Prolonged Clopidogrel Use is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Eluting But Not Bare Metal Stent Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend clopidogrel use for 6-12 months following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and 1-12 months following bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. The role of clopidogrel beyond 12 months is unclear. METHODS: We linked hospital administrative, community pharmacy and cardiac revascularization data to determine clopidogrel use and outcomes for all patients (those with acute presentations and those with stable angina) receiving a coronary stent in British Columbia 2004-2006, with follow-up until the end of 2008. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to evaluate the effect of clopidogrel duration (≤12 vs. >12 months) on outcomes following BMS or DES implantation. Patients who died ≤12 months from index stent placement were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 15,629 patients were included in the study. Of 3599 patients who received at least one DES and 12,030 patients who received only BMS, 1326 (37 %) and 2121 (18 %), respectively, filled a prescription for clopidogrel >12 months from the index procedure. The mean duration of clopidogrel was 406 ± 35 days and 407 ± 37 days in the prolonged use (>12 months) DES and BMS cohorts, respectively, compared with 224 ± 112 days (p < 0.001) and 122 ± 117 days (p < 0.001), respectively, for patients receiving clopidogrel ≤12 months. Clopidogrel use beyond 12 months was associated with a reduction in mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.97] and the composite of mortality and readmission for myocardial infarction (HR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.55-0.94) in patients treated with DES, but not BMS alone. Prolonged clopidogrel use was not associated with bleeding-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel use beyond 12 months was associated with a reduction in death and hospitalization for myocardial infarction following DES, but not BMS, implantation. Our findings support a longer duration of clopidogrel therapy for patients treated with DES.

Delay in filling first clopidogrel prescription after coronary stenting is associated with an increased risk of death and myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Patients frequently experience difficulties with medication compliance after hospital discharge. We investigated the effect of a delay in filling a first clopidogrel prescription after hospital discharge on clinical outcomes subsequent to coronary stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospital administrative, community pharmacy, and cardiac revascularization data were determined for all patients receiving a coronary stent in British Columbia 2004-2006 with follow-up out to 2 years. Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis, adjusting for baseline demographics and procedural variables, was performed to examine the effects of delay in filling a clopidogrel prescription after hospital discharge on clinical outcomes.Of 15 629 patients treated with coronary stents, 3599 received at least 1 drug-eluting stent (DES), whereas 12 030 received bare metal stents (BMS) alone. In total, 1064 (30%) and 3758 (31%) patients in the DES and BMS groups, respectively, failed to fill a prescription within 3 days of discharge (median, 1 day; interquartile range [IQR], 1 to 3). After regression analysis, a delay of >3 days was predictive of mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) irrespective of stent type (DES: hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.4; and HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7, respectively, and BMS: HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 2.6; and HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.1, respectively). This excess hazard was greatest in the 30-day period immediately after hospital discharge (mortality: HR, 5.5; 95% CI, 3.5 to 8.6; and MI: HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 2.4 to 4.0, for all patients). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in patients filling their first prescription for clopidogrel after coronary stenting are common and associated with adverse clinical outcomes, irrespective of stent type. Strategies to reduce delays have the potential to improve clinical outcomes.

Non-red blood cell transfusion as a risk factor for mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is common and may lead to transfusion and death. Although previous work has examined the effect of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in patients with coronary disease, no study had investigated whether transfusion of non-RBC components was associated with mortality following PCI. METHODS: All subjects transfused in the 10 days following PCI were identified using the British Columbia Cardiac and Central Transfusion Registries. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery following PCI were excluded as transfusion was assumed to be due to surgical related bleeding. Transfusion products were categorised as RBC and non-RBC comprising platelets, plasma and cryoprecipitate. Blood product use was compared according to thirty day mortality using multivariate regression and propensity adjustment for confounding variables. RESULTS: From a total of 32,580 patients who underwent PCI, 952 patients received at least 1 blood product within 10 days of PCI. Non-RBC transfusion occurred more commonly in the cohort of transfused patients dying within 30 days (p<0.001). After adjustment for baseline risk, transfusion of plasma/cryoprecipitate (HR 5.17; 95% C.I. 2.87-9.32, p<0.001) and platelets (HR 2.13; 95% C.I. 1.10-4.13, p=0.03) was associated with increased 30 day mortality. In a propensity risk adjusted model, transfusion of plasma/cryoprecipitate and RBC transfusion volume remained as significant predictors of 30-day mortality (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion following PCI appears to be associated with an increased risk of death within 30 days. We now report that transfusion with plasma rich non-RBC products may confer an additional mortality risk to patients undergoing PCI.

Clopidogrel loading dose and bleeding outcomes in patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed within 5 days of clopidogrel administration is associated with increased bleeding. The impact of clopidogrel loading dose is unknown. We examined the effect of clopidogrel loading dose on bleeding outcomes in patients undergoing urgent CABG. METHODS: Clinical outcomes were examined retrospectively for 196 consecutive patients undergoing urgent CABG within 5 days of a clopidogrel loading dose between January 2003 and June 2009. Major bleeding was defined as a fall in hemoglobin > 5 g/dL, fatal or intracranial bleeding, or cardiac tamponade. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients received 300 mg and 48 patients received ≥ 600 mg clopidogrel loading. Patients were predominantly male (78%) with a mean age of 66 ± 10 years. Mean duration from clopidogrel loading to CABG was 3.0 ± 1.5 and 3.0 ± 1.6 days for the 300 and 600 mg loading doses, respectively. Major bleeding occurred in 47% of patients receiving 300 mg and 73% of patients receiving ≥ 600 mg clopidogrel loading (P = .002). Compared with 300 mg, patients receiving ≥ 600 mg had greater 24-hour chest tube output (391 ± 251 vs 536 ± 354 mL, P = .01), stayed longer in surgical intensive care (4.3 ± 4.1 vs 5.0 ± 3.1 days, P = .0001), and trended toward greater reoperation for bleeding (5% vs 12%, P = .09). Following multivariate analysis, clopidogrel loading dose ≥ 600 mg (odds ratio 2.8, CI 1.2-6.6), preoperative hemoglobin (3.4, 2.7-5.0 per 1 g/dL increase), and female gender (2.9, 1.1-7.4) predicted major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Higher clopidogrel loading doses are associated with increased bleeding when administered within 5 days of CABG. The development of shorter-acting, reversible, oral antiplatelet agents may reduce perioperative bleeding in this population.

Chronic kidney injury in patients after cardiac catheterisation or percutaneous coronary intervention: a comparison of radial and femoral approaches (from the British Columbia Cardiac and Renal Registries).

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-recognised complication of cardiac catheterisation and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) after catheterisation and PCI has not been fully evaluated. A number of risk factors have been implicated in the development of AKI following cardiac catheterisation. Transradial access could lead to a lower incidence of CKD after catheterisation or PCI because of less catheter contact with aortic atheroma, and reduced potential for atheroembolism. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of CKD onset and its association with arterial access in patients after cardiac catheterisation or PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Linkages between the British Columbia (BC) Cardiac Registry (N=69 214) patients who underwent catheterisation or PCI between 1999 and 2005 and the BC Renal Database were determined. Within 6 months after the cardiac procedure 0.4% of patients developed dialysis dependency, 0.2% in the transradial versus 0.4% in the transfemoral group (p<0.0001); 0.3% of patients developed stage 4 or 5 CKD, 0.1% in the transradial versus 0.4% in the transfemoral group (p<0.0001); 0.9% of patients developed new CKD, 0.2% in the transradial versus 1.2% in the transfemoral group (p<0.0001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics the femoral access site had an OR of 4.36 (95% CI 2.48 to 7.66) for the development of the composite end point of new dialysis, new stage 4 or 5 CKD or new CKD. CONCLUSIONS: In this large database of current practice coronary catheterisation and PCI, the incidence of CKD onset within 6 months of the procedure was 0.9%. The transradial access site is associated with less CKD than the femoral approach.

Red blood cell storage duration and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion has been associated with an increased mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the reasons for this remain unclear, it may be related to the structural and functional changes occurring within red blood cells (RBCs) during storage. We investigated whether RBC storage duration was associated with mortality in patients requiring transfusion after PCI. METHODS: We collected data on all RBC transfusions occurring within 10 days of PCI (excluding those related to cardiac surgery) using the British Columbia Cardiac Registry and Central Transfusion Registry. Transfusion details were analyzed according to 30-day survival. RESULTS: From a total of 32,580 patients undergoing PCI, 909 (2.8%) patients received RBCs with a mean storage duration of 25 +/- 10 days. In these 909 patients, mean transfusion volumes were lower in survivors (2.8 +/- 2.1 vs 3.8 +/- 2.9 U, P = .002) than those who died within 30 days. In a multivariate analysis to adjust for baseline risk, mean RBC storage age (HR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01-1.04], P = .002) and transfusion volume (HR 1.26 [95% CI 1.18-1.34], P < .001) both predicted 30-day mortality. Transfused patients who received only older blood (RBC min age >28 days) appeared to be at greater risk of death (HR 2.49 [95% CI 1.45-4.25], P = .001). CONCLUSION: Red blood cell transfusion is associated with increased 30-day mortality in patients undergoing PCI. Although current transfusion practice permits RBC storage for up to 42 days, the use of older red cells may pose an additional hazard to this patient group.

Comparison of treatment outcomes in patients > or =80 years undergoing transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention.

We assessed the effect of transradial access (vs transfemoral access) for percutaneous coronary intervention on postprocedure length of stay and patient outcomes (in-hospital complications and all-cause and cardiac death at 6 and 12 months) in 225 elderly patients (> or =80 years old). Raw differences between transradial and transfemoral accesses were compared, and 3 forms of propensity score analysis were used to determine the true effect of transradial access. After matching to adjust for baseline differences in patient characteristics, remaining differences in outcomes and postprocedure length of stay were small and not statistically significant at the 95% level, but a decrease in postprocedural length of stay of nearly 1 day was observed and likely was not due to chance. Transradial access in patients > or =80 years old undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention should be preferred due to equivalent success rate and safety and likely reduction in postprocedural hospitalization.