How surgical Trainee Research Collaboratives achieve success: a mixed methods study to develop trainee engagement strategies.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand the role of surgical Trainee Research Collaboratives (TRCs) in conducting randomised controlled trials and identify strategies to enhance trainee engagement in trials. DESIGN: This is a mixed methods study. We used observation of TRC meetings, semi-structured interviews and an online survey to explore trainees' motivations for engagement in trials and TRCs, including barriers and facilitators. Interviews were analysed thematically, alongside observation field notes. Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Strategies to enhance TRCs were developed at a workshop by 13 trial methodologists, surgical trainees, consultants and research nurses. SETTING: This study was conducted within a secondary care setting in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was sent to registered UK surgical trainees. TRC members and linked stakeholders across surgical specialties and UK regions were purposefully sampled for interviews. RESULTS: We observed 5 TRC meetings, conducted 32 semi-structured interviews and analysed 73 survey responses. TRCs can mobilise trainees thus gaining wider access to patients. Trainees engaged with TRCs to improve patient care, surgical evidence and to help progress their careers. Trainees valued the TRC infrastructure, research expertise and mentoring. Challenges for trainees included clinical and other priorities, limited time and confidence, and recognition, especially by authorship. Key TRC strategies were consultant support, initial simple rapid studies, transparency of involvement and recognition for trainees (including authorship policies) and working with Clinical Trials Units and research nurses. A 6 min digital story on YouTube disseminated these strategies. CONCLUSION: Trainee surgeons are mostly motivated to engage with trials and TRCs. Trainee engagement in TRCs can be enhanced through building relationships with key stakeholders, maximising multi-disciplinary working and offering training and career development opportunities.

Surgical stress: the muscle and cognitive demands of robotic and laparoscopic surgery.

Introduction: Surgeons are among the most at-risk professionals for work-related musculoskeletal decline and experience high mental demands. This study examined the electromyographic (EMG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) activities of surgeons during surgery. Methods: Surgeons who performed live laparoscopic (LS) and robotic (RS) surgeries underwent EMG and EEG measurements. Wireless EMG was used to measure muscle activation in four muscle groups bilaterally (biceps brachii, deltoid, upper trapezius, and latissimus dorsi), and an 8-channel wireless EEG device was used to measure cognitive demand. EMG and EEG recordings were completed simultaneously during (i) noncritical bowel dissection, (ii) critical vessel dissection, and (iii) dissection after vessel control. Robust ANOVA was used to compare the %MVCRMS and alpha power between LS and RS. Results: Thirteen male surgeons performed 26 laparoscopic surgeries (LS) and 28 robotic surgeries (RS). Muscle activation was significantly higher in the right deltoid (p = 0.006), upper trapezius (left, p = 0.041; right, p = 0.032), and latissimus dorsi (left, p = 0.003; right, p = 0.014) muscles in the LS group. There was greater muscle activation in the right biceps than in the left biceps in both surgical modalities (both p = 0.0001). There was a significant effect of the time of surgery on the EEG activity (p <0.0001). A significantly greater cognitive demand was observed in the RS than in the LS with alpha, beta, theta, delta, and gamma (p = 0.002 - p <0.0001). Conclusion: These data suggest greater muscle demands in laparoscopic surgery, but greater cognitive demands in robotic surgery.

Continuous vs stepwise anal acoustic reflectometry: An improved technique for physiological measurement of anal sphincter function?

BACKGROUND: Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) is a technique for measuring the physiological profile of the anal canal, primarily the internal anal sphincter. Evaluation of a new continuous method, recently developed for the urethra, would enable its future application for investigation of rectal reflexes. METHODS: Patients aged 18 and over with fecal incontinence (FI) were included. Stepwise AAR parameters were compared with continuous opening pressure (Op, cmH2 O), opening elastance (Oe, cmH2 O/mm2 ), closing pressure (Cp, cmH2 O), closing elastance (Ce, cmH2 O/mm2 ), hysteresis (Hys, [%]), squeeze opening pressure (SqOp, cmH2 O), and squeeze opening elastance (SqOe, cmH2 O/mm2 ). Vaizey incontinence and Manchester Health Questionnaire scores were also collected. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients, 26 females were analyzed. Median age: 60 (range, 32-75). Median AAR parameters of Op (37.50 vs 35.15, P = .031), Oe (1.31 vs 0.84, P < .0001), Ce (1.11 vs 0.88, P < .0001), Hys (37.75 vs 19.04, P < .0001), and SqOe (1.27 vs 1.06, P = .005) were significantly higher with the continuous method. Cp (22.70 vs 27.22, P = .003) is lower and SqOp (96.87 vs 59.47, P = .71) not significantly different. The continuous technique had superior repeatability between cycles for all AAR parameters except Oe, which was equivalent and continuous SqOp had a stronger negative correlation with Vaizey score than stepwise (-0.46, P = .009 vs -0.37, P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: The differences seen between the two techniques are likely to be related to the rate of stretch. The continuous technique appears to represent a more physiological measurement of anal sphincter function than the stepwise technique particularly in the assessment of voluntary squeeze function.

Developing a core outcome set for fistulising perianal Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Lack of standardised outcomes hampers effective analysis and comparison of data when comparing treatments in fistulising perianal Crohn's disease (pCD). Development of a standardised set of outcomes would resolve these issues. This study provides the definitive core outcome set (COS) for fistulising pCD. DESIGN: Candidate outcomes were generated through a systematic review and patient interviews. Consensus was established via a three-round Delphi process using a 9-point Likert scale based on how important they felt it was in determining treatment success culminating in a final consensus meeting. Stakeholders were recruited nationally and grouped into three panels (surgeons and radiologists, gastroenterologists and IBD specialist nurses, and patients). Participants received feedback from their panel (in the second round) and all participants (in the third round) to allow refinement of their scores. RESULTS: A total of 295 outcomes were identified from systematic reviews and interviews that were categorised into 92 domains. 187 stakeholders (response rate 78.5%) prioritised 49 outcomes through a three-round Delphi study. The final consensus meeting of 41 experts and patients generated agreement on an eight domain COS. The COS comprised three patient-reported outcome domains (quality of life, incontinence and a combined score of patient priorities) and five clinician-reported outcome domains (perianal disease activity, development of new perianal abscess/sepsis, new/recurrent fistula, unplanned surgery and faecal diversion). CONCLUSION: A fistulising pCD COS has been produced by all key stakeholders. Application of the COS will reduce heterogeneity in outcome reporting, thereby facilitating more meaningful comparisons between treatments, data synthesis and ultimately benefit patient care.

Methodologic Validation of a Faster Pelvic Floor Test: Two Randomized Studies in Anal Acoustic Reflectometry.

BACKGROUND: Anal acoustic reflectometry investigates the opening and closing function of the anal canal using reflected sound waves to measure a cross-sectional area at different pressures. Anal acoustic reflectometry is reliable and repeatable, distinguishes between continence and incontinence and between subgroups of incontinence, correlates with symptom severity, and does not distort the anal canal during investigation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to validate anal acoustic reflectometry methodology by asking 2 questions: can anal acoustic reflectometry be used alongside manometry (order study) and can anal acoustic reflectometry be performed faster (filling study). The secondary aim was to assess the response of the anal canal to stretch using anal acoustic reflectometry. DESIGN: This research included 2 prospective randomized studies. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing investigation for fecal incontinence were included. INTERVENTION: For the order study, patients were prospectively randomized to anal acoustic reflectometry, manometry, 2-minute rest and then manometry, anal acoustic reflectometry, or vice versa. For the filling study, patients were prospectively randomized to fast rate anal acoustic reflectometry (5 cm H2O/1 s), manometry, 2-minute rest and then manometry, normal rate anal acoustic reflectometry (5 cm H2O/3 s), or vice versa. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was no difference in anal acoustic reflectometry or manometry variables. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. RESULTS: The order study included 30 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 30-84 y); 77% were women. No difference was found among all of the variables of anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry regardless of which test was performed first. The filling study included 50 patients with a median age of 62 years (range, 30-78 y); 80% were women. No difference was found between fast and normal rates of anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry in any order. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its comparison with water-perfused manometry. CONCLUSIONS: Anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry can be performed at the normal or fast rate of anal acoustic reflectometry in any order. A fast rate of anal acoustic reflectometry did not augment the response of the anal canal to stretch as measured by anal acoustic reflectometry and manometry. This study validates a faster anal acoustic reflectometry technique and vindicates previous data. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A821.

The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters. METHODS: Fifty patients with FI underwent 30 min of PTNS treatment, weekly for 12 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry, bowel diaries and Vaizey questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Successful treatment was determined as a greater than 50% reduction in FI episodes. RESULTS: Fifty patients with FI were studied; 39 women, median age 62 years (range 30-82). Compared with pretreatment, there were reductions in episodes of urgency (16.0 versus 11.4, p = 0.006), overall FI (14.5 versus 9.1, p = 0.001), urge FI (5.4 versus 3.2, p = 0.016) and passive FI (9.1 versus 5.9, p = 0.008). Vaizey score was reduced (16.1 versus 14.5, p = 0.002). Rectal sensory volumes (ml) decreased (onset 40.3 versus 32.6, p = 0.014, call 75.7 versus 57.5, p < 0.001, urge 104.1 versus 87.4, p = 0.004). There was no significant change in anal canal pressures (mmHg) (maximum resting pressure 41.4 versus 44.2, p = 0.39, maximum squeeze pressure, 78.7 versus 88.2, p = 0.15, incremental squeeze pressure 37.2 versus 44.1, p = 0.22). Reduction in FI episodes did not correlate with changes in physiological parameters (p > 0.05). Treatment success of 44% was independent of changes in manometric parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTNS has a measureable physiological effect on rectal sensory volumes without an effect on anal canal pressures. It also reduces FI episodes; however, this effect is independent of changing physiology, suggesting that PTNS has a complex mechanism of action.

Improving accuracy of clinical coding in surgery: collaboration is key.

BACKGROUND: Clinical coding data provide the basis for Hospital Episode Statistics and Healthcare Resource Group codes. High accuracy of this information is required for payment by results, allocation of health and research resources, and public health data and planning. We sought to identify the level of accuracy of clinical coding in general surgical admissions across hospitals in the Northwest of England. METHOD: Clinical coding departments identified a total of 208 emergency general surgical patients discharged between 1st March and 15th August 2013 from seven hospital trusts (median = 20, range = 16-60). Blinded re-coding was performed by a senior clinical coder and clinician, with results compared with the original coding outcome. Recorded codes were generated from OPCS-4 & ICD-10. RESULTS: Of all cases, 194 of 208 (93.3%) had at least one coding error and 9 of 208 (4.3%) had errors in both primary diagnosis and primary procedure. Errors were found in 64 of 208 (30.8%) of primary diagnoses and 30 of 137 (21.9%) of primary procedure codes. Median tariff using original codes was £1411.50 (range, £409-9138). Re-calculation using updated clinical codes showed a median tariff of £1387.50, P = 0.997 (range, £406-10,102). The most frequent reasons for incorrect coding were "coder error" and a requirement for "clinical interpretation of notes". CONCLUSIONS: Errors in clinical coding are multifactorial and have significant impact on primary diagnosis, potentially affecting the accuracy of Hospital Episode Statistics data and in turn the allocation of health care resources and public health planning. As we move toward surgeon specific outcomes, surgeons should increase collaboration with coding departments to ensure the system is robust.

MRSA screening in orthopaedic surgery: clinically valuable and cost effective? A prospective analysis of 8,867 patients.

This study aimed at assessing the prevalence of MRSA colonisation in Trauma and Orthopaedics. Risk factors, decolonisation, and subsequent infection rates were investigated. Cost-analysis of the MRSA screening program was performed. The validity and effectiveness of the MRSA screening program was reviewed. A prospective analysis was made of all orthopaedic admissions in East Lancashire Hospital Trust. A total number of 13,155 swabs were taken in 8,867 patients in 2010. This MRSA screening program was compared to the ideal screening criteria set out by Wilson and Junger (WHO 1968). The MRSA prevalence in Trauma and Orthopaedics in 2010 was 0.47%. The decolonisation rate was 55%. There was no correlation between MRSA colonisation and subsequent infection. The total cost of MRSA screening at ELHT was calculated as a minimum of 184,170 Pounds. This could extrapolate to a national expense of around 16 million pounds in England and Wales in Orthopaedics alone. The MRSA screening program did not meet 4 out of 9 screening criteria of Wilson and Junger. The vast majority of Trauma and Orthopaedic patients are not at risk of MRSA colonisation or infection and therefore should not be screened. MRSA infection is a risk in certain high risk groups which should be screened. The MRSA screening program is ineffective when assessed to WHO standards. The program should be considered to be surveillance of MRSA, not an effective screening program for pathological MRSA infection.

Beware the syndrome in neonatal hip instability: follow up assessment is required after apparent resolution.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is one of the most common congenital musculoskeletal disorders of childhood, affecting 1-3% of newborns. An early diagnosis and prompt treatment is essential to avoid complex treatments and achieve improved results. Since 1992, we have undertaken a screening programme for clinical instability and at risk patients. During this time, there have been only two cases which have been normal on both clinical, and, static and dynamic ultrasound assessment, that have subsequently deteriorated. In these two cases there was an underlying syndrome associated with hyperlaxity, which behaves unpredictably compared to 'true' developmental dysplasia of the hip. In conclusion, if a hip has been referred as unstable but it is found to have a primary syndromal cause (especially if hyper lax) with sonographically normal hips at one to two weeks of age, it is best to review clinically and sonographically at 6 weeks and 3 months of age to confirm that the hip is maintaining stability.