RESUMO
Pulmonology is one of the branches that frequently receive consultation requests from the emergency department. Pulmonology consultation (PC) is requested from almost all clinical branches due to the diagnosis and treatment of any respiratory condition, preoperative evaluation, or postoperative pulmonary problems. The aim of our study was to describe the profile of the pulmonology consultations received from emergency departments in Turkiye. A total of 32 centers from Turkiye (the PuPCEST Study Group) were included to the study. The demographic, clinical, laboratory and radiological data of the consulted cases were examined. The final result of the consultation and the justification of the consultation by the consulting pulmonologist were recorded. We identified 1712 patients, 64% of which applied to the emergency department by themselves and 41.4% were women. Eighty-five percent of the patients had a previously diagnosed disease. Dyspnea was the reason for consultation in 34.7% of the cases. The leading radiological finding was consolidation (13%). Exacerbation of preexisting lung disease was present in 39% of patients. The most commonly established diagnoses by pulmonologists were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (19%) and pneumonia (12%). While 35% of the patients were discharged, 35% were interned into the chest diseases ward. The majority of patients were hospitalized and treated conservatively. It may be suggested that most of the applications would be evaluated in the pulmonology outpatient clinic which may result in a decrease in emergency department visits/consultations. Thus, improvements in the reorganization of the pulmonology outpatient clinics and follow-up visits may positively contribute emergency admission rates.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Pneumopatias , Médicos , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Turquia , Pulmão , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias/terapia , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) commonly arises from lower extremity thrombus and can be fatal if left untreated. To date, many laboratory biomarkers have been used for predicting the prognosis in patients with PTE. C-reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) is a new biomarker of systemic inflammation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical importance of CAR in PTE patients. METHODS: One hundred thirty-three eligible patients who were followed up with the diagnosis of PTE in our hospital between July 2016 and May 2020 were retrospectively evaluated in this study. The patients were divided into three groups as non-massive, sub-massive, and massive PTE. RESULTS: The results of complete blood counts (CBC) and biochemical analysis were evaluated among three groups. Neutrophil, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), D-dimer, troponin, CRP, albumin, and CAR were significantly different among groups. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, CAR and troponin were determined as the independent predictors of massive PTE. Also, CAR was determined as the only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with PTE. CONCLUSIONS: CAR may be a reliable and easily accessible parameter to determine the severity and prognosis in PTE patients.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Estudos Retrospectivos , Relevância Clínica , Albuminas , Biomarcadores , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , TroponinaRESUMO
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used in acute pulmonary thromboembolism as an alternative to warfarin due to drug interactions, narrow therapeutic range, and necessary close International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring. Phase 3 study results have reported that these drugs are at least as effective as warfarin and beneficial in terms of bleeding; however, studies that present up-to-date life data are necessary. Aims: To evaluate the frequency of using DOACs, which are prescribed with a limited number of indications in our country, and real-life data results. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: This cross-sectional survey collected the clinical data (history, current treatment, treatment duration, etc.) of patients with pulmonary thromboembolism and who applied to the physician for follow-up between October 15, 2019, and March 15, 2020. The researchers kept the patient records sequentially. Results: Data from 836 patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism from 25 centers were collected, and DOAC was used in 320 (38.5%) of them. The most preferred DOAC was rivaroxaban (n = 294, 91.9%). DOAC was mostly preferred because it could not provide an effective INR level with warfarin (n=133, 41.6%). Bleeding was observed in 13 (4%) patients. Conclusion: The use of direct oral anticoagulants is becoming almost as widespread as conventional therapy. Real-life data results are important for their contribution to clinical practice.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Embolia Pulmonar , Doença Aguda , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Turquia , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Varfarina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Classification of pleural fluids as transudate and exudate is important for diagnosis and treatment. Light's criteria are used worldwide to differentiate transudate and exudate. However, in some cases, the distinction between transudate and exudate pleural fluid is unclear. We investigated the serum and pleural fluid TAS, TOS, and OSI values of patients with pleural effusion, and their roles in differentiating transudate and exudate. METHODS: Sixty-six patients hospitalized for pleural effusion between July 2018 and December 2020, and 33 healthy individuals, were prospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into exudate and transudate groups according to Light's criteria. Demographic and laboratory data, and serum TAS, TOS, and OSI values, were compared among the three groups (exudate, transudate, and control group). The pleural fluid TAS, TOS, and OSI values were compared between the exudate and transudate groups. RESULTS: Although the serum TAS value was significantly higher in the control than exudate and transudate groups, the serum TOS and OSI values were significantly lower. There was no significant difference between the exudate and transudate groups in the serum TAS, TOS, or OSI values. Compared to the transudate group, the pleural fluid TAS value was significantly higher in the exudate group, whereas the pleural fluid OSI value was significantly lower. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified pleural OSI as independent predictors of exudative pleural fluid. CONCLUSIONS: Pleural fluid TAS and OSI values may be useful biomarkers for differentiating exudative and transudative fluid and as an adjunct to Light's criteria in suspicious cases.
Assuntos
Exsudatos e Transudatos , Derrame Pleural , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Estresse Oxidativo , Pleura , Derrame Pleural/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is both the most common seen malignity and cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a hydrolytic enzyme that catalyses the conversion of adenosine to inosine in the purine metabolism pathway. Studies examining ADA levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids of patients with lung malignancy are very limited in the literature. Our aim examine the clinical significance of ADA levels in BAL fluids of patients with lung malignancy. METHODS: A total of 89 patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with different indications from December 2017 to December 2018 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups as malignancy and non-malignancy groups. Demographic, laboratory data and ADA levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were compared between the two groups. In addition, ADA levels in BAL were compared among the histopathological subtypes of patients in the malignant group. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 58.2 ± 14.5 years with 86% of male gender. ADA enzyme levels were statistically higher in the malignant patient group compared with the non-malignant group (37.2 [17.6-71] vs 17.1 [9-35.3], P < .001). When the patients in the malignant group were compared in terms of ADA levels according to their histopathological types, a statistically significant difference was obtained in small cell carcinoma patients (49 [12.5-75.3], P = .005). CONCLUSION: ADA levels in BAL may be a diagnostic biomarker in lung malignancies. In patients where a biopsy cannot be taken or histopathological typing cannot be performed because of tissue insufficiency, ADA levels in BAL can be an auxiliary parameter in making malignancy / histopathological diagnosis accompanied by radiological and clinical findings.
Assuntos
Adenosina Desaminase , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Adulto , Idoso , Brônquios , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar , Broncoscopia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by persistent airflow restriction and respiratory symptoms. Studies demonstrated that cardiac arrhythmias and cardiovascular mortality increased in these patients as a result of altered myocardial repolarization. Frontal QRS-T angle is a novel marker of myocardial depolarization and repolarization heterogeneity. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between frontal QRS-T angle and disease severity in patients with newly diagnosed COPD. METHODS: A total of 104 newly diagnosed COPD patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to GOLD (Global Obstructive Lung Disease) stage as follows: patients with mild and moderate COPD (group I), and severe and very severe COPD (group II). Frontal QRS-T angle was calculated from the automatic report of the electrocardiography device. RESULTS: Frontal QRS-T angle was significantly higher in group II patients compared with in group I patients (43.0 [25.5-60.0] vs. 20.0 [12.0-32.0], P < .001). The best cut-off value of frontal QRS-T angle for predicting severe-very severe COPD was ≥34.5°. Correlation analysis showed that frontal QRS-T angle was negatively correlated with FEV1/FVC (r = -.524, P < .001) and MEF25-75 (r = -.453, P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was showed that frontal QRS-T angle was the only independent predictor of severe-very severe COPD (OR: 1.051, 95% CI: 1.024-1.079, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Frontal QRS-T angle is an easily obtainable marker form surface electrocardiography. In this study, we have shown for the first time that frontal QRS-T angle was significantly increased in patients with severe and very severe COPD.
Assuntos
Eletrocardiografia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Arritmias Cardíacas , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Intensive care physicians are increasingly involved in decision making about the prognosis of intensive care unit ICU patients. With this study; we aimed to evaluate the power of clinician foresight at prediction of mortality in patient at triage to intensive care and patient follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in ICUs located in various geographical regions of Turkey between January 1, 2017-April 30, 2017.The clinical research was planned as observational, multicenter, cross-sectional. RESULT: A total of 1169 intubated patients were followed in 37 different ICU. At the beginning of the follow-up we asked the physician who will follow the patient in the ICU to give a score for the probability of survival of the patients. Scoring included a total of 6 scores from 0 to 5, with the "0" the worst probability "5" being the best. According to this distribution, only 1 (0.9%) of 113 patients who were given 0 points survived. Three (6.1%) of 49 with the best score of 5 died. Survival rates were significantly different in each score group (r: -0.488; p<0.001). After the combined mortality estimation scores based on the clinical observations of the physicians (0 and 1 point score was combined as non-survive, 4 and 5 score was combined as survived) 320 of the 545 patients were estimated to be dead and 225 were predicted survival. Sensitivity and spesifity of scoring system to predict mortality was 91.56% (95% CI: 87.96-94.37), 76.89% (95% CI: 70.82-82.23) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we concluded that the physicians who follow the patients in the ICU can predict the poor prognosis at the time of admission and the high mortality rate. The physician's opinion on mortality estimation should be considered in intensive care mortality scoring in addition to other laboratory and clinical parameters.