RESUMO
Purpose: We examined differences in the accuracy of three intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas: the traditional Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T) formula; the Barrett Universal II (BU II) formula, which is a new-generation IOL calculation formula; and the postoperative spherical equivalent prediction using artificial intelligence and linear algorithms developed by Debellemanière, Gatinel, and Saad formula (PEARL-DGS [PEARL]) formula, and evaluated factors that cause postoperative refractive error (PE). Patients and Methods: The study included 205 patients (205 eyes) with a mean age of 75.2 ± 8.7 years who underwent cataract surgery at our institution from December 2018 to October 2023. The PE of the three IOL calculation formulas was calculated and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with a PE higher than ±0.50 D as the dependent variable, and age, sex, axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW) as independent variables. Results: The mean PE (ME) ± standard deviation of the SRK/T, BU II, and PEARL formulas was 0.11 ± 0.52, 0.11 ± 0.50, and 0.21 ± 0.50 D, respectively. MEs of the three IOL calculation formulas were significantly different from 0 (p < 0.01). The median absolute error (MedAE) was not significantly different among the three IOL calculation formulas (p = 0.83). The percentage of PE within ±0.50 D was not significantly different among the three IOL calculation formulas (p = 0.13). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the significantly associated factors with PE higher than ±0.50 D were AL, ACD, and LT for the SRK/T formula, sex and LT for the BU II formula, and LT for the PEARL formula (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: In the BU II and PEARL formulas, AL was excluded as a factor affecting PE, indicating that LT was a risk factor.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The significance of resection of paraaortic lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the prognosis of colorectal cancer after paraaortic lymph node metastasis resection. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. SETTINGS: Thirty-six institutions in Japan participated in this study. PATIENTS: Patients with resected and pathologically proven paraaortic lymph node metastasis of CRC between 2010 and 2015. DATA SOURCES: Database and medical records at each institution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival after paraaortic lymph node metastasis resection, recurrence-free survival, and recurrence patterns after R0 resection of paraaortic lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were included in the primary analysis population in this study. The 5-year overall survival rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 41.0% (32.0, 49.8), and the median survival (95% CI) was 4.1 (3.4, 4.7) years. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were the pathological T stage (pT4 vs. pT1- 3, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.91, p = 0.006), other organ metastasis (present vs. absent, aHR: 1.98, p = 0.005), time to metastases (synchronous vs. metachronous, aHR: 2.02, p = 0.02), and number of paraaortic lymph node metastasis (≥3 vs. <3, aHR: 2.13, p = 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (95% CI) was 21.1% (13.5, 29.7), with a median (95% CI) of 1.2 (0.9, 1.4) years. The primary tumor location (left- vs. right-sided colon, aHR: 4.77, p = 0.01; rectum vs. right-sided colon, aHR: 5.27, p = 0.006), other organ metastasis (present vs. absent, aHR: 1.90, p = 0.03), number of paraaortic lymph node metastasis (≥3 vs. <3, aHR: 2.20, p = 0.001), and hospital volume (<10 vs. ≥10, aHR: 2.18, p = 0.02) were identified as independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. Paraaortic lymph node recurrence was the most common at 33.3%. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias cannot be ruled out because of the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Less than three paraaortic lymph node metastasis was a favorable prognostic factor for both overall survival and recurrence-free survival. However, paraaortic lymph node metastases were considered to be a systemic disease and the significance of resection was limited. See Video Abstract.
RESUMO
Archaeosine (G+) is an archaea-specific tRNA modification synthesized via multiple steps. In the first step, archaeosine tRNA guanine transglucosylase (ArcTGT) exchanges the G15 base in tRNA with 7-cyano-7-deazaguanine (preQ0). In Euryarchaea, preQ015 in tRNA is further modified by archaeosine synthase (ArcS). Thermococcus kodakarensis ArcS catalyzes a lysine-transfer reaction to produce preQ0-lysine (preQ0-Lys) as an intermediate. The resulting preQ0-Lys15 in tRNA is converted to G+15 by a radical S-adenosyl-L-methionine enzyme for archaeosine formation (RaSEA), which forms a complex with ArcS. Here, we focus on the substrate tRNA recognition mechanism of ArcS. Kinetic parameters of ArcS for lysine and tRNA-preQ0 were determined using a purified enzyme. RNA fragments containing preQ0 were prepared from Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNAPhe-preQ015. ArcS transferred 14C-labeled lysine to RNA fragments. Furthermore, ArcS transferred lysine to preQ0 nucleoside and preQ0 nucleoside 5'-monophosphate. Thus, the L-shaped structure and the sequence of tRNA are not essential for the lysine-transfer reaction by ArcS. However, the presence of D-arm structure accelerates the lysine-transfer reaction. Because ArcTGT from thermophilic archaea recognizes the common D-arm structure, we expected the combination of T. kodakarensis ArcTGT and ArcS and RaSEA complex would result in the formation of preQ0-Lys15 in all tRNAs. This hypothesis was confirmed using 46 T. kodakarensis tRNA transcripts and three Haloferax volcanii tRNA transcripts. In addition, ArcTGT did not exchange the preQ0-Lys15 in tRNA with guanine or preQ0 base, showing that formation of tRNA-preQ0-Lys by ArcS plays a role in preventing the reverse reaction in G+ biosynthesis.
RESUMO
AIMS: To predict high-risk factors for zonular complications during cataract surgery due to pre-existing severe zonular dehiscence in eyes with pseudoexfoliation (PXF) syndrome. METHODS: 315 eyes of 315 consecutive patients with PXF scheduled for phacoemulsification surgery underwent preoperative examination of various ocular parameters using an anterior segment-optical coherence tomography and other devices. When zonular complications occurred during surgery due to zonular dehiscence, scleral fixation of the intraocular lens (IOL) or implantation of a capsular tension ring (CTR) was performed. High-risk factors for these intraoperative zonular complications were examined using classification-tree and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 315 eyes, 31 (9.84%) underwent scleral IOL fixation or CTR implantation. High-risk factors identified by classification-tree analysis were a small pupillary diameter after mydriasis <6.30 mm, a shallow anterior chamber depth <2.074 mm and lens decentration >0.260 mm. Based on exact logistic regression analysis, the OR was 4.81-fold higher for eyes with poor mydriasis than for eyes without poor mydriasis (p=0.006, 95% CI 1.49 to 18.23), 23.99-fold higher for eyes with poor mydriasis and a shallow anterior chamber (p<0.001, 5.92 to 109.02) and 287.39-fold higher for eyes with poor mydriasis, a shallow chamber and great lens decentration (p<0.001, 50.46 to infinity). CONCLUSION: In eyes with PXF, high-risk factors for zonular complications during cataract surgery due to pre-existing severe zonular dehiscence were poor mydriasis, shallow anterior chamber and large lens decentration, suggesting the importance of evaluating these conditions preoperatively.