The Impact of Addictions Management Following Cardiac Surgery on People Who Inject Drugs and Have Infective Endocarditis.

Background: Managing reinfection in patients who inject drugs and have undergone cardiac surgery could reduce mortality. A significant gap exists in the management of addiction in this population and it is rarely addressed during index hospitalization for surgical intervention. This study sought to determine if management of addiction changed rates of readmission for reinfection. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review and analysis. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis due to injection drug use underwent a full chart review to determine if they received management of their addiction (addictions medicine consultation, social work consultation, medication- and/or opioid-assisted treatment, and community follow-up) following their surgical intervention. Results: A total of 41 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. For addictions management, 43.2% of patients received an addictions medicine consultation, 67.6% received a social work consultation, 40.5% received medication- and/or opioid-assisted treatment, and 56.8% received community follow-up. Overall mortality of these patients was 21.6%, and 56.8% of patients were readmitted with reinfection. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients who received intervention were 1.6 times more likely to be readmitted with reinfection (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 0.29-9.41, P = 0.5736). Female patients had a significantly higher odds of reinfection, when adjusted for gender (odds ratio 9.95, 95% confidence interval 1.42-69.72, P = 0.021). Conclusions: We demonstrated a nonstandardized approach to consultation and varying approaches to management of addiction. Patients who received intervention for addiction were more likely to be readmitted for reinfection, but this difference was not significant. Future efforts can include promotion of formalized addictions consultation services for high-risk patients.

Contexte: La prise en charge de la réinfection chez les patients qui s'injectent des drogues et ont subi une intervention chirurgicale cardiaque pourrait réduire la mortalité. Il existe des lacunes importantes dans la gestion de la dépendance dans cette population, et celle-ci est rarement abordée lors de la première hospitalisation pour l'intervention chirurgicale. Cette étude a cherché à déterminer si la gestion de la dépendance peut changer les taux de réadmission pour réinfection. Méthodologie: Cette étude consistait en une analyse rétrospective de dossiers de patients. Les patients ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale cardiaque pour une endocardite infectieuse due à l'usage de drogues injectables ont fait l'objet d'un examen complet de leur dossier afin de déterminer s'ils avaient reçu une prise en charge de leur dépendance (consultation en médecine des dépendances, consultation en travail social, traitement médicamenteux associant ou non des opioïdes et suivi communautaire) après l'intervention chirurgicale. Résultats: Au total, 41 patients répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. En ce qui concerne la gestion des dépendances, 43,2 % des patients avaient effectué une consultation en médecine des dépendances, 67,6 %, en travail social, 40,5 % avaient reçu un traitement médicamenteux associant ou non des opioïdes et 56,8 % avaient fait l'objet d'un suivi communautaire. Le taux de mortalité globale chez ces patients était de 21,6 %, et 56,8 % des patients avaient subi une réinfection ayant nécessité une nouvelle hospitalisation. Une analyse de régression logistique multivariée a montré que les patients ayant reçu une intervention avaient une probabilité 1,6 fois supérieure de subir une nouvelle hospitalisation en raison d'une réinfection (rapport de cotes de 1,65, intervalle de confiance à 95 % de 0,29 à 9,41, p = 0,5736). Après ajustement en fonction du sexe, les femmes avaient une probabilité sensiblement plus élevée de réinfection (rapport de cotes de 9,95, intervalle de confiance à 95 % de 1,42 à 69,72, p = 0,021). Conclusions: Nous avons présenté une approche non normalisée de la consultation et des diverses approches de la gestion de la dépendance. Les patients ayant reçu une intervention pour la dépendance étaient plus susceptibles de subir une nouvelle hospitalisation en raison d'une réinfection, sans que cette différence soit significative. Les efforts futurs peuvent inclure la promotion de services officiels de consultation sur les dépendances pour les patients à risque élevé.

Single-Centre Registry Analysis of Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Their Coronary Bypass Grafts.

Background: The study assessed the outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to bypass grafts, focusing on all-cause mortality and target vessel failure (TVF) rates. Methods: A single-centre registry analysis included 364 patients who underwent PCI on coronary bypass grafts between 2008 and 2019. The study analyzed all-cause mortality and TVF, which encompassed target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and medically treated occluded target graft post-PCI. Results: The median age of the patients was 71 years (interquartile range: [IQR] 65-78), with 82.1% being male. Most patients (94.8%) received PCI on saphenous vein grafts, and the median graft age was 13.0 years (IQR: 8.4-17.6). Drug-eluting stents were used more frequently (54.4%) than bare-metal stents (45.6%), with a median stent diameter of 3.5 mm (IQR: 3-4) and length of 19 mm (IQR: 18-28). Outcome differences were not significant for PCI sites (aorto-ostial, graft body, anastomosis), use of drug-eluting stents, or use of protection devices. The 1-year mortality rate was 3.3%, whereas the combined rate of TVF or death was 20.3%. After 5 years, the mortality rate increased to 14.9%, and the combined TVF or death rate rose to 40.3%. Multivariable analyses revealed that chronic kidney disease was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.61, P = 0.007), whereas hypertension (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.32-4.42, P = 0.004) and increased stent length (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, P = 0.007) were independently associated with the TVF-or-mortality outcome. Conclusions: Patients undergoing PCI to bypass grafts experience considerable adverse outcomes over a 5-year period, highlighting the need for further strategies in managing this high-risk population.

Contexte: L'étude visait à évaluer l'issue des patients ayant subi une intervention coronarienne percutanée (ICP) sur un greffon coronarien, en mettant l'accent sur le taux de mortalité toutes causes confondues et le taux d'échecs de revascularisation du vaisseau cible (EVC). Méthodologie: Une analyse du registre d'un seul établissement a porté sur 364 patients ayant subi une ICP sur un greffon coronarien de 2008 à 2019. L'étude a analysé la mortalité toutes causes confondues et les EVC, qui comprenaient la revascularisation de la lésion cible, la revascularisation du vaisseau cible et le traitement médical de l'occlusion du greffon coronarien cible après l'ICP. Résultats: L'âge médian des patients était de 71 ans (intervalle interquartile [IIQ] de 65 à 78) et 82,1 % d'entre eux étaient de sexe masculin. La plupart des patients (94,8 %) avaient subi une ICP sur un greffon de veine saphène; l'âge médian des greffons était de 13,0 ans (IIQ de 8,4 à 17,6). Les endoprothèses médicamentées avaient été utilisées plus fréquemment (54,4 %) que les endoprothèses non médicamentées (45,6 %), le diamètre médian de l'endoprothèse étant de 3,5 mm (IIQ de 3 à 4) et sa longueur, de 19 mm (IIQ de 18 à 28). Les différences pour ce qui est de l'issue clinique n'étaient pas significatives à l'égard des sites d'ICP (aorto-ostial, corps du greffon, anastomose), de l'utilisation d'une endoprothèse médicamentée, ou encore de l'utilisation de dispositifs de protection. Le taux de mortalité à 1 an était de 3,3 %, alors que le taux combiné d'EVC ou de décès était de 20,3 %. Après 5 ans, le taux de mortalité avait augmenté à 14,9 %, alors que le taux combiné d'EVC ou de décès s'élevait à 40,3 %. Les analyses multivariables ont révélé que la néphropathie chronique était indépendamment associée au décès (rapport des risques instantanés [RRI] de 1,74, intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % de 1,16 à 2,61, p = 0,007), alors que l'hypertension (RRI de 2,42, IC à 95 % de 1,32 à 4,42, p = 0,004) et une longueur accrue de l'endoprothèse (RRI de 1,01, IC à 95 % de 1,00 à 1,02, p = 0,007) étaient indépendamment associées à une issue d'EVC ou de décès. Conclusions: Les patients qui ont subi une ICP sur un greffon coronarien présentent des complications considérables sur une période de 5 ans, ce qui souligne le besoin de mettre en place davantage de stratégies de prise en charge pour cette population à risque élevé.

A formalized shared decision-making process with individualized decision aids for older patients referred for cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Comprehension of risks, benefits and alternative treatment options is poor among patients referred for cardiac surgery interventions. We sought to explore the impact of a formalized shared decision-making (SDM) process on patient comprehension and decisional quality among older patients referred for cardiac surgery. METHODS: We developed and evaluated a paper-based decision aid for cardiac surgery within the context of a prospective SDM design. Surgeons were trained in SDM through a Web-based program. We acted as decisional coaches, going through the decision aids with the patients and their families, and remaining available for consultation. Patients (aged ≥ 65 yr) undergoing isolated valve, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or CABG and valve surgery were eligible. Participants in the non-SDM phase followed standard care. Participants in the SDM group received a decision aid following cardiac catheterization, populated with individualized risk assessment, personal profile and comorbidity status. Both groups were assessed before surgery on comprehension, decisional conflict, decisional quality, anxiety and depression. RESULTS: We included 98 patients in the SDM group and 97 in the non-SDM group. Patients who received decision aids through a formalized SDM approach scored higher in comprehension (median 15.0, interquartile range [IQR] 12.0-18.0) than those who did not (median 9.0, IQR 7.0-12.0, p < 0.001). Decisional quality was greater in the SDM group (median 82.0, IQR 73.0-91.0) than in the non-SDM group (median 76.0, IQR 62.0-82.0, p < 0.05). Decisional conflict scores were lower in the SDM group (mean 1.76, standard deviation [SD] 1.14) than in the non-SDM group (mean 5.26, SD 1.02, p < 0.05). Anxiety and depression scores showed no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Institution of a formalized SDM process including individualized decision aids improved comprehension of risks, benefits and alternatives to cardiac surgery, as well as decisional quality, and did not result in increased levels of anxiety.

Implementation of enhanced recovery in cardiac surgery: An experimental study with the control group.

INTRODUCTION: The Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery protocol is the most recent addition to cardiac treatment. In this paper, we aimed to test the safety and viability of this protocol in our hospital to improve our standard of care. METHODS: This study was conducted as an experimental study with a historical control at the Maritime Heart Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. In order to quantify the success of this protocol, we measured the postoperative Length of Hospital Stay and three intensive care unit variables: time to extubation, time to ambulation, and opioid consumption. In the study, 100 patients were in the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery group, and 103 patients were used as historic controls-selected by strenuous chart review and selection criteria. RESULTS: The primary outcome (Length of Hospital Stay) was reduced from a mean of 8.88 ± 3.50 days in the control group to a mean of 5.13 ± 1.34 days in the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery group (p < 0.001). Likewise, we observed a significant reduction in intensive care unit variables: time to extubation was reduced from 10.54 ± 7.83 h in the control group to 6.69 ± 1.63 in the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery group (p < 0.01), and time to ambulation was reduced from 36.27 ± 35.21 h in the control group to 9.78 ± 2.03 in the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery group (p < 0.01) and opioid consumption was reduced from 50.58 ± 11.93 milligram morphine equivalent in the control group to 11.58 ± 4.43 milligram morphine equivalent in the Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery protocols were seamlessly integrated into selected cardiac surgical patients, contingent on a high level of interprofessional communication and collaboration.

Structural valve deterioration of bioprosthesis in the aortic position: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is one of the most common open-heart surgical procedures. The durability of the tissue valve in the aortic position is crucial in AVR and transcatheter AVR. We reviewed structural valve deterioration using echocardiographic follow-up in three types of surgical aortic tissue valves. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted where hemodynamic deterioration was evaluated and compared using transthoracic echocardiography, including pressure gradients and effective orifice area. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to summarize the time to failure. RESULTS: The study included 133 Trifecta, 156 Epic, and 321 Magna Ease valves. Seventy-six percent (1941/2551) of patients had to be excluded due to insufficient echo data. Through univariate analysis, 34% (216/610) of valves met deterioration criteria after 24 months. Unadjusted survival curves showed a significant difference between valves (p ≤ .001), with a longer mean time to deterioration for the Magna Ease versus Trifecta and Epic of 68.9 versus 50.1 and 38.2 months, respectively. A Cox proportional hazard analysis found worse hazard ratios of 1.69 (p ≤ .04) and 2.4 (p ≤ .01) for Trifecta versus Magna and Epic versus Trifecta, respectively. CONCLUSION: All three valve types demonstrated structural valve deterioration on echocardiographic follow-up with significant differences in rate. The Magna Ease appeared to have the highest durability, and the Epic the lowest. Further investigation is warranted to confirm the results in a larger multicenter study.

Impact of Clopidogrel Stop Interval on Major Adverse Bleeding Events in Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Major societal guidelines recommend a 5-day stop interval before cardiac surgery for patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving clopidogrel. Yet, many such patients present with high acuity, generating surgeon inclination toward use of shorter stop intervals. Thus, this study aimed to determine the impact of the duration and timing of the interval of clopidogrel cessation on adverse bleeding events. METHODS: Patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2009 and 2016 at a tertiary-care centre were included in this retrospective cohort study. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for clopidogrel stop interval, age, urgency of procedure, and procedure type were used to quantify the effect of clinically relevant baseline demographic characteristics on incidence of massive transfusion as well as hemorrhagic complication outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 5748 patients underwent cardiac surgery. In this cohort, 1743 patients (30.3%) received clopidogrel preoperatively, and 884 (50.7%) of these patients discontinued clopidogrel 5 days before presenting to the operating room. The administration of clopidogrel 1-2 days before surgery (odds ratio 1.97; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 3.29) was an independent predictor for massive transfusions and hemorrhagic complications (odds ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 3.37). The 3-4 day group did not have an increased risk of major bleeding complications. The risk for both massive transfusions and hemorrhagic complications also increased with the urgency and complexity of surgery. CONCLUSION: A clopidogrel stop interval of 3-4 days preoperatively was not associated with an increased risk for major bleeding complications.

INTRODUCTION: Les grandes lignes directrices sociétales recommandent une interruption de cinq jours avant l'intervention chirurgicale du cœur des patients atteints d'un syndrome coronarien aigu qui prennent du clopidogrel. Toutefois, comme il s'agit pour plusieurs d'entre eux de patients de haute acuité, le chirurgien penche vers l'utilisation d'une interruption plus courte. Par conséquent, la présente étude avait pour objectif de déterminer les conséquences de la durée et du moment de la cessation du clopidogrel sur les événements hémorragiques indésirables. MÉTHODES: La présente étude de cohorte rétrospective portait sur les patients qui avaient subi une intervention chirurgicale au cœur entre 2009 et 2016 dans un centre de soins tertiaires. Nous avons utilisé les modèles multivariés de régression logistique ajustés à l'interruption du clopidogrel, à l'âge, à l'urgence de l'intervention chirurgicale et au type d'intervention chirurgicale pour quantifier les effets des caractéristiques démographiques initiales cliniquement pertinentes sur la fréquence des transfusions massives ainsi que sur les issues des complications hémorragiques. RÉSULTATS: Un total de 5 748 patients ont subi une intervention chirurgicale au cœur. Dans cette cohorte, parmi les 1 743 patients (30,3 %) qui avaient reçu du clopidogrel avant l'opération, 884 (50,7 %) avaient cessé le clopidogrel cinq jours avant leur admission à la salle d'opération. L'administration du clopidogrel un à deux jours avant l'intervention chirurgicale (ratio d'incidence approché 1,97; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : de 1,18 à 3,29) était un prédicteur indépendant des transfusions massives et des complications hémorragiques (ratio d'incidence approché 1,85; [IC] à 95 % : de 1,01 à 3,37). Le groupe de l'interruption de trois à quatre jours n'a pas montré de risque accru de complications hémorragiques graves. Le risque de transfusions massives et de complications hémorragiques a aussi contribué à l'augmentation de l'urgence et de la complexité de l'intervention chirurgicale. CONCLUSION: Une interruption du clopidogrel de trois à quatre jours avant l'opération n'a pas été associée à un risque accru de complications hémorragiques graves.

Psychosocial Distress in Adult Patients Awaiting Cancer Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cancer causes substantial emotional and psychosocial distress, which may be exacerbated by delays in treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in increased wait times for many patients with cancer. In this study, the psychosocial distress associated with waiting for cancer surgery during the pandemic was investigated. This cross-sectional, convergent mixed-methods study included patients with lower priority disease during the first wave of COVID-19 at an academic, tertiary care hospital in eastern Canada. Participants underwent semi-structured interviews and completed two questionnaires: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Qualitative analysis was completed through a thematic analysis approach, with integration achieved through triangulation. Fourteen participants were recruited, with cancer sites including thyroid, kidney, breast, prostate, and a gynecological disorder. Increased anxiety symptoms were found in 36% of patients and depressive symptoms in 14%. Similarly, 64% of patients experienced moderate or high stress. Six key themes were identified, including uncertainty, life changes, coping strategies, communication, experience, and health services. Participants discussed substantial distress associated with lifestyle changes and uncertain treatment timelines. Participants identified quality communication with their healthcare team and individualized coping strategies as being partially protective against such symptoms. Delays in surgery for patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in extensive psychosocial distress. Patients may be able to mitigate these symptoms partially through various coping mechanisms and improved communication with their healthcare teams.

Six-year follow-up of aortic valve reoperation rates: Carpentier-Edwards Perimount versus St. Jude Medical Trifecta.

BACKGROUND: The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valves have a proven track record in aortic valve replacement: good durability, hemodynamic performance, rates of survival, and low rates of valve-related complications and prosthesis-patient mismatch. The St. Jude Medical Trifecta is a newer valve that has shown comparable early and midterm outcomes. Studies show reoperation rates of Trifecta are comparable with Perimount valves, with a few recent studies bringing into focus early structural valve deterioration (SVD), and increased midterm SVD in younger patients. Given that midterm data for Trifecta is still sparse, we wanted to confirm the early low reoperation rates of Trifecta persist over time compared with Perimount. METHODS: The Maritime Heart Centre Database was searched for AVR between 2011 and 2016, inclusive. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause reoperation rate. RESULTS: In total, 711 Perimount and 453 Trifecta implantations were included. The reoperation hazards were determined for age: 0.96 (0.92-0.99; p = .02), female (vs. male): 0.35 (0.08-1.53; p = .16), smoker (vs. nonsmoker): 2.44 (0.85-7.02; p = .1), and Trifecta (vs. Perimount): 2.68 (0.97-7.39; p = .06). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in subgroups-age <60, age ≥60, male, female, smoker, and nonsmoker-showed Perimount having lower reoperation rates than Trifecta in patients younger than 60 (p = .02) and current smokers (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of reoperation of Perimount and Trifecta were comparable, with Trifecta showing higher rates in patients younger than 60 years, and current smokers. Continued diligence and further independent reporting of midterm reoperation and SVD rates of the Trifecta, including detailed echocardiographic follow-up, are needed to confirm these findings.

Exploiting Machine Learning Algorithms and Methods for the Prediction of Agitated Delirium After Cardiac Surgery: Models Development and Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a temporary mental disorder that occasionally affects patients undergoing surgery, especially cardiac surgery. It is strongly associated with major adverse events, which in turn leads to increased cost and poor outcomes (eg, need for nursing home due to cognitive impairment, stroke, and death). The ability to foresee patients at risk of delirium will guide the timely initiation of multimodal preventive interventions, which will aid in reducing the burden and negative consequences associated with delirium. Several studies have focused on the prediction of delirium. However, the number of studies in cardiac surgical patients that have used machine learning methods is very limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the application of several machine learning predictive models that can pre-emptively predict delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and compare their performance. METHODS: We investigated a number of machine learning methods to develop models that can predict delirium after cardiac surgery. A clinical dataset comprising over 5000 actual patients who underwent cardiac surgery in a single center was used to develop the models using logistic regression, artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), Bayesian belief networks (BBN), naïve Bayesian, random forest, and decision trees. RESULTS: Only 507 out of 5584 patients (11.4%) developed delirium. We addressed the underlying class imbalance, using random undersampling, in the training dataset. The final prediction performance was validated on a separate test dataset. Owing to the target class imbalance, several measures were used to evaluate algorithm's performance for the delirium class on the test dataset. Out of the selected algorithms, the SVM algorithm had the best F1 score for positive cases, kappa, and positive predictive value (40.2%, 29.3%, and 29.7%, respectively) with a P=.01, .03, .02, respectively. The ANN had the best receiver-operator area-under the curve (78.2%; P=.03). The BBN had the best precision-recall area-under the curve for detecting positive cases (30.4%; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Although delirium is inherently complex, preventive measures to mitigate its negative effect can be applied proactively if patients at risk are prospectively identified. Our results highlight 2 important points: (1) addressing class imbalance on the training dataset will augment machine learning model's performance in identifying patients likely to develop postoperative delirium, and (2) as the prediction of postoperative delirium is difficult because it is multifactorial and has complex pathophysiology, applying machine learning methods (complex or simple) may improve the prediction by revealing hidden patterns, which will lead to cost reduction by prevention of complications and will optimize patients' outcomes.

Evaluation of the Performance of the Cobas CT/NG Test for Use on the Cobas 6800/8800 Systems for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Male and Female Urogenital Samples.

The clinical performance of the Cobas CT/NG assay on the Cobas 6800/8800 systems (Cobas) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae was established in a multisite, prospective collection study using male and female urogenital specimens; supportive data from archived specimens were also included. The results obtained with the Cobas assay were compared with the patient infected status derived from a combination of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved nucleic acid amplification tests to determine the sensitivity and specificity of detection from each sample type. The sensitivity of Cobas for the detection of C. trachomatis in female specimens was 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.4% to 97.4%) for urine; 98.6% (95% CI, 95.2% to 99.6%) and 99.2% (95% CI, 95.4% to 99.9%) for clinician- and self-collected vaginal swab specimens, respectively; 93.3% (95% CI, 89.6% to 95.7%) for endocervical swabs; and 92.5% (95% CI, 88.7% to 95.1%) for cervical swab samples in PreservCyt. The specificity for the detection of C. trachomatis was ≥98.8% for all female sample types. Sensitivity and specificity estimates of Cobas for the detection of C. trachomatis in male urine samples were 100% (96.8% to 100.0%) and 99.7% (95% CI, 99.2% to 99.9%), respectively. The sensitivity of Cobas for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae in female specimens was 94.8% (95% CI, 89.6% to 97.4%) for urine; 100.0% (95% CI, 87.9% to 100.0%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 87.9% to 100.0%) for clinician- and self-collected vaginal swab specimens, respectively; 97.0% (95% CI, 91.5% to 99.0%) for endocervical swabs; and 96.6% (95% CI, 90.6% to 98.8%) for cervical samples in PreservCyt; the specificity for all female sample types was >99.0%. The sensitivity and specificity of Cobas for detecting N. gonorrhoeae in male urine were 100.0% (95% CI, 95.8% to 100.0%) and 99.5% (95% CI, 98.8% to 99.8%), respectively. Fully automated assays help fill the clinical need for a sensitive, high-throughput screening tool to aid public health efforts to control C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections.

A noninferiority randomized controlled trial to compare transabdominal and transvaginal sonography for eligibility assessment prior to medical abortion.

OBJECTIVES: To compare transabdominal sonography (TAS) to transvaginal sonography (TVS) in medical abortion eligibility assessment, specifically to measure how often clinicians chose to order additional testing for eligibility assessment following TAS and TVS, and to look for differences by patient and clinician characteristics. Also, to compare patient acceptability between the two modalities. STUDY DESIGN: This pragmatic multisite randomized noninferiority trial compared TAS to TVS at 10 New York City and New Jersey health centers that provide medical abortion. Women seeking medical abortion were randomized 1:1 to receive TAS or TVS. Following the study ultrasound examination, clinicians determined whether participants were eligible for medical abortion based on these results or warranted further testing. All participants completed an acceptability questionnaire. We compared additional testing and acceptability between TAS and TVS. RESULTS: Of those randomized to TAS, 63/317 (19.9%) received additional testing compared to 15/312 (4.8%) randomized to TVS. After TAS, most additional testing consisted of a same-day TVS. Other tests included ß-hCG testing, scheduled repeat sonography or return visit. After TAS, 13.4% seen by physicians and 27.6% seen by advanced practice nurses (APNs) received additional testing (p<.01). Additional testing was more common in early gestational ages for both groups. We enrolled too few women with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2 to make comparisons. Participants found TAS more acceptable than TVS, and two thirds preferred TAS for future care. CONCLUSIONS: TAS provided sufficient information for clinicians to assess medical abortion eligibility without additional tests for most patients. However, the frequency of additional testing was exceedingly close to our predefined noninferiority boundary. Why APNs ordered substantially more additional testing than physicians is unclear. TAS was more acceptable to patients than TVS. IMPLICATIONS: TVS use requires high-level disinfection, which is resource-intensive and thus can be a barrier to care. Instead, TAS can be first-line for most women, reducing resources needed to provide medical abortion. Further research could help to establish gestational age and BMI thresholds beyond which TVS would be a more informative first test. We also need to evaluate whether additional training in using TAS would decrease additional testing.

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the anticipated difficult airway: a case report and systematic review.

While extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an effective method of oxygenation for patients with respiratory failure, further refinement of its incorporation into airway guidelines is needed. We present a case of severe glottic stenosis from advanced thyroid carcinoma in which gas exchange was facilitated by veno-arterial ECMO prior to achieving a definitive airway. We also conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, using the keywords "airway/ tracheal obstruction", "anesthesia", "extracorporeal", and "cardiopulmonary bypass" to identify reports where ECMO was initiated as the a priori method of oxygenation during difficult airway management.Thirty-six papers were retrieved discussing the use of ECMO or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for the management of critical airway obstruction. Forty-five patients underwent pre-induction of anesthesia institution of CPB or ECMO for airway obstruction. The patients presenting with critical airway obstruction had a range of airway pathologies with tracheal tumours (31%), tracheal stenosis (20%), and head and neck cancers (20%) being the most common. All cases reported a favourable patient outcome with all patients surviving to hospital discharge without significant complications.While most practitioners are familiar with the fundamental airway techniques of bag-mask ventilation, supraglottic airway use, tracheal intubation, and front-of-neck airway access for oxygenation, these techniques have limitations in managing patients with pre-existing severe airway obstruction. The use of ECMO should be considered in patients with severe (or near-complete) airway obstruction secondary to anterior neck or tracheal disease. This approach can provide essential tissue oxygenation while attempts to secure a definitive airway are carried out in a controlled environment.

Perioperative prediction of agitated (hyperactive) delirium after cardiac surgery in adults - The development of a practical scorecard.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a temporary mental disorder that occurs frequently among hospitalized patients. In this study we sought to develop a user-friendly scorecard based on perioperative features to identify patients at risk of developing agitated delirium after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery in a single center. A parsimonious predictive model was created, with subsequent internal validation. Then a simple scorecard was developed that can be used to predict the probability of agitated delirium. RESULTS: Among the 5584 patients who met the study criteria, 614 (11.4%) developed postoperative agitated delirium. Independent predictors of postoperative agitated delirium were age, male gender, history of cerebrovascular disease, procedure other than isolated Coronary Arteries Bypass Surgery, transfusion of blood products within the first 48h, mechanical ventilation for >24h, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit. The scorecard stratified patients into 4 categories at risk of postoperative agitated delirium ranging from <5% to >30%. CONCLUSION: Using a large cohort of adult patient's undergoing cardiac surgery, a user-friendly scorecard was developed and validated, which will facilitate the implementation of timely interventions to mitigate adverse effects of agitated delirium in this high risk population.

Toward Optimal Decision Making among Vulnerable Patients Referred for Cardiac Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient and Provider Perspectives.

OBJECTIVES: Comprehension of risks, benefits, and alternative treatment options has been shown to be poor among patients referred for cardiac interventions. Patients' values and preferences are rarely explicitly sought. An increasing proportion of frail and older patients are undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures with increased risk of both mortality and prolonged institutional care. We sought input from patients and caregivers to determine the optimal approach to decision making in this vulnerable patient population. METHODS: Focus groups were held with both providers and former patients. Three focus groups were convened for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG), Valve, or CABG +Valve patients ≥ 70 y old (2-y post-op, ≤ 8-wk post-op, complicated post-op course) (n = 15). Three focus groups were convened for Intermediate Medical Care Unit (IMCU) nurses, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses, surgeons, anesthesiologists and cardiac intensivists (n = 20). We used a semi-structured interview format to ask questions surrounding the informed consent process. Transcribed audio data was analyzed to develop consistent and comprehensive themes. RESULTS: We identified 5 main themes that influence the decision making process: educational barriers, educational facilitators, patient autonomy and perceived autonomy, patient and family expectations of care, and decision making advocates. All themes were influenced by time constraints experienced in the current consent process. Patient groups expressed a desire to receive information earlier in their care to allow time to identify personal values and preferences in developing plans for treatment. Both groups strongly supported a formal approach for shared decision making with a decisional coach to provide information and facilitate communication with the care team. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the barriers and facilitators to patient and caretaker engagement in decision making is a key step in the development of a structured, patient-centered SDM approach. Intervention early in the decision process, the use of individualized decision aids that employ graphic risk presentations, and a dedicated decisional coach were identified by patients and providers as approaches with a high potential for success. The impact of such a formalized shared decision making process in cardiac surgery on decisional quality will need to be formally assessed. Given the trend toward older and frail patients referred for complex cardiac procedures, the need for an effective shared decision making process is compelling.

The Importance of Continued Quality Improvement Efforts in Monitoring Hospital-Acquired Infection Rates: A Cardiac Surgery Experience.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired infections have been suggested to affect patients' outcomes and raise health care costs. However, research regarding the change in rates and types of infections over time remains limited. METHODS: All patients who underwent cardiac surgical procedures from 1995 to 2012 at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center in Halifax, Canada were identified. The prevalence of superficial surgical site infection (sSSI), deep surgical site infection (dSSI), urinary tract infection, sepsis, pneumonia, and leg site infection was examined to determine trends in infections over time. Nonparsimonious logistic regression models were created to identify independent preoperative predictors of length of stay and infection onset. RESULTS: A total of 19,333 consecutive patients underwent cardiac surgical procedures, of whom 2,726 (14%) contracted at least one postoperative infection. The incidence of infections increased from 8% to 20% during the 17-year span (p < 0.0001). The overall prevalence of infection types, from highest to lowest, was pneumonia (6%), urinary tract infection (6%), sepsis (3%), sSSI (2%), leg infection (2%), and dSSI (1%). After adjusting for clinical differences, postoperative infection was found to be an independent predictor of length of stay longer than 9 days. In turn, independent predictors for contracting a postoperative infection included operative era, advanced age of patients, and complex procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of infection increased nearly threefold since 1995 independent of patient- or procedure-related variables and was found to affect hospital length of stay significantly. Our findings highlight that efforts to monitor only rates of hospital-acquired infections may not in isolation help affect patient care.

A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing CABG surgery performed with total arterial grafts or without.

OBJECTIVE: To date only a few randomized controlled studies have compared grafting strategies in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease. This study represents a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of a trial comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG) and CABG performed with total arterial grafting (TAG). METHODS: Consenting patients undergoing non-redo isolated CABG surgery at a single institution were randomized to TAG or LIMA+SVG groups. Exclusion criteria included prior CABG, emergent procedure, concomitant procedure, varicose veins and renal dysfunction. The primary endpoints were: enrolment >20% and completion of CT coronary angiography at 6 months >80%. Statistical investigation was performed on an intention to treat analysis. RESULTS: Of 421 eligible patients, 60 were enrolled and 2 withdrew (n = 30 in TAG, n = 28 LIMA+SVG) for 14% enrolment rate. Patient characteristics were similar in each group. No patients died in hospital and adverse events such as MI, stroke and deep sternal wound infection were not significantly different between groups. Clinical follow-up was complete in 100% of patients, with 44/58 (76%) undergoing CT coronary angio at 6 months. Graft occlusion occurred in 2 patients in each group for patency rates of 89% (TAG) and 91% (LIMA+SVG). CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that an RCT comparing grafting strategy is possible but also show that achieving recruitment or follow-up CT may be difficult. Given the excellent patency results and little difference between groups, our findings suggest that the sample size required may make it infeasible to compare graft patency at 6 months as a study end-point. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized Controlled Trial number: ISRCTN80270323 . Few RCT's exist comparing conventional CABG performed with a LIMA-LAD plus saphenous vein grafts (LIMA+SVG) compared to CABG performed with total arterial grafting (TAG). This study is a pilot RCT designed to test the feasibility of such a trial and identify pitfalls.

Does more than a single chest tube for mediastinal drainage affect outcomes after cardiac surgery?

BACKGROUND: The use of 1 or more mediastinal chest tubes has traditionally been routine for all cardiac surgery procedures to deal with bleeding. However, it remains unproven whether multiple chest tubes offer a benefit over a single chest tube. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery (2005-2010) received at least 1 chest tube at the time of surgery based on surgeon preference. Patients were grouped into those receiving a single chest tube (SCT) and those receiving multiple chest tubes (MCT). The primary outcome was return to the operating room for bleeding or tamponade. RESULTS: A total of 5698 consecutive patients were assigned to 2 groups: 3045 to the SCT and 2653 to the MCT group. Patients in the SCT group were older, more often female and less likely to undergo isolated coronary artery bypass graft than those in the MCT group. Unadjusted outcomes for SCT and MCT, respectively, were return to the operating room for bleeding or tamponade (4.7% v. 5.0%; p = 0.50), intensive care unit stay longer than 48 hours (25.5% v. 27.9%; p = 0.041, postoperative stay > 9 days (31.5% v. 33.1%; p = 0.20) and mortality (3.8% v. 4.6%; p = 0.16). Logistic regression analysis, adjusted for clinical differences between groups, showed that the number of chest tubes was not associated with return to the operating room for bleeding or tamponade. CONCLUSION: The use of multiple mediastinal chest tubes after cardiac surgery confers no advantage over a single chest tube in preventing return to the operating room for bleeding or tamponade.

Myocardium at risk is associated with adverse clinical events in women but not in men, after coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Factors responsible for this observation include smaller coronary size and delayed presentation. To date, no studies have examined the effect of the degree of myocardium at risk (MAR) on the relationship between female sex and adverse postoperative events. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing first-time isolated CABG at a single institution from 2002-2007 were identified. MAR was calculated using the weighted Duke Index and was categorized as low, moderate, or high. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to compare the impact of MAR on adverse clinical events. RESULTS: We identified 3741 patients, 3325 (89%) of whom had complete angiographic data. Women (n = 755) were older (P = 0.0001) and presented more often with hypertension (P = 0.0001), diabetes (P = 0.0001), heart failure (P = 0.0001), and an urgent/emergent situation (P = 0.002). After surgery, women experienced greater rates of adverse events (15.2% vs 9.3%; P = 0.0001). In a fully adjusted logistic regression model, the nested interaction of sex in MAR showed that women had a significantly greater risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when MAR was high (odds ratio [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.6; P = 0.0004). Greater severity of MAR emerged as an independent predictor of adverse events among women (high: OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.3; moderate: OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 0.8-5.7; low: OR, 1.0), but not among men. CONCLUSIONS: MAR was independently associated with higher rates of adverse events among women but not in men undergoing CABG. This finding may help explain differences in outcomes seen between women and men after revascularization.

The changing face of cardiac surgery: practice patterns and outcomes 2001-2010.

BACKGROUND: Advances in cardiac surgical care have allowed for successful surgery in high-risk elderly patients. Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques and expanded indications for PCI have resulted in a decrease in referrals for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Our objective was to document changes in practice patterns and outcomes in a single tertiary cardiac surgery centre serving a large geographic area. METHODS: For all cardiac surgery cases performed from 2001-2010 we examined its use, patient clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Frailty was assessed using a measure we have previously demonstrated to be associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, annual case volume decreased by 13%. The number of isolated CABG cases declined, and valve surgery and other complex procedures increased. The proportion of patients aged ≥ 80 years rose from 7%-12%, and the proportion of frail patients increased from 4%-10%. Although unadjusted in-hospital mortality remained relatively unchanged, intensive care unit (ICU) stays and prolonged institutional care increased. Older age and frailty were associated with mortality, prolonged ICU stays, prolonged institutional care, and a composite of mortality and major morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed a decline in CABG, an increase in more complex operations, and an increase in prolonged ICU stays and prolonged institutional care. The proportion of frail and elderly patients increased over time and these patient groups were at higher risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. Particular attention is required in the decision for surgery and perioperative management of these patients.