EVALUATION OF RADIATION DOSE IN MULTI-SLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY PROTOCOLS OF HEAD AND NECK REGIONS.

In head and neck computed tomography (CT) imaging, the optimisation of radiation dose is crucial due to the presence of radio-sensitive organs. This study aimed to evaluate the radiation dose in multi-slice CT for head and neck examinations. Volume CT dose index, dose length product and effective dose (E) were assessed for 10 head and neck CT scans performed on 292 adult patients (mean age 49.2 ± 15.9 y). The study resulted in median E values of 0.82, 1.62, 2.43, 0.93, 1.70, 0.83, 3.55, 6.25, 2.19 and 5.26 mSv, respectively, for sinuses (non-contrast (NC)), sinuses (NC) and contrast-enhanced (CE), petrous bone (PTB)/internal auditory meatus (IAM) (NC + CE), PTB/IAM (NC), orbit (NC + CE), orbit (NC), brain with the orbit (NC), brain CT angiography (CTA) subtraction, neck (NC) and brain/neck (NC). Furthermore, the overall radiation doses of this institution were found to be below the values suggested by similar studies. However, optimisation of the dose is required for brain CTA.

DETERMINATION OF ENTRANCE SURFACE DOSE FOR THREE COMMON PLANAR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.

Patient dose during diagnostic radiography procedures primarily depends on the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the exposure area. The purpose of this study was to determine ESD for five common diagnostic X-ray examinations using dose area product and X-ray tube output. The ESDs were estimated in a sample of 340 patients using normalised X-ray output from Philips-PrimaryDiagnost digital X-ray machine equipped with digital flat panel scintillator detector. The resultant mean ESDs for chest postero-anterior/lateral, lumbar spine antero-posterior (AP)/lateral and abdomen AP were 0.49, 2.00, 5.74, 12.79 and 4.62 mGy, respectively. The mean and third quartile ESD values of this study were significantly higher than the values found in the literature. This can be attributed to the lower tube potential (kVp) values and the higher tube current-time products (mAs). The methodology used here is a better option for low-resources countries for routine dose monitoring.