Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 140(11): 1373-1380, 2020.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33132273

RESUMO

The treatment of acute ischemic stroke usually involves argatroban administration by continuous infusion for 2 d and by intravenous infusion twice a day for 5 d after that. However, the appropriate dose of argatroban to be administered is not clear. Therefore, no studies have been reported a comparison of intravenous and continuous argatroban infusion after day 3 for acute ischemic stroke patients. We aimed to identify the connection between differences in argatroban administration and worsening of symptoms after day 3 in ischemic stroke patients. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 107 ischemic stroke patients who received treatment with argatroban. The study endpoint was defined as the worsening of symptoms from days 3 to 7. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors that were significantly associated with worsening of symptoms. Patients were administered argatroban, with rates of 72.0%, and 28.0% for continuous, and intravenous infusion, respectively. A total of 10 (9.3%) patients experienced worsening of symptoms. In the single logistic regression analysis, carotid stenosis [non-adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.775, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.486-22.442, p=0.011] was only significantly associated with worsening of symptoms. Worsening of symptoms was not related to either intravenous or continuous infusion group (16.7% vs. 6.5%, p=0.104). Bleeding was also not associated with either group (6.7% vs. 3.9%, p=0.618). We suggest that the differences in the mode of argatroban administration were not related to the worsening of symptoms in ischemic stroke patients. We also found that safety was equivalent regardless of the administration route.


Assuntos
Administração Intravenosa/métodos , Ácidos Pipecólicos/administração & dosagem , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Exacerbação dos Sintomas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arginina/análogos & derivados , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Ácidos Pipecólicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Segurança , Sulfonamidas
2.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 139(3): 461-467, 2019.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30828024

RESUMO

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe and efficacious when compared to warfarin for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, bleeding is a major side effect of anticoagulant therapy in VTE patients. Discontinuation of the DOACs associated to adverse events such as bleeding. The HAS-BLED score predicts warfarin-associated hemorrhage. However, little is known about risk factors for DOAC-associated minor bleeding in VTE patients. We aimed to identify risk factors for minor bleeding in VTE patients that were treated with edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or apixaban. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 212 VTE patients who received treatment with a DOAC. The study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of minor bleeding. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors that were significantly associated with minor bleeding. A total of 36 (17.0%) patients experienced minor bleeding, with rates of 15.7%, 0%, and 21.3% for edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, bleeding history or predisposition [odds ratio (OR) 6.083, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.131-17.364, p=0.001] and cancer (OR 6.397, 95% CI 2.858-14.317, p<0.001) were significantly associated with minor bleeding. Bleeding history or predisposition and cancer were the most important risk factors for DOAC-induced minor bleeding in VTE patients in this study. To continue anticoagulant therapy of the DOACs, further management systems by minor bleeding risk factors for patients with VTE will be required.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/etiologia , Pirazóis/administração & dosagem , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Piridonas/administração & dosagem , Piridonas/efeitos adversos , Rivaroxabana/administração & dosagem , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Tiazóis/administração & dosagem , Tiazóis/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
3.
Chemotherapy ; 62(6): 327-333, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28605733

RESUMO

Zoledronic acid is an established agent used in the management of metastatic bone disease. The administration of zoledronic acid improves overall survival (OS) of lung cancer patients with bone metastases receiving chemotherapy. However, it is currently unknown whether zoledronic acid-induced fever is associated with OS. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between zoledronic acid-induced fever and prognosis in lung cancer patients with bone metastases. We retrospectively analyzed 98 lung cancer patients with bone metastases who had received zoledronic acid. The end point outcome measure was OS. Multivariate analyses were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for OS due to fever after adjusting for covariates. In multivariate analysis, white blood cell (WBC) count, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, fever, chemotherapy, and hypercalcemia were independent prognostic factors, with HRs of 2.834 for WBC count (<10 × 103/µL vs. ≥10 × 103/µL, p < 0.001), 3.044 for LDH level (<250 vs. ≥250 IU/L, p < 0.001), 0.603 for fever (<37.0 vs. ≥37.0°C, p = 0.039), 0.481 for chemotherapy (chemotherapy not administered vs. administered, p = 0.006), and 2.453 for hypercalcemia (<11.0 vs. ≥11.0 mg/dL, p = 0.001). Zoledronic acid-induced fever was the most important prognostic factor in this cohort of lung cancer patients with bone metastases.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Febre/complicações , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , L-Lactato Desidrogenase/metabolismo , Leucócitos/citologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/complicações , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácido Zoledrônico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...