Asciminib monotherapy in patients with CML-CP without BCR::ABL1 T315I mutations treated with at least two prior TKIs: 4-year phase 1 safety and efficacy results.

Asciminib is approved for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) who received ≥2 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors or have the T315I mutation. We report updated results of a phase 1, open-label, nonrandomized trial (NCT02081378) assessing the safety, tolerability, and antileukemic activity of asciminib monotherapy 10-200 mg once or twice daily in 115 patients with CML-CP without T315I (data cutoff: January 6, 2021). After ≈4-year median exposure, 69.6% of patients remained on asciminib. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included increased pancreatic enzymes (22.6%), thrombocytopenia (13.9%), hypertension (13.0%), and neutropenia (12.2%); all-grade AEs (mostly grade 1/2) included musculoskeletal pain (59.1%), upper respiratory tract infection (41.7%), and fatigue (40.9%). Clinical pancreatitis and arterial occlusive events (AOEs) occurred in 7.0% and 8.7%, respectively. Most AEs occurred during year 1; the subsequent likelihood of new events, including AOEs, was low. By data cutoff, among patients without the indicated response at baseline, 61.3% achieved BCR::ABL1 ≤ 1%, 61.6% achieved ≤0.1% (major molecular response [MMR]), and 33.7% achieved ≤0.01% on the International Scale. MMR was maintained in 48/53 patients who achieved it and 19/20 who were in MMR at screening, supporting the long-term safety and efficacy of asciminib in this population.

Relative Bioavailability and Food Effect of Asciminib Pediatric Mini-tablet Formulation Compared to the Reference Tablet Formulation in Healthy Adult Participants.

Asciminib, a first-in-class allosteric BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that works by Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP) is used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. We describe a randomized, single-dose, open-label, four-period crossover study in healthy adult participants (N = 24) which evaluated the relative bioavailability of a single 40-mg dose of asciminib in pediatric formulation (1-mg mini-tablets) compared with the reference adult tablet under fasted conditions. Additionally, the effect of food on the bioavailability of the mini-tablet formulation was evaluated. Under fasted conditions, asciminib exposure was similar for both formulations (geometric mean [Gmean ] area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUCinf ] 5970 and 5700 ng ×h/mL, respectively). Food decreased the AUCinf and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) of the asciminib mini-tablets; this effect was more pronounced with a high-fat meal (Gmean ratios [90% confidence interval]: fasted/low-fat meal, 0.42 [0.38-047], 0.32 [0.28-0.37], respectively; fasted/high-fat meal, 0.30 [0.27-0.34], 0.22 [0.19-0.25], respectively). The mini-tablets were assessed to be easy to ingest with good palatability. Asciminib doses for a pivotal pediatric clinical trial will be defined using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, which will consider the age and the higher food effect observed with the mini-tablets.

Exposure-Efficacy Analysis of Asciminib in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.

Asciminib (Scemblix) is a first-in-class BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that works by specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP) and has potent activity against the T315I mutation. This study aimed to characterize the effect of asciminib exposure on disease progression and to elucidate factors influencing efficacy. Our analysis included 303 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase recruited in a phase I study with dose ranging from 10 to 200 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) or 40 to 200 mg once a day (q.d.) (NCT02081378) and in the phase III ASCEMBL (Study of Efficacy of CML-CP Patients Treated With ABL001 Versus Bosutinib, Previously Treated With 2 or More TKIs) study receiving asciminib 40 mg b.i.d. (NCT03106779). A total of 67 patients harbored the T315I mutation. A longitudinal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed to characterize the exposure-efficacy relationship, in which the efficacy was assessed through BCR::ABL1 transcript levels over time. Specifically, a three-compartment model representing quiescent leukemic stem cells, proliferating bone marrow cells, and resistant cells was developed. Drug killing of the proliferating cells by asciminib was characterized by a power model. A subgroup analysis was performed on the patients with the T315I mutation using a maximum drug effect model to characterize the drug effect. The model demonstrated the appropriateness of a total daily dose of asciminib 80 mg in patients without the T315I mutation and 200 mg b.i.d. in patients with the T315I mutation with further validation in light of safety data. This model captured key characteristics of patients' response to asciminib and helped inform dosing rationale for resistant and difficult-to-treat populations.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Asciminib in Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Treated Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic and Acute Phases.

BACKGROUND: Asciminib, a first-in-class, highly potent and specific ABL/BCR-ABL1 inhibitor, has shown superior efficacy compared to bosutinib in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, treated with two or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This study aimed to describe pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of asciminib and to identify clinically relevant covariates impacting its exposure. METHODS: A population PK (PopPK) model was developed using a two-compartment model with delayed first-order absorption and elimination. The analysis included PK data from two clinical studies (Phases 1 and 3) involving 353 patients, with total daily dose of asciminib in the range of 20-400 mg. RESULTS: The nominal total daily dose was incorporated as a structural covariate on clearance (CL), and body weight (BW) was included as a structural covariate via allometric scaling on CL and central volume. Renal function and formulation were included as statistically significant covariates on CL and absorption (ka), respectively. The simulation results revealed a modest but clinically non-significant effect of baseline BW and renal function on ka. Correlations between covariates, such as baseline demographics and disease characteristics, heavy smoking status, hepatic function, and T315I mutation status, were not statistically significant with respect to CL, and they were not incorporated in the final model. Additionally, the final model-based simulations demonstrated comparable exposure and CL for asciminib 40 mg twice daily and 80 mg once daily (an alternative regimen not studied in the Phase 3 trial), as well as similar PK properties in patients with and without the T315I mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The final PopPK model adequately characterized the PK properties of asciminib and assessed the impact of key covariates on its exposure. The model corroborates the use of the approved asciminib dose of 80 mg total daily dose as 40 mg twice daily, and supports the use of 80 mg once daily as an alternative dose regimen to facilitate patient's compliance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER [DATE OF REGISTRATION]: First-in-human (CABL001X2101, Phase 1), ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02081378 [28 February 2014]; ASCEMBL (CABL001A2301, Phase 3), ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03106779 [10 April 2017].

Pharmacokinetics of asciminib in the presence of CYP3A or P-gp inhibitors, CYP3A inducers, and acid-reducing agents.

Asciminib is a first-in-class inhibitor of BCR::ABL1, specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket. Asciminib is a substrate of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and possesses pH-dependent solubility in aqueous solution. This report summarizes the results of two phase I studies in healthy subjects aimed at assessing the impact of CYP3A and P-gp inhibitors, CYP3A inducers and acid-reducing agents (ARAs) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of asciminib (single dose of 40 mg). Asciminib exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) unexpectedly decreased by ~40% when administered concomitantly with the strong CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole oral solution, whereas maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) decreased by ~50%. However, asciminib exposure was slightly increased in subjects receiving an itraconazole capsule (~3%) or clarithromycin (~35%), another strong CYP3A inhibitor. Macroflux studies showed that cyclodextrin (present in high quantities as excipient [40-fold excess to itraconazole] in the oral solution formulation of itraconazole) decreased asciminib flux through a lipid membrane by ~80%. The AUC of asciminib was marginally decreased by concomitant administration with the strong CYP3A inducer rifampicin (by ~13-15%) and the strong P-gp inhibitor quinidine (by ~13-16%). Concomitant administration of the ARA rabeprazole had little or no effect on asciminib AUC, with a 9% decrease in Cmax . The treatments were generally well tolerated. Taking into account the large therapeutic window of asciminib, the observed changes in asciminib PK following multiple doses of P-gp, CYP3A inhibitors, CYP3A inducers, or ARAs are not considered to be clinically meaningful. Care should be exercised when administering asciminib concomitantly with cyclodextrin-containing drug formulations.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of asciminib with the sensitive cytochrome P450 probe substrates midazolam, warfarin, and repaglinide in healthy participants.

Asciminib, a first-in-class BCR-ABL1 inhibitor that works by Specifically Targeting the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP), is a new treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who no longer benefit from currently approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In vitro, asciminib reversibly inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5, CYP2C9, and CYP2C8. This phase I, open-label, two-stage study in healthy participants evaluated the effect of asciminib (40 mg b.i.d. at steady-state) as a potential perpetrator on single-dose pharmacokinetics of a two-drug cocktail containing midazolam (CYP3A substrate) and warfarin (CYP2C9 substrate) in stage 1 (n = 22), and of repaglinide (CYP2C8 substrate) in stage 2 (n = 25). For midazolam plus asciminib versus midazolam, geometric mean (Gmean ) ratios (90% confidence interval) for midazolam area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) were 1.28 (1.15, 1.43) and 1.11 (0.96, 1.28), respectively. For warfarin plus asciminib versus warfarin, Gmean ratios for S-warfarin AUCinf and Cmax were 1.41 (1.37, 1.45) and 1.08 (1.04, 1.13), respectively. Results for R-warfarin were in line with those for S-warfarin. For repaglinide plus asciminib versus repaglinide, Gmean ratios for AUCinf and Cmax were 1.08 (1.02, 1.14) and 1.14 (1.01, 1.28), respectively. The treatments were generally well tolerated, and the asciminib safety profile was consistent with previous studies of asciminib in the absence of probe substrates. Overall, the results indicate that asciminib (40 mg b.i.d.) is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A and CYP2C9 and has no meaningful effect on CYP2C8.

Pharmacokinetics of Asciminib When Taken With Imatinib or With Food.

Asciminib, a first-in-class, Specifically Targeting the Abelson kinase Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP) inhibitor with the potential to overcome resistance to adenosine triphosphate-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors, is being investigated in leukemia as monotherapy and in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors including imatinib. This phase 1 study in healthy volunteers assessed the pharmacokinetics of asciminib (40 mg single dose) under 2 conditions: when taken with imatinib (steady state; 400 mg once daily) and a low-fat meal (according to imatinib prescription information), or when taken as single-agent under different food conditions. Asciminib plus imatinib with a low-fat meal increased asciminib area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum plasma concentration (geometric mean ratios [90% confidence interval], 2.08 [1.93-2.24] and 1.59 [1.45-1.75], respectively) compared with asciminib alone under the same food conditions. Asciminib plus food decreased asciminib area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity compared with asciminib taken under fasted conditions (geometric mean ratios: low-fat meal, 0.7 [0.631-0.776]; high-fat meal, 0.377 [0.341-0.417]). Asciminib plus imatinib was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Overall, coadministration of asciminib with imatinib and a low-fat meal results in a moderate increase in asciminib exposure compared with asciminib alone under the same food condition. Food itself decreases asciminib exposure, indicating that single-agent asciminib should be administered in the fasted state to prevent potential suboptimal exposures.

Pharmacokinetics of Asciminib in Individuals With Hepatic or Renal Impairment.

Asciminib is an investigational, first-in-class, specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP) inhibitor of BCR-ABL1 with a new mechanism of action compared with approved ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This report describes the findings from 2 phase 1 studies assessing the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a single dose of asciminib (40 mg) in individuals with impaired renal function (based on absolute glomerular filtration rate; NCT03605277) or impaired hepatic function (based on Child-Pugh classification; NCT02857868). Individuals with severe renal impairment exhibited 49%-56% higher exposure (area under the curve [AUC]), with similar maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), than matched healthy controls. Based on these findings, as per the protocol, the PK of asciminib in individuals with mild or moderate renal impairment was not assessed. In individuals with mild and severe hepatic impairment, asciminib AUC was 21%-22% and 55%-66% higher, respectively, and Cmax was 26% and 29% higher, respectively, compared with individuals with normal hepatic function. Individuals with moderate hepatic impairment had similar asciminib AUC and Cmax than matched healthy controls. The increase in asciminib AUC and Cmax in the mild hepatic impairment cohort was mainly driven by 1 participant with particularly high exposure. Asciminib was generally well tolerated, and the safety data were consistent with its known safety profile. In summary, these findings indicate that renal or hepatic impairment has no clinically meaningful effect on the exposure or safety profile of asciminib, and support its use in patients with varying degrees of renal or hepatic dysfunction.

Brain exposure of the ATM inhibitor AZD1390 in humans-a positron emission tomography study.

BACKGROUND: The protein kinase ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) mediates cellular response to DNA damage induced by radiation. ATM inhibition decreases DNA damage repair in tumor cells and affects tumor growth. AZD1390 is a novel, highly potent, selective ATM inhibitor designed to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and currently evaluated with radiotherapy in a phase I study in patients with brain malignancies. In the present study, PET was used to measure brain exposure of 11C-labeled AZD1390 after intravenous (i.v.) bolus administration in healthy subjects with an intact BBB. METHODS: AZD1390 was radiolabeled with carbon-11 and a microdose (mean injected mass 1.21 µg) was injected in 8 male subjects (21-65 y). The radioactivity concentration of [11C]AZD1390 in brain was measured using a high-resolution PET system. Radioactivity in arterial blood was measured to obtain a metabolite corrected arterial input function for quantitative image analysis. Participants were monitored by laboratory examinations, vital signs, electrocardiogram, adverse events. RESULTS: The brain radioactivity concentration of [11C]AZD1390 was 0.64 SUV (standard uptake value) and reached maximum 1.00% of injected dose at Tmax[brain] of 21 min (time of maximum brain radioactivity concentration) after i.v. injection. The whole brain total distribution volume was 5.20 mL*cm-3. No adverse events related to [11C]AZD1390 were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that [11C]AZD1390 crosses the intact BBB and supports development of AZD1390 for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme or other brain malignancies. Moreover, it illustrates the potential of PET microdosing in predicting and guiding dose range and schedule for subsequent clinical studies.

Impact of Acid-Reducing Agents on Gastrointestinal Physiology and Design of Biorelevant Dissolution Tests to Reflect These Changes.

BACKGROUND: Of the various drug therapies that influence gastrointestinal (GI) physiology, one of the most important are the acid-reducing agents (ARAs). Because changes in GI physiology often influence the pharmacokinetics of drugs given orally, there is a need to identify in vitro methods with which such effects can be elucidated. OBJECTIVE: Literature concerning the effects of ARAs (antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]) on GI physiology are reviewed with the aim of identifying conditions under which drugs are released after oral administration in the fasted state. In vitro dissolution tests to mimic the effects in the stomach were designed for H2-receptor antagonists and PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of ARAs on GI physiology depends on the type, duration, and amount of ARA administered as well as the location in the GI tract, with greatest impact on gastric physiology. While ARAs have a high impact on the gastric fluid pH and composition, changes in volume, viscosity, surface tension, and gastric emptying appear to be less profound. The proposed dissolution tests enable a ready comparison between dosage form performance in healthy adults and those receiving PPIs or H2-receptor antagonists.

TECHNICAL NOTE: Development of a pressure sensor-based system for measuring rumination time in pre-weaned dairy calves.

The pressure-based noseband sensor system (RWS: RumiWatch System; ITIN + HOCH GmbH Feeding Technology, Liestal, Switzerland) has recently been validated for the measurement of rumination time in mature cows. We aimed in this study at developing a similar pressure-based system for monitoring rumination in young dairy calves. To this end, a vegetable oil-filled silicon tube with a built-in pressure sensor (outer diameter 5.7 mm, length 38 cm) was attached to the noseband of a calf halter. In contrast to the RWS developed for mature cows, the accelerometer, the battery, the data logger, and the SD card of the RWS were integrated into 1 box to reduce the weight of the RWS to 0.35 kg. The box was attached to the halter so that it was located behind the right ear of the calf. Ten pre-weaned German Holstein calves (49-106 kg BW and 33-63 days of age) were equipped with the RWS. Calves were milk-fed thrice a day and offered hay and commercial starter for ad libitum intake. In parallel, animals were monitored by a video camera connected to a video recorder for 12 h. Two independent observers assessed the video records to obtain a reliable gold standard for the evaluation of the newly developed RWS. Data obtained by either RWS or visual video observation were processed as min rumination per h, yielding a total of 120 pairs of values (12 pairs per animal) for regression analysis. Assessment of 2 independent observers were highly correlated (r = 0.99). Results indicated relatively low random error between results obtained from the RWS (on y-axis) and video observations (on x-axis) (R2 = 0.82). However, the intercept of the regression line (y = 7.70 + 0.64 x) was significantly different from zero (P < 0.01) and the 95% confidence interval of the slope (0.79-0.94) did not include the value of 1. This translates to a significant systemic error resulting in overestimation of rumination time which is attributable to nutritive and nonnutritive oral activities that almost exclusively lasted for up to 10 min. Exclusion of false positive rumination signals lasting less than 10 or 5 consecutive min from the analysis reduced the random and systemic errors of the model (R2 = 0.86 and 0.93, respectively). We conclude that the newly developed RWS can be used to provide accurate measurement of rumination time in young calves. However, an extra programmed algorithm in the evaluation software is recommended to make the system more user-friendly for measurements on calves.

Circulating Biomarkers and Resistance to Endocrine Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancers: Correlative Results from AZD9496 Oral SERD Phase I Trial.

PURPOSE: Common resistance mechanisms to endocrine therapy (ET) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancers include, among others, ER loss and acquired activating mutations in the ligand-binding domain of the ER gene (ESR1LBDm). ESR1 mutational mediated resistance may be overcome by selective ER degraders (SERD). During the first-in-human study of oral SERD AZD9496, early changes in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were explored as potential noninvasive tools, alongside paired tumor biopsies, to assess pharmacodynamics and early efficacy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: CTC were enumerated/phenotyped for ER and Ki67 using CellSearch in serial blood draws. ctDNA was assessed for the most common ESR1LBDm by droplet digital PCR (BioRad). RESULTS: Before starting AZD9496, 11 of 43 (25%) patients had ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL whole blood (WB), none of whom underwent reduction to <5 CTC/7.5 mL WB on C1D15. Five of 11 patients had baseline CTC-ER+, two of whom had CTC-ER+ reduction. CTC-Ki67 status did not change appreciably. Patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL WB before treatment had worse progression-free survival (PFS) than patients with <5 CTC (P = 0.0003). Fourteen of 45 (31%) patients had ESR1LBDm + ctDNA at baseline, five of whom had ≥2 unique mutations. Baseline ESR1LBDm status was not prognostic. Patients with persistently elevated CTC and/or ESR1LBDm + ctDNA at C1D15 had worse PFS than patients who did not (P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated CTC at baseline was a strong prognostic factor in this cohort. Early on-treatment changes were observed in CTC-ER+ and ESR1LBDm + ctDNA, but not in overall CTC number. Integrating multiple biomarkers in prospective trials may improve outcome prediction and ET resistance mechanisms' identification over a single biomarker.

Complete Substrate Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 2C8 by AZD9496, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader.

AZD9496 ((E)-3-(3,5-difluoro-4-((1R,3R)-2-(2-fluoro-2-methylpropyl)-3-methyl-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-1-yl)phenyl)acrylic acid) is an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader currently in clinical development for treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. In a first-in-human phase 1 study, AZD9496 exhibited dose nonlinear pharmacokinetics, the mechanistic basis of which was investigated in this study. The metabolism kinetics of AZD9496 were studied using human liver microsomes (HLMs), recombinant cytochrome P450s (rP450s), and hepatocytes. In addition, modeling approaches were used to gain further mechanistic insights. CYP2C8 was predominantly responsible for biotransformation of AZD9496 to its two main metabolites whose rate of formation with increasing AZD9496 concentrations exhibited complete substrate inhibition in HLM, rCYP2C8, and hepatocytes. Total inhibition by AZD9496 of amodiaquine N-deethylation, a specific probe of CYP2C8 activity, confirmed the completeness of this inhibition. The commonly used substrate inhibition model analogous to uncompetitive inhibition fit poorly to the data. However, using the same model but without constraints on the number of molecules occupying the inhibitory binding site (i.e., nS1ES) provided a significantly better fit (F test, P< 0.005). With the improved model, up to three AZD9496 molecules were predicted to bind the inhibitory site of CYP2C8. In contrast to previous studies showing substrate inhibition of P450s to be partial, our results demonstrate complete substrate inhibition of CYP2C8 via binding of more than one molecule of AZD9496 to the inhibitory site. As CYP2C8 appears to be the sole isoform catalyzing formation of the main metabolites, the substrate inhibition might explain the observed dose nonlinearity in the clinic at higher doses.

A First-in-Human Study of the New Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader AZD9496 for ER+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer.

Purpose: AZD9496 is an oral nonsteroidal, small-molecule inhibitor of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and a potent and selective antagonist and degrader of ERα. This first-in-human phase I study determined the safety and tolerability of ascending doses of oral AZD9496 in women with estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, characterized its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and made preliminary assessment of antitumor activity.Patients and Methods: Forty-five patients received AZD9496 [20 mg once daily (QD) to 600 mg twice daily (BID)] in a dose-escalation, dose-expansion "rolling 6" design. Safety, tolerability, and PK activity in each cohort were reviewed before escalating to the next dose. PK was determined by mass spectrometry. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Objective tumor response was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.Results: Most common causally related AEs were diarrhea (35.6%), fatigue (31.1%), and nausea (22.2%), and seven patients had grade ≥3 AEs. Three patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity: one each at 150 mg BID (abnormal hepatic function), 400 mg BID (diarrhea and elevated liver function tests), and 600 mg BID (diarrhea), and all were reversible. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Partial response was confirmed in one patient, who also had decreased tumor marker Ca15.3. Four patients had stable disease at 12 months' follow-up.Conclusions: AZD9496 is well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile, showing evidence of prolonged disease stabilization in heavily pretreated patients with ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3510-8. ©2018 AACRSee related commentary by Jordan, p. 3480.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Tolerability, and Food Effect of Cenerimod, a Selective S1P1 Receptor Modulator in Healthy Subjects.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and food effect of cenerimod, a potent sphingosine-1-phosphate subtype 1 receptor modulator, were investigated in three sub-studies. Two double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised studies in healthy male subjects were performed. Cenerimod was administered either as single dose (1, 3, 10 or 25 mg; Study 1) or once daily for 35 days (0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg; Study 2). A two-period cross-over, open-label study was performed to assess the food effect (1 mg, Study 3). The pharmacokinetic profile of cenerimod was characterised by a tmax of 5.0-6.2 h. Terminal half-life after single and multiple doses ranged from 170 to 199 h and 283 to 539 h, respectively. Food had no relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of cenerimod. A dose-dependent decrease in lymphocyte count was observed after initiation of cenerimod and reached a plateau (maximum change from baseline: -64%) after 20-23 days of treatment. Lymphocyte counts returned to baseline values at end-of-study examination. One serious adverse event of circulatory collapse (25 mg dose group, maximum tolerated dose: 10 mg) and adverse events of mild-to-moderate intensity were reported. Treatment initiation was associated with transient decreases in heart rate and blood pressure at doses >1 and ≥10 mg, respectively.

Absolute Bioavailability of Ponesimod, a Selective S1P1 Receptor Modulator, in Healthy Male Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetic profile of ponesimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 modulator, is characterized by a rapid absorption [time to maximum concentration (t max) of 2-4 h] and a terminal half-life (t ½) of 32 h after single-dose administration. The aim of this study was to assess additional pharmacokinetic parameters [absolute bioavailability, total clearance (CL), and volume of distribution (V ss)] in healthy male subjects. METHODS: After ensuring in a pilot phase the full pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and tolerability of a 5-mg intravenous infusion of ponesimod over 3 h (treatment A), the study proceeded to the randomized, two-way crossover, single-dose (treatment A; treatment B: 10 mg oral) main phase. RESULTS: The absolute bioavailability of ponesimod was 83.8 % [90 % confidence interval (CI): 80.2-87.5]. CL and V ss (95 % CI) were 3.8 L/h (3.3-4.3) and 160 L (146.1-174.2), respectively. C max (95 % CI) was 48.5 ng/mL (43.9-53.6) and 61.4 ng/mL (55.3-68.3) after intravenous infusion and oral administration, respectively. The t ½ (95 % CI) following intravenous infusion was 32.9 h (28.5-38.1) and 31.7 h (27.9-36.0) following oral administration. Ponesimod administered by both routes of administration was well tolerated and resulted in transient decreases in lymphocyte count and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates high absolute bioavailability, low CL, and moderate V ss of ponesimod.

Mitigation of Initial Cardiodynamic Effects of the S1P1 Receptor Modulator Ponesimod Using a Novel Up-Titration Regimen.

Ponesimod, a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 modulator, leads to a reduction in circulating total lymphocyte count and transient decreases in heart rate (HR). Based on a modeling and simulation approach, this study was conducted to investigate whether a gradual up-titration regimen may mitigate these cardiodynamic effects. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-way crossover study, 32 healthy participants (15 males) received placebo on day 1 followed by multiple-dose administration of either ponesimod or placebo (ratio 3:1). Ponesimod was administered alternately using regimen A (incremental dose increase from 2 to 20 mg in 9 steps) or B (10 mg for 7 days followed by a single-dose administration of 20 mg). Cardiodynamic (Holter and 12-lead ECG), pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (total lymphocyte count), and safety variables were assessed. After first-dose ponesimod administration (day 2), a transient decrease in HR was observed (nadir 2-3 hours postdose, back to predose values within 4-5 hours) of approximately 6 and 12 beats/min (bpm) (mean) following regimens A and B, respectively. On day 2, occurrence of HR <45 bpm, HR decrease from baseline of over 20 bpm, PR interval ≥200 milliseconds, or PR interval increase from baseline >20 ms, was lower following regimen A than B (14 vs 43 events). During the course of the study, incidence of HR <45 bpm was lower following regimen A than B (20 vs 58 events). Fewer participants reported adverse events following regimen A than B. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were similar between the regimens. The novel gradual up-titration with ponesimod markedly mitigated initial cardiodynamic effects.

Effect of Hepatic or Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Ponesimod, a Selective S1P1 Receptor Modulator.

Ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator, is a potential therapeutic agent for autoimmune disorders. The impact of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of ponesimod and its inactive metabolites, ACT-204426 and ACT-338375, was evaluated. Two separate single-centre, open-label studies with 32 (hepatic study) and 24 (renal study) male and female individuals were conducted. Hepatic impairment was based on the Child-Pugh classification, and renal impairment was determined by creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Individuals with severe hepatic or renal impairment were to be matched (sex and body mass index) with healthy individuals. All individuals received a single dose of 10 mg ponesimod. For ponesimod, the ratio of geometric means of AUC0-∞ for individuals with severe hepatic impairment versus healthy individuals was 3.07 (90% CI: 2.19, 4.32). For severely renally impaired individuals versus healthy individuals, this ratio was 1.14 (0.82, 1.58). Cmax and tmax values of ponesimod were comparable across all groups in both studies. Exposure to metabolites was increased in individuals with moderate or severe hepatic impairment as compared to healthy individuals. During the course of these studies, there were no clinically relevant abnormalities related to vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms and clinical laboratory values. Sixteen adverse events (AEs) were reported, 12 of them of mild intensity. No AEs were considered to be treatment related. Overall, ponesimod was well tolerated. In individuals with renal function impairment, dose adjustment is not warranted, whereas the dose should be reduced in individuals with moderate and severe hepatic impairment.

Biocomparison of Three Formulations of the S1P1 Receptor Modulator Ponesimod in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Ponesimod is a potent selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) modulator, which leads to a reduction in circulating lymphocytes, reflecting their sequestration within lymphoid organs. Modulation of the S1P1 receptor has been previously described to be an effective treatment of autoimmune diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability of two polymorphic forms of ponesimod in capsules (Form A versus Form C; Study 1) and the relative bioavailability of a capsule formulation and a tablet formulation (both polymorphic Form C; Study 2). METHODS: Two open-label, randomized, two-way crossover studies in healthy subjects were performed. In Study 1, 12 male subjects received a single dose of 20 mg of polymorphic Form A or Form C of ponesimod in a capsule. In Study 2, 14 male and female subjects (ratio 1:1) received a single dose of 40 mg of polymorphic Form C of ponesimod in either a capsule or a tablet formulation. Pharmacokinetic and safety variables (clinical laboratory test results, vital signs, and an electrocardiogram) were assessed. RESULTS: Comparison of the exposure to ponesimod following administration of the formulations in Study 1 showed that the 90 % confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for the area under the curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf), the area under the curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), the terminal half-life (t ½), and the maximum plasma concentration (C max) were all within the 0.80-1.25 bioequivalence interval. In Study 2, more rapid absorption of ponesimod was observed from the tablet formulation than from the capsule formulation. There were no relevant differences in the safety and tolerability profiles between the different formulations. CONCLUSION: The two polymorphic forms of ponesimod and tablet versus capsule formulations were similar in terms of pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability.