Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: why women take longer to recover.

BACKGROUND: Recovery following successful coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been dramatically improved with the use of fast-track methods. Although data exist that demonstrate a significant gender difference in survival following CABG, little is known about factors influencing gender-specific recovery. This report describes a series of consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG to determine gender-associated factors that may impact outcomes and recovery. METHODS: Five hundred and seventeen consecutive patients underwent isolated CABG utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass and were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes of 351 men in the study were compared to the group of 160 women. A rapid recovery protocol focused on reduced cardiopulmonary bypass time, aggressive preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use, early extubation, perioperative administration of corticosteroids and thyroid hormone, aggressive diuresis and atrial fibrillation prevention was applied to all patients. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate for the women was 4.2% (Parsonnet risk 16.3+/-9.0) compared with 3.4% (Parsonnet risk 9.9+/-7.5) for the men. There were no statistically significant differences in the 30-day mortality rates or postoperative complication rates between the women and men. The women, however, were found to be older (71+/- years versus 65+/- years, p<0.001), and to have a higher incidence of acute myocardial infarction (31% versus 20%, p<0.05), obesity (23% versus 10%, p <0.05), diabetes (31% versus 22%, p<0.05), hypertension (65% versus 48%, p<0.001), and symptomatic vascular disease (20% versus 12%, p<0.05). The women required fewer bypass grafts (2.9 versus 3.5 grafts, p<0.001), and consequently, had shorter cross and cardiopulmonary bypass times. Rapid recovery with discharge before the fifth postoperative day was achieved in 30% of the women, in comparison to 44% of the men (p<0.01). The postoperative hospital length of stay was longer for the women in comparison to the men (7.2+/-7.1 versus 5.8+/-5.2 days, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Women had similar operative mortality and postoperative complication rates to men under a rapid recovery protocol. However, women have a longer recovery interval compared to men, which may be a reflection of their higher preoperative risk profile.

Initial experience with beating heart surgery: comparison with fast-track methods.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may increase postoperative complications in high-risk patients. The goal of this study is to retrospectively review a series of consecutive patients undergoing conventional CABG using a fast-track recovery method and to compare this series with the initial series of patients undergoing beating heart surgery using either the single-vessel minimally invasive approach or the off-pump multivessel bypass technique with a median sternotomy. One hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent CABG. One hundred four patients underwent conventional CABG using CPB with a short-pump fast-track recovery method (Group A). Twenty-nine patients underwent a single-vessel bypass via a left anterior thoracotomy off pump [Group B, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB)]. Twenty-five patients underwent multivessel CABG with a median sternotomy off pump (Group C). Short-pump fast-track (Group A) patients exhibited minimal complications and expedient recovery and received extensive revascularization. Off-pump multivessel patients (Group C) received fewer bypass grafts, had more preoperative comorbidity, and recovered as quickly as lower-risk fast-track short-pump patients (Group A). Single-vessel off-pump patients (Group B, MIDCAB) were younger elective patients and demonstrated no recovery advantage. The overall mortality was 1.8 per cent. The conversion rates from beating heart surgery to CPB for groups B and C were 10.3 and 16 per cent, respectively. The postoperative hospital length of stay for groups A, B, and C were 4.8+/-2.4, 3.9+/-1.8, and 5.2+/-2.3 days, respectively. Eliminating CPB is not as important as reducing exposure for minimizing operative risk. Beating heart surgery is an adjunct to conventional CABG with CPB. The off-pump multivessel bypass technique is best suited for high-risk patients requiring three grafts or fewer, whereas MIDCAB is best suited for single-vessel bypass that cannot be managed using interventional percutaneous techniques; however, the recovery advantage with MIDCAB is not apparent. Patients requiring more than three bypass grafts should undergo conventional CABG with CPB.

Reduced postoperative atrial fibrillation using multidrug prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AFIB) is the most common complication following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Despite three decades of recognition, efforts to reduce the high incidence reported (15%-30%) have been largely unsuccessful. Reasons for postoperative AFIB are likely multifactorial. As a result, we defined a multidrug prophylaxis based on agents known to be individually effective. This method was applied prospectively to a series of consecutive CABG patients with the goal of reducing the incidence of new-onset postoperative AFIB. METHODS: Isolated CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass was performed on 517 consecutive patients. A rapid recovery protocol emphasizing AFIB multidrug prophylaxis was applied to all patients. All patients received 10 microg of triiodothyronine intraoperatively when the clamp on the aorta was released. Immediately following CABG, parenteral magnesium was administered to assure a serum magnesium > 2.2 mEq/dL. Thyroxine 200 microg was administered parenterally to all patients on postoperative days 1 and 2. Metoprolol (25 mg to 100 mg/day) was begun on all patients after extubation provided: heart rate > 85 beats/min and systolic blood pressure > 130 mmHg. Parenteral procainamide (12 mg/kg) loading dose, followed by a maintenance dose (2 mg/min), was used for patients who developed premature atrial contractions (> 1/min), nonsustained supraventricular tachycardia, or any episodes of atrial fibrillation. All patients also received postoperative digitalization, steroids, and aggressive diuresis. RESULTS: The 30-day operative mortality was 3.7%. The overall incidence of new-onset postoperative AFIB was 10.3% (53 patients). There was no major difference in operative mortality (7.5% vs 3.2%, p = 0.23), Parsonnet risk score, or intraoperative variables between AFIB patients and the non-AFIB patients. Patients presenting with a preoperative acute myocardial infarction (p < 0.05), left main stenosis > or = 70% (p < 0.01), and advanced age > or = 70 years (p < 0.05) were at increased risk of developing AFIB. The length of stay for patients with AFIB was 9.9 +/- 9.6 days versus 5.9 +/- 5.2 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Application of a multidrug prophylaxis can reduce postoperative AFIB to a low incidence. Identification of associated clinical features can help predict patients at risk for postoperative AFIB. Additional strategies to target postoperative AFIB may include treatment at the earliest recognition of atrial rhythm instability.