Reallocating Time to Physical Activity and Sleep: Associations with Body Mass Index in Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) above ≥ 25 kg/m2 is associated with increased risk for cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Achieving recommended amounts of physical activity (PA), sedentary time (ST), and sleep can help cancer survivors (CS) attain a healthy BMI. This cross-sectional study examined the potential role of reallocating time between moderate and light PA, ST, and sleep on BMI in CS. METHOD: A sample of CS (N = 73, Mage = 53.7 ± 12.9) wore an activPAL and Actiwatch accelerometer for 7 days, 24 h per day to measure PA intensity and sleep, respectively. Self-reported height and weight or scale/stadiometer were used to calculate BMI. Isotemporal substitution models were used to reallocate time, averaged over the 7-day period, from one activity of interest to another and examine the associations with BMI. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. RESULTS: The following reallocations of 30 min were significantly associated with BMI: sleep to ST (+ 0.80 kg/m2, p = 0.02) and ST to light PA (- 0.53 kg/m2, p = 0.008). No significant associations with BMI were observed for reallocating time to or away from moderate-vigorous PA. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that sleep and light PA may have important implications for achieving a healthy BMI in CS. Therefore, future research should include interventions which target light PA and sleep to determine if they can improve BMI in CS.

Matching Exercise Volume in Active Control Groups for Yoga Interventions.

Context: The selection of a control group should foremost be determined by the study's primary intended outcome and trial design. When examining the effects of the physical movements that comprise yoga postures, an active control group, with physical exercise as the control, is often recommended. Objective: The current study aimed to define an active control group that participates in physical exercise, emphasizing the importance of matching the exercise's volume to that of an intervention group's yoga, and to provide a tangible example from a federally funded, recently completed, randomized controlled trial. Design: The research team designed a control group, providing a case study as a example of it. Setting: The study took place at Colorado State University. Intervention: The exercise component for the control group included 60 minutes of low-intensity exercise, matched with 60 minutes of Hatha yoga for the intervention group. Because the intervention included chronic pain self-management in addition to the exercise component, the education component for the control group included 45 minutes of group-based, general health-and-wellness education and discussion. Conclusions: Future randomized trials for yoga and other complementary or integrative health interventions should continue to use appropriate active control groups, which will serve to enhance the scientific rigor of conclusions that can be drawn with respect to the effectiveness of these interventions.

An Evaluation of Participant Perspectives and Wear-Time Compliance for a Wrist-Worn Versus Thigh-Worn Accelerometer in Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Accelerometers are frequently used to measure free-living physical activity and sleep in cancer survivors. To obtain valid data, participants must adhere to wear-time guidelines; therefore, understanding survivor's preference may be critical when selecting an accelerometer. This study compared cancer survivors' reported discomfort and interference, and wear-time compliance between a wrist-worn accelerometer and a thigh-worn accelerometer. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis. Cancer survivors (N = 52, mean age = 51.8 [13.0], 82.3% female) wore the Actiwatch-2 (wrist) and the activPAL (thigh) for 7 days, 24 hours per day. On day 7, participants completed a questionnaire to evaluate each accelerometer using a 1 to 5 Likert scale and open-ended questions. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test evaluated differences in discomfort and interference. Paired samples t test evaluated differences in wear-time compliance. Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis methods. RESULTS: No differences were observed in discomfort, interference, or wear-time compliance (P = .08). Qualitative analysis resulted in 2 themes: discomfort and ease of use and interference and adverse reaction. Interferences were primarily reported with the Actiwatch-2, whereas discomfort and ease were primarily reported with the activPAL. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were observed regarding discomfort, interference, and compliance. Results of this study can prepare researchers for common issues regarding accelerometer compliance, allowing researchers to offer resources to alleviate discomforts or interferences that may affect wear-time compliance.

Reallocating time to physical activity and sleep: associations with quality of life in cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Quality of life (QOL) is an important psychosocial outcome in cancer survivors (CS). Physical activity (PA), reducing sedentary time (ST), and sleep can help CS improve QOL; however, these behaviors are commonly studied in isolation, despite their interdependence during the 24-h day (i.e., time in one activity cannot increase without time decreasing in another activity). This study examined the effects of reallocating time between moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA), light PA, ST, and sleep on QOL in a mixed sample of CS. METHODS: A cross-sectional sample of CS (N = 73) diagnosed with breast (29.7%), colorectal (33.8%), or other (36.5%) cancer. MVPA, light PA, and ST were measured using the activPAL™ accelerometer, and sleep duration using the Actiwatch™ accelerometer. Both were worn for 7 days, 24 h per day. QOL was self-reported using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire. Isotemporal substitution models were used to reallocate 30 min between activities. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. RESULTS: Participants accumulated, M = 24.0 ± 18.9 min/day of MVPA, 291.7 ± 100.4 min/day of light PA, 593.1 ± 108.3 min/day of ST, and 486.6 ± 57.6 min/night of sleep. Isotemporal substitution effects for reallocating time between MVPA, light PA, ST, and sleep were not significantly associated with QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study suggest that among CS who are achieving adequate levels of PA and sleep, changes in 30 min of these activities may not impact QOL. Future studies should aim to recruit a larger, more representative sample and explore the role of bouted activity time.

Exploring Social Ecological Determinants of Physical Activity Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Purpose: Adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCCs) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease from chemotherapy- and radiation therapy-related cardiotoxicity. Physical activity (PA) can reduce this risk, but the majority of ASCCs do not engage in sufficient PA. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers, facilitators, and resources for PA among ASCCs using the ecological model of physical activity (EMPA) as a theoretical framework. Methods: A concept elicitation survey was distributed independently to ASCCs (diagnosed with cancer before the age of 18, and currently 18-39 years old) and parents/legal guardians of an ASCC. The survey consisted of open-ended questions asking about barriers, facilitators, and resources for PA. Content analysis of open-ended questions categorized responses into levels of the EMPA and identified key themes. Results: Seventeen ASCCs and eight parents of ASCCs completed the survey. The majority of barriers, facilitators, and resources reported were at the individual and microsystem level of the EMPA. Six themes emerged, suggesting that ASCC's PA was related to proximity/access, social support, equipment, time/schedule, finances, and health-related barriers. Conclusion: This is the first study to examine barriers, facilitators, and resources of PA among ASCCs using the EMPA. Findings from this study provide a multilevel perspective on the influences of PA among ASCCs, and can be used for future, in-depth qualitative studies and quantitative survey development, and as a foundational step toward supportive efforts in increasing PA among ASCCs.

Effects of a Clinic-Based Exercise Program on Sleep Disturbance Among Cancer Survivors.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disturbance is the second leading negative side effect reported by cancer survivors, and evidence exists to suggest that exercise may improve sleep for cancer survivors. This study examined changes in sleep following a 3-month, clinic-based exercise program among a diverse group of cancer survivors. METHODS: Single group, pre-post study design. Participants were enrolled in a supervised exercise program which consisted of moderate intensity aerobic and resistance training, twice per week for 3-months. To be eligible, individuals had to be diagnosed with cancer, and undergoing, or within 6-months of completing chemo and/or radiation therapy. Sleep was assessed at pre-and post-program using 3 self-report questions as part of a standard wellness assessment conducted at the program's facility. Changes in categorical outcomes were evaluated using McNemar and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Tests. RESULTS: Participants (N = 94) were mostly female (68.1%, N = 64), mean age = 54.26 ± 14.26 (20-78), and diagnosed with more than 8 different cancer types. Half (N = 48, 51.1%) of participants improved on 1 or more of the questions assessing sleep. At post-program, 39% of participants reported that they did not awaken feeling rested versus 48% at pre-program (P = .08). At post-program, 47% reported awakening ≥1 time per night versus 46% at pre-program (P = .97), and 17% reported poor or very poor sleep quality at post-program versus 24% at pre-program (P = .16). There were no differences in demographic, cancer-related, psychosocial, and physical fitness variables between participants who improved on any of the questions assessing sleep versus those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically implemented exercise program may help some cancer survivors improve sleep, however more studies utilizing validated, objective measures of sleep are needed to confirm effectiveness.

Community-based exercise programs for cancer survivors: a scoping review of practice-based evidence.

PURPOSE: Based on randomized controlled trials, exercise is an efficacious strategy to improve quality of life (QOL) among cancer survivors. However, the effectiveness of exercise programs to improve QOL in real-world settings is unknown, as are factors related to external validity. This hinders dissemination and scalability. This scoping review synthesized published research on community-based exercise programs for cancer survivors and reported on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM). METHODS: A systematic literature search identified community-based exercise programs for adult cancer survivors (1980-March 2018), that met the following inclusion criteria: at least one face-to-face exercise session, the primary aim of program evaluation (i.e., feasibility/effectiveness), and pre/post measure of QOL. Data were coded using the RE-AIM framework. The effect size was calculated for overall QOL. RESULTS: Electronic database search yielded 553 articles; 31 studies describing unique programs were included for review. All studies described at least one element of implementation and most (80.6%) reported a significant (p < .05) improvement in at least one subscale, or total QOL. Few studies reported on indicators of reach (16.1%), adoption (6.5%), individual (16.1%), or system-level maintenance (32.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Community-based exercise programs are effective for improving QOL in adult cancer survivors. Recommendations are provided to improve reporting across RE-AIM dimensions, which is an important step to enhance the scalability of programs and thus, the potential for exercise to be fully integrated into system-level standard care for cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Community-based exercise programs are a resource to improve QOL for adult cancer survivors.

A Group Dynamics-Based Exercise Intervention to Improve Physical Activity Maintenance in Breast Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: To maintain increases in physical activity (PA), interventions that implement group dynamics principles and strategies with the intent of enhancing group cohesion may be advantageous. This study examined group cohesion and PA following a group dynamics-based PA intervention among breast cancer survivors. METHODS: The study was designed as a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing an 8-week group dynamics-based intervention with an individually supervised intervention. Group cohesion was measured by the Physical Activity Group Environment Questionnaire, and PA was measured at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up using a self-report questionnaire and pedometer. RESULTS: Group cohesion levels were high following the intervention and positively associated with PA at 3-month follow-up (ranger = .182-.555). At 3-month follow-up, 91.7% of participants in the group-dynamics-based intervention (n = 12) were classified as moderately active or greater, compared with 54.5% in the individually supervised intervention (n = 11). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, for breast cancer survivors, peer support and fostering group cohesion as part of an exercise program may help to support PA following the completion of a structured intervention. A larger trial with longer follow-up is needed to establish comparative efficacy for a group-dynamics-based exercise intervention to enhance long-term PA adherence in breast cancer survivors.

Ratings of Perceived Exertion and Physiological Responses in Children During Exercise.

OMNI ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and physiological responses in children (n=7 boys, 8 girls, 11.1±1.0 years) were examined during estimation (graded exercise test [GXT] and steady-state) and production (steady-state) trials on a cycle ergometer. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) was determined via a GXT with RPE estimated every 30 s. Later, two 6-min trials were completed: Participants 1) estimated RPE at ~75% of VO2peak, 2) produced a level of exertion corresponding to their RPE at ~75% of VO2peak during the GXT. Data analysis included a one-way MANOVA and a paired t-test. The target intensity during the GXT corresponded to 74.2±2.5% of VO2peak; the steady-state estimation and production trials were performed at 76.5±2.7% and 68.5±14.1% of VO2peak, respectively (p>0.05). Mean RPE at ~75% of VO2peak during the GXT and production trial was 6.7±1.5; during the steady-state estimation trial RPE was 5.8±2.0 (p>0.05). There were no differences (p>0.05) in the physiological responses. Participants estimated RPE similarly at ~75% of VO2peak during both graded and steady-state exercise, but when asked to produce a given RPE, marked variability was observed in physiological responses. These findings may have implications in optimizing exercise prescriptions for children.