IMAGING PREDICTORS OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the microstructural optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence imaging predictors of visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and aniseikonia following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment who underwent repair. Best-corrected visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and aniseikonia were formally tested at 3 months postoperatively. Metamorphopsia and aniseikonia were quantitatively assessed with M-CHARTS and the New Aniseikonia Test, respectively. High-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence images were obtained at 3 months postoperatively. Images were assessed for discontinuity of the outer retinal bands on optical coherence tomography and retinal displacement detected by retinal vessel printings on fundus autofluorescence by two masked graders with disagreements adjudicated by a third senior masked grader. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine the predictors of postoperative visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and aniseikonia. RESULTS: Six hundred fourteen eyes of 614 patients were included in this study. Regression analysis indicated that significant early postoperative (at 3 months) imaging predictors of visual acuity were discontinuity of the external limiting membrane (P = 0.001) and the presence of retinal vessel printings on fundus autofluorescence (P = 0.033). Discontinuity of interdigitation zone was a significant predictor of metamorphopsia [horizontal metamorphopsia (P =0.004); vertical metamorphopsia (P = 0.056); average of horizontal metamorphopsia + vertical metamorphopsia (P = 0.008)], and presence of retinal vessel printings was a significant predictor of aniseikonia (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Discontinuity of the external limiting membrane and retinal displacement were significant predictors of postoperative visual acuity following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Discontinuity of the interdigitation zone and retinal displacement were significant predictors of metamorphopsia and aniseikonia, respectively.

Vitrectomy as an Adjunct to Treat-and-Extend Anti-VEGF Injections for Diabetic Macular Edema: The Vitrectomy in Diabetic Macular Oedema (VIDEO) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: There are reported benefits from vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema (DME); however, data precede anti-vascular endothelial growth therapy (VEGF) therapy, supporting a need to assess the current role of vitrectomy. Objective: To determine rates of recruitment and efficacy outcomes of vitrectomy plus internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling adjunctive to treat-and-extend (T&E) anti-VEGF injections for diabetic macular edema (DME). Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a single-masked, multicenter randomized clinical trial at 21 sites in the United Kingdom from June 2018 to January 2021, evaluating single eyes of treatment-naive patients with symptomatic vision loss from DME for less than 1 year. Inclusion criteria were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score greater than 35 (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/200 or better) and central subfield thickness (CST) greater than 350 µm after 3 monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab or aflibercept. Data analysis was performed in July 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 into vitrectomy plus standard care or standard care alone and further stratified into groups with vs without vitreomacular interface abnormality. Both groups received a T&E anti-VEGF injection regimen with aflibercept, 2 mg, or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg. The vitrectomy group additionally underwent pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane or ILM peel within 1 month of randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of recruitment and distance BCVA. Secondary outcome measures were CST, change in BCVA and CST, number of injections, rate of completed follow-up, and withdrawal rate. Results: Over 32 months, 47 of a planned 100 patients were enrolled; 42 (89%; mean [SD] age, 63 [11] years; 26 [62%] male) completed 12-month follow-up visits. Baseline characteristics appeared comparable between the control (n = 23; mean [SD] age, 66 [10] years) and vitrectomy (n = 24; mean [SD] age, 62 [12] years) groups. No difference in 12-month BCVA was noted between groups, with a 12-month median (IQR) BCVA letter score of 73 (65-77) letters (Snellen equivalent, 20/40) in the control group vs 77 (67-81) letters (Snellen equivalent, 20/32) in the vitrectomy group (difference, 4 letters; 95% CI, -8 to 2; P = .24). There was no difference in BCVA change from baseline (median [IQR], -1 [-3 to 2] letters for the control group vs -2 [-8 to 2] letters for the vitrectomy group; difference, 1 letter; 95% CI, -5 to 7; P = .85). No difference was found in CST changes (median [IQR], -94 [-122 to 9] µm for the control group vs -32 [-48 to 25] µm for the vitrectomy group; difference, 62 µm; 95% CI, -110 to 11; P = .11). Conclusions and Relevance: Enrollment goals could not be attained. However, with 47 participants, evidence did not support a clinical benefit of vitrectomy plus ILM peeling as an adjunct to a T&E regimen of anti-VEGF therapy for DME. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN59902040.

Long-Term Re-Detachment Rates of Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Retinal Detachment: a PIVOT Post-Hoc Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess long-term re-detachment rates of the Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: PIVOT trial participants METHODS: This study was performed at St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada. PIVOT trial participants, with a minimum follow-up of two years, who had undergone either pneumatic retinopexy or ppv for rrd repair were assessed for long-term re-detachment by chart review or telephone interview. The latter was the only accepted method for those with less than two years of follow-up. Patients were only eligible if no re-intervention to reattach the retina was performed within the first year of the initial procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Long-term re-detachment rates for pneumatic retinopexy versus ppv following RRD repair. RESULTS: 61 ppv participants and 62 pneumatic retinopexy participants were analyzed. The long-term re-detachment rate was 0% and 1.61% (1/62) in the ppv and pneumatic retinopexy groups, respectively (p= 0.32). The mean follow-up duration in years was 5.43+/-3.60 versus 5.51+/-3.03 in the ppv and pnr groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in long-term re-detachment rates for pneumatic retinopexy vs ppv. Both procedures are durable treatment options for rrd over an extended period, rarely requiring additional intervention for re-detachment.

Reattachment rate with pneumatic retinopexy versus pars plana vitrectomy for single break rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

AIM: To assess the primary reattachment rate (PARR) in pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) meeting the Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomised Trial (PIVOT) criteria with a single break in detached retina. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of two clinical trials. To be included, patients with primary RRD had to meet PIVOT criteria but could have only one break in the detached retina. Patients with additional pathology in the attached retina were included in a secondary analysis. The primary outcome was PARR following PnR versus PPV at 1-year postoperatively. RESULTS: 162 patients were included. 53% (86/162) underwent PnR and 47% (76/162) had a PPV. 99% (85/86) and 86.8% (66/76) completed the 1-year follow-up visits in the PnR and PPV groups, respectively. PARR was 88.2% (75/85) in the PnR group and 90.9% (60/66) in the PPV group (p=0.6) with a mean postoperative logMAR best-corrected visual acuity of 0.19±0.25 versus 0.34±0.37 (Snellen 20/30 vs 20/44) (p=0.01) each in the PnR and PPV groups, respectively.In an additional analysis of patients who were also allowed to have any pathology in the attached retina, the PARR was 85% (91/107) and 91.6% (66/72) in the PnR and PPV groups, respectively (p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: PnR and PPV provide similar long-term PARR in a substantial proportion of patients meeting PIVOT criteria with only a single break in the detached retina. Therefore, in patients meeting these specific criteria, PnR is an appropriate first-line therapy as it offers superior functional outcomes without compromising PARR.

PEDICLE TRANSPOSITION FLAP, INVERTED FLAP, FREE FLAP, AND STANDARD PEEL FOR LARGE FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To compare anatomical and functional outcomes of four different techniques for the treatment of large idiopathic full-thickness macular holes. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 129 eyes of 126 patients with large (>500 µ m) full-thickness macular holes who presented between January 2018 and October 2022. All patients underwent 23/25 G vitrectomy and gas with standard internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel, pedicle transposition, inverted, or free flap technique. Postoperative optical coherence tomography images were assessed by two independent masked graders. RESULTS: Mean age was 73.2 years (SD 8.4) with a median F/U of 5 months (IQR 8). The overall anatomical success rate was 81%; it was significantly lower (59%) for the standard ILM peel ( P < 0.0001). The pedicle transposition flap showed superior visual recovery compared with the free flap (+27 vs. +12 ETDRS letters, P = 0.02). At 3 months, restoration of the external limiting membrane was significantly better for the pedicle transposition flap compared with free flap and standard ILM peel ( P = 0.008 and P = 0.03) and superior to all the other techniques at 6 months ( P = 0.02, P = 0.04, and P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Standard ILM peel alone offers inferior outcomes for the management of large full-thickness macular holes. Of the alternative ILM techniques, despite similar closure rates, foveal microstructural recovery is most complete following the pedicle transposition flap and least complete following the free flap.

International Classification System for Ocular Complications of Anti-VEGF Agents in Clinical Trials.

PURPOSE: Complications associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies are reported inconsistently in the literature, thus limiting an accurate evaluation and comparison of safety between studies. This study aimed to develop a standardized classification system for anti-VEGF ocular complications using the Delphi consensus process. DESIGN: Systematic review and Delphi consensus process. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five international retinal specialists participated in the Delphi consensus survey. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify complications of intravitreal anti-VEGF agent administration based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-VEGF therapy. A comprehensive list of complications was derived from these studies, and this list was subjected to iterative Delphi consensus surveys involving international retinal specialists who voted on inclusion, exclusion, rephrasing, and addition of complications. Furthermore, surveys determined specifiers for the selected complications. This iterative process helped to refine the final classification system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of retinal specialists who choose to include or exclude complications associated with anti-VEGF administration. RESULTS: After screening 18 229 articles, 130 complications were categorized from 145 included RCTs. Participant consensus via the Delphi method resulted in the inclusion of 91 complications (70%) after 3 rounds. After incorporating further modifications made based on participant suggestions, such as rewording certain phrases and combining similar terms, 24 redundant complications were removed, leaving a total of 67 complications (52%) in the final list. A total of 14 complications (11%) met exclusion thresholds and were eliminated by participants across both rounds. All other remaining complications not meeting inclusion or exclusion thresholds also were excluded from the final classification system after the Delphi process terminated. In addition, 47 of 75 proposed complication specifiers (63%) were included based on participant agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Delphi consensus process, a comprehensive, standardized classification system consisting of 67 ocular complications and 47 unique specifiers was established for intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in clinical trials. The adoption of this system in future trials could improve consistency and quality of adverse event reporting, potentially facilitating more accurate risk-benefit analyses. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Guidelines (2022): a series of treated infants falling outside the updated criteria.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a core healthcare intervention in premature babies to avoid preventable sight loss. A variety of screening criteria are in place globally for this purpose. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health recently updated the United Kingdom ROP screening guidelines (March 2022). A key change was the reduction in the gestational age (GA) to warrant retinal screening (from 32 to 31 weeks). SUBJECTS/METHODS: In the course of informal national surveillance during guideline development (2017-2022) and soon after, babies under our care falling outside the updated screening criteria who underwent treatment for ROP were identified. A retrospective case review was carried out. RESULTS: Six babies were identified as having undergone screening and treatment, prior to implementation of the new guidance. Screening and treatment would have been forfeited as per the March 2022 guidelines. All six had numerous systemic risk factors for developing ROP. Specifically, all had documented poor postnatal weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: We present this case series to bring forth an urgent discussion amongst key stakeholders as to whether the new guidance, as it stands, is safe and fit for purpose.

A Population-Based Analysis of Long-Term Costs and Adverse Events after Pneumatic Retinopexy and Pars Plana Vitrectomy.

PURPOSE: To comprehensively examine the cost effectiveness, reattachment rate, and complications of pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) compared with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) within a universal health care system. DESIGN: Population-based, multicenter, consecutive, retrospective longitudinal cohort analysis. SUBJECTS: We identified consecutive adults aged ≥ 50 years requiring surgery for primary RRD over a 20-year interval between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2022. Initial surgery was considered the index date for analyses. INTERVENTION: Pneumatic retinopexy was compared with PPV in all analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary analysis investigated the mean annualized health care costs comparing PnR to PPV over the 2 years after initial surgery. Secondary analyses examined the primary reattachment rate and complications. RESULTS: In total, 25 665 eligible patients were identified, with 8794 undergoing PnR and 16 871 undergoing PPV. The mean patient age was 65 years and 39% were women. The mean annualized cost after PnR was $8924 and $11 937 after PPV (mean difference, $3013; 95% confidence interval, $2533-$3493; P < 0.001). The primary reattachment rate at 90 days after PnR was 83% and after PPV was 93% (P < 0.001). The risk of cataract or glaucoma surgery was lower after PnR, and the frequency of ophthalmology clinic visits, intravitreal injections, and anxiety was higher after PnR. Hospitalizations and long-term disability were less frequent after PnR. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumatic retinopexy, when compared with PPV, was associated with lower long-term health care costs. Pneumatic retinopexy appeared to be effective, safe, and inexpensive, thus offering a viable option for improving access to RRD repair in appropriately selected cases. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY MORPHOLOGY AFTER RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR: ALIGN Post Hoc Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare foveal avascular zone (FAZ) geometric indices using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). FAZ morphology was assessed as a possible imaging feature of retinal displacement. METHODS: This ALIGN post hoc analysis included primary fovea-off RRDs that underwent successful PnR or PPV, and performed OCTA, and fundus autofluorescence at (FAF) 3 months postoperatively at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. FAZ area (mm 2 ), axial ratio, circularity, and roundness were measured, and FAF images were assessed for retinal displacement. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included, 78% (56/72) were male mean age was 60 ± 9 years, and 60% (43/72) were phakic. Sixty-five percent (47/72) and 35% (25/72) underwent PnR and PPV, respectively. The mean baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity was 1.49 ± 0.76. FAZ circularity was lower after PPV (0.629 ± 0.120) versus PnR (0.703 ± 0.122); P = 0.016. Sixty-six patients had gradable FAF images. Retinal displacement was present in 29% (19/66), 84.2% (16/19) of which had displacement in the macula. FAZ circularity was lower in eyes with displacement in the macula (0.613 ± 0.110) versus those without displacement (0.700 ± 0.124); P = 0.015. There was a moderate negative correlation between 12-month aniseikonia and FAZ circularity(r = -0.262; P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: FAZ circularity was lower after PPV and in eyes with retinal displacement in the macula. Circularity was negatively correlated with 12-month aniseikonia scores. FAZ circularity may be another imaging feature to consider postoperatively after RRD repair.

En Face OCT in Diagnosis of Persistent Subretinal Fluid and Outer Retinal Folds after Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of en face OCT as a diagnostic tool for the detection of persistent subretinal fluid (PSRF) and outer retinal folds (ORFs) after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. DESIGN: Observational post hoc analysis of 2 prospective surgical trials. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with gradable (signal strength ≥ 5 and no segmentation error) 6 × 6-mm2 macular cube scans obtained using spectral-domain OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec) between 1 and 2 months after surgery were included in this study. METHODS: The scans were assessed for the presence or absence of PSRF or ORFs using en face OCT and cross-sectional B scans by 2 masked graders, with any disagreements adjudicated by a third senior masked grader. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy (using area under the curve [AUC]) of en face OCT were compared with those of cross-sectional OCT, which is considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three patients were included in this study. The Cohen kappa between the graders in the diagnosis of PSRF and ORFs using en face OCT was 0.84 and 0.86, respectively. The sensitivity of en face OCT was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 100%-100%) in the diagnosis of PSRF and 98.8% (95% CI, 96.5%-101.1%) in the diagnosis of ORFs. Similarly, the specificity of en face OCT was 98.7% (95% CI, 96.8%-100.5%) and 84.2% (95% CI, 78.1%-90.2%) in the diagnosis of PSRF and ORFs, respectively. The AUC was 0.99 for PSRF and 0.91 for ORFs. CONCLUSIONS: En face OCT has good sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy (using AUC) in the diagnosis of PSRF and ORFs. En face OCT is an efficient screening tool for postoperative anatomic abnormalities, such as PSRF and ORFs, after RRD repair. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Novel classification system for management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with minimally invasive detachment surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials focused on patient-centred outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel classification system for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) based on level 1 evidence assessing the functional outcomes of repair techniques with the goal of using a minimally invasive detachment surgery. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing pneumatic retinopexy (PnR), scleral buckle (SB), or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for RRD was conducted. Primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), metamorphopsia, and operative complications. A meta-analysis was performed with a random effects maximum likelihood model, with outcomes of standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were assessed to inform a classification system. RESULTS: Fourteen trials were included. RRDs were classified from categories 1-3 based on configuration (simple to complex). There was no significant difference in final BCVA between PnR and PPV (categories 1 and 2; SMD = -0.10, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.04), nor was a final BVCA difference found between SB and PPV (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.08), combined SB + PPV and PPV (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.12), or combined SB + PPV and SB (SMD = 0.01, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.12). SB had an elevated risk of choroidal detachment (RR = 5.17, 95% CI 1.68-15.97), hypotony (RR = 12.26, 95% CI 1.63-92.04), and strabismus or diplopia (RR = 5.86, 95% CI 1.04-32.91) compared with PPV but a lower risk of iatrogenic breaks (RR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.43). Vertical metamorphopsia scores were superior for PnR over PPV at 12 months (Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: This novel classification system may be useful for future trials assessing morphologic categories of RRD in a systematic manner. Minimally invasive detachment surgery may allow for trials to focus on maximizing functional outcomes while minimizing morbidity.

Platelet-rich plasma and macular hole surgery: A clue to their mode of action and the influence of anti-platelet agents.

PURPOSE: To present a case of refractory full-thickness macular hole (FTMH), in which autologous platelet-rich plasma (aPRP) was used on two consecutive occasions, and associated with successful closure only after complete cessation of anti-platelet therapy. METHODS: Interventional case report. RESULTS: A 63-year-old male with Alport syndrome underwent pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and gas for a large FTMH. The patient was on systemic anti-platelet agents for coronary disease. Post-operatively, the FTMH remained open and repeated surgery, augmented with aPRP, was performed. Although a thick pre-retinal coagulum was evident on optical coherence tomography on day one post-surgery, the second surgery failed. Ultimately, successful aPRP-augmented surgical closure of the FTMH was achieved only after complete cessation of systemic anti-platelet agents. CONCLUSION: Appropriate management of anti-platelet therapy may be relevant when planning aPRP use, though further large-scale studies are needed to assess the precise effect of anti-platelet therapy on the efficacy of aPRP, and to confirm the potential role of aPRP in patients with Alport syndrome.

A randomised controlled trial evaluating internal limiting membrane peeling forceps in macular hole surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess study design and a range of anatomical and functional changes after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling using forceps developed for atraumatic ILM pick-up compared to standard forceps. METHODS: We conducted a masked proof-of concept randomised controlled trial (RCT) on 65 patients who underwent ILM peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) using etched-tip forceps (etched-tip group, 33 eyes) compared to standard ILM forceps (smooth-tip group, 32 eyes). Patients were assessed preoperatively, 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The primary closure rate was 95.4%. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of final visual acuity (66.9 vs 70.9 ETDRS letters, p = 0.13), difference of visual field mean deviation (1.32 vs 1.14 decibels), and number of eyes with pick-up-related retinal haemorrhages (16% vs 16%, p = 0.96), swelling of arcuate nerve fibre layer lesions (63% vs 55%, p = 0.54), number of dissociated optic nerve fibre layer lesions (31.4 vs 41.0, p = 0.16), nor inner retina defects (37% vs 22%, p = 0.17). Similar changes in inner retinal volumes were detected in all 9 sectors of an ETDRS grid except for a trend (p = 0.06) towards a lower reduction in the inferior inner sector in the etched-tip group. CONCLUSIONS: The study was successfully completed with masking maintained and a low risk of bias. Multiple endpoints relating to ILM peeling were assessed, and estimates were provided that can be used for future studies. Although the study was not powered to assess any specific endpoint, the anatomical and functional outcomes assessed did not significantly differ.

Persistent subfoveal fluid in pneumatic retinopexy versus pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: posthoc analysis of the PIVOT randomised trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of persistent subfoveal fluid (PSFF) in pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and to determine its association with functional outcomes. METHODS: Posthoc analysis of the PIVOT randomised trial. Eyes with gradable en face and cross-sectional spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans at 1-2 months postoperatively were included. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with PSFF following PnR versus PPV at 1-2 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included association of PSFF with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score at 3, 6 and 12 months and metamorphopsia score (MCHARTs) at 12 months. RESULTS: Of 176 participants enrolled in PIVOT, 158 (89.8%) had gradable SD-OCT scans. Intergrader agreement was 0.870 (Cohen's kappa). The incidence of PSFF was 16% (13/81) following PnR and 10.4% (8/77) following PPV (p=0.298; OR=1.65, 95% CI 0.64 to 4.23). Median ETDRS score at 3 months postoperatively between eyes with and without PSFF was 71 (IQR=58-78) and 78 (IQR=70-84), respectively (difference=7 letters, p=0.037), with no significant difference at subsequent 6-month and 12-month visits. Median metamorphopsia scores in patients with versus without PSFF were: horizontal: 0.1 (IQR=0-0.3) vs 0 (IQR=0-0.2) (difference=0.1, p=0.228) and vertical: 0.25 (IQR=0-0.4) vs 0 (IQR=0-0.2) (difference=0.25, p=0.148), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of PSFF in eyes undergoing PnR versus PPV for RRD. The presence of PSFF at 1-2 months postoperatively was associated with worse ETDRS letter score at 3 months, but there was no difference at 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01639209.

A paradigm shift in retinal detachment repair: The concept of integrity.

The management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has rapidly evolved over recent decades. A range of surgical techniques exist, all of which can achieve retinal reattachment in most cases. In recent years there have also been vast technical advances in retinal imaging that have introduced novel ways of visualizing and studying the retinal macro and microstructural anatomy following retinal detachment repair. Recent clinical trial data demonstrates that functional and patient-reported outcomes of retinal reattachment differ with surgical technique, accompanied by differences in anatomic biomarkers of retinal recovery or 'integrity'. We discuss recent insights into the physiology of retinal reattachment gleaned from multimodal imaging, which shed light on the pathophysiology of various post-operative anatomic abnormalities. The ideal scenario is to achieve retinal reattachment as soon as possible, without retinal displacement, outer retinal folds or discontinuity of the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone, with an intact foveal bulge. To this end, we present an in-depth contemporary account of current concepts and mechanisms involved during retinal reattachment surgery, supported by clinical data and mathematical modelling, awareness of which can help the vitreoretinal surgeon achieve better post-operative outcomes. In this review we substantiate the case for a paradigm shift in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair; beyond the emphasis on single-operation reattachment rates, and instead striving to maximize functional outcomes using minimally invasive techniques. This can only be achieved if vitreoretinal surgeons embrace all of the available techniques, with individualized selection of surgical approach and the resolute goal of optimizing the 'integrity' of retinal reattachment.

A Case of Morning Glory Disc Associated With Unilateral Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Morning glory disc anomaly is associated with serous retinal detachments, high refractive errors, amblyopia, and strabismus. There have been limited reports of an association between morning glory disc and peripheral retinal non-perfusion. The authors report a case of unilateral morning glory disc anomaly associated with markedly asymmetric retinopathy of prematurity. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(5):e55-e57.].

A Novel Method of Quantifying Retinal Displacement Using Ultra-Widefield Fundus Autofluorescence Imaging.

PURPOSE: To introduce a novel method of quantifying retinal displacement in three dimensions (3D) using ultra-widefield fundus autofluorescence (UWF-FAF). DESIGN: Prospective clinical cohort study. METHODS: Patients with primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) or vitrectomy were included. Masked graders selected corresponding points on retinal vasculature and retinal vessel printings (RVPs) within Zone 1, a circular region centered on the fovea with a radius extending to the optic disc (OD) center. Two-dimensional (2D) UWF-FAF was projected to 3D using OD and foveal coordinates. Vertical, horizontal, and diagonal distances between corresponding vessel and RVPs were calculated. Vector displacement of the RVPs to vessels were averaged. RESULTS: A total of 170 retinal vessel-RVP pairs were identified from 54 UWF-FAF images. Mean displacement in Zone 1 was 0.36 ± 0.38 mm, with an absolute mean angle of displacement of 94.93 ± 41.48° and directionality of 191.84 ± 97.39°. Mean Zone 1 displacement was 0.44 ± 0.42mm and 0.21 ± 0.27 mm in vitrectomy (n = 35) and PnR (n = 19) eyes, respectively (P = .041), with no differences in mean angle of displacement/directionality. CONCLUSIONS: A novel method of quantifying the magnitude and direction of retinal displacement is presented, accounting for the spherical 3D curvature of the eye by using corresponding points on retinal vessels and RVPs using UWF-FAF. This provides a 3D vector of displacement agnostic of a singular fixation point such as the optic disc. Accurately quantifying the magnitude and angle/direction of displacement may allow for a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in retinal displacement in various surgical techniques, and a better assessment of the association with functional outcomes.