Evaluation of the effects of sugarcane processing on the presence of GM DNA and protein in sugar.

The Brazilian Sucro-energy Sector produces both energy, in the form of ethanol fuel, industrial steam and electricity, and sugar. Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira (CTC), the leading Brazilian sugarcane breeding company, has developed a pipeline of insect-protected sugarcane varieties to control sugarcane borer damage. The goal of this manuscript is to present the results of studies with three genetically modified (GM) sugarcane varieties and to evaluate the published literature regarding the possible presence of GM sugarcane DNA or protein in raw or refined sugar. Specifically, two varieties of approved GM sugarcane, CTC91087-6 and CTC175-A, and an experimental CTC variety, were grown in four individual plots to produce four batches each of processed raw sugar using standard smaller-scale laboratory processing methods resulting in a total of 12 independent batches of raw sugar. Herein, we report the development of event-specific probes and DNA detection methods, designed to detect the junction of sugarcane genomic DNA and the inserted DNA of the two approved GM varieties. An identical approach was used for the testing of sugar made from the experimental CTC variety. The methodology used TaqMan® real-time PCR and ELISA assays validated for the four GM proteins expressed by these three events (Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, NPTII, and PAT (bar)). The developed assays had very low limits of detection (LODs) for the various event-specific DNA probes (7.2-25 ng/g sugar) and insecticidal and selectable marker proteins (2.9-10.9 ng/g sugar). No event-specific DNA and no GM proteins were detectable in the 12 independent batches of raw sugar produced from these three GM sugarcane events. The results of this study, using very sensitive methods and testing several sugar batches, extend the conclusions of previous studies, reviewed herein, that showed the extensive degradation and removal of DNA and protein during sugarcane processing. Overall, these results indicate that there are no distinguishable differences between the highly purified, chemically defined sugar produced from conventional or GM varieties.

The insect-protected CTC91087-6 sugarcane event expresses Cry1Ac protein preferentially in leaves and presents compositional equivalence to conventional sugarcane.

A Cry1Ac-expressing sugarcane cultivar, CTC91087-6, has been developed by Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira (CTC) to be resistant to the sugarcane borer (Diatraea saccharalis). This genetically modified event was developed using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and the help of the selectable marker phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase (PAT) expressed from bar gene. We describe here a detailed characterization of CTC91087-6 event with respect to protein expression, nutritional composition, and assessment of its derived DNA and proteins in raw sugar. Expression of the Cry1Ac and PAT (bar) proteins produced by CTC91087-6 was evaluated in different tissues and at different times during the growing season. The new proteins are preferentially expressed in leaves, are produced at low levels in stalks, and are near the limits of detection in root tissues. The levels of Cry1Ac were much higher than PAT in all evaluated tissues. Furthermore, Cry1Ac levels in CTC91087-6 leaves are stable at various times during sugarcane cultivation cycle, assuring borer control throughout the complete crop cycle. Assessment of CTC91087-6 tissues for key food and feed nutrients as recommended by OECD to assess the safety of new varieties of sugarcane showed compositional equivalence to the conventional counterpart CTC9001 and to other commercial sugarcane varieties used as references. Raw sugar samples produced from CTC91087-6 did not contain DNA corresponding to cry1Ac and bar genes nor DNA specifically derived from CTC91087-6. In a similar way, there is no detection of Cry1Ac and PAT proteins in raw sugar produced from CTC91087-6. Taken together these results show that CTC91087-6 stably expresses Cry1Ac and PAT proteins and is substantially equivalent to the conventional counterpart CTC9001.

A General Safety Assessment for Purified Food Ingredients Derived From Biotechnology Crops: Case Study of Brazilian Sugar and Beverages Produced From Insect-Protected Sugarcane.

Insect-protected sugarcane that expresses Cry1Ab has been developed in Brazil. Analysis of trade information has shown that effectively all the sugarcane-derived Brazilian exports are raw or refined sugar and ethanol. The fact that raw and refined sugar are highly purified food ingredients, with no detectable transgenic protein, provides an interesting case study of a generalized safety assessment approach. In this study, both the theoretical protein intakes and safety assessments of Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, NPTII, and Bar proteins used in insect-protected biotechnology crops were examined. The potential consumption of these proteins was examined using local market research data of average added sugar intakes in eight diverse and representative Brazilian raw and refined sugar export markets (Brazil, Canada, China, Indonesia, India, Japan, Russia, and the USA). The average sugar intakes, which ranged from 5.1 g of added sugar/person/day (India) to 126 g sugar/p/day (USA) were used to calculated possible human exposure. The theoretical protein intake estimates were carried out in the "Worst-case" scenario, assumed that 1 µg of newly-expressed protein is detected/g of raw or refined sugar; and the "Reasonable-case" scenario assumed 1 ng protein/g sugar. The "Worst-case" scenario was based on results of detailed studies of sugarcane processing in Brazil that showed that refined sugar contains less than 1 µg of total plant protein /g refined sugar. The "Reasonable-case" scenario was based on assumption that the expression levels in stalk of newly-expressed proteins were less than 0.1% of total stalk protein. Using these calculated protein intake values from the consumption of sugar, along with the accepted NOAEL levels of the four representative proteins we concluded that safety margins for the "Worst-case" scenario ranged from 6.9 × 105 to 5.9 × 107 and for the "Reasonable-case" scenario ranged from 6.9 × 108 to 5.9 × 1010. These safety margins are very high due to the extremely low possible exposures and the high NOAELs for these non-toxic proteins. This generalized approach to the safety assessment of highly purified food ingredients like sugar illustrates that sugar processed from Brazilian GM varieties are safe for consumption in representative markets globally.