Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 73(2): 129-36, 2009 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18924164

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previously, the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection of Patients with High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) randomized trial showed that carotid artery stenting (CAS) was not inferior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of high-surgical risk patients. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry is to evaluate 30-day major adverse events (MAE) after CAS performed by physicians with varied experience and utilizing a formal training program. Data will be analyzed on the overall patient population and by high-risk inclusion criteria. METHODS: SAPPHIRE Worldwide is a multicenter, prospective, postapproval registry to evaluate CAS with distal protection in patients at high-risk for surgery using the Cordis PRECISE Nitinol Stent and ANGIOGUARD XP/RX Emboli Capture Guidewire. Participating physicians are encouraged to treat patients according to their standard of practice and consistent with current Food and Drug Administration-approved labeling. RESULTS: Enrollment began in October 2006. Data are available on the first 2,001 patients enrolled and followed to 30 days. Of these patients, the mean age was 72.2 +/- 9.75 yr; 62% were male; and 27.7% were symptomatic. Entry criteria for surgical high-risk included anatomic (n = 716), physiologic (n = 918), or both risk factors (n = 327). At 30-day follow-up, the MAE was 4.4% (death 1.1%, stroke 3.2%, MI 0.7%) for the overall population. Patients with anatomic risk had a significantly lower 30-day MAE than patients with physiologic risk (2.8% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.0306), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While the number of physicians performing CAS continues to increase, MAE rates seen in this registry (4.4%) are well within an acceptable range, as was first seen in the SAPPHIRE randomized trial (4.8%). A significant decrease in MAE was seen in patients with anatomic risk compared with physiologic risk factors. The SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry supports the use of CAS as an alternative to CEA in patients who are at high-risk for surgery due to anatomic risk factors.


Assuntos
Angioplastia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Competência Clínica , Educação Médica , Embolia/prevenção & controle , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ligas , Angioplastia/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia/educação , Angioplastia/instrumentação , Angioplastia/mortalidade , Canadá , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Estenose das Carótidas/mortalidade , Estenose das Carótidas/patologia , Embolia/etiologia , Embolia/mortalidade , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Seleção de Pacientes , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA