Genetic Toxicity Studies of the Ketogenic Ester Bis Hexanoyl (R)-1,3-Butanediol.

A series of studies was conducted to assess the genetic toxicity of a novel ketone ester, bis hexanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol (herein referred to as BH-BD), according to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development testing guidelines under the standards of Good Laboratory Practices. In bacterial reverse mutation tests, there was no evidence of mutagenic activity in any of the Salmonella typhimurium strains tested or in Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA, at dose levels up to 5,000 µg/plate in the presence or absence of Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver (S9 mix) for metabolic activation. In the in vitro micronucleus test using human TK6 cells, BH-BD did not show a statistically significant increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei when compared with concurrent control cultures at all time points and at any of the concentrations analyzed (up to 100 µg/mL, final concentration in culture medium), with and without S9 mix activation. In the in vivo micronucleus test using Sprague Dawley rats, BH-BD did not show a statistically significant increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes relative to the vehicle control group. Therefore, BH-BD was concluded to be negative in all 3 tests. These results support the safety assessment of BH-BD for potential use in food.

Toxicological evaluation of the ketogenic ester bis hexanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol: Subchronic toxicity in Sprague Dawley rats.

Bis-hexanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol (BH-BD) is novel ketone ester undergoing development as a food ingredient to achieve nutritional ketosis in humans. Male and female Crl:CD(SD) rats were administered BH-BD twice daily at 9000, 12,000 or 15,000 mg/kg/day, by oral gavage in a 90-day toxicity study with 28-day recovery period; and an interim 28-day phase. Test substance-related early deaths occurred in four females at 15,000 mg/kg/day. A dose-dependent increase in acute transient postdose (1-3 h) observations of incoordination at ≥12,000 mg/kg/day and decreased activity at all dose levels were noted in both sexes. Postdose observations were likely associated with peak ketonemia and were considered adverse at 15,000 mg/kg/day. These daily observations decreased over the study without any persistent effects, as determined during weekly pre-dose observations. Adverse histopathological changes included ulceration/erosion in non-glandular stomach at ≥ 12,000 mg/k/day and in glandular stomach at 15,000 mg/kg/day. These histopathological findings were not noted after 28-days of recovery. Due to unlikely human relevance of the rat non-glandular stomach effects for BH-BD and test substance-related mortality at 15,000 mg/kg/day, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for subchronic toxicity of BH-BD was determined to be 12,000 mg/kg/day.

In vitro stability and in vivo pharmacokinetics of the novel ketogenic ester, bis hexanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol.

A novel ketone ester, bis hexanoyl (R)-1,3-butanediol (BH-BD), has been developed as a means to elevate blood ketones, for use as an energy substrate and a signaling metabolite. The metabolism of BH-BD and its effects on blood beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) levels was evaluated in various in vitro matrices and through analysis of plasma collected from Sprague Dawley rats and C57/BL6 mice in two oral gavage studies. A well-characterized ketone ester, (R)-3-hydroxybutyl (R)-3-hydroxybutyrate (HB-BHB), was used as an active control throughout. In vitro assay results demonstrated that BH-BD likely remains intact in the stomach and is hydrolyzed in the small intestine into hexanoate and (R)-1,3-butanediol. If absorbed intact, BH-BD is subject to hydrolysis by non-CYP enzymes in liver and esterases in plasma. If BH-BD reaches the lower intestine it is metabolized by gut flora. Plasma BHB delivery increased in a dose-dependent manner in rats and mice following oral administration of BH-BD. All doses of BH-BD were well tolerated. At doses over 3 g/kg, BHB delivery was similar between BH-BD and HB-BHB. The results of these studies support the hydrolysis of BH-BD into hexanoate and (R)-1,3-butanediol which are metabolized into BHB, delivering a well-tolerated, sustained and dose-dependent increase in plasma BHB in rodents.

How experts are chosen to inform public policy: can the process be improved?

The ever-increasing complexity of the food supply has magnified the importance of ongoing research into nutrition and food safety issues that have significant impact on public health. At the same time, ethical questions have been raised regarding conflict of interest, making it more challenging to form the expert panels that advise government agencies and public health officials in formulating nutrition and food safety policy. Primarily due to the growing complexity of the interactions among government, industry, and academic research institutions, increasingly stringent conflict-of-interest policies may have the effect of barring the most experienced and knowledgeable nutrition and food scientists from contributing their expertise on the panels informing public policy. This paper explores the issue in some depth, proposing a set of principles for determining considerations for service on expert advisory committees. Although the issues around scientific policy counsel and the selection of advisory panels clearly have global applicability, the context for their development had a US and Canadian focus in this work. The authors also call for a broader discussion in all sectors of the research community as to whether and how the process of empaneling food science and nutrition experts might be improved.

Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity.

There has been substantial public debate about the susceptibility of research to biases of various kinds. The dialogue has extended to the peer-reviewed literature, scientific conferences, the mass media, government advisory bodies, and beyond. While biases can come from myriad sources, the overwhelming focus of the discussion, to date, has been on industry-funded science. Given the critical role that industry has played and will continue to play in the research process, the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America Working Group on Guiding Principles has, in this paper, set out proposed conflict-of-interest guidelines regarding industry funding for protecting the integrity and credibility of the scientific record, particularly with respect to health, nutrition, and food safety science. Eight principles are enumerated, specifying ground rules for industry-sponsored research. The paper, which issues a challenge to the broader scientific community to address all bias issues, is only a first step; the document is intended to be dynamic, prompting ongoing discussion and refinement.

Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity.

There has been significant public debate about the susceptibility of research to biases of various kinds. The dialogue has extended to the peer-reviewed literature, scientific conferences, the mass media, government advisory bodies, and beyond. Whereas biases can come from myriad sources, the overwhelming focus of the discussion to date has been on industry-funded science. Given the critical role that industry has played and will continue to play in the research process, the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America Working Group on Guiding Principles has, in this article, proposed conflict-of-interest guidelines regarding industry funding to protect the integrity and credibility of the scientific record, particularly with respect to health, nutrition, and food-safety science. Eight principles are enumerated, which specify the ground rules for industry-sponsored research. This article, which issues a challenge to the broader scientific community to address all bias issues, is only a first step; the document is intended to be dynamic, prompting ongoing discussion and refinement. In the conduct of public/private research relationships, all relevant parties shall 1) conduct or sponsor research that is factual, transparent, and designed objectively, and, according to accepted principles of scientific inquiry, the research design will generate an appropriately phrased hypothesis and the research will answer the appropriate questions, rather than favor a particular outcome; 2) require control of both study design and research itself to remain with scientific investigators; 3) not offer or accept remuneration geared to the outcome of a research project; 4) ensure, before the commencement of studies, that there is a written agreement that the investigative team has the freedom and obligation to attempt to publish the findings within some specified time frame; 5) require, in publications and conference presentations, full signed disclosure of all financial interests; 6) not participate in undisclosed paid authorship arrangements in industry-sponsored publications or presentations; 7) guarantee accessibility to all data and control of statistical analysis by investigators and appropriate auditors/reviewers; 8) require that academic researchers, when they work in contract research organizations (CRO) or act as contract researchers, make clear statements of their affiliation; and require that such researchers publish only under the auspices of the CRO.

Funding food science and nutrition research: financial conflicts and scientific integrity.

There has been significant public debate about the susceptibility of research to biases of various kinds. The dialogue has extended to the peer-reviewed literature, scientific conferences, the mass media, government advisory bodies, and beyond. While biases can come from myriad sources, the overwhelming focus of the discussion, to date, has been on industry-funded science. Given the critical role that industry has played and will continue to play in the research process, the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America Working Group on Guiding Principles has, in this paper, set out proposed conflict-of-interest guidelines, regarding industry funding, for protecting the integrity and credibility of the scientific record, particularly with respect to health, nutrition, and food-safety science. Eight principles are enumerated, specifying ground rules for industry-sponsored research. The paper, which issues a challenge to the broader scientific community to address all bias issues, is only a first step; the document is intended to be dynamic, prompting ongoing discussion and refinement. The Guiding Principles are as follows. In the conduct of public/private research relationships, all relevant parties shall: 1) conduct or sponsor research that is factual, transparent, and designed objectively; according to accepted principles of scientific inquiry, the research design will generate an appropriately phrased hypothesis and the research will answer the appropriate questions, rather than favor a particular outcome; 2) require control of both study design and research itself to remain with scientific investigators; 3) not offer or accept remuneration geared to the outcome of a research project; 4) prior to the commencement of studies, ensure that there is a written agreement that the investigative team has the freedom and obligation to attempt to publish the findings within some specified time-frame; 5) require, in publications and conference presentations, full signed disclosure of all financial interests; 6) not participate in undisclosed paid authorship arrangements in industry-sponsored publications or presentations; 7) guarantee accessibility to all data and control of statistical analysis by investigators and appropriate auditors/reviewers; and 8) require that academic researchers, when they work in contract research organizations (CRO) or act as contract researchers, make clear statements of their affiliation; require that such researchers publish only under the auspices of the CRO.

Sterol Oxidation Products in French Fries and in Stored Potato Chips.

Potato chips and french fries were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography and thin layer chromatography for cholesterol and (ß-sitosterol oxidation products. Chips stored for 150 d at 23°C in unopened foil bags contained no detectable sitosterol oxidation products, but those held at 40°C contained 7α-hydroxysitosterol, 7ß-hydroxysitosterol, and sitosterol (ß-epoxide only after an extended storage of 95 d. French fries as purchased contained sterol α- and ß-epoxides, and 7α- and 7ß-hydroxysterols. These sterol oxidation products were present in repeat samples from five different fast food restaurants. Ingestion of sterol oxides from potato chips is unlikely, whereas ingestion of sterol oxides from french fries is possible.