesthesia practice, including the perioperative care of neonates and infants. Adverse effects may be encountered during epidural needle placement, with catheter advancement, or subsequently during infusion of local anesthetic agents. Despite applying standard practice of care regarding placement of epidural catheter, epidural catheter-related infections may still occur. We present the rare occurrence of an epidural abscess in a 4-month-old infant after placement and subsequent use of a tunneled caudal epidural catheter for postoperative pain management following abdominal surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the gold standard diagnostic imaging modality and was used to identify the abscess. Management included intravenous antibiotic therapy as well as hemilaminectomy with evacuation of the epidural abscess and hematoma. The patient continued to progress well with no deficits noted on neurological examination. There were no other postoperative concerns. When there is a concern for epidural catheter-related infection, the catheter should be removed immediately. The epidural catheter tip as well as any purulent discharge from the insertion site should be sent for culture and sensitivity. Urgent neurosurgical and infectious disease consultation is suggested to provide opinions regarding surgical intervention and antibiotic therapy.

Paediatric pain management: from regional to virtual.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Due to increased interest in opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic strategies both inside and outside of the operating room, anaesthesiologists have started to look towards regional anaesthesia as well as nonpharmacological pain-reducing techniques. The purpose of this article is to discuss current trends and recent developments in regional anaesthesia and virtual reality for paediatric pain management. RECENT FINDINGS: The development of novel fascial plane blocks has expanded regional options for anaesthesiologists, especially when neuraxial anaesthesia is not a viable or straightforward option. Other regional techniques, such as spinal anaesthesia and continuous epidural analgesia for infants and neonates, are becoming more popular, as more paediatric anaesthesiologists become familiar with these techniques. Virtual reality for paediatric pain management is a relatively new area of study that has shown promise, but more research needs to be done before widespread adoption of this practice becomes a reality. Various preexisting pain-reducing strategies such as distraction and biofeedback are being integrated with virtual reality to help optimize its effect on pain and anxiety for paediatric patients. SUMMARY: Regional anaesthesia and virtual reality are valuable tools that serve to alleviate pain in paediatric patients. Advances are being made within both fields in various healthcare settings for different types of pain. Over the next few years, they will likely both play an increasing role in paediatric pain management.

Ambulatory spinal anesthesia in infants ≤ six months of age: A retrospective review of outcomes and safety.

PURPOSE: To review experience with outpatient spinal anesthesia (SA) from a single center in infants ≤6 months of age. METHODS: Retrospective review of all SAs performed in the ambulatory setting in the outpatient surgery centers in infants ≤6 months of age from 2016 to 2020, focusing on success rate, adverse events, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) times, and emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) returns within 7 days of the operation. RESULTS: The study cohort included 175 SAs performed on 173 patients ≤6 months of age. One hundred and sixty-two patients (93%) were able to undergo their respective surgical procedures under SA without conversion to general anesthesia. One hundred and thirty-six patients (78%) did not require additional sedation or analgesic agents. The median time from entering the operating room until the start of surgical procedure was 17 min. One hundred and twenty-six patients (72%) were able to bypass Phase I of the PACU. One hundred and forty-seven patients (86%) were discharged in less than two hours postoperatively. Only one complication related to SA was noted. This was a patient who returned on postoperative day 2 with a possible CSF leak noted by ultrasound. After overnight hospital floor admission, he was discharged the next day after receiving intravenous fluids without further sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: SA is a viable option for anesthetic care in infants ≤6 months of age presenting for outpatient surgery. Advantages included the ability to bypass PACU Phase I and facilitation of hospital discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Retrospective cohort treatment study.

Characterization of the Difficult Peripheral IV in the Perioperative Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study of Intravenous Access for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anesthesia.

Background: Various criteria exist for defining difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in infants and children. The current study evaluated the factors associated with DIVA in a prospective cohort of over 1000 infants and children presenting for anesthetic care. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study of patients aged 0 to 18 years undergoing elective surgical or radiologic procedures under general anesthesia. Prior to the initial attempt at peripheral intravenous (PIV) cannulation, the anticipated difficulty of PIV catheter placement was determined by the provider using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10. The number of attempts was recorded as well as the time required to achieve PIV access. DIVA was defined as requiring three or more attempts. After successful cannulation, the actual difficulty of the PIV placement was assessed by the provider and recorded using the same VAS. Patient characteristics, including age, race, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification, and history of difficult PIV placement, were evaluated as covariates. Results: In our cohort of 1002 pediatric patients, 78% of patients were successfully cannulated in a single attempt and 91% of patients were successfully cannulated in two or fewer attempts. Factors associated with requiring three or more PIV attempts included younger age (OR 8.73; 95% CI: 3.38, 22.6 for age <1 year and OR 4.93; 95% CI: 2.05, 11.8 for age 1-3 years), higher ASA physical classification (OR 1.95; 95% CI: 1.10, 3.46 for ASA II), and prior history of difficult PIV placement (OR 3.46; 95% CI: 1.70, 7.08). BMI, racial category or gender were not independent predictors of DIVA. Conclusion: We found that approximately 9% of patients required three or more attempts at IV placement in the operating room. Patients that required multiple PIV attempts were more likely to be younger, have a higher ASA classification or a history of difficult PIV placement.

Postoperative Analgesia in Neonates and Infants Using Epidural Chloroprocaine and Clonidine.

INTRODUCTION: In neonates and infants, epidural analgesia has gained popularity as a means of providing postoperative analgesia, limiting opioid-related adverse effects and improving the postoperative course. In addition to a local anesthetic agent, adjunctive agents may be added to further augment analgesia. Clonidine is an α2-adrenergic agonist that is frequently added to single-shot caudal analgesia, but there are limited data regarding its use in a continuous epidural infusion, especially in patients ≤12 months of age. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of neonates and infants who received postoperative epidural infusions with 2-chloroprocaine, and clonidine was identified over a 4-year period. RESULTS: The study cohort included 52 neonates and infants ranging in age from 0 to 12 months and in weight from 2.1 to 10.1 kilograms. The catheters were dosed with either 1.5% 2-chloroprocaine (n=47) or 3% 2-chloroprocaine (n=5) with clonidine (median concentration 0.2 µg/mL) infused at a median rate of 0.72 mL/kg/hour. Pain scores were uniformly ≤3 at all evaluation points during the first 72 postoperative hours with a limited need for supplemental systemic opioids. No serious adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSION: With the recognized limitations of a retrospective study, these preliminary data demonstrate the safety of adding clonidine to an epidural infusion of 2-chloroprocaine in neonates and infants less than 12 months of age. Future studies are needed to determine its analgesic efficacy compared to 2-chloroprocaine alone and the optimal clonidine concentration for postoperative epidural infusions.