Effect of radioprotective curtain length on the scattered dose rate distribution and endoscopist eye lens dose with an over-couch fluoroscopy system.

Sufficient dose reduction may not be achieved if radioprotective curtains are folded. This study aimed to evaluate the scattered dose rate distribution and physician eye lens dose at different curtain lengths. Using an over-couch fluoroscopy system, dH*(10)/dt was measured using a survey meter 150 cm from the floor at 29 positions in the examination room when the curtain lengths were 0% (no curtain), 50%, 75%, and 100%. The absorbed dose rates in the air at the positions of endoscopist and assistant were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation by varying the curtain length from 0 to 100%. The air kerma was measured by 10 min fluoroscopy using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters at the eye surfaces of the endoscopist phantom and the outside and inside of the radioprotective goggles. At curtain lengths of 50%, 75%, and 100%, the ratios of dH*(10)/dt relative to 0% ranged from 80.8 to 104.1%, 10.5 to 61.0%, and 11.8 to 24.8%, respectively. In the simulation, the absorbed dose rates at the endoscopist's and assistant's positions changed rapidly between 55 and 75% and 65% and 80% of the curtain length, respectively. At the 0%, 50%, 75%, and 100% curtain lengths, the air kerma at the left eye surface of the endoscopist phantom was 237 ± 29, 271 ± 30, 37.7 ± 7.5, and 33.5 ± 6.1 µGy, respectively. Therefore, a curtain length of 75% or greater is required to achieve a sufficient eye lens dose reduction effect at the position of the endoscopist.

Half-value layer measurements using solid-state detectors and single-rotation technique with lead apertures in spiral computed tomography with and without a tin filter.

Solid-state detectors (SSDs) may be used along with a lead collimator for half-value layer (HVL) measurement using computed tomography (CT) with or without a tin filter. We aimed to compare HVL measurements obtained using three SSDs (AGMS-DM+ , X2 R/F sensor, and Black Piranha) with those obtained using the single-rotation technique with lead apertures (SRTLA). HVL measurements were performed using spiral CT at tube voltages of 70-140 kV without a tin filter and 100-140 kV (Sn 100-140 kV) with a tin filter in increments of 10 kV. For SRTLA, a 0.6-cc ionization chamber was suspended at the isocenter to measure the free-in-air kerma rate ( K ˙ air ) values. Five apertures were made on the gantry cover using lead sheets, and four aluminum plates were placed on these apertures. HVLs in SRTLA were obtained from K ˙ air decline curves. Subsequently, SSDs inserted into the lead collimator were placed on the gantry cover and used to measure HVLs. Maximum HVL differences of AGMS-DM+ , X2 R/F sensor, and Black Piranha with respect to SRTLA without/with a tin filter were - 0.09/0.6 (only two Sn 100-110 kV) mm, - 0.50/ - 0.6 mm, and - 0.17/(no data available) mm, respectively. These values were within the specification limit. SSDs inserted into the lead collimator could be used to measure HVL using spiral CT without a tin filter. HVLs could be measured with a tin filter using only the X2 R/F sensor, and further improvement of its calibration accuracy with respect to other SSDs is warranted.

[Efficacy of L-shaped Shielding in Interventional Radiology by Transradial Approach and Consideration of Methods for Appropriate Use].

The present study investigated how effective an L-shaped shield was, depending on its position, in reducing a doctor's exposure to radiation during catheterization to access the transradial approach (TRA). The shield's effectiveness was evaluated by measuring the air kerma where the doctor stood under four conditions: with and without the shield, and with and without the shield in conjunction with conventional protection. To enable the shield to be positioned correctly in clinical practice, an illustrated instruction decal affixable to the shield's doctor-facing surface was produced, and the effectiveness of the decal was verified by means of a crossover test in which, as subjects of the study, different nurses set up the shield with and without the decal affixed to it. In the test, in which a human body phantom was used, the C-arm set at the PA angle, and the shield positioned 10 cm from the axilla of the phantom, the shield's effectiveness at 100 cm, 130 cm, and 160 cm above the floor where the doctor stood was 55%, 77%, and 47%, respectively. The effectiveness increased when the shield was positioned closer to the axilla. A significant difference in the positioning of the shield by the subjects was observed depending on whether or not the decal was affixed ( p<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), indicating that the use of the decal improved the positioning. It was concluded that, positioned correctly, the shield could effectively reduce the doctor's exposure to radiation during TRA.

Use of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter and radiophotoliminescent glass dosimeter for dose measurement in dual-source dual-energy computed tomography.

We aimed to evaluate properties of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters (RPLDs) used in dual-source dual-energy (DE) computed tomography (DECT) dosimetry. Energy dependence was evaluated in single-energy (SE) and DE modes, and their relative dose responses differed by 3.8% and 6.6% under equivalent effective energy with OSLD and RPLD, respectively. Dose variation was evaluated using coefficients of variation of dose values from 10 dosimeters, and dose variation of OSLD and RPLD in SE mode ranged from 2.1 to 3.0% and from 2.1 to 2.8%, and those in the DE mode were 1.8 and 2.6%, respectively. Dose linearity was evaluated from 1 to 150 mGy, and linear relationships of dose response were observed between the dosimeters and the ionization chamber (correlation coefficients ≥ 0.9991). Angular dependence was evaluated from - 90° to + 90°, and it was smaller in DE mode than in SE mode for OSLD. The normalized response of RPLD was higher at ± 30° and ± 60° and lower at - 90° in SE and DE modes. This study demonstrated both OSLD and RPLD can perform dosimetry in dual-source DECT with small influence of the properties of the dosimeters compared with that in SECT.

Characterization of Small Dosimeters Used for Measurement of Eye Lens Dose for Medical Staff during Fluoroscopic Examination.

This study aimed to evaluate the property of small dosimeters used for measuring eye lens doses for medical staff during fluoroscopic examination. Dose linearity, energy dependence, and directional dependence of scattered X-rays were evaluated for small radiophotoluminescence glass dosimeters (RPLDs), those with a tin filter (Sn-RPLDs), and small optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs). These dosimeters were pasted on radioprotective glasses, and accumulated air kerma was obtained after irradiating the X-rays to a patient phantom. Strong correlations existed between fluoroscopic time and accumulated air kerma in all types of dosimeters. The energy dependence of Sn-RPLD and OSLD was smaller than that of RPLD. The relative dose value of the OSLD gradually decreased as the angle of the OSLD against the scattered X-rays was larger or lower than the right angle in the horizontal direction. The ranges of relative dose values of RPLD and Sn-RPLD were larger than that of OSLD in the vertical direction. The OSLDs showed lower doses than the RPLDs and Sn-RPLDs, especially on the right side of the radioprotective glasses. These results showed that RPLDs, Sn-RPLDs, and OSLDs had different dosimeter properties, and influence measured eye lens doses for the physician, especially on the opposite side of the patient.

[Reduction of Radiation Exposure to Operator with Radiation Protective Device in ERCP Procedure Using Over-coach X-ray TV System].

It is important to reduce the dose received by medical staffs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of protective curtain and the property of small optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters used for ambient dose measurement in fluoroscopy. The property of small OSL dosimeters was investigated in terms of uniformity, changing fluoroscopy time and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) thickness, and angular dependence. Paper pipes were assembled in glid shape and ambient dose was investigated by using small OSL dosimeters that were put on them with and without protective curtain. Air kerma was investigated by small OSL dosimeters that were put on a head phantom at the position of eyes. Dose response of small OSL dosimeters was independent of fluoroscopy time and PMMA thickness, so it is appropriate to measure ambient dose by small OSL dosimeters. In relation to ambient dose, there was significant difference with and without protective curtain (p<0.001, paired-t-test). These air kerma on the head phantom were reduced to approximately 20% by attaching protective curtain. In order to reduce the dose received by operators, it is desirable to use protective curtain.

[Properties and usage of radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters for computed tomography dosimetry].

There are two types of radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters (RPLDs). One has a tin filter in the capsule (GD-352M) and the other has no filter (GD-302M). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the properties of these RPLDs for computed tomography (CT) dosimetry: energy dependence, variation, angular dependence, and dose distribution in a single slice. Energy dependence and variation were investigated for ratio of the air kerma measured by RPLDs to that by ion chamber. Angular dependence was investigated for RPLDs and ion chamber. RPLDs were irradiated at 90°, 60°, 30°, 0°, -30°, -60°, and -90°: 0° was vertical to long axial direction of the RPLD, and plus and minus meant clockwise and anti-clockwise, respectively. Dose distribution in a single slice of an anthropomorphic phantom was acquired using 46 RPLDs. The dose responses of GD-302M and GD-352M depended on beam energy and irradiation angle of X-ray, respectively. The dose variation among dosimeters was large with GD-352M. The dose obtained from GD-352M was lower than that from GD-302M. It was expected that the dose distribution of GD-352M was formed by the primary X-ray, so RPLD without tin filter should be used for CT dosimetry.

[A comparison of several convenient methods of estimating effective energy in X-ray computed tomography].

The measurement of half-value layers (HVLs) and effective energy in X-ray computed tomography (CT) using conventional nonrotating methods is regarded as a highly challenging task, as it necessitates the use of a nonrotating X-ray tube and the assistance of service engineers. Several convenient methods have been proposed to circumvent this limitation; however, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports that provide a comparative study on the accuracy of each method. This prompted us to compare the accuracy and practicality of each method. Effective energy was calculated using four methods: lead shielding, copper pipe, localization, and inner-metal center-air ratio (IMCAR). The accuracy of each method for the measurement of effective energy in X-ray CT was evaluated and compared with the conventional nonrotating method. The differences in the effective energy were 0.0 to 0.6 keV (0.0% to 1.1%) for lead shielding, -2.2 to -0.6 keV (1.4% to 4.3%) for copper pipe, 4.7 to 16.7 keV (9.9% to 31.4%) for localization, and -7.4 to -0.3 keV (0.6% to 17.5%) for the IMCAR method. The results indicate that the lead shielding method is the most accurate and practical method of estimating effective energy in X-ray CT.

Accuracy of measuring half- and quarter-value layers and appropriate aperture width of a convenient method using a lead-covered case in X-ray computed tomography.

Determination of the half-value layer (HVL) and quarter-value layer (QVL) values is not an easy task in x-ray computed tomography (CT), because a nonrotating x-ray tube must be used, which requires the assistance of service engineers. Therefore, in this study, we determined the accuracy of the lead-covered case method, which uses x-rays from a rotating x-ray tube, for measuring the HVL and QVL in CT. The lead-covered case was manufactured from polystyrene foam and a 4-mm thick lead plate. The ionizing chamber was placed in the center of the case, and aluminum filters were placed 15 cm above the aperture surface. Aperture widths of 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 cm for a tube voltage of 110 kV and an aperture width of 2.0 cm for the tube voltages of 80 and 130 kV were used to measure exposure doses. The results of the HVL and QVL were compared with those of the conventional nonrotating method. A 2.0-cm aperture was believed to be adequate, because of its small differences in the HVL and QVL in the nonrotating method and its reasonable exposure dose level. When the 2.0-cm aperture was used, the lead-covered case method demonstrated slightly larger HVLs and QVLs (0.03-0.06 mm for the HVL and 0.2-0.4 mm for the QVL) at all the tube voltage settings. However, the differences in the effective energy were 0.1-0.3 keV; therefore, it could be negligible in an organ-absorbed dose evaluation and a quality assurance test for CT.