Rapid real-world data analysis of patients with cancer, with and without COVID-19, across distinct health systems.

BACKGROUND: The understanding of the impact of COVID-19 in patients with cancer is evolving, with need for rapid analysis. AIMS: This study aims to compare the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with cancer (with and without COVID-19) and characterize the clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: Real-world data (RWD) from two health systems were used to identify 146 702 adults diagnosed with cancer between 2015 and 2020; 1267 COVID-19 cases were identified between February 1 and July 30, 2020. Demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic characteristics were extracted. Incidence of all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and invasive respiratory support was assessed between February 1 and August 14, 2020. Among patients with cancer, patients with COVID-19 were more likely to be Non-Hispanic black (NHB), have active cancer, have comorbidities, and/or live in zip codes with median household income <$30 000. Patients with COVID-19 living in lower-income areas and NHB patients were at greatest risk for hospitalization from pneumonia, fluid and electrolyte disorders, cough, respiratory failure, and acute renal failure and were more likely to receive hydroxychloroquine. All-cause mortality, hospital admission, and invasive respiratory support were more frequent among patients with cancer and COVID-19. Male sex, increasing age, living in zip codes with median household income <$30 000, history of pulmonary circulation disorders, and recent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy were associated with greater odds of all-cause mortality in multivariable logistic regression models. CONCLUSION: RWD can be rapidly leveraged to understand urgent healthcare challenges. Patients with cancer are more vulnerable to COVID-19 effects, especially in the setting of active cancer and comorbidities, with additional risk observed in NHB patients and those living in zip codes with median household income <$30 000.

Data silos are undermining drug development and failing rare disease patients.

Data silos are proliferating while research and development activity explode following genetic and immunological advances for many clinically described disorders with previously unknown etiologies. The latter event has inspired optimism in the patient, clinical, and research communities that disease-specific treatments are on the way. However, we fear the tendency of various stakeholders to balkanize databases in proprietary formats, driven by current economic and academic incentives, will inevitably fragment the expanding knowledge base and undermine current and future research efforts to develop much-needed treatments. The proliferation of proprietary databases, compounded by a paucity of meaningful outcome measures and/or good natural history data, slows our ability to generate scalable solutions to benefit chronically underserved patient populations in ways that would translate to more common diseases. The current research and development landscape sets too many projects up for unnecessary failure, particularly in the rare disease sphere, and does a grave disservice to highly vulnerable patients. This system also encourages the collection of redundant data in uncoordinated parallel studies and registries to ultimately delay or deny potential treatments for ostensibly tractable diseases; it also promotes the waste of precious time, energy, and resources. Groups at the National Institutes of Health and Food and Drug Administration have started programs to address these issues. However, we and many others feel there should be significantly more discussion of how to coordinate and scale registry efforts. Such discourse aims to reduce needless complexity and duplication of efforts, as well as promote a pre-competitive knowledge ecosystem for rare disease drug development that cultivates and accelerates innovation.

COVID-19 Evidence Accelerator: A parallel analysis to describe the use of Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic remains a significant global threat. However, despite urgent need, there remains uncertainty surrounding best practices for pharmaceutical interventions to treat COVID-19. In particular, conflicting evidence has emerged surrounding the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, alone or in combination, for COVID-19. The COVID-19 Evidence Accelerator convened by the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA, in collaboration with Friends of Cancer Research, assembled experts from the health systems research, regulatory science, data science, and epidemiology to participate in a large parallel analysis of different data sets to further explore the effectiveness of these treatments. METHODS: Electronic health record (EHR) and claims data were extracted from seven separate databases. Parallel analyses were undertaken on data extracted from each source. Each analysis examined time to mortality in hospitalized patients treated with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and the two in combination as compared to patients not treated with either drug. Cox proportional hazards models were used, and propensity score methods were undertaken to adjust for confounding. Frequencies of adverse events in each treatment group were also examined. RESULTS: Neither hydroxychloroquine nor azithromycin, alone or in combination, were significantly associated with time to mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. No treatment groups appeared to have an elevated risk of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Administration of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and their combination appeared to have no effect on time to mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Continued research is needed to clarify best practices surrounding treatment of COVID-19.

European Registry on Helicobacter pylori management (Hp-EuReg): First-line Therapy in Israel.

BACKGROUND: The antibiotic resistance profile of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is constantly changing. Up-to-date and reliable data for the effectiveness of first-line H. pylori treatment protocols are necessary to provide evidence-based best-practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness, compliance and safety of first-line treatment for H. pylori in Israel. METHODS: An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted in tertiary referral centers in Israel, as part of the European registry on H. pylori management (Hp-EuReg). H. pylori-infected patients were included from 2013 to March 2020. Data collected included demographics, clinical data, diagnostic tests, previous eradication attempts, current treatment, compliance, adverse events, and treatment outcome result. RESULTS: In total, 242 patients were registered, including 121 (50%) who received first-line therapy, 41% of these individuals received clarithromycin based triple therapy and 58.9% received a four-drug regimen. The overall effectiveness of first-line therapy was 85% and 86% by modified intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. The effectiveness of both sequential and concomitant therapies was 100% while clarithromycin-based triple therapy achieved an eradication rate of 79%. Treatment eradication was higher among patients who received high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) compared to those treated with low dose PPI (100% vs. 81.5% respectively, P < 0.01). No difference in treatment effectiveness was found between 7-, 10-, and 14-day treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of clarithromycin-based triple therapy is suboptimal. First-line treatment of H. pylori infection should consist of four drugs, including high dose PPI, according to international guidelines.

Gender-based effect of statins on functional decline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Recently an association between statins and the onset and more rapid disease course of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) was reported, while other studies rejected such a link. The role of gender in that controversy is unclear. We evaluated the gender-specific effect of statins on the rate of functional decline in patients with ALS, based on data retrieved from the medical records of all ALS patients who participated in two previously reported clinical trials on the efficacy of topiramate and of celecoxib in ALS. The topiramate trial enrolled 294 patients, 28 (9.5%) of whom were statin users (20 males). The celecoxib trial enrolled 300 patients, 25 (8.3%) of whom were statin users (17 males). Statins had no effect on the functional decline in the celecoxib trial, but they did have a negative impact on disease course in the topiramate trial. When males and females were analyzed separately, the functional decline of females taking statins was significantly greater than that of males in both trials. Our results indicate that statins affect possibly negatively ALS progression among females but not males. They emphasize the need to consider gender in future analyses of drug effects.

Clinical evaluation of a titanium, headless variable-pitched tapered cannulated compression screw for repair of frontal plane slab fractures of the third carpal bone in thoroughbred racehorses.

OBJECTIVE: To report clinical evaluation of third carpal bone (C3) frontal plane slab fracture repair with the Acutrak screw system. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. SAMPLE POPULATION: Racing Thoroughbreds (n=17) with frontal C3 slab fractures. METHODS: C3 slab fractures in Thoroughbred racehorses (1999-2004) were repaired by use of the Acutrak screw system. Data collected were (1) preoperative variables--gender, age at injury, limb involved, injury occurrence, fracture thickness, complexity, and displacement, race starts and earnings and (2) postoperative variables were: surgical complications, days to first start, race starts, and earnings. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pre- and postoperative starts and earnings; significance was set at P<.05. RESULTS: Seventeen Thoroughbred racehorses (12 females, 3 males, 2 geldings) were enrolled. Mean (+/-SD) age at injury was 3.3+/-1.0 years. Right carpi (10) were affected more than left (7). Ten injuries occurred during training, 7 during racing. Twelve of 15 horses that raced before injury returned to racing. Average days to first start was 349.3+/-153.9 days. Horses that returned to racing had more starts after repair (median, 6.5 versus 3.5; P=.04) and did not have decreased earnings per start (median, $2452 versus $3061; P=.30). CONCLUSION: The Acutrak screw system is a useful repair technique for frontal C3 slab fractures in Thoroughbred racehorses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adequate reduction and stability of C3 slab fractures can be achieved with the Acutrak screw system, decreasing the likelihood of fragment splitting and screw head impingement on carpal soft tissues.

Albugranin, a recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) genetically fused to recombinant human albumin induces prolonged myelopoietic effects in mice and monkeys.

PURPOSE: Albugranin fusion protein is recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rG-CSF) genetically fused at its N-terminus to the C-terminus of recombinant serum human albumin and is expected to have a relatively long half-life compared with rG-CSF alone. In this study, the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of Albugranin were evaluated in BDF1 mice and cynomolgus monkeys. METHODS: Single doses of Albugranin (0.25-5 mg/kg) or Filgrastim (methionyl rG-CSF, 0.25, or 1.25 mg/kg) were administered subcutaneously (SC) to mice and multiple doses of Albugranin (25-100 microg/kg every 4 or 7 days) or Filgrastim (5 microg/kg daily) were administered SC for 14 days to monkeys for hematologic evaluation. For pharmacokinetics studies, mice were injected intravenously (IV) or SC with single doses of Albugranin (0.25-1.25 mg/kg) or Filgrastim (0.25 mg/ kg) and monkeys were injected SC with multiple doses of Albugranin (100-1,000 microg/kg once weekly for 5 weeks). Plasma levels of Albugranin and Filgrastim were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: In mice, administration of Albugranin effectively increased the number of peripheral granulocytes and mobilized hematopoietic progenitor cells for up to 5 days. The magnitude and duration of this effect were dose-dependent. In contrast, administration of Filgrastim resulted in a small increase in both cell types on day 1 only. Albugranin administered to cynomolgus monkeys caused an increase in peripheral neutrophils, with a less prominent increase in peripheral monocytes. Albugranin-induced neutrophilia peaked 24 h following each dose administration. Administration of Filgrastim daily in monkeys resulted in moderate increases in neutrophils that were maximal on days 8-12 during the course of treatment. Compared with Filgrastim, Albugranin had a longer terminal half-life (t(1/2,term)) and mean residence time (MRT), and slower clearance (CL/F) in mice. The t(1/2,term), MRT, and CL/F of Albugranin following SC administration to BDF1 mice were 5.6-5.7 h, 16.7-20.7 h, and 6.37-12.2 mL/h/kg, respectively, compared with 2.54 h, 4.9 h, and 164 mL/h/kg, respectively for Filgrastim. In cynomolgus monkeys, the corresponding values of t(1/2,term), MRT, and CL/F for Albugranin were 7.73-133 h, 19.4-27.3 h, and 7.90-27.5 mL/h/kg, respectively, for doses of 100-1000 microg/kg. An exposure-response relationship that could be empirically described with a simple Emax model with baseline was found between day 15 absolute neutrophil count and area under the curve following the first dose in cynomolgus monkeys. CONCLUSION: The sustained activity of Albugranin in mice and monkeys demonstrated in these studies suggests that this agent could be given less frequently than Filgrastim to achieve similar therapeutic effects in patients.