Clinical Outcomes of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole in Critically Ill Patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia and Pneumonia Utilizing Renal Replacement Therapies.

Background: The clinical outcomes of usual doses of Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) for treating S. maltophilia in critically ill patients on renal replacement therapies (RRT) have not been established. We sought to assess the clinical outcomes of TMP/SMZ in patients with sepsis utilizing RRT. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on all critically ill adult patients with S. maltophilia infections who received RRT between May 2015 and January 2022. The primary endpoint was clinical cure while the secondary endpoints were microbiologic cure, 30-day infection recurrence, and mortality. Results: Forty-five subjects met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 70.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 63.5-77] years, 57.8% were males, and the median body mass index was 25.7 [IQR: 22-30.2] kg/m2. Clinical success and failure were reported in 18 (40%) and 27 (60%) cases, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 30-day reinfection rates of both groups; however, mortality was significantly higher in the clinical failure group, involving 12 patients (44.4%), versus none in the clinical success group (p = 0.001). The median daily dose of TMP/SMZ upon continuous veno-venous hemofiltration was 1064 [IQR: 776-1380] mg in the clinical cure group vs. 768 [IQR:540-1200] mg in the clinical failure group (p = 0.035). Meanwhile, the median dose for those who received intermittent hemodialysis was 500 [IQR: 320-928] mg in the clinical success group compared to 640 [IQR: 360-1005] mg in the clinical failure group (p = 0.372). A total of 55% experienced thrombocytopenia, 42% hyperkalemia, and 2.2% neutropenia. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the total daily dose at therapy initiation was the only independent factor associated with clinical success after adjusting for different variables including the body mass index [Odds ratio 1.004; 95% confidence interval: (1-1.007), p = 0.044]. Conclusions: Although the S. maltophilia isolates were reported as susceptible, TMP/SMZ with conventional doses to treat bacteremia and pneumonia in critically ill patients utilizing RRT was associated with high rates of clinical and microbiologic failure as well as with mortality. Larger outcomes and pharmacokinetics studies are needed to confirm our findings.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease on Dialysis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background: Apixaban has been increasingly utilized for various FDA-approved indications, including stroke prevention and venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis. However, the safety and efficacy of its use in this population is not well established. Hence, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apixaban by examining outcomes in this population. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study that involved adults with ESKD who were on hemodialysis and prescribed apixaban from our hospital's outpatient pharmacy between 1 May 2015, and 31 March 2022. Demographics, apixaban indications, dose appropriateness, concomitant antiplatelet use, and comorbidities data were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic events were also collected. Results: Sixty-six patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 50% of them males. Median age was 71 (63.5-82) years, and the median BMI 28.2 (59.5-86.25) kg/m2. The median follow-up time was 5 (1.9-12.3) months. Concomitant antiplatelet use (39.4%) and high medication adherence (84.8%) were observed. During follow-up, major bleeding events occurred in 15.2% of cases, with minor bleeding being more common (36.4%), and VTE and stroke events occurred in 4.5% of cases; appropriate dosing was prevalent (62.1%), and there was an overall all-cause mortality rate of 34.8%. Most patients received a 2.5 mg BID apixaban dose (56.1%), including both NVAF and VTE groups. Notably, the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that weight, and daily dose were insignificant predictors of bleeding events (p = 0.104, 0.591), however, the BMI was the main independent risk factor for bleeding in this population [OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-0.99; p = 0.023]. Conclusions: Our analysis of apixaban-treated ESKD patients highlights that the risk of bleeding is significant, and BMI was the main independent risk factor. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm our findings.

The prevalence of cardiorenal anemia syndrome among patients with heart failure and its association with all-cause hospitalizations: a retrospective single-center study from the Middle East.

Background and aim: Little is known about the burden of cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) and cardiorenal anemia syndrome (CRAS) in the Middle East Region. Furthermore, whether the occurrence rates of CRAS differ across heart failure (HF) phenotypes is not widely investigated. We aimed to examine the prevalence of CRS and CRAS in patients with HF, compare characteristics of patients with CRAS-HFrEF vs. CRAS-HFpEF, and investigate anemia association with 1-year all-cause hospitalizations. Methods: HF patients who visited a multidisciplinary HF clinic at a single center between 10-2015 and 06-2022 (n = 968) were retrospectively included. Differences in rates of CRAS prevalence, and patients' characteristics of those with CRAS-HFrEF vs. CRAS-HFpEF were determined using appropriate testing methods. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to determine if anemia was associated with higher rates of hospitalization. Results: CRS was prevalent in 34.4% of subjects, while 25.3% had CRAS. CRAS prevalence rates among patients with HFpEF vs. HFrEF were comparable (27.2% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.3). Compared to patients with HFrEF-CRAS, those with HFpEF-CRAS were more likely females (p < 0.001), had a higher burden of hypertension (p = 0.01), and lower hemoglobin (p = 0.02). In an adjusted GEE model, anemia was associated with an average increase of 1.8 admissions in CRS patients (p = 0.015). Conclusion: In patients with HF, 1 in 3 patients presented with CRS, and 1 in 4 patients had CRAS. The prevalence of CRAS was comparable among those HFpEF and HFrEF. Anemia was associated with an increased rate of 1-year all-cause hospitalization in CRS patients.

Refractory seizures in a dialysis patient and a vitamin consigned to oblivion.

Intradialytic breakthrough seizures refractory to multiple classes of antiepileptic medications are not common and can be due to many different reasons. Pyridoxine deficiency is an under-recognized cause of such seizures and frequently missed in clinical practice. Many factors specifically related to dialysis can lead to pyridoxine deficiency and in turn can contribute to refractory seizures. Herein, we report one of the very few cases of intradialytic breakthrough refractory seizures secondary to pyridoxine deficiency recognized in the literature.

Clinical outcomes of ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing in patients with sepsis undergoing renal replacement therapies.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) recommended dosing in patients undergoing renal replacement therapies (RRT) is lacking evidence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of C/T dosing in patients on RRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study conducted at our institution between May 1, 2017, and March 15, 2022. The primary endpoint was to determine the clinical cure for patients who received C/T for documented infection while on RRT. The secondary endpoints were the microbiologic cure, 30-day infection recurrence, and 30-day crude mortality. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 17 (63%) were males, median age was 69 (62 - 82) years, and weight 67 (57 - 79) kg. The majority of patients had pneumonia 19 (70.4%) followed by bacteremia 5 (18.5%). Multidrug resistant Pseudomonas spp. was the causative organism of infection in 22 subjects (81.5%). Clinical cure was achieved in 17 subjects (63%). Of the 14 subjects who had their culture repeated, 10 (71.4%) patients had microbiologic cure vs. 4 (28.5%) patients who had a microbiologic failure (p = 0.327). 30-day infection recurrence occurred in 6 (35.3%) patients of the clinical cure group and 2 (20%) patients in the clinical failure group (p = 0.362), while mortality occurred in 5 (29.4%) subjects vs. 7 (70%) in both groups, respectively (p = 0.049). The most frequently used doses of C/T were 1.5 g IV q8h while undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration and 0.75 g IV q8h while undergoing hemodialysis (p = 0.209). The median duration of therapy was 9 (4.5 - 13) days in the clinically cured group vs. 5 (3.75 - 5.5) days in those who had clinical failure (p = 0.038). There was no adverse event reported using these doses during the study period. CONCLUSION: The used doses of C/T in this study were higher than those approved by the U.S. FDA, while clinical success is uncertain. Larger outcomes and pharmacokinetics studies are needed to establish effective dosing and therapy duration.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and dialysis: outcome and patients' views.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initially described as an intervention to be used in otherwise healthy individuals suffering acute cardiorespiratory arrest. Over the years, CPR has been extended to all hospitalized patients unless specific orders not to resuscitate have been written with the informed consent of the patient and/or surrogate. The 14-15% survival to hospital discharge reported for in-hospital CPR has not changed over the past three decades. Compared with other diseases, chronic kidney disease reduces long-term survival (more than 6 months) following CPR, and the functional status of the few who survive is often quite poor. Nevertheless, most dialysis patients want to be resuscitated. Unfortunately television shows portraying resuscitation imply that survival after CPR is much more common than it really is. Such misinformation contributes to the overwhelming choice for CPR despite the dismal prognosis. Dialysis unit staff need to educate patients and families about the expected success and complications of CPR as part of the advance care planning process that should now be routine.