Analyses of Dupilumab-Related Ocular Adverse Drug Reactions Using the WHO's VigiBase.

INTRODUCTION: Dupilumab is a drug that inhibits the action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 and is a potent therapeutic drug for allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis. Although its use has been associated with significant ocular adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the IL-4 and IL-13 inhibition may also have favorable therapeutic effects. The aim of this study was to determine the disease spectrum in which the use of dupilumab may have been associated with an increase or decrease of ocular ADRs. METHODS: We searched the World Health Organization's VigiBase for ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab for data up to 12 June 2022. The number of all ADRs that were retrieved was compared with the number of ocular ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab. Disproportionate reporting was assessed by calculating the information component (IC) values and odds ratios. RESULTS: Since the introduction of dupilumab, 100,267 ADRs have been reported. Of all the ADRs associated with dupilumab, 28,522 ADRs were ocular complications, and it ranked fourth in the ocular complications by organ level. By assessments of the IC for age ≤ 44 years, the most significantly associated ADRs were dry eye followed by blepharitis including eyelid crusting and dryness and conjunctivitis. Crusting and dryness of the eyelids were the most significant ADRs for all age groups. Other ocular ADRs reported include meibomian gland dysfunction, keratitis, glaucoma, and retinal disorders. In contrast, periorbital edema, neuro-ophthalmic disorders, optic neuritis, and macular edema were significantly reduced by the use of dupilumab. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab-related ADRs included an increase or decrease of various ocular disorders. The results indicate that dupilumab also has potential therapeutic effects.

Using ultrasonography in evaluating the intramuscular injection techniques used for administering drug treatments to schizophrenic patients in Japan.

This study was conducted with six patients with schizophrenia, four of whom received the atypical antipsychotic risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI), and two patients receiving the typical depot injection (TDI). The purpose of this study was to determine the location (gluteus medius or maximus; deltoid muscles) and diffusion of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications administered intramuscularly using ultrasonography. When using the standardized depth of needle insertion, in some cases, the drug was injected into the gluteus maximus instead of the gluteus medius. Similarly, in some cases the TDI was not visible in the ultrasonographic images until sixteen days after the injection. This verifies how hard the injection site becomes when microspheres of RLAI is injected as compared to other muscle areas. These results confirmed that the gluteus muscle structure was the ideal muscle for depot injection as evidenced by the injection solution being dispersed and rendered not visible immediately after intramuscular injection (IM). With the use of ultrasonography, injection sites and drug dispersions were evaluated under a direct visual guidance, suggesting that ultrasonography is a useful method for establishing evidence for determining correct insertion of IM injection, diffusion of medications, and the effective administration of IM injections.