RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed worldwide, often resulting in their overuse. Consequently, it is essential to identify the likely causes of this overuse to facilitate their appropriate prescription. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess physician prescribing patterns, their knowledge of PPIs, and factors affecting their knowledge. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among Latin American and Spanish physicians, collecting the following data: professional information, patterns of PPI usage, familiarity with published evidence, and the management approach in three hypothetical case-scenarios. Participant knowledge was categorized as sufficient or insufficient based on the results of the case scenarios. Subsequently, subgroup analysis was performed based on physician training level, years in practice, specialty, and time since the last PPI literature review. RESULTS: A total of 371 physicians participated in the survey. Thirty-eight percent frequently prescribe PPIs, primarily for prophylactic purposes (57.9%). Eighty percent were unfamiliar with PPI deprescribing strategies, and 54.4% rarely reviewed the ongoing indication of patients taking a PPI. Sixty-four percent demonstrated sufficient knowledge in the case-scenarios. A significant association was observed between specialty type (medical vs surgical: 69.4% vs 46.8%, P<0.001), the timing of the PPI indication literature review (<5 years vs >5 years: 71.4% vs 58.7%, P=0.010), and sufficient knowledge. CONCLUSION: While most participants prescribed PPIs regularly and for prophylaxis purposes, the majority were unfamiliar with deprescribing strategies and rarely reviewed ongoing indications. Sufficient knowledge is correlated with recent literature reviews and medical specialty affiliation. BACKGROUND: ⢠The study aims to evaluate physician prescribing patterns, assess their knowledge of proton pump inhibitors, and identify factors influencing their knowledge. BACKGROUND: ⢠An online survey of Latin American and Spanish physicians assessed proton pump inhibitor usage patterns and case-scenario responses, categorizing knowledge, and conducting subgroup analysis based on training, experience, specialty, and literature review timing. BACKGROUND: ⢠Thirty-eight percent of surveyed physicians commonly prescribed proton pump inhibitors, and among them, 80% were unfamiliar with deprescribing strategies, with 54.4% rarely reviewing ongoing indications. BACKGROUND: ⢠Sufficient knowledge was correlated with recent literature reviews and medical specialty affiliations.
Assuntos
Médicos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Prescrições , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
ABSTRACT Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed worldwide, often resulting in their overuse. Consequently, it is essential to identify the likely causes of this overuse to facilitate their appropriate prescription. Objective: This study aims to assess physician prescribing patterns, their knowledge of PPIs, and factors affecting their knowledge. Methods: An online survey was conducted among Latin American and Spanish physicians, collecting the following data: professional information, patterns of PPI usage, familiarity with published evidence, and the management approach in three hypothetical case-scenarios. Participant knowledge was categorized as sufficient or insufficient based on the results of the case scenarios. Subsequently, subgroup analysis was performed based on physician training level, years in practice, specialty, and time since the last PPI literature review. Results: A total of 371 physicians participated in the survey. Thirty-eight percent frequently prescribe PPIs, primarily for prophylactic purposes (57.9%). Eighty percent were unfamiliar with PPI deprescribing strategies, and 54.4% rarely reviewed the ongoing indication of patients taking a PPI. Sixty-four percent demonstrated sufficient knowledge in the case-scenarios. A significant association was observed between specialty type (medical vs surgical: 69.4% vs 46.8%, P<0.001), the timing of the PPI indication literature review (<5 years vs >5 years: 71.4% vs 58.7%, P=0.010), and sufficient knowledge. Conclusion: While most participants prescribed PPIs regularly and for prophylaxis purposes, the majority were unfamiliar with deprescribing strategies and rarely reviewed ongoing indications. Sufficient knowledge is correlated with recent literature reviews and medical specialty affiliation.
RESUMO Contexto: Os inibidores da bomba de prótons (IBPs) são amplamente prescritos em todo o mundo, muitas vezes resultando em seu uso excessivo. Consequentemente, é essencial identificar as prováveis causas desse uso excessivo para facilitar sua prescrição adequada. Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar o padrão de prescrição dos médicos, seu conhecimento sobre IBPs e fatores que afetam seu conhecimento. Métodos: Uma pesquisa on-line foi conduzida entre médicos latino-americanos e espanhóis, coletando os seguintes dados: informações profissionais, padrões de uso de IBP, familiaridade com evidências publicadas e abordagem de manejo em três casos-cenários hipotéticos. O conhecimento dos participantes foi categorizado em suficiente ou insuficiente com base nos resultados dos cenários de caso. Posteriormente, a análise de subgrupos foi realizada com base no nível de formação do médico, anos de prática, especialidade e tempo desde a última revisão da literatura dos IBPs. Resultados: Um total de 371 médicos participaram da pesquisa. Trinta e oito por cento prescrevem frequentemente IBP, principalmente para fins profiláticos (57,9%). Oitenta por cento não estavam familiarizados com as estratégias de prescrição de IBP, e 54,4% raramente revisaram a indicação contínua de pacientes em uso de IBP. Sessenta e quatro por cento demonstraram conhecimento suficiente nos cenários-caso. Observou-se associação significativa entre o tipo de especialidade (médica vs cirúrgica: 69,4% vs 46,8%, P<0,001), o momento da revisão da literatura de indicação do IBP (<5 anos vs >5 anos: 71,4% vs 58,7%, P=0,010) e conhecimento suficiente. Conclusão: Embora a maioria dos participantes prescrevesse IBPs regularmente e para fins de profilaxia, no entanto, não estava familiarizada com estratégias de prescrição e raramente revisava as indicações em andamento. O conhecimento suficiente está correlacionado com revisões recentes da literatura e afiliação à especialidade médica.
RESUMO
El síndrome de Guillain-Barré (SGB) es la causa más común de parálisis generalizada aguda. El SGB es una polirradiculoneuropatia aguda inflamatoria desmielinizante que generalmente se presenta como una parálisis que inicia en miembros inferiores y luego progresa de forma ascendente y simétrica. El presente trabajo, tiene como objetivo, informar un caso de diplejía facial como manifestación inicial de SGB. Paciente masculino, 37 años de edad, diabético tipo 2, que luego de ocho días de haber padecido una sinusitis aguda, presentó de forma gradual, cefalea hemicraneana derecha, derramamiento salival y disartria. En la exploración neurológica se observó ausencia bilateral de los pliegues frontales, lagoftalmos bilateral acompañado de epífora, signo de Bell bilateral y derramamiento salival a través de ambas comisuras labiales. A las 48 horas de su ingreso hospitalario, presentó paresia en ambos miembros superiores. El estudio del líquido cefalorraquídeo reportó 1,1 células/mm³ representadas en su totalidad por linfocitos de aspecto normal, y proteínas totales 196,9mg/dL. La electromiografía fue compatible con polineuropatía desmielinizante aguda de predominio motor con mayor afectación facial. Con los hallazgos clínicos y paraclínicos se realizó el diagnóstico de SGB. Se inició tratamiento a base de plasmaféresis e inmunoglobulina endovenosa, con posterior mejoría de la clínica. La diplejía facial forma parte de las variantes regionales del SGB. A pesar que cerca del 60% de los pacientes con SGB presentan debilidad facial en el curso del trastorno, ésta habitualmente es precedida por debilidad en extremidades. El presente caso permite evidenciar que el SGB puede debutar clínicamente como una diplejía facial.
The Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is the most common cause of acute generalized paralysis. GBS is an acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. It usually presents as a paralysis that starts in the lower limbs and then progresses symmetrically upward. The present study reports a case of bilateral facial palsy as the initial manifestation of GBS. This is a report of a case of a 37-year-old male, diabetic, that eight days after having suffered acute sinusitis, gradually presented with right hemicranial headache, dysarthria and sialorrhea. The neurological examination disclosed the absence of the bilateral frontal folds, accompanied by epiphora, bilateral lagophthalmos, bilateral Bell sign and salivary drooling through both commissures of lips. At 48 hours after hospital admission the patient showed paresis in both upper limbs. The cerebrospinal fluid analysis reported 1.1cells/mm³, fully represented by lymphocytes of normal aspect and total proteins were 196.9 mg/dL. The electromyography was consistent with acute demyelinating polyneuropathy, with a predominant motor component and a major facial involvement. With the clinical and laboratory findings, a diagnosis of GBS was established. Treatment was started with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin, with the subsequent improvement of the clinic. The facial diplegia is part of the regional variants of GBS. Although about 60% of GBS patients present with facial weakness, it is usually preceded by weakness in the limbs. This case makes evident that GBS may present clinically as a facial diplegia.