COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy prevalence in Mexico: A systematic review and metanalysis.

Background: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is a recognized threat to public health that undermines efforts to mitigate disease burden. This study aims to gather available evidence regarding COVID-19 VH in Mexico, estimate the prevalence of VH, and its determinants to inform policymaking in this country. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE literature, articles that estimated the prevalence of COVID-19 VH in Mexico were included in the analysis to obtain a pooled estimate. We used a binomial-normal model for meta-analysis of proportions (i.e., generalized linear mixed model) to perform the metanalysis. We then performed a narrative review of COVID-19 VH in Mexican subpopulations. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria. We estimated a pooled prevalence of COVID-19 VH of 16 % (95 % CI: 11-23 %) in Mexico. We found an association between VH and demographic characteristics, intrinsic vaccine factors, and beliefs. Subgroup analyses from specific studies suggested that patients with clinical conditions such as breast cancer or rheumatologic diseases had a higher prevalence of VH. Conclusions: VH is a highly complex and dynamic phenomenon in Mexico. Characterizing and understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the Mexican population helps target future policy interventions to mitigate the spread and impact of infectious diseases. The implications of VH differ among groups that may be at higher risk of severe disease, underscoring the importance of prompt research among these groups as well as targeted interventions to address VH.

Indirect assessment of low-intensity shockwave therapy's energy density and pulse frequency for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review, bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Shockwaves are thought to activate regenerative and angiogenic pathways, providing a possible therapeutic benefit for patients with erectile dysfunction. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy energy density and pulse frequency. In May 2022, a systematic search of online databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials related to low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in erectile dysfunction. Eligible articles compared low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy to controls or sham procedures. A Bayesian framework with 200,000 Markov chains was performed. We included a total of 1272 patients from 18 studies. The energy flux density measured in joules included 0.09 mJ/mm2 (mean difference 3.2 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 3.6]), 0.15 mJ/mm2 (mean difference 4.9 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 7.2]) and 0.20 mJ/mm2 (mean difference 1.2 IIEF [95% CrI 0.11, 2.3]). Of these, 0.15 mJ/mm2 had the greatest ranking (SUCRA = 0.983) compared with placebo. When analyzed by pulse frequency, significant increases were found in 500 pulses/session (mean difference 2.5 IIEF [CrI 1.9, 3.2]), 1500 pulses/session (mean difference 4.6 IIEF [95% CrI 3.9, 5.4]) and > 3000 pulses/session (mean difference 3.1 IIEF [95% CrI 2.1, 4.2]). Of these, 1500 pulses/session had the highest SUCRA, at 0.996. Our network meta-analysis suggests that low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy is an effective intervention for erectile dysfunction, as measured by increases in the IIEF-EF. Sessions featuring 1500 pulses and an energy flux density of 0.15 mJ/mm2 appear to be the most effective.

Overview of Robotic Surgery in the U.S. Military: From Conception to Utilization, and Future Applications.

This column explores the inception, challenges, and prospects of robotic surgery in the military. It highlights the military's role in developing early prototypes, current utilization, training struggles, partnerships with civilian organizations, and potential future applications. The military's influence on the evolving landscape of robotic surgery is emphasized.

Comparison of peritoneal interposition flaps and sealants for prevention of lymphocele after robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a systematic review, meta-analysis, Bayesian network meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Lymphocele is one of the most common complications after radical prostatectomy. Multiple authors have proposed the use of vessel sealants or peritoneal interposition techniques as preventive interventions. This study aimed to aggregate and analyze the available literature on different interventions which seek to prevent lymphocele through a Bayesian Network. A systematic review was performed to identify prospective studies evaluating strategies for lymphocele prevention after robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Meta-regression was used to determine coefficient of change and adjust for pelvic lymph node dissection extent. Ten studies providing data from 2211 patients were included. 1097 patients received an intervention and 1114 patients served as controls. Interposition with fenestration had the lowest risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.14 [0.04, 0.50], p = 0.003). All interventions, except sealants or patches, had significant decreased odds of lymphocele rates. Meta-analysis of all the included studies showed a decreased risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.42 [0.33, 0.53], p < 0.00001) for the intervention group. Perivesical fixation and interposition with fenestration appear to be effective interventions for reducing the overall incidence of lymphocele.

Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer and neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a prevalent disease that urgently needs to address its treatment-related complications. By examining existing evidence on the association between Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and dementia, this study contributes to the understanding of potential risks. We sought to analyze the currently available evidence regarding the risk of dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia, and Parkinson's disease (PD) in patients undergoing ADT. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies published from the databases' inception to April 2023. Studies were identified through systematic review to facilitate comparisons between studies with and without some degree of controls for biases affecting distinctions between ADT receivers and non-ADT receivers. This review identified 305 studies, with 28 meeting the inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2%. Variables with an I2 over 50% were considered heterogeneous and analyzed using a Random-Effects model. Otherwise, a Fixed-Effects model was employed. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies were included for analysis. Out of these, only 1 study did not report the number of patients. From the remaining 27 studies, there were a total of 2,543,483 patients, including 900,994 with prostate cancer who received ADT, 1,262,905 with prostate cancer who did not receive ADT, and 334,682 patients without prostate cancer who did not receive ADT. This analysis revealed significantly increased Hazard Ratios (HR) of 1.20 [1.11, 1.29], p < 0.00001 for dementia, HR 1.26 [1.10, 1.43], p = 0.0007 for Alzheimer's Disease, HR 1.66 [1.40, 1.97], p < 0.00001 for depression, and HR 1.57 [1.31, 1.88], p < 0.00001 for Parkinson's Disease. The risk of vascular dementia was HR 1.30 [0.97, 1.73], p < 0.00001. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis of the currently available evidence, it suggests that ADT significantly increases the risk of dementia, AD, PD, and depression.

Oncologic Outcome of the Extent of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Analysis.

CONTEXT: Some authors propose extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer. However, recent evidence found no difference in biochemical recurrence (BCR). OBJECTIVE: To stratify and analyze available evidence on ePLND and its impact on BCR in patients with localized prostate cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We systematically reviewed the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies up to November 2023. We identified original articles that presented statistical comparisons through Cox regressions reported as hazard ratio (HR) or survival curve data reported as Kaplan-Meier curve differences in BCR in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and stratified by the extent of lymph node dissection for localized prostate cancer. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 12 studies, with two being randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The RCTs showed no benefit of ePLND with an HR of 1.03 ([0.92, 1.14], p = 0.61). A combined analysis with the ten retrospective studies revealed a notable reduction in BCR with an HR of 0.68 ([0.52, 0.88], p = 0.003). A subgroup analysis based on the extent of dissection demonstrated that studies focusing on the more conservative extended template of dissection did not show significant BCR benefit (HR 0.97 [0.72, 1.32], p = 0.86). In contrast, dissections that expanded the anatomical extent showed decreased BCR (HR 0.56 [0.41, 0.75], p < 0.0001). A Bayesian network analysis highlights significant differences in BCR reduction between different dissection approaches, indicating the potential benefits of specific dissection templates. CONCLUSIONS: Available literature on the extent of pelvic lymph node dissection needs to be improved in quality and varying definitions of the ePLND template. Dissection of the common iliac nodes may be beneficial. PATIENT SUMMARY: There is a potential benefit in removing more lymph nodes during radical prostatectomy. However, more research is needed to determine whether this strategy benefits certain patient groups.

Complete Intraureteral Stents Decrease Urinary Symptoms Compared with Conventional Ureteral Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Up to 80% of stent patients report urinary discomfort, negatively impacting their daily activities and quality of life. Conventional Double-J ureteral stents (DJSs) can cause adverse kidney and bladder-related symptoms. Complete intraureteral stents (CISs) may reduce bothersome bladder symptoms by reducing foreign material in the bladder. We sought to aggregate and analyze ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) data from the available randomized controlled trials comparing CISs with conventional ureteral stents. Methods: In February 2023, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review was performed to identify studies that evaluated the use of CISs and reported outcomes using the USSQ score. Two authors (D.E.H.-G. and G.S.) independently extracted and analyzed data using Review Manager 5.41. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2%, with values >50% considered heterogeneous and analyzed with a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. The results are presented as the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We set our significance level at p = 0.05. Results: Six randomized controlled clinical trials compared CISs with DJSs, but only five trials reported the USSQ score. Among these patients, 235 had CISs, whereas the remaining 259 had DJSs or loop-tail stents and served as controls for 494 patients. Urinary symptoms scores were lower in the CIS group (MD -5.19, 95% CI: [-5.89 to -4.50], p < 0.0001). Pain scores were also lower in the CIS group (MD -1.90 [-2.63 to -1.16] p < 0.00001). General health and work performance domains were similar between the groups. A 2.5% stent failure or migration rate requiring endoscopic intervention was reported in the CIS group compared with 0.3% in the DJS group (odds ratio 4.01 [0.96-16.76] p = 0.06). Conclusions: CISs significantly decrease urinary symptoms and pain associated with conventional indwelling ureteral stents. However, further trials are needed to determine the optimal patient selection for this type of stent.

Blood salvage and autotransfusion during orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant cause of oncologic mortality worldwide. Liver transplantation represents a curative option for patients with significant liver dysfunction and absence of metastases. However, this therapeutic option is associated with significant blood loss and frequently requires various transfusions and intraoperative blood salvage for autotransfusion (IBS-AT) with or without a leukocyte reduction filter. This study aimed to analyze available evidence on long-term oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCC with and without IBS-AT. METHODS: Per PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of keywords "Blood Salvage," "Auto-transfusion," "Hepatocellular carcinoma," and "Liver-transplant" was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. Studies comparing operative and postoperative outcomes were screened and analyzed for review. RESULTS: Twelve studies totaling 1704 participants were included for analysis. Length of stay, recurrence rates, and overall survival were not different between IBS-AT group and non IBS-AT group. CONCLUSION: IBS-AT use is not associated with increased risk of recurrence in liver transplant for HCC even without leukocyte filtration. Both operative and postoperative outcomes are similar between groups. Comparison of analyzed studies suggest that IBS-AT is safe for use during liver transplant for HCC.

The robotic NICE procedure outperforms conventional laparoscopic extracorporeal-assisted colorectal resection: results of a matched cohort analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We introduced the robotic NICE procedure for left-sided colorectal resection in 2018 in which the entire procedure is performed without loss of pneumoperitoneum and without an abdominal wall incision by performing natural orifice-assisted transrectal extraction of the specimen and intracorporeal anastomosis. We compare the results of the NICE procedure versus conventional laparoscopic resection, which was our standard approach prior to 2018. METHODS: A matched pair case-control study compared patients following the NICE procedure versus those who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection with conventional extracorporeal-assisted technique. Cases were performed at an Academic Medical Center and recorded in a prospective database to analyze perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: From a total cohort of 352 patients, 83 were matched in each group. When comparing the NICE procedure vs. the Extracorporeal-Assisted laparoscopic group, there were no significant differences in age (58.5 vs. 59.3 years old), sex (47 vs. 42 Female), body mass index (27.4 vs. 27.5 kg/m2), ASA, diagnosis, or type of surgery. Operative time (198.8 vs. 197.7 min), blood loss (56.0 vs. 53.3 ml), intraoperative complications (0.0% vs. 0.0%), and conversion rates (0.0% vs. 0.0%) were similar in both groups. The NICE procedure was associated with significantly earlier return of bowel function (40.7 vs. 23.6 h), shorter length of stay (3.1 vs. 2.2 days), and lower total opioid use (94.6 vs. 70.5 morphine milligram equivalents). Overall, there were no differences in postoperative abscess formation, complications, readmission, or reoperation rates. CONCLUSION: When compared to conventional laparoscopic resection, the NICE procedure is associated with short-term benefits including earlier recovery and less opioid use without increased operative time or increased risk of complications. Multicenter studies are recommended to validate benefits and limitations of this technique.

Latin America Research Output Within the Top 5 Vascular Surgery Journals.

BACKGROUND: Dedicated studies on patient outcomes are crucial to the development of effective policies aimed at prevention and management of vascular diseases. This study aims to determine the scientific productivity of Latin American countries through a bibliometric analysis of top 5 vascular journals. METHODS: The 5 dedicated vascular journals indexed in the "surgery" category were selected for analysis. These were the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (EJVES), the Journal of Vascular Surgery (JVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy (JEVT), the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders (JVS-VL) and the Annals of Vascular Surgery (AVS). Databases were queried with the combination of each journal's name + each of the 21 Latin American countries. All possible combinations were searched. Inclusion criteria were articles affiliated with a university, medical center, or hospital from any Latin American country. RESULTS: A total of 501 articles were retrieved, 104 (20.7%) were published between 2000 and 2011, and 397 (79.2%) between 2012 and 2022. The journal with the most publications was AVS with 221 (43.9%), followed by JVS with 135 (26.9%), EJVES with 60 (11.9%), JEVT with 49 (9.9%), and JVS-VL with 36 (7.1%). Brazil had the highest volume of publications at 346 (69.0%), followed by Argentina at 54 (10.7%), Chile at 35 (6.9%), and Mexico at 32 (6.3%). JVS had a higher median citation when compared with AVS, JVS-VL, and JEVT, 18 vs. 5, 5.5, and 7, respectively (P = <0.001). Furthermore, JVS had a greater median citation than EJVES, at 18 vs. 12.5, respectively (P = 0.005). Median citation per year from 2000 to 2011 was 1.59 (range: 0-45), and 1.50 (range: 0-114.5) from 2012 to 2022 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Latin America's research output within the vascular surgery field has increased over the years. Efforts must be made to increase research output in this region and translate findings into effective interventions for these populations.

Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant persons.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines reduce the risk of contracting and developing complications from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Pregnant people are at increased risk of disease-related complications but have a higher prevalence of vaccine hesitancy (VH) than their nonpregnant counterparts. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe risk factors and COVID-19- and vaccine-related perspectives that lead to VH among pregnant people in Mexico to target strategies to increase vaccine acceptance in this population. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based study to evaluate risk factors and COVID-19- and vaccine-related perspectives associated with VH among pregnant people was conducted. Respondents were pregnant people of all ages attending a regular follow-up visit or admitted to labor and delivery in a third-level maternity hospital in Mexico. VH was defined as not having received a COVID-19 vaccine and either declining or being undecided to accept a vaccine during their pregnancy. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate assess the relationship among demographic factors, COVID-19- and vaccine-related perspectives, and VH. RESULTS: A total of 1475 respondents completed the questionnaire; 216 (18%) were under the age of 18 years, and 860 (58%) had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. In this sample, 264 (18%) were classified as vaccine hesitant. Key factors associated with VH were adolescence, having family as a primary source of information, first pregnancy, and history of vaccines in previous pregnancies. COVID-19 perspectives were also strongly associated with VH. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant people in Mexico, VH is associated with demographic factors, vaccination history, sources of information, and perceived risks to the fetus. This information is relevant to policy makers and health care professionals to identify those more likely to be hesitant and to inform strategies to increase vaccine uptake among pregnant people.

High Altitude Carotid Body Tumors Growth During active Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for patients with carotid body tumors (CBT) is surgical resection; nevertheless, some patients are unfit for surgery or, for other reasons, could not be operated on. Active surveillance has been known to be a reasonable strategy for these cases. This study aimed to evaluate tumor growth in unoperated patients with CBTs. METHODS: A retrospective review of all unoperated patients with CBT from a single academic hospital diagnosed between 2014 and 2021 was performed. Results of nonparametric testing were presented using the median and ranges for Mann-Whitney-U or Kruskal-Wallis. Significance was defined as a 2-tailed P < .05. RESULTS: The cohort included a total of 31 patients, with a median age of 60 years (range: 37-80 years), of which 27 (87.1%) were females. The patients live at a median altitude of 2800 meters (range: 2756-2980 meters) above sea level. Twenty (64.5%) patients had Shamblin I tumors, eight (25.8%) patients had Shamblin II tumors, and three (9.7%) patients had Shamblin III tumors. Median CBT volume at diagnosis was 14.1 cm3 (range: .9 - 213.3 cm3). Median volume at diagnosis of symptomatic tumors was substantially larger than asymptomatic tumors, 49.2 cm3 vs 7.9 cm3, respectively (P = .03). Median growth of the tumors during a median 15-month follow-up (range: 3-43 months) was 3.3 cm3 (range: 0-199.9 cm3). Overall, 77% (n = 24) of the CBTs grew at least 1 cm3. CONCLUSION: Most patients in the present study had tumor growth by at least 1 cm3, with a median tumor growth of 3.3 cm.3 In the present study tumor growth was shown to be greater than other low altitude CBT active surveillance studies; therefore, surgical resection should be recommended in patients with CBT living at high altitudes.

Biomarkers in Urolithiasis.

A variety of biomarkers have been studied in the setting of conditions and scenarios related to kidney stone disease. These biomarkers are commonly serum markers, novel urinary proteins, and inflammatory whose use is aimed at providing clinicians with additional information of underlying processes and improving detection and stratification of patients with kidney stones, acute ureteral obstruction, stone passage, and related infectious complications. Their adoption has been limited, and further evidence is required to determine their role in the care of patients with stone disease.

Risk Factors for Stroke After Carotid Paraganglioma Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Carotid Paraganglioma Cooperative International Registry (CAPACITY) is an international registry composed of 1,432 patients with carotid body tumors (CBT) from 11 centers from 4 countries. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for patients who presented stroke after carotid paraganglioma resection. METHODS: Clinical characteristics and demographics of patients who presented transoperatively and postoperatively stroke from the CAPACITY database were retrospectively gathered. Regression analysis was performed using single logistic regression with Omnibus' test for possible factors that might contribute to present stroke. RESULTS: Out of 1,432 patients, 8 (0.5%) female patients presented stroke. Median age was 53 years (range: 41-70 years). Six strokes occurred transoperatively, diagnosed clinically in the immediate postoperative period. Of them, none of the patients received any further treatment. Three of them died on postoperative day 2, 3, and 4. Two patients developed stroke during the first 24 postoperative hours, patients showed dysarthria, and aphasia. One of them was reintervened with thrombectomy due to thrombosis of the common carotid artery the other patient was treated conservatively. Median follow-up was 16 months (range: 2-72 months). Single logistic regression analysis revealed a history of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio (OR) 7.62), carotid artery disease (OR 17.51), and vascular lesion (OR 2.37) to have significantly increased odds of stroke during CBT surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study history of diabetes mellitus, carotid artery disease, and vascular lesion had increased odds of stroke during CBT surgery. Findings are limited by low event rate and even larger cohorts are needed to fully define preventive preoperative strategies for preventing stroke.

Nasopharyngeal viral load at admission is not an independent predictor of thromboembolic complications in unvaccinated COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

COVID-19 patients may develop thrombotic complications, and data regarding an association between nasopharyngeal viral load and thrombosis is scarce. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal viral load upon admission is a useful prognostic marker for the development of thromboembolic events in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection. We performed a retrospective study of all hospitalized patients with a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV2 who had deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolization (PE), or arterial thrombosis diagnosed during their clinical course in a single academic center. The study population was divided according to the cycle threshold (Ct) value upon admission in patients with high viral load (Ct < 25), intermediate/medium viral load (Ct 25-30), and low viral load (Ct > 30). A regression model for propensity was performed matching in a 1:3 ratio those patients who had a thrombotic complication to those who did not. Among 2,000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 41 (2.0%) developed thrombotic complications. Of these, 21 (51.2%) were diagnosed with PE, eight (19.5%) were diagnosed with DVT, and 12 (29.2%) were diagnosed with arterial thrombosis. Thrombotic complications occurred as frequently among the nasopharyngeal viral load or severity stratification groups with no statistically significant differences. Univariate logistic regression revealed increased odds for thrombosis only in mechanically ventilated patients OR 3.10 [1.37, 7.03] (p = 0.007). Admission SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal viral loads, as determined by Ct values, were not independently associated with thromboembolic complications among hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Analysis of deferral times in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: There are still controversies regarding the time of surgical management for acute appendicitis (AA). The main objective of this study was to recognize the surgical deferral time in patients with acute appendicitis and its relationship with the severity of presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of all patients with acute appendicitis undergoing appendectomy from August 2018 to August 2020 in an academic, public hospital. Elapsed time from arrival to the emergency room to skin incision was determined. Patients were divided into three groups based on the elapsed time: less than 6 h, between 6 and 12 h, and more than 12 h. RESULTS: A total of 782 patients were included. Of them, 443 (56.6%) patients had a surgical deferral time of less than 6 h, 238 (30.4%) patients between 6 and 12 h, and 101 (13%) patients of more than 12 h. Patients with more than 12 h of surgical deferral time had a more complicated clinical presentation (P = 0.013), a higher frequency of abscess formation (P = 0.022), higher requirement for the use of surgical drainage (P = 0.018), and longer length of hospital stay (P = <0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgical deferral >12 h was associated with a higher incidence of complicated appendicitis, intra-abdominal abscesses, and overall hospital stay. However, in the multivariate analysis, only total evolution time, from the first symptom to surgery, was a significant independent predictor of complicated appendicitis.

Predicting Septic Shock After Emergent Ureteral Stenting in Stone-Related Obstruction and Presumed Infections.

Introduction: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria have long been used to predict septic shock. The sequential organ failure assessment and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores have been suggested to be more accurate predictors. This study aims to compare SIRS and qSOFA for predicting of septic shock in the setting of retrograde ureteral stenting for obstructing stones and concomitant urinary tract infection. Methods: A retrospective review of records at two centers of consecutive patients was performed. Patients with unilateral ureteral obstruction by a stone who underwent ureteral stent placement and suspicion of urinary tract infection were identified. Primary endpoints were SIRS and qSOFA positive scores, intensive care unit admission, and vasopressor requirements. Results: A total of 187 patients were included. SIRS criteria were met in 103 patients (55.1%) and in 30 patients who experienced septic shock. qSOFA criteria were met for 24 patients (12.8%) and in 18 patients who experienced septic shock. Specificity for postoperative septic shock was significantly higher for qSOFA than for SIRS criteria (75 vs 29.1%, McNemar test p < 0.001). Both SIRS and qSOFA had significant areas under the curve (AUC), qSOFA had a fair AUC of 0.750, p = 0.001, whereas SIRS had a poor AUC of 0.659, p = 0.008. Univariate logistic regression of SIRS and qSOFA for septic shock showed: qSOFA (odds ratio [OR] 46 [0.25-228], p = 0.001) and SIRS (OR 2.29 [0.716-7.37], p = 0.162). Conclusion: Although SIRS offers higher sensitivity, qSOFA score may offer advantages over SIRS criteria in evaluation of risk for septic shock for patients who present with obstructing ureteral stone and urinary tract infection.

Killip-Kimball classification in octogenarians with acute coronary syndrome: an 11-year experience / Clasificación de Killip-Kimball en octogenarios con síndrome coronario agudo: 11 años de experiencia

Abstract Objective: The objective of the study is to validate the use of the Killip-Kimball classification (KC) as a predictor of outcomes in an octogenarian cohort with acute coronary syndrome. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent a catheterization procedure for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was performed. ACS was defined as per the American Heart Association guidelines, and included ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI and Unstable Angina. We determined factors associated with the KC upon admission to the emergency room. Likewise, we compared in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and other outcomes dividing the patients by KC. Results: A total of 133 patients with a mean age of 83 years were analyzed and assigned a KC from 1 to 4 according to clinical presentation. Each group included 86, 9, 23, and 15 patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12%, 5% in KC-I, 11% in KC-II, 22% in KC-III, and 40% in KC-IV with a significant difference between classes (p = 0.002). In addition, we found higher KC groups to be associated with acute kidney injury during the hospitalization (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Despite a strong reduction in mortality for elderly patients with ACS in recent decades, patients presenting with ACS and higher KC have a high mortality rate, as described in younger cohorts. KC remains a reliable prognostic tool, with applicability in octogenarian patients.

Resumen Objetivo: Validar el uso de la clasificación de Killip- Kimball como predictor de desenlaces en una cohorte de pacientes octogenarios con síndrome coronario agudo. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a cateterismo por síndrome coronario agudo (ACS). Se incluyeron infarto al miocardio con y sin elevación del segment ST, así como angina inestable, utilizando las definiciones de la American Heart Association (AHA). Se determinaron los factores que influyeron en la clasificación de Killip-Kimball (KC) al momento de ingreso al hospital. Se comparó la mortalidad, la estancia intrahospitalaria y otros desenlaces, dividiendo a los pacientes por su KC. Resultados: Un total de 133 pacientes se incluyeron en el análisis y se clasificaron dependiendo de su KC (I-IV). Cada grupo incluyó 86, 9, 23 y 15 pacientes, respectivamente. La edad media fue de 83 años. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue de 5, 11, 22 y 40%, respectivamente para cada KC, y 12% global. Hubo una diferencia significativa en la mortalidad por clase (p = 0.002). Adicionalmente, se encontró que a mayor KC, mayor riesgo de lesión renal aguda durante la hospitalización (p < 0.01). Conclusión: A pesar de una reducción en la mortalidad de adultos mayores con ACS en décadas recients, pacientes con ACS y mayor KC tienen riesgo aumentado de morir, igual que pacientes en grupos de edad menores. La KC continñua siendo una herramienta confiable para la clasificación y con utilidad pronóstica, con aplicabilidad en pacientes mayores de 80 años.

Current trends in carotid body tumors: Comprehensive review.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumor (CBT) is a rare neoplasm that has been increasingly studied during the last decades; nevertheless, it continues to be a topic of controversy. This review aims to provide an update on the general features of CBT and particularly review different treatment strategies and primary outcomes. METHODS: Data for this literature review were identified by PubMed, Scopus, and Medline. 93 articles from the initial search were included, as well as 28 relevant studies utilizing the snowballing method; totaling 121 articles about CBT. RESULTS: Main features such as anatomy, embryology, genetics, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of CBT are presented, followed by evidence of different treatment strategies such as radiotherapy, preoperative embolization, vascular resection, and vascular reconstruction. Main complications are also discussed. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the most critical aspects regarding CBT. Future studies should compare different treatments to attain the best surgical results with lower morbidity rates.