Use of wearable technology in cardiac monitoring after cryptogenic stroke or embolic stroke of undetermined source: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged cardiac monitoring after cryptogenic stroke or embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is necessary to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) that requires anticoagulation. Wearable devices may improve AF detection compared to conventional management. We aimed to review the evidence for the use of wearable devices in post-cryptogenic stroke and post-ESUS monitoring. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and clinicaltrials.gov on 21 July 2022, identifying all studies that investigated the use of wearable devices in patients with cryptogenic stroke or ESUS. The outcomes of AF detection were analysed. Literature reports on electrocardiogram (ECG)-based (external wearable, handheld, patch, mobile cardiac telemetry [MCT], smartwatch) and photoplethysmography (PPG)-based (smartwatch, smartphone) devices were summarised. RESULTS: A total of 27 relevant studies were included (two randomised controlled trials, seven prospective trials, 10 cohort studies, six case series and two case reports). Only four studies compared wearable technology to Holter monitoring or implantable loop recorder, and these studies showed no significant differences on meta-analysis (odds ratio 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-7.48, I 2 = 70%). External wearable devices detected AF in 20.7% (95% CI 14.9-27.2, I 2 = 76%) of patients and MCT detected new AF in 9.6% (95% CI 7.4%-11.9%, I 2 = 56%) of patients. Other devices investigated included patch sensors, handheld ECG recorders and PPG-based smartphone apps, which demonstrated feasibility in the post-cryptogenic stroke and post-ESUS setting. CONCLUSION: Wearable devices that are ECG or PPG based are effective for paroxysmal AF detection after cryptogenic stroke and ESUS, but further studies are needed to establish how they compare with Holter monitors and implantable loop recorder.

Increased left ventricular remodelling index in paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction compared to normal-flow severe aortic stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with paradoxical low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis (AS) despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) appear distinct from normal-flow (NF) patients, showing worse prognosis, more concentric hypertrophy and smaller left ventricular (LV) cavities. The left ventricular remodelling index (LVRI) has been demonstrated to reliably discriminate between physiologically adapted athlete's heart and pathological LV remodelling. METHODS: We studied patients with index echocardiographic diagnosis of severe AS (aortic valve area <1 cm2) with preserved LVEF (>50%). The LVRI was determined by the ratio of the LV mass to the end-diastolic volume, as previously reported, and was compared between patients with LF and NF AS. Patients were prospectively followed up for at least 3 years, and clinical outcomes were examined in association with LVRI. RESULTS: Of the 450 patients studied, 112 (24.9%) had LF AS. While there were no significant differences in baseline clinical profile between LF and NF patients, LVRI was significantly higher in the LF group. Patients with high LVRI (>1.56 g/mL) had increased all-cause mortality (log-rank 9.18, P = 0.002) and were more likely to be admitted for cardiac failure (log-rank 7.61, P = 0.006) or undergo aortic valve replacement (log-rank 18.4, P < 0.001). After adjusting for the effect of age, hypertension, aortic valve area and mean pressure gradient on multivariate Cox regression, high LVRI remained independently associated with poor clinical outcomes (hazard ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.25, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Pathological LV remodelling (increased LVRI) was more common in patients with LF AS, and increased LVRI independently predicts worse clinical outcomes.

Comparison of short-term outcomes between patients with extracranial carotid and/or intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

OBJECTIVE: To directly compare the 90-day outcomes of patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD), extracranial carotid atherosclerotic disease (ECAD), and ICAD with concomitant ECAD. METHODS: From 2017-2021, patients who had (1) a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke within 30 days of admission as evaluated by a stroke neurologist and (2) ipsilateral ICAD and/or ECAD were prospectively enrolled. The cohort was divided into three groups: ICAD, ECAD, and ICAD with concomitant ECAD. The primary outcome assessed was 90-day ischemic stroke recurrence. Secondary outcomes included 90-day myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and/or nonfatal ischemic stroke). RESULTS: Of 371 patients included in the analysis, 240 (64.7%) patients had ICAD only, 93 (25.0%) patients had ECAD only, and 38 (10.3%) patients had ICAD with concomitant ECAD. On multivariate time-to-event analysis adjusting for potential confounders and with ICAD as the reference comparator, the risk of 90-day clinical outcomes was highest among patients with ICAD and concomitant ECAD, with adjusted hazard ratios of 4.54 (95% CI=1.45, 14.2; p = 0.006), 9.32 (95% CI=1.58, 54.8; p = 0.014), and 8.52 (95% CI=3.54, 20.5; p < 0.001) for 90-day ischemic stroke, MI, and MACE, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICAD and concomitant ECAD have a poorer prognosis and are at significantly higher risk for 90-day ischemic stroke, MI, and MACE. Further research should focus on the evaluation of coronary atherosclerotic disease and more intensive medical therapy in this population.

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation After Ischemic Stroke with an Insertable Cardiac Monitor: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVE: In ischemic stroke patients, we compared the use of insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) versus non-ICM methods of cardiac monitoring on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection and other clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the routine use of 12-lead electrocardiography or Holter monitoring for AF detection after ischemic stroke. Recent randomised controlled trials have investigated the impact of ICM versus non-ICM methods of cardiac monitoring for AF detection in this population. However, precise recommendations for monitoring post-stroke AF are lacking; including the optimal timing, duration, and method of electrocardiography monitoring. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on Embase and PubMed from database inception until 27 October 2022 to include randomised controlled trials that compared ICM with non-ICM methods of cardiac monitoring for post-stroke AF detection. This yielded 3 randomised controlled trials with a combined cohort of 1231 patients with a recent ischemic stroke. Individual patient data (IPD) was then reconstructed from Kaplan-Meier curves and analysed using the shared-frailty Cox model. An aggregate data meta-analysis was conducted for 1231 patients across all 3 studies for outcomes that could not be reconstructed using IPD. RESULTS: One-stage meta-analysis demonstrated an increase in the hazard ratio (HR 6.01, 95% CI 3.40-10.60; p<0.001) of AF detection in patients undergoing monitoring via ICM compared to standard care. Aggregate data meta analysis revealed a significant increase in initiation of anticoagulation (OR 3.09, 95% CI 2.05 - 4.66; p<0.00001) in the ICM group. However, no significant differences in the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack or death were found. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, we found that the use of ICM increased the detection rate of post-stroke AF and the rate of anticoagulation initiation. However, this did not translate into a reduced incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke.

Etiologies, mechanisms, and risk factors of ischemic stroke in a young Asian adult cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Risk factors and causes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are more diverse in young adults, and traditional stroke classifications may be inadequate. Precise characterisation of AIS is important for guiding management and prognostication. We describe stroke subtypes, risk factors and etiologies for AIS in a young Asian adult population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Young AIS patients aged 18-50 years admitted to two comprehensive stroke centres from 2020-2022 were included. Stroke etiologies and risk factors were adjudicated using Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and International Pediatric Stroke Study (IPSS) risk factors. Potential embolic sources (PES) were identified in a subgroup with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). These were compared across sex, ethnicities and age groups (18-39 years versus 40-50 years). RESULTS: A total of 276 AIS patients were included, with mean age 43±5.7 years and 70.3% male. Median duration of follow-up was 5 months (IQR: 3-10). The most common TOAST subtypes were small-vessel disease (32.6%) and undetermined etiology (24.6%). IPSS risk factors were identified in 95% of all patients and 90% with undetermined etiology. IPSS risk factors included atherosclerosis (59.5%), cardiac disorders (18.7%), prothrombotic states (12.4%) and arteriopathy (7.7%). In this cohort, 20.3% had ESUS, of which 73.2% had at least one PES, which increased to 84.2% in those <40 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults have diverse risk factors and causes of AIS. IPSS risk factors and ESUS-PES construct are comprehensive classification systems that may better reflect heterogeneous risk factors and etiologies in young stroke patients.

Incidence of acute cerebrovascular events in patients with rheumatic or calcific mitral stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mitral stenosis (MS) may be predisposed to acute cerebrovascular events (ACE) and peripheral thromboembolic events (TEE). Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF), mitral annular calcification (MAC) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) are independent risk factors. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of ACEs in MS patients and the implications of AF, MAC and RHD on thromboembolic risks. METHODS: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021291316). Six databases were searched from inception to 19th December 2021. The clinical outcomes were composite ACE, ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and peripheral TEE. RESULTS: We included 16 and 9 papers, respectively, in our qualitative and quantitative analyses. The MS cohort with AF had the highest incidence of composite ACE (31.55%; 95% CI 3.60-85.03; I2 = 99%), followed by the MAC (14.85%; 95% CI 7.21-28.11; I2 = 98%), overall MS (8.30%; 95% CI 3.45-18.63; I2 = 96%) and rheumatic MS population (4.92%; 95% CI 3.53-6.83; I2 = 38%). Stroke/TIA were reported in 29.62% of the concomitant AF subgroup (95% CI 2.91-85.51; I2 = 99%) and in 7.11% of the overall MS patients (95% CI 1.91-23.16; I2 = 97%). However, the heterogeneity of the pooled incidence of clinical outcomes in all groups, except the rheumatic MS group, was substantial and significant. The logit-transformed proportion of composite ACE increased by 0.0141 (95% CI 0.0111-0.0171; p < 0.01) per year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In the MS population, MAC and concomitant AF are risk factors for the development of ACE. The scarcity of data in our systematic review reflects the need for further studies to explore thromboembolic risks in all MS subtypes.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged 80 years old and above: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Ischaemic heart disease remains the main cause of death in the world. With increasing age, frailty and comorbidities, senior patients aged 80 years old and above who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at higher risk of mortality and other complications. Aims: We aimed to examine the overall outcomes for this group of patients. Methods: Four databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS and CENTRAL) were searched. Studies with patients aged 80 years old and above who underwent PCI for all indications were included. Pooled outcomes of all-cause death, cardiac death, in-hospital death, subsequent stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA), subsequent myocardial infarction (MI), subsequent congestive cardiac failure (CCF), and overall major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were obtained for meta-analysis. Results: From 2,566,004 patients, the pooled cumulative incidence of death was 19.22%, cardiac death was 7.78%, in-hospital death was 7.16%, subsequent stroke/TIA was 1.54%, subsequent MI was 3.58%, subsequent CCF was 4.74%, and MACE was 17.51%. The mortality rate of all patients was high when followed up for 3 years (33.27%). ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients had more outcomes of in-hospital death (14.24% vs 4.89%), stroke/TIA (1.93% vs 0.12%), MI (3.68 vs 1.55%) and 1-year mortality (26.16% vs 13.62%), when compared to non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Conclusions: There was a high mortality rate at 1 year and 3 years post-PCI in the overall population of senior patients aged 80 years old and above, regardless of indication. This necessitates further studies to explore the implications of these observations.

Clinical characteristics, treatment and long-term outcomes of patients with right-sided cardiac thrombus.

OBJECTIVE: Right-sided cardiac thrombus is rare and may be caused by venous thromboembolism, in association with medical devices or stasis of blood in atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiomyopathies. Complications include pulmonary embolism (PE) and paradoxical stroke. Current data are limited and mostly from case series and PE registries. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, echocardiographic features, treatments, and outcomes of right-sided cardiac thrombus patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of 97 consecutive patients with right-sided cardiac thrombus detected on echocardiography. We studied co-morbidities, predisposing factors, thrombus characteristics, and therapeutic interventions and assessed their associations with the development of PE, paradoxical stroke, circulatory collapse, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The mean age was 58.7 years, and 55/97 (56.7%) of the participants were female. Ischemic heart disease (IHD), heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy were common co-morbidities. Right atrial (RA) thrombus was often associated with medical devices, while right ventricular (RV) thrombus was more commonly associated with cardiomyopathy. Thrombus mobility did not affect embolic events but was associated with greater short-term mortality. On multivariable analysis, anticoagulation (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.68) and thrombus resolution (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.62) were associated with greater survival. CONCLUSION: Right-sided cardiac thrombus is rare but may have potentially life-threatening complications such as PE and paradoxical stroke. Further research is needed to determine the optimal therapeutic strategies for this poorly studied population.

Long-Term Outcomes of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack after Non-Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

OBJECTIVES: Non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has lower risk of stroke than emergency PCI. With increasing elective PCI and increasing risk of stroke after PCI, risk factors for stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in non-emergency PCI and long-term outcomes needs to be better characterised. We aim to identify risk factors for cerebrovascular accidents in patients undergoing non-emergency PCI and long-term outcomes after stroke or TIA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 1724 consecutive patients who underwent non-emergency PCI for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable and stable angina. The primary outcomes measured were stroke or TIA, myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause death. RESULTS: Upon mean follow-up of 3.71 (SD 0.97) years, 70 (4.1%) had subsequent ischaemic stroke or TIA, and they were more likely to present with NSTEMI (50 [71.4%] vs 892 [54.0%], OR 2.13 [1.26-3.62], p = 0.004) and not stable angina (19 [27.1%] vs 648 [39.2%], OR 0.58 [0.34-0.99]). Femoral access was associated with subsequent stroke or TIA compared to radial access (OR 2.10 [1.30-3.39], p < 0.002). Previous stroke/TIA was associated with subsequent stroke/TIA (p < 0.001), death (p < 0.001) and MI (p = 0.002). Furthermore, subsequent stroke/TIA was significantly associated with subsequent MI (p = 0.006), congestive cardiac failure (CCF) (p = 0.008) and death (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing non-emergency PCI, previous stroke/TIA predicted post-PCI ischaemic stroke/TIA, which was associated with death, MI, CCF.

Coronavirus-induced myocarditis: A meta-summary of cases.

BACKGROUND: Myocarditis caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection was proposed to account for a proportion of cardiac injury in patients with COVID-19. However, reports of coronavirus-induced myocarditis were scarce. The aim of this review was to summarise the published cases of myocarditis and describe their presentations, diagnostic processes, clinical characteristics and outcomes. METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL and OpenGrey on was performed on 3 June 2020. Studies of myocarditis in patients with COVID-19 were included, and those only reporting cardiac injury or heart failure were excluded. Cases were "confirmed" myocarditis if diagnosed on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or histopathology. Those without were grouped as "possible" myocarditis. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies on 51 patients were included; 12 cases were confirmed myocarditis while 39 had possible myocarditis. The median age was 55 and 69% were male. The most common presenting symptoms were fever, shortness of breath, cough and chest pain. Electrocardiogram changes included non-specific ST-segment and T-wave changes and ventricular tachycardia. Most patients had elevated cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers. Left ventricular dysfunction and hypokinesis was common. CMR established the diagnosis in 10 patients, with features of cardiac oedema and cardiac injury. Five patients had histopathological examination. Some cases required mechanical ventilation and extracoporeal membrane oxygenation, and 30% of patients recovered but 27% died. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 myocarditis was associated with ECG, cardiac biomarker and echocardiographic changes, and the manifestation could be severe leading to mortality. Endomyocardial biopsy was not available in most cases but CMR was valuable.

Effect of coronavirus infection on the human heart: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has highlighted the importance of understanding the cardiovascular implications of coronavirus infections, with more severe disease in those with cardiovascular co-morbidities, and resulting cardiac manifestations such as myocardial injury, arrhythmias, and heart failure. DESIGN: A systematic review of the current knowledge on the effects of coronavirus infection on the cardiovascular system in humans was performed and results were summarized. METHODS: Databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese Knowledge Resource Integrated Database and Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were searched on 20 March 2020. RESULTS: In total, 135 studies were included, involving severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, coronavirus disease 2019 and other coronaviruses. Most were case reports, case series and cohort studies of poor to fair quality. In post-mortem examinations of subjects who died from infection, around half had virus identified in heart tissues in severe acute respiratory syndrome, but none in Middle East respiratory syndrome and coronavirus disease 2019. Cardiac manifestations reported include tachycardia, bradycardia, arrhythmias, and myocardial injury, secondary to both systemic infection and treatment. Cardiac injury and arrhythmias are more prevalent in coronavirus disease 2019, and elevated cardiac markers are associated with intensive care unit admission and death. In severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and coronavirus disease 2019, comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and heart disease are associated with intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality. There were cases of misdiagnosis due to overlapping presentations of cardiovascular diseases and coronavirus infections, leading to hospital spread and delayed management of life-threatening conditions. CONCLUSION: This review highlighted the ways in which coronaviruses affect cardiovascular function and interacts with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases.