Analysis of the Association of Administration of various glucocorticoids with development of acute pancreatitis using US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

BACKGROUND: There have been debates about the association between the administration of glucocorticoids and the development of acute pancreatitis, since many anecdotal cases of this adverse event were affected either by concomitant diseases (such as systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE) that may develop acute pancreatitis without glucocorticoid treatment or by co-administered drugs with high risk for the event. The aim of the present study was to explore whether disproportionally elevated signals of developing acute pancreatitis may be detected in patients receiving glucocorticoids as compared those receiving other drugs. METHODS: We retrieved spontaneously reported cases of acute pancreatitis and clinically related adverse events (target events) from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) using 18 preferred terms (PTs). Target drugs studied were cortisol, cortisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, triamcinolone, dexamethasone, and betamethasone. After cleaning the data, we calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of acute pancreatitis in patients who received one of the glucocorticoids. RORs were calculated for each glucocorticoid using all reported cases irrespective of reporters' judgement about the contribution of the target drugs to events [i.e., primary suspected medication (PS), secondary suspected medication (SS), concomitant medication (C) and interacting (I)] and using cases with higher certainty of contribution (PS and SS), separately. When the lower limit of 95% CI of a ROR signal exceeded 1.0, the signal was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The RORs (95% CIs) calculated using all reported cases (PS, SS, C, and I) for cortisol (1.68; 1.43-1.98), prednisolone (1.33; 1.19-1.47), methylprednisolone (1.77; 1.55-2.02) were significant, whereas those for other target drugs were insignificant. Using the cases in which target drugs were considered to contribute the events with higher certainty (PS or SS), RORs for prednisolone (1.31; 1.10-1.55), methylprednisolone (1.62; 1.30-2.01), and dexamethasone (1.27; 1.10-1.47) were considered significant, whereas those for others were insignificant. Regarding the performance of PTs for detecting signals (RORs) associated with acute pancreatitis from FAERS database, "pancreatitis acute" gave RORs with higher significance than others, whereas more specific PTs, "haemorrhagic necrotic pancreatitis", "ischaemic pancreatitis", "pancreatic necrosis" and "pancreatitis necrotising", gave RORs with greater magnitude. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that the overrepresentation of signals for acute pancreatitis may be detected for prednisolone, methylprednisolone, and some others in the FAERS database.(372 words).

Causal relationship between acute pancreatitis and methylprednisolone pulse therapy for fulminant autoimmune hepatitis: a case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: A causal relationship between acute pancreatitis and administration of glucocorticoids remains a matter of debate, since most of the reported cases were diagnosed with systemic vascular diseases (including systemic lupus erythematosus and polyarteritis nodosa) that may be responsible for the pancreatitis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 51-year-old woman who developed acute pancreatitis after receiving methylprednisolone pulse therapy for the treatment of fulminant autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). She was admitted to our hospital because of overt jaundice and back pain. Since her liver dysfunction deteriorated progressively, a liver biopsy was performed and a diagnosis of AIH was established. She was given intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy at 1000 mg/day for 3 days, and oral prednisolone at 40 mg/day thereafter. While her liver function improved rapidly, she started complaining of mild back pain and serum amylase and lipase levels were elevated from 5 days after the initiation of steroid therapy. A CT scan revealed mildly edematous changes around the pancreas, leading to a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. After tapering off prednisolone, back pain disappeared, and elevated serum amylase was normalized without exacerbation of AIH. A systematic literature review identified 8 cases of acute pancreatitis developing after administration of corticosteroid pulse therapy with a median latent period of 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The present case and reports in the literature suggest that steroid pulse therapy may cause acute pancreatitis in patients having no signs of systemic vasculitis.